Hogan is already the hero

By Ryan Buckland / Expert

Let’s play a quick game of word association. Dour, bland, uninteresting. Which AFL team of the past four or five years do you associate those words with?

The Melbourne Demons.

Exciting, dazzling, ambitious. Good at football (I kid, I kid).

That would be Melbourne’s No. 1, in more ways than one, Jesse Hogan.

Hogan was drafted by the Dees in the 2012 mini-AFL draft, one of those complicated concoctions designed to give Gold Coast and Greater Western Sydney a leg-up in the talent stakes. As a 17-year-old, Hogan wasn’t eligible to play with the big boys, so he played a year in the VFL.

But that wasn’t before long-suffering Melbourne fans got a taste of his talent, with Hogan suiting up for the Dees in the 2013 NAB Cup.

During his VFL stint, Hogan bagged 39 goals in what was effectively 14 games (he went down with a knee injury in his 15th), scoring in each on his way to winning Casey’s best and fairest.

That’s right, a 17-year-old, playing just over two thirds of a season, was voted the best player on a VFL team.

It had the Dees faithful salivating at the prospect of him starting a long, storied career in the blue and red in the 2014 season. But they were forced to wait a further 12 months, after Hogan injured his back in the pre-season competition. A very sad – in retrospect at least – article on the Melbourne club website, dated March 7, 2014, summed up both the excitement and frustration of Hogan’s injury:

“Early signs are positive and he could potentially still play in two to three weeks or it could be longer.”

It was longer. Hogan played one game of competitive football for the remainder of 2014, for Casey in the VFL.

The Messiah
But, sports fans, it looks like those frustrating days are over. Jesse Hogan has played 16 of a possible 18 games for the Melbourne Demons in 2015.

To steal a phrase from a professional AFL watcher, “Boy oh boy, wowee has he played the pants off of those 16 games.”

You probably know all of this already, but Hogan has kicked a Dee-leading 36 goals (more than two a game), and has taken an equal team-leading 114 marks (but is leading on a per-game basis), with 42 of those taken inside the 50-metre arc. He is having perhaps the best season a Demons forward has had since Brad Green in 2010, and we’ve still got four games to go.

And Hogan is 20 years old.

We’re told key forwards take time to develop. Tom Hawkins was a laughing stock in his first couple of seasons. West Coast’s Josh Kennedy was traded for an established midfielder, the Blues guffawing. Joe Daniher is just emerging from his newborn giraffe phase, after 44 games.

Young key forwards do not do what Jesse Hogan is doing right now.

Want some proof? Here’s how what I would call the best key forwards of the current AFL era (post-2000 debut, played more than 100 games in their career) performed over their first 20 games, on contested marks and total points per game (goals and behinds).

Hogan is the only player of this group to average more than two contested marks per game at the start of his career, but not only that, he’s also the only one to have kicked more than two goals per game.

Yeah, this kid is alright.

There’s a bit caveat on these numbers, of course: most of the rest of those guys started off with big, established key forwards around them. Hogan is the main man (sorry, Chris Dawes), and so gets more attention from his teammates. But with that attention comes greater defensive pressure, and, well, Hogan isn’t too fussed.

Think Patrick Cripps is the Rising Star for 2015? Think again.

Just in time…
With output like that, you’d have to assume Hogan is having a huge impact on Melbourne’s offence. That’s true, to a point. After all, he’s only one man.

Melbourne’s offensive efficiency, as measured by OER, was 42.5 per cent in 2014 and in the two games Hogan hasn’t played this season – which, if you haven’t worked out by now, is not particularly good. Its not the worst, that’s Essendon, but it’s about 20 per cent below the elite levels of Hawthorn and West Coast.

When Hogan has played, Melbourne’s OER has lifted to 47.6 per cent, which is bang on average, and an increase of about 12 per cent.

Before you say that could be anything, consider this: Melbourne’s average number of inside 50s when Hogan has been out was 40.5, which is actually terrible. When Hogan has played, this number lifts 43.8, while when Hogan plays and he takes more than two marks inside 50, the Dees get the ball in the scoring zone 44.4 times a game. That’s still well below average, but it’s a start.

All told, Melbourne project as about nine points per game, or 15 per cent, better on the scoreboard when Hogan plays versus when he doesn’t.

It hasn’t quite translated to wins on the board for Melbourne, yet. While they have already won more games than their previous two seasons combined, the Dees will finish the year with a losing record for the tenth-straight season.

Paul Roos, for all of the knocks on his game plan, is eeking incremental improvement out of his charges. And for the first time in what probably feels like a century for Melbourne fans, the future is looking a little bit brighter.

That’s in no small part because of No. 1, Jesse Hogan. Melbourne simply must throw the universe at him.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2015-08-14T00:23:40+00:00

Ryan Buckland

Expert


I seriously think they might offer him a six or seven year contract extension next season, to ward off post-2017 suitors and his restricted free agency (which will come in in 2019, I think). They'll have the cap space to do it, assuming there's no over payment for players in the next year or so. Lock him up through his development and early prime years, and see what happens.

2015-08-13T20:33:05+00:00

Josh

Expert


As your chart shows Ryan, his debut season is simply insane. We haven't seen a season like it from a KPF in recent times and I reckon it will be a long time before we do again. If I was a Melbourne fan I'd have no trouble with the club giving him a blank contract where he can write in as many years and $$ as he wants, he looks like the kind of player who can almost single-handedly bring very good times to his club, ala Carey at North in the 90s. Obviously there's an enormous amount of hard work and a bit of luck needed for him to fulfill that potential, but if all goes well, the sky's the limit.

2015-08-13T08:30:47+00:00

Gecko

Guest


Good theory Mitcher but was that the case with Hawkins, Tippett, Pavlich, Cloke and Kennedy?

2015-08-13T07:42:58+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


???

2015-08-13T07:29:50+00:00

Macca

Guest


I didn't realise it took more than a few for the word people to apply - so it's 1 person and at some point over a few it becomes people but what is it in between? And even if it is just a few (which is highly debatable) you are still the common denominator so it might be time you start to think about whether it is really the few that are at issue or just the 1?

2015-08-13T07:25:20+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Not "people"...just an unusual few.

2015-08-13T07:23:36+00:00

Macca

Guest


Don - Have you noticed you are always the common denominator in peoples complaints?

2015-08-13T07:19:25+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


So you want to post on a discussion site without a discussion? You've started badly...but you can pick it up. Just lighten up and wear a challenge or two.

2015-08-13T07:18:28+00:00

Macca

Guest


On the Cripps V Hogan comparison it should be said that Cripps was runner up in the BLues VFL teams B&F last year while playing only about 10 games (he missed 7 with a knee injury & played 3 senior games)

2015-08-13T07:07:24+00:00

Edgar Slosh

Roar Guru


Stop stalking me :P

2015-08-13T07:06:53+00:00

Edgar Slosh

Roar Guru


I did read the piece but to label him a Messiah is way over the top Give him 5 years and then write an article similar but in reality he's just an average kid with a good start to his career in a poor team

2015-08-13T07:04:07+00:00

Macca

Guest


Col - I wouldn't get too fussed on his goal kicking - as he gets a bigger tank and gets more confident he will start nailing them - he hasn't been shanking them and there doesn't seem to be any massive errors in his style and hey we can get Casboult to this point where he has kicked 17.5 since Barker took over (10 games) anything is possible!!! Your other figures show that like Hogan, Cripps will eb a player the blues can build a decent team around (which when taken in association with Bell & Graham explains the recruitment of Boekhorst). Ryan - I look forward to your analysis on Cripps.

2015-08-13T06:16:55+00:00

Perry Bridge

Guest


As a North fan/long time member - I came to Melb in 1989 and young W.Carey was coming through the ranks from U19s in 1988. He'd already stood out at U18 level and looked comfortable in the ressies - however his debut matches in 1989 were in the wettest/muddiest conditions over successive rounds (11-12) against Fitzroy and Carlton at Princes Park. Not great for young tall forwards - the first game NM 6.13 over Fizt 1.8 and Carey got 6 kicks, 3 marks and a handball but no scores. The next week Carl 7.9 to Nth 5.10 - slightly better conditions but not by much. Carey 4 kicks, 3 marks and 2 handballs - again no scores. That was as an 18 year old. 2 more appearances v StKilda and Hawthorn and his first season taste was 4 games, 14 marks, and 2 behinds. In 1990 he managed 21 games in a pretty full season - 98 marks and hit the scoreboard with 38 goals and 23 behinds. Still only turning 19 that year. Hogan turned 20 in Feb this year so as a 20 year old he's snagged so far 36 goals (15 bh) and 114 marks as a 20 yr old. Dodgey shoulders and all. Then of course John Longmire - at 19 (turned 20 Dec of 1990) - had played 27 games in 88/89 (30 goals) - managed 96 goals 52 bh in first 21 games and alas stuttered with 2.8 in Rnd 22 v Coll at Waverley. So - yes - Hogan is terribly exciting - and it's an era now with a dirth of 'gorilla' key forwards and Hogan provides hope for big star forwards coming back in vogue. Can he be the best ever? Let's wait and see a little more.

2015-08-13T06:11:14+00:00

Mitcher

Guest


Equally though, if you're in a better team, you're more likely to be playing beside established forwards who are more the focus of incoming ball.

2015-08-13T04:30:45+00:00

Pumping Dougie

Roar Guru


They also have Jack Fitzpatrick and 14 players beginning with the letter 'J'.

2015-08-13T04:27:30+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Although I suspect much of that freed up money will be heading into Nat Fyfe's BSB. Lachie Neale, Stephen Hill, Sunny and Alex Pearce will all need some more. Pearce will be that good.

AUTHOR

2015-08-13T04:21:04+00:00

Ryan Buckland

Expert


I reckon Pav could play for another couple of years Don, absolutely. But if they win it all this year - and lets face it, they're in with an almighty chance - he might just ride off into the storied sunset. Alex Pearce is going to be a forward isn't he? That's been my suspicion since I saw him debut. He fits the new key forward mould: tall, agile, good overhead.

AUTHOR

2015-08-13T04:19:14+00:00

Ryan Buckland

Expert


That contested possession number is remarkable for a first year player. Suggest he's beating people that have years of experience on him. Perhaps I'll chart something up comparing him and those players (plus a few more) in the week leading up to Rising Star. I still think its Hogan, because he's taking contested marks and kicking lots of goals - more "spectacular", I guess, even if Cripps is pulling in 13 freaking contested possessions a game.

AUTHOR

2015-08-13T04:16:31+00:00

Ryan Buckland

Expert


I think you should be very worried about Fremantle's capacity to make a big, credible offer. They've been unable to lure anyone but home town prospects to when it comes to key forwards in recent years, and with Sylvia and Gumbleton's planned salaries no longer on the books, plus the prospect of the retirement of some veteran players (although $100,000ish is currently outside of the salary cap for them) they should be cashed up a little. But then you add the spectre of a post 2016 broadcast deal salary cap jump, and they've got a lot of money to spend.

2015-08-13T04:14:50+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


You'd think 4 Jacks would be a winning hand.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar