Is Formula One seriously crap?

By Michael Lamonato / Expert

Not for the first time this year Formula One has been described as excrement by various levels of authority in the sport.

The latest offender to commit a Gerald Ratner moment on behalf of the pinnacle of motorsport is Patrick Allen, boss of the Silverstone Circuit, who told London’s Independent that he thinks Formula One in 2015 is “s**t”.

“I think it is criminal when we have got to that state of racing and that is not saleable,” he said.

“Months and months back I said it to Mr [Ecclestone] himself that I can’t sell tickets for a s**t product.”

Perhaps Allen is who inspired Bernie Ecclestone himself to describe the sport as “crap” in the lead up to the Silverstone Grand Prix – though at least the Formula One ringleader had the decency to backpedal from his comments.

Putting to one side for a moment the ludicrous contrast that Silverstone recorded its biggest ever attendance this year when 140,000 people walked through the gates of the British circuit to watch what turned out to be one of the thrillers of the season, what right those who ensure billions of dollars are turned through the sport, all of which makes its way from the pockets of fans via one route another, have to tear Formula One down?

On the surface it is absurd that two men can on the one hand live comfortably at least in part on the economic success of Formula One while using the other hand to flip off the public by telling them they’ve been duded – after charging exorbitantly for the privilege, mind you.

It is similarly nonsensical that two people who rely to a great extent on the popularity of Formula One for their own success – Ecclestone as the representative of the commercial rights holder, Allen as the managing director of Silverstone, the calendar for which pivots around Formula One – would seek to further devalue an asset they already apparently see as being of too little value.

But on a deeper level this hurt should be felt more keenly. More than these comments hovering suspiciously in the unknown motive zone considering less than two weeks ago that Allen suggested pleading for financial assistance may be the only way to keep the British Grand Prix at Silverstone, intrinsic in the utterances of both Britons is an attempt to shift blame elsewhere.

Complaining arbitrarily about Formula One – Allen pointed to “guys looking at data on screens” as the most significant reason why no-one turned up to this year’s attendance record-breaking British Grand Prix, Ecclestone was quoted as saying his sport is “probably too easy” – are subtle attempts to remove the speakers from the problem.

It is impossible, however, to distinguish either Briton from the sport, and it is disingenuous at best to attempt to fool the public into thinking otherwise.

Allen is the managing director of the sport’s most influential circuit and can therefore brandish a formidable contact book filled with some of Formula One’s most eminent voices. Ecclestone, meanwhile, has control over virtually every aspect in the sport through the leverage he has by controlling Formula One’s income.

There is no denying that Formula One is not perfect either on or off the track, but its sporting imperfections in particular are from irreparable – and these two men are ideally placed as both authoritative voices and promoters as designated by the sport’s commercial structure to get the rebuild started.

The building blocks sit before them, screaming to be put into place – for the third time I am forced to reference the British Grand Prix’s record-breaking attendance figure of 140,000.

The figure, which withstood the notoriously fickle Northamptonshire weather, proves that Formula One still works at its core and that the fans are still willing to absorbed in the narrative of the world championship; it is evidence disproving the ‘crap’ theory.

It is in light of this that both Ecclestone and Allen’s comments to brand the sport as unsellable hurt and disappoint most, because buried in them is that neither man is really trying.

Out there, whether it be in the United Kingdom, the sport’s broader traditional home of Europe, and even some of the farther-flung destinations in Australia, Asia, and the United States fans are ready to be engaged by a sport that has always been compelling, even among its lacklustre seasons, to which no sport is immune, if only those styled as ‘promoters’ would attempt to sell it to them.

The Crowd Says:

2015-10-11T01:28:48+00:00

Beny Iniesta

Guest


I would wager most of the support of Formula 1 is through 'rusted on' fans - at a greater rate than for other comparable sports. I'd really doubt Formula 1 is proving very good at attracting the 'yoof' these days. One way to measure this of course is to look at the average age of Formula 1 viewership - I would suggest in many countries this is 'rocketing' higher.

2015-10-10T06:00:58+00:00

Benjamin Conkey

Editor


I've watched the whole season, champ but unlike you I'm not asking for a medal.

2015-10-09T20:54:46+00:00

nordster

Guest


Well when some these articles are clocking in at single digits on the motorsport tab, beggars shall not be choosers... And looking back at what made f1 watchable 'back in the day' may have some merit if recapturing some of that is of interest... It has lost some of its excitement in that you're no longer wondering what new, revolutionary, organic change some team will come up with might be. Instead f1 just serves up some new regs for everyone to work within. Quite different to the 80s and 90s ....

2015-10-09T16:34:40+00:00

Scuba

Guest


Usually when I haven't watched something in 10 years, I refrain from making comments on the current state of the sport.

2015-10-09T16:30:59+00:00

Scuba

Guest


Wow, something happened at Monaco, the race that people who pretend to follow F1 watch and then complain that it's boring. Give yourself a clap, champ.

2015-10-09T09:43:55+00:00

Stumpy

Roar Rookie


The rule set makes for horrid racing and a very narrow target to get things right, then if you get it wrong you can't correct things to make your vehicle/engine/chassis competitive. And it doesn't make thing cheaper the money is simply spent elsewhere to gain advantage Give a rule set that promotes development, A set amount of fuel, multiple tyre manufactures, set maxium and minimum dimensions and weights and get out of the way and let the engineers and drivers show us what is possible.

2015-10-09T00:13:56+00:00

Not convinced

Guest


I used to kick myself if I ever missed a race and would often sit there absolutely stunned at some of the racing and overtaking. Even the commentary provided by Murray Walker and James Hunt alone was worth staying up for. Who could forget when James Hunt said at a wet Monaco "It's absolutely pissing down now"? Now, I haven't watched a race in months and seriously couldn't care less. I wouldn't know what the points gap is between drivers or if there's a possibility of a challenge at the top, and I don't care. So in short, is F1 seriously crap. Absolutely!! Can it be saved? I doubt it.

2015-10-08T21:57:17+00:00

Benjamin Conkey

Editor


You know it's a bad season when one of the top moments relied on Mercedes stuffing up (Monaco GP) . While it's been a tough watch at times it's great that drivers finally are 100% in control of the car at race starts...rather than engineers making tweaks and telling drivers when to activate the clutch etc.

2015-10-08T21:37:55+00:00

nordster

Guest


Between motogp, wrc, wec ....and projectcars ....plus all the other ps racers to occupy ones time....havent watched f1 in like a decade. Its lost its way as an engineering race, which was why i followed it as a kid. Now they just change the regs every so often instead. Lost its magic from there.

Read more at The Roar