Super Rugby run home: A thrilling two weeks to come

By Brett McKay / Expert

Man, oh man, there are some really big, important games to come in the final weeks of this Super Rugby season. Even the Hurricanes, who look safe at the top of the table, are sorta-kinda vulnerable to a last-season toppling.

You couldn’t really ask for much more. If the top six had been nailed down a month ago, we’d be left to lament teams going through the motions and resting key players. With it all on the line, there’s still a lot to play for, for several teams.

For one thing, the Crusaders are still in the hunt, and just refuse to let me put the red line through them. Their up-and-down season may yet see them miss the playoffs, but would I want to play them in an elimination final, if they got there? Hell, no.

Considering how they’ve ridden the roller coaster all season, would anyone be overly surprised if the ‘Saders lost to the Blues at Eden Park this weekend? The Blues, despite consistently being in the bottom five, have lost just five of 18 games in Auckland since the start of the 2013 season, and that includes two wins over the Crusaders in that same time.

But a win would keep the Crusaders in the hunt, even if those chances remain faint. In fact, if the Brumbies and Chiefs win this weekend, then a Crusaders win may not be enough. And it would certainly be ironic if they won their penultimate game of the season but were knocked out of the running on the same weekend.

Will I tip against them? Don’t know. Come back to me on Friday.

The Bulls are all but done, and Frans Ludeke admitted post-match on Friday night that his team would “need a few favours” over the remaining weeks. The only thing that keeps their hopes alive is that they’re only one win behind the Lions, who play the conference-leading Stormers in Cape Town this weekend, and have the bye in the following round.

But like the Crusaders, winning may not be enough for the Bulls, either. Even if they finished with two bonus point wins – and they play the Rebels and Cheetahs, remember – they can still only get to 46 points. And if the Brumbies win just one of their last two and also finished on 46, their record is superior in all of the tie-breaking aspects (bar the coin toss).

For the Lions, it’s beat the Stormers at Newlands or forget about it. And even then, †hey will be sweating on results in the final round, at which time they’ll be cooling their heels at home with the bye.

So a win over the Stormers would see the Lions take the South African conference lead. Who picked that would ever happen at the start of the year? Exactly, no one. But while sitting atop the conference watching on while possible playoff opponents get bashed, they’ll be hoping the Sharks can help them out by beating the Stormers in Durban.

And if the Bulls do register a bonus-point win over the Rebels, the Lions will need the Cheetahs to at least not get smashed when they play the Bulls in Pretoria. The Lions could go from having a home final to missing the playoffs completely, and they can’t do a bloody thing about it. Talk about rough draws!

There is a strong belief that the current top six will be the final top six, with a few internal positional changes. I tend to agree with this, with the Hurricanes the only side unlikely to move. That said, if I follow my forward projections from a month ago for Round 17, then the top six won’t change at all this weekend, and there’ll be a six-point gap between sixth and seventh.

The Brumbies in sixth can probably lock in a playoff spot this weekend with a win in Perth over the Force. If the Reds can record a bonus point against the Force, then you’d like to think a finals-bound Brumbies side can as well. A bonus-point win would take the Brumbies to 47 points, meaning that not even the fast-finishing Crusaders – who they’ll host in the final round – could run them down.

That needs to be the goal, nay the requirement, of the weekend for the Brumbies.

The Chiefs find themselves in a bit of a bind. They beat the Bulls very well a fortnight ago, yet found themselves on the end of a similar belting down in the thick and cold air of Invercargill. This weekend they face the Reds in Brisbane with the taste of a good win, and the smell of a wounded contender in their nostrils.

A win would almost certainly confirm their playoffs place. A loss with wins around them could drop the Chiefs to sixth, or worse, right out of the six completely. And then they’d have to beat the Hurricanes in the final round to try and win back into a wildcard spot.

It’s more than squeaky bum time around the Waikato; the prospect of missing the finals is suddenly very real, and considering they’ve been entrenched in the six from pretty much day one this season, it’d be a massive collapse. Can their injury-depleted squad find the biggest win of their season in them?

The Highlanders are very, very real, people. Right now, at their best, they’re the only team in the comp who could beat the Hurricanes in a final in Wellington, and I was even thinking over the weekend that they could give that task a shake this weekend coming.

But Jamie Joseph has made the decision to sit his three All Blacks out from this game in one block, rather than splitting the final required rest game over the last two weeks. This is interesting. Is he conceding the Hurricanes game, in order to give the Blues both barrels in the final round en route the finals, or does he figure that the winged Canes will be tough to beat even with his team at full strength?

I wonder how much ‘should we have done this a month ago?’ has been going on in Dunedin this week?

What of the Waratahs? They should thump the Cheetahs this weekend, yet without three starting players and new players joining the squad both last week and this weekend coming, you just have to wonder. And this all without mentioning the evident discipline issues that threaten to ruin the Tahs’ season from within.

Forget the dual roles, the next few weeks might be Michael Cheika’s biggest coaching challenge in Australia to date. Between now and Saturday night, he’s got to somehow dial back the aggression, find the dulled or hidden spark, and get the title defence back on track.

The Stormers can lock down the South African conference and a home final with a win over the Lions this weekend. And they should do it, despite the Lions becoming the team everyone loves watching. The Lions are timing their run perfectly, but they will hit a blue and white wall this weekend.

And the Stormers should roll through the Sharks without too much issue in the final round, which with one point and one win over both the Waratahs and Brumbies, should be enough to lock down a home semi.

And that just leaves the Hurricanes. Here’s a sobering thought for Canes supporters: two losses over the last two rounds, and your team could easily drop into sudden death territory.

Will it happen? No, probably not. They cannot be overrun by the Australians or the South Africans, and with a nine-point gap over the Highlanders, a win this weekend will allow the New Zealand conference trophy-engraver to start a week early.

But the Hurricanes were curiously off the money last weekend, and I get the impression that we’ll look back on that game as the loss that won the Canes their maiden title.

The Crowd Says:

2015-06-04T23:59:35+00:00

Clark

Guest


Seems someone has been waiting a very long time to bring down a team with a long history of consistency and success, just stinks of bitterness and jealousy

2015-06-03T03:12:29+00:00

Baylion

Roar Rookie


Sorry, three times, 16/19 times the top try scorer going into the final won 2009 Bulls 37 Chiefs 43 - Bulls won 2000 Brumbies 48 Crusaders 43 - Crusaders won 1999 Highlanders (3rd) 32 Crusaders (4th) 30 - Crusaders won

2015-06-03T00:46:25+00:00

Pinetree

Guest


Yes, the 1999 season the crusaders came from 4th spot to win the title. Crusaders beat Reds in away semi, and landers beat stormers in Cape Town. Crusaders then beat Landers at "the party at Tony Brown's" to claim title. I like your stat saying that 17 out of 19 times, the top try scorer won SR. Great stat mate. Any idea which 2 years this did not happen? I suspect it was the Crusaders both times between 1998-2000.

2015-06-02T19:24:53+00:00

Baylion

Roar Rookie


The team currently in 2nd place on the Saffer log may not have any Boks at the RWC

2015-06-02T19:22:51+00:00

Baylion

Roar Rookie


Only once the SR champion didn't finish top 2 on the log after the regular season - the Crusaders in 1999 17/19 times the team in the final the team that scored the most tries during the regular season won the final

2015-06-02T12:47:53+00:00

Rugby Tragic

Guest


Ugh ... I know they are not in the mix but the Blues have lost Patrick Tuipulotu for the rest of the season and Hansen will need to find a new lock to back up Retallick and Whitelock. A reprieve for Thrush and Brid maybe?.... or an opening for Broadhurst? I think Tuipulotu is a real find for NZ rugby stocks, he has size, power and a host of other great attributes and he is only 22. He is to have an operation on both hips and according to reports in NZ, he will not be back until S15 in 2016. You have to feel for the guy but he is still very young and provided his re-hab goes well, he will get to a RWC, perhaps even two.

2015-06-02T11:45:37+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


I think he concedes too many penalties. But knocking on the door.

2015-06-02T10:32:26+00:00

Pinetree

Guest


Yip, out of the 12 away playoff wins, Saders have taken 5 of those. 3 vs overseas teams. The sharks have also won 3 away playoffs, 2 vs overseas (reds twice). The Brumbies have won 2 (warartahs, bulls). That's 10 away wins among those 3 teams.

2015-06-02T10:21:49+00:00

Pinetree

Guest


The sharks are without doubt the best team 2 never win super rugby. They have also been my nominated favourite SA team for most of the competition. Their one point loss to the bulls in 2007 in the last minute must of been hard to swallow. Havana try if I remember rightly. 2012 was tough as well, because they deserved 5th place instead of 6th, while the reds should of been in 6th, not 3rd if points, and not top of conference ranked the teams. Having to travel to Aus, then back to SA, and over to NZ, would of been too hard for any team.playing in SA twice then to NZ would of been so much easier for the sharks. All the best for the sharks in the future mate.

2015-06-02T10:11:21+00:00

Taylorman

Guest


Yep...Saders are also the only side to win a final overseas, versus Brumbies in 2000. They also won two away in NZ versus the Blues and Highlanders. Bulls are the other side to win an away final..versus the Sharks in Durban. One amazing stat in light of home versus away advantage so heavily skewed to home teams is the Crusaders have more than 50% winning % versus both NZ and overseas sides playing AWAY.. 50.4 and 50.6 respectively.

2015-06-02T10:08:18+00:00

Charging Rhino

Roar Guru


Don't you feel sorry for the Sharks...!?? 4 finals, 96, 01, 07 & 12 (5 if you include 1994 which they hosted too) and zero wins!!! Lost 3 semi-finals and a playoff game to the Crusaders in 2011 too. The most successful Super Rugby team to have never won the tournament! Forever the bridesmaid... Lol.. it sux :-(

2015-06-02T09:54:42+00:00

Pinetree

Guest


Also just realised that 7 out of those 12 playoff losses at home have been to overseas teams. 5 of those are the reds (3) and stormers (2). The other 2 to lose a play off at home to an overseas team are the Brumbies to the crusaders in 2000, and the bulls to the Brumbies in 2013. Reds lost to the sharks twice and Saders once, and stormers to the highlanders and Saders.

2015-06-02T09:53:44+00:00

Charging Rhino

Roar Guru


But the Lambie-Steyn combo has hardly even payed together all season due to injuries and suspensions....??? Maybe one or two games which they won early on in the season?

2015-06-02T09:33:56+00:00

Pinetree

Guest


Just thought I would put in some stats on playoff games. Out of 65 playoff games in super rugby since 1996, only 12 teams have lost a playoff. 4 of those losses have been in a final. The blues, highlanders, Reds and sharks have been those teams. All but the sharks have lost to the crusaders. Sharks lost to the bulls. 7 losses have been in semifinals. Those teams are the stormers (3 times), reds (twice), bulls and Waratahs. Only one team has lost a qualifier match, which is the reds to the sharks in 2012. That means that half of all home playoff losses have fallen to the reds and stormers ( 3 each). They are the only teams to top the table, and not make the final, stormers having done this once in 2012, reds twice (1996 and 1999). Must of been a great relief for reds fans in 2011. I feel sorry for stormer fans, 6 playoffs, 1 final loss, 1 semifinal win, 4 semifinal losses, 3 of those at home. Ouch!

2015-06-02T09:05:31+00:00

Vic

Guest


Brett has been brave all season, voting with his heart, now he's running scared - he's even deserting the Lions ;)

2015-06-02T07:24:47+00:00

Runit

Guest


That was also an England second team that played, England are going to be very hard to beat at this RWC.

2015-06-02T07:19:30+00:00

Taylorman

Guest


Yeah there's certainly no standout so someone is going to stumble onto a win eventually, simply because they have to, but to date, there's no one one can say...they're the likely winners. Canes perhaps, but if they were in fifth place would that be the case? Not so sure now. For me highlanders look most likeliest kiwi side to handle an away game now, but that might change next week...!

2015-06-02T07:15:35+00:00

Pinetree

Guest


I thought I might just post some stats of highest average differential a team has achieved in a season per game, including playoff games. 1 Crusaders '02 (18avg), 2 Blues '03 (17.92avg), 3 Crusaders '05 (17.54), 4 Brumbies '00 (16.92), 5 Crusaders '06 (15.27), 6 Brumbies '01 (15.23), 7 Blues '97 (14.38), 8 Crusades '08 (14.13), 9 Stormers '10 (13.67), 10 Waratahs '14 (12.67). As you can see, the Crusaders, Blues and Brumbies have been impressive. The Crusaders in the top 25 avg diff per game actually feature 10 times! I was surprised how low the Tahs were, at 10th best, considering all the talk about records broken. I guess those extra games in super 15, in comparison to super 12\14 make a difference. But what is most surprising for me was how low the Chiefs were. They avg 6.67 diff in '12 and 5.56 diff per game in '13. I saw the as an attacking team, but I guess not as dominant as I thought.

2015-06-02T07:09:19+00:00

PeterK

Roar Guru


it could be either way tahs 3 and brumbies 6th or vice versa

2015-06-02T07:05:01+00:00

Edward Pye

Roar Guru


The 2 Smiths in particular are so crucial to the Landers winning, but I thought they might rest them individually - Tanaka has a similar game to Aaron and Marty Banks is a fairly solid replacement for Ben, but doing it all at the same time just seems like they are simply giving away points. One other point to make in reference to your first question there is that - the other teams in the comp (particularly the South African teams) just aren't very good teams. This might be the worst year ever in terms of the standards of the teams overall.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar