How much has Mitchell Johnson got left in the tank?

By Glenn Mitchell / Expert

“I was sitting there, thinking, ‘I could die here in the f***ing Gabbattoir.” So wrote England batsman Kevin Pietersen in his autobiography KP, released late last year.

The thoughts entered his mind as he was watching Mitchell Johnson’s frightening assault on England number three Jonathan Trott, on the second day of the 2013-14 Ashes series Gabba Test.

“You very seldom hear people in your own team saying that they are physically scared, but our tail-end batsmen were scared,” Pietersen wrote.

“I heard (Stuart) Broad, (James) Anderson and (Graeme) Swann say they were scared. When you’ve got that, you know that a bloke in the other team is doing damage.”

That series ended in a whitewash, just the third time in the famous little urn’s history. Sadly for England, they have been on the receiving end each time.

The first two occasions were at the hands of great Australian teams – Warwick Armstrong’s 1920-21 side and the Ricky Ponting led side of 2006-07.

In 2013-14, Australia rode to a clean sweep on the coattails of Mitchell Johnson, who singlehandedly dismantled England’s batting – and in the process got into the minds of every one of their batsmen.

His performance provided a redolence of the 1974-75 Ashes series, when Dennis Lillee and Jeff Thomson destroyed England.

From the opening Test at the Gabba, where Johnson captured 9-103, the tourists had few answers.

His man of the series award was a fait accompli – 37 wickets at 13.97 across the five Tests, with three five-wicket-hauls, a best of 7-40 and a strike rate of 30.5.

It was an effort that sat comfortably in the pantheon of cricket’s greatest solo performances.

Johnson had become England’s nemesis, and he carried that form to South Africa in early 2014, where he captured 22 wickets at 17.4 across the three Tests.

Having arrived in the Old Dart on the back of averaging 18.6 with the ball in the twin-Test Caribbean series in June, he was once again on the lips of England’s fans, and no doubt its players too.

The broad-shouldered, moustachioed left-armer landed on English soil on the cusp of 300 Test wickets.

But would he provide the same menace? The man himself said “yes”.

Johnson was keen to start the mind games before the series began, saying in the Daily Mail of the last encounter, “You could see their batsmen scratching around at the crease, you could see the different movements in them and you could just sense something different about their blokes.

“The plan was to go hard at them and it worked. The short stuff made an impact.”

Last Australian summer, against India (where he averaged 35.5), the short ball and the outright hostility was largely missing from Johnson’s game.

He admitted prior to the current Ashes series that his pace last summer and through the Caribbean was down as a result of the Phil Hughes tragedy in November last year.

“We were definitely underprepared at that time and my pace was definitely off,” Johnson told the ABC. “I probably wasn’t fully right, fully mentally right at that time.”

He declared in the lead-in to the opening Test at Cardiff that he was ready to return to the tactics that had made him so devastating 18 months earlier – namely by bowling quick, with fire and menace.

Yet, on balance, through the opening four Tests of this series we have only seen glimpses of the Johnson of old.

Coming off match figures of 2-180 at Cardiff, the venom seemed to return during the second Test at Lord’s, with the likes of Ian Bell and Moeen Ali really given the hurry up.

In the third Test at Edgbaston he produced two snorters in the one over, with steepling deliveries clipping the gloves of both Johnny Bairstow and Ben Stokes en route to wicketkeeper Peter Nevill.

But the moments of outright pace and menace have been generally lacking, especially when you consider that the last two Tests have been played on pitches that have given the bowlers something, with both matches ending in two-and-a-half days.

Johnson is very much a confidence bowler. How he starts often determines how things will go. He is not the sort who can necessarily work his way back into the match after a flat start.

His success is also predicated on pace. And therein lies a problem for the selectors, as his numbers on the speed gun have fallen this series.

Johnson is not like Lillee or Richard Hadlee, who became masters of swing and cut in their later years when the rigours of the game saw their speed diminish.

Johnson is a bowler in the Thomson category – the key to success is outright pace. Both men also share the trait of not always knowing where the next ball was heading.

Johnson turns 34 in November, which for a bowler whose game is centred around pace, is old.

The end of Johnson’s career may well come quickly. When his body can no longer summon consistent pace, his main weapon will have been stripped away.

The final Ashes Test at The Oval will be played, by all accounts, on a pitch that will again provide the quicks with solace. Johnson will enter the match with 11 wickets at 39.8 from the series, and best figures of 3-27 at Lord’s.

He and the selectors will be hoping that he makes an impact.

The career of Mitchell Johnson is not yet over, but the signs perhaps are there.

The Crowd Says:

2015-08-20T11:08:08+00:00

Wobbly

Guest


Fred "The demon" Spofforth anyone?

2015-08-20T11:03:11+00:00

Matth

Guest


Alan Davidson?

2015-08-20T08:22:36+00:00

madmonk

Guest


Julian its all relative. I am not saying he is a mug. He was hyped before he played for Australia, he had some breathtaking periods in his career and some fairly disappointing periods. His numbers are closer to Thommo, McDermott, Lee and Gillespie than they are to McGrath and Lillee. That was the point I am making if inelegantly. Interesting how many of this group played around 70 tests and between 260 and 310 wickets.

2015-08-20T07:25:24+00:00

Julian King

Roar Guru


I think you can make a solid case for having him above Thommo, McDermott, Miller, Lee and Gillespie just on numbers alone. If an underachiever can get to 300 test wickets at 28 with a strike rate of 51, then that points to a very gifted cricketer.

2015-08-20T06:43:03+00:00

madmonk

Guest


I'll defer to you Don on McKenzie, Lindwall and Miller. In my memory McDermott was a warrior for AB at a time when he had not much else. Johnno's career will be judged probably as an underachiever. With his talent, apparently effortless style and early raps from DK the perception is he could have been more than a 29 per wicket man. Also the fact he bowled so much at first change indicates he never quite mastered all the tools he had at his disposal.

AUTHOR

2015-08-20T06:26:00+00:00

Glenn Mitchell

Expert


Paul, Johnson has 302 Test wickets .... 5th all-time for AUS & just eight behind Lee. Saying "5 minutes of sunshine' is harsh.

2015-08-20T06:11:49+00:00

The Bush

Roar Guru


Yeah in fairness, once you become an established Test and ODI player, you play next to no T20 cricket at all, maybe IPL at most and never even the whole series. They aren't available for the domestic stuff and they're usually touring when others are playing in the Caribbean or elsewhere.

2015-08-20T06:05:10+00:00

Johnno

Guest


3rd best since 1980, Bruce Reid on a really good day maybe better, such good bounce Big Bruce Reid, well endowed

2015-08-20T05:25:19+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


McKenzie above Lindwall for me, Monkman. Johnno definitely in top ten ahead of Hughes, McDermott, Gillespie...probably Miller, maybe Thommo.

2015-08-20T05:16:33+00:00

madmonk

Guest


Sorry Julian, easily top 5. McGrath, Lillee and Lindwall are clearly at the head table. Johnson might be in the top 10 alongside McKenzie, Thompson, McDermott, Miller, Merv Hughes and Jason Gillespie. Thommo was more devastating and arguably McDermott, Hughes and Gillespie were more consistent. A fine career but not an all time great.

2015-08-20T03:28:54+00:00

Simoc

Guest


Easy. Play him on a fast responsive track. Hey presto. It's not rocket science. Playing in England is way different.

2015-08-20T03:03:42+00:00

GPR

Guest


I think the main problem is anger- or lack thereof. In Aus, he outright hated the batsmen, but since the Hughes tragedy he just hasn't been angry, and his menace has dropped accordingly. Remember when Kohli and Rohit sledged him last summer? He got angry and was MOM. Get angry Johnno!

2015-08-20T01:30:33+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Harvey has his head in the sand. Move on. These boys don't play much T20 at all.

2015-08-20T01:29:28+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Shin soreness.

2015-08-20T01:27:19+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


300 Test wickets is not "...5 minutes in the sunshine", Paul.

2015-08-20T01:20:26+00:00

Julian King

Roar Guru


Bowling, as they say, is about partnerships. The concern with Johnson, Starc and Cummins all in the one team is that none of those guys are long spell bowlers. Having said that, picking Siddle in this dead rubber would be regressive, as much as I love him. If ever he was going to play, it would've been at Trent Bridge. Cummins is a talent, but his lack of long from cricket is concerning. Johnson's best this series came when Mitch Marsh bowled tight and consistently at Lord's, allowing Mitch to be used in bursts. I think Johnson, well managed, has more to offer Australian cricket. We just need to get the balance right. Regardless, he has established himself as one of our finest ever seamers. He's easily in the top 5 Aussie quicks, along with McGrath, Lillee, Lindwall, and McKenzie.

2015-08-20T01:04:26+00:00

spruce moose

Guest


How many soon to be 35/36 year old's maintain a 25 average though Ronan?

2015-08-20T00:48:15+00:00

Ethan Purdon

Roar Rookie


Definitely rest him for Bangladesh. I think Coulter-Nile and Behrendorff are OK choices.

2015-08-20T00:36:46+00:00

Christo the Daddyo

Guest


Why? Siddle won't be considered for future games, so what's the point in selecting him in this game? Makes much more sense to bring Cummins in. It's only one game so it's low risk from an injury perspective and he certainly showed plenty in the tour game last weekend. And by all accounts The Oval will be a greentop, so even more reason to select Cummins over Siddle.

2015-08-20T00:33:05+00:00

Jameswm

Guest


If he's out. I'd bring in Siddle. Too risky to go with Johnson, Starc and Cummins.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar