Australia dominate Windies in first Test

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

Australia appeared to have faltered by fielding four pace options on a dry, utterly lifeless pitch in Wednesday night’s first Test against the West Indies.

In the opening over, armed with a hard, new ball, Australia’s fastest bowler Mitchell Johnson struggled to get his deliveries even to carry to the keeper.

In the 16th over, tweaker Nathan Lyon got the ball to turn alarmingly, inducing a fatal edge from Darren Bravo.

FULL AUSTRALIA vs WEST INDIES SCORECARD

Combined, these two circumstances seemed to be strong evidence the selectors had made a blunder.

The parched, slow and low pitch came as no surprise. Windsor Park in Dominica is beloved by slow bowlers in the West Indies domestic competitions and tweakers have run amok in the few Tests played there.

Over the past two Tests at the ground, spin bowlers dominated, taking 47 wickets, which amounted to a whopping 71 per cent of dismissals.

When Australia last played at Roseau in 2012, 26 wickets were taken by spinners, compared to just twelve for the quicks, despite the fact both teams fielded three specialist fast bowlers.

Again on Wednesday, both teams went with just one spinner. The West Indies had a more obvious reason: they don’t even have one slow bowler of Test standard. Lyon receives regular criticism in Australia but the Windies would rejoice were they somehow able to acquire his services.

Leg spinner Fawad Ahmed may not have lit up the tour match last week, but he is coming off a wonderful Sheffield Shield season and is a vastly experienced bowler. If he cannot get a game on a pitch which suits spinners as much as any other Test strip in the world, the selectors must not have complete faith in his skills.

It was a vote of no confidence in Ahmed from the Australian hierarchy. It seems that, unless Lyon’s game completely falls apart, we are unlikely to see the Pakistani refugee make an inspiring debut any time soon.

Of course, bashing the selectors is a popular pastime. Despite the surface hindering their pace-heavy attack, Australia flourished.

The Mitchells, Johnson and Starc, were both well below their best but Josh Hazlewood was sublime. A bowler built for hard, responsive pitches, the lofty right-armer managed to adapt remarkably well to the soporific deck, as he had done in the warm-up match.

Maintaining a fuller line than his pace counterparts, he regularly drew the batsmen forward, getting them to grope at deliveries pitched just outside off stump. It was a masterful display from such a young bowler.

Hazlewood regularly has been compared with Australian legend Glenn McGrath. The champion seamer was hugely effective at home but was at his most valuable on sleepy foreign pitches, worrying batsmen when others couldn’t.

Hazlewood was truly reminiscent of McGrath on Wednesday night, extracting every skerrick of assistance from the barren surface and constantly testing the technique and temperament of his foes.

As for the selectors, they deserve credit when they get things right and that is just what they’ve done by promoting Steve Smith. Number three has been the side’s biggest weakness since the demise of Ricky Ponting as a world-class player five years ago.

An array of batsmen have tried and failed to make that position their own. Shane Watson, Rob Quiney, Ed Cowan, David Warner, Usman Khawaja, Michael Clarke, Phil Hughes, Glenn Maxwell, Alex Doolan – none have gone close to bedding down the spot.

Meanwhile, Smith has blossomed into the side’s most rounded batsman and one of the truly elite players in world cricket. Having turned 26 years old on Tuesday, he is still a year or two away from the age at which batsmen typically reach their peak.

He has the advantage of taking on the most pivotal position in the batting line-up while overflowing with confidence and form. All of those nine aforementioned batsmen who went before him either looked uncomfortable or overawed at first drop.

It is a long time since Smith has exhibited either of those unattractive attributes. Crucially, he has done much of his best work as a rescue artist coming to the aid of his side in the wake of batting collapses.

He absorbs pressure like a pressure-absorbing sponge designed to… you get the picture. Now he will have the opportunity to head off calamities rather than seeking to rectify them.

Smith is equally at ease whether starting his innings in an assertive fashion to maintain his side’s ascendancy, or in a sedate, cautious manner to halt the march of the opposition attack.

He can shift gears in his batting seamlessly, an attribute which is often overlooked when assessing the quality of a Test batsman.

This is one of the hallmarks of a great first drop. Finally, Australia have a number three who evokes confidence.

The Crowd Says:

2015-06-05T23:47:07+00:00

ColinP

Guest


Ronan what will be the average age of the likely test team in the ashes? With voges, Haddin, Harris, Rogers, Johnson, Watson, Clarke all over 33 or so, it is looking decrepit.

2015-06-04T22:54:31+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


Now that's showing a little grit and hopefully what we can expect from Voges. I'm not enamoured by one big score but the signs seem to be there with a great 130 not out start. His first class performances and then this auger well for him to be a potential regular in the middle order for a year or two. Statistically, he has the credentials.

2015-06-04T14:28:57+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


I'd leave Rogers out. Missing short balls in the nets...tch!tch! Rogers' Shield form is quite a way off the form of Marsh and Voges.

AUTHOR

2015-06-04T13:31:01+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


No problems Mitcher.

2015-06-04T12:30:41+00:00

The Bush

Roar Guru


No doubt about temperament or a bunch of other qualities - like I said I'm sure he'll be fine - but tailor made he is not!

2015-06-04T12:25:59+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


You may be right Matth but with the problems we've had up top of the order, I would have thought Smith was ideal to move up earlier.He has that grittiness of an Alan Border and steadies the ship.But better late than never and I think having Voges at 5 gives Australia added confidence with someone who knows how to stick around and score big. Though I would have liked Burns or Lynn in that position purely for future development, I have full respect in Voges, who should have been selected far earlier and has that experience and solidity the younger batsmen need around them.

2015-06-04T12:22:29+00:00

ThugbyFan

Guest


Right on Nudge, Adam Voges isn't too shabby a spin bowler also. His slow left arm armers have got quite a few Sheffield shield wickets, so he is a good backup to put in 5-10 overs and allow Lyon and other bowlers to rest. I was surprised they didn't give him a bowl last night but then the pacemen were taking wickets. And of course don't forget Captain Clarke and the Steve Smith who scored a wicket last night. I think its a brilliant move to put him in rather than Ahmed. Voges was top run scorer last year (1st class career av over 45) with mountains of experience and a bowler who can form a spin duo with Lyon on a dusty 4th day wicket or be used as a rest bowler.

2015-06-04T12:21:32+00:00

Mitcher

Guest


Of course. Just a poor attempt on my part at being whimsical. Cheers for the report.

2015-06-04T12:01:59+00:00

Tom from Perth

Guest


Fair enough mate.

2015-06-04T12:01:00+00:00

Tom from Perth

Guest


You realise Chris Rogers' test average is only 39?

2015-06-04T11:59:06+00:00

Tom from Perth

Guest


Exactly. It was a question of which WA lad to drop, if you had to.

2015-06-04T10:23:43+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


Johnson, Harris, Hazlewood, Lyon looks a pretty damn fine attack in almost any conditions.

2015-06-04T09:56:43+00:00

Damo

Guest


If Australia put out Harris, Hazlewood, Johnson, Lyon, Watson/Marsh with Voges/Smith as support for every test in England then I think it's going to be hard for Eng to consistantly post big scores. Even if they produce sub continent decks there's just too much firepower there.

2015-06-04T08:59:30+00:00

Nudge

Guest


Your probably right Ronan, but I reckon the vote would be 8-3.Anderson, Broad and Moeen would pick Johnson to miss and the other 8 Harris. 18 months ago it would have been 6-5 because we know who Swann and Trott would have picked. Couldn't help myself

AUTHOR

2015-06-04T08:32:54+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


"Oh and the Poms are pretty scared of him – Johnson made them duck and weave but Harris made them look like fools." If the Poms could choose for one of Harris or Johnson to miss the Ashes I'm confident they'd pick Harris. Harris has been amazing against them in all three Ashes he has played - taking 57 wickets at 20 and averaging 19 in England. Johnson, meanwhile, has had just one good series (as amazing as it was) from three and averages 38 in England.

AUTHOR

2015-06-04T08:25:50+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


This story was submitted before Tea, as you would expect given the time zone.

2015-06-04T07:47:19+00:00

Bakkies

Guest


Fawad might not get enough overs in that bowling line up as the Windies fold like a deck of cards unless Holder and Blackwood start swinging. Starc bounced out Samuels caught hooking. Johnson was aggressive against the tail which England didn't do as a result they leaked runs. The English are worried about Johnson and Starc. From the overs I saw Starc he was around 142 km/h. Hazlewood is going largely unnoticed when the English tv commentators discuss the Ashes. They really struggle against his style of bowling. He went wider on the crease in the Blackwood (I think it was him) dismissal. That could work for him in England. Mark Wood was doing it against the Kiwis as a variation.

2015-06-04T07:31:15+00:00

Bakkies

Guest


The Duke ball in the West Indies is different to the English version. You have to be patient batting on these pitches. Marsh like the English batsmen gave up his wicket from a sloppy bit of work.

2015-06-04T07:27:59+00:00

Damo

Guest


Don't forget Harris will be a walk up start in England. Word is since his surgery and between new daddy duties he's training the house down doing something akin to a football pre-season schedule. He also has a history of bouncing back from injuries and performing very well straight away. Oh and the Poms are pretty scared of him - Johnson made them duck and weave but Harris made them look like fools.

2015-06-04T07:19:00+00:00

Worlds Biggest

Guest


Given the dearth of options since Punter retired I'd say Smithy fits the bill very nicely ! He isn't a classical first drop sure but he has the temperament required now.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar