How technology made everything better for a sports fan on the couch

By Josh / Expert

Sports and technology. It’s a combination that can seem a bit mismatched at first, but when you look at how far our sports viewing experience has come over time, it’s really quite amazing.

If you go back far enough in the history of sport there are legends that we can only imagine. Games which never had a second of footage captured, players who are simply names and numbers to us now.

Not so today. Technology has made our sport up close and personal. Sometimes it’s a little too personal. I’ve seen close-ups of players losing their lunch on field more times than I’d like to in my life – and for the record, the number of times I’d like to see that is zero.

All things considered though, technological advances have massively improved our sports-watching. For me it’s a great feeling to know that technology will preserve the great games and achievements of the modern day for years to come, that I’ll be able to watch them again even as an old man.

Arguably one of the biggest ways that modern technology improves our sports watching experience is in giving us an appreciation of how incredibly fit our athletes are, thanks to innovations like GPS tracking of athletes.

It’s one thing to see a football player make a quick spring up the ground on TV, but it’s another thing all together to look at the data put up on them by GPS tracking.

When we’re looking at them we’re impressed with the fitness they’re showing, but it’s when we’re not looking at them that they’re arguably showing off their fitness to the greatest extent – always chasing the play or running into position.

Work off the ball, one of those things it’s hard to track with a camera, is captured very neatly.

In genuine endurance sports like distance running and cycling we usually already have an understanding of how fit those participating are. Still, seeing the raw numbers just always seems to make it more impressive.

GPS data shows us the hard yards that players are putting in that most of us wouldn’t otherwise notice and gives a whole new appreciation for the amazing fitness they develop through their intense training.

Le Tour de France wouldn’t be the same without knowing that cyclists worked for over an hour to pedal at a speed of over 70km/h. As a mere mortal, it’s sometimes hard to believe the data being crunched out.

Even on opposite sides of the globe today’s technologies can give us the feeling of being right in the action. Also, new technologies are giving us insights into sport that you just don’t get from watching with the naked eye.

In 1888 for the first time the photo finish was introduced to racing – probably the first major technological development in sport. Can you imagine not having it today?

Or consider 1955, when instant replay screens began to be used for the first time. Admittedly, no matter how many replays we get these days people still heckle the referee.

In many sports nowadays you will get find players given microphones before or during the match. It’s a great insight into the game.

All too often we tend to think of our sportspeople as being larger than life, when really they’re just people. Listening to the chatter on a mic can really remind you of that.

Of course, sometimes today’s audio equipment picks up a bit more than what the players would probably like you to hear. Nick Kyrgios could probably tell you more about that, though he’d probably better off taking a look at his heart rate monitor.

Increasingly creative use of cameras continues to give us new ways of looking at the action. Whether it’s a slow motion replay of an incident too fast for the eye, or a spidercam-style view from above, we’re viewing our sport in new and different ways.

Technology also – in theory – can make our sport a bit more accurately officiated. Most sports have some sort of video review system now, though like the umpiring itself, the decisions are never universally liked.

The AFL’s goal review system for example has ranged from an inconvenience to a laughing stock at times. On the other hand, some of the innovations brought into cricket like the snickometer or the hot spot can do a lot to make decisions more accurate.

On top of that, it can improve the coverage of events on TV or online dramatically, giving us a pin-point precise way to follow competing athletes progress, and also a greater appreciation for just how much ground they’re covering.

These technologies aren’t perfect, and sometimes they’re subject to a bit of misuse. They can be the cause of massive controversy. Still, when they’re used right, they improve our sport, and they make for great TV.

Who knows what technological advances we’ll see in the future? Virtual reality technology is coming along in leaps and bounds. I look forward to the day when we can slip on a headset and find ourselves right in the game.

And hey, maybe someday they’ll even sort out the score review. We can dream.

The Crowd Says:

2015-10-28T01:46:57+00:00

Paul D

Roar Guru


One of my cycling friends - who is a very decent amateur road rider himself, reckons that the guys at the elite level in cycling are almost beyond human, such are the changes to their metabolism and their fitness levels. I'd wager though that the gap might be largest, but the consequences of putting an amateur in a cycling race are less immediate. Sure they'll get thrashed, but they'll be unharmed. I wouldn't want to put an amateur in the path of a rampaging Sam Whitelock, and you certainly couldn't pay me enough money to go out into the middle and face up to Mitchell Johnson.

2015-10-28T01:38:48+00:00

Paul D

Roar Guru


Don't forget third man. You get some amazing appeals from there. I basically tell anyone having a whinge who's not the bowler - if that was a good place to judge lbw's from I'd be standing out wherever they are.

2015-10-28T01:32:21+00:00

Chris

Guest


Its easy, if the ball hits the pads its lbw if you are the fielding team.

2015-10-28T01:31:34+00:00

Andy

Guest


Watching the tour de france on tv is beautiful but its also so misleading because of the angle they shoot it at, you just cannot appreciate the sheer speed they go at. Not just the likes of Cavendish at the end but just consistenly all day for 2 weeks going at 40km/h and more up freaking mountains, not just slight hills like we have in Brisbane but legitimate freaking mountains. Its awe inspiring and makes me hate them a little. I think cycling is one of those sports where the difference between an average fit person who cycles and a professional is the greatest. I think most other sports a sporty amateur will still get beaten soundly but they wont look like a complete idiot, a decent soccer or tennis or league/union player wont look completely out of place but in cycling the elites are just so elite. I dont understand how you can sprint finish after a hundred kilometer ride. And then do it the next day and the next for 10 more days.

2015-10-28T01:20:52+00:00

Andy

Guest


I think technology has been great but i think we do need to not get too excited about new technology and pretend that its perfect when its far from it. And we should put a limit on how often the channel 9 cricket commentators can use the new technology of the summer. But mostly i love the new technology, especially as you say the gps tracking and such, it is one thing to know that guys in the tour de france are fit or know that usain bolt is fast but when we see the actual numbers it makes it just that much more impressive.

2015-10-28T00:57:47+00:00

Pope Paul vii

Guest


In our comp, apparently cover and deep midwicket are the best spots to judge a LBW.

2015-10-28T00:31:15+00:00

Pottsy

Guest


Funny you should mention that. I had one of my less incompetent days as an opener on the weekend and at one stage we were something like 2-200. A half hearted LBW appeal was made against our number four. The umpire gave it not out. This guy then jokingly said at short cover, "Reconsider?" I looked at the umpire, who looked a bit bemused and then smiled and said, "Very well. Not out!"

2015-10-27T23:17:51+00:00

Paul D

Roar Guru


As a suburban ground cricket umpire, I appreciate the advent of the DRS review, as it easily allows you to identify the tossers on each team. They're the ones making the T gesture after each decision.

2015-10-27T23:01:18+00:00

Darth Vader

Guest


camera angles that show you things you would never see live are the biggest for me. Spiercam etc.

2015-10-27T22:33:06+00:00

SuperEel22

Roar Guru


You're really splitting hairs there Prof. In the context that he's presented, ranking the photo finish as the first major technological development in sport would be pretty close to correct. I really like to read through the cyclists' power metres and then get on a bike in the gym and find out how hard a mortal such as myself would have to push themselves to even get close to their numbers. I can crunch around 200 watts on a consistent basis in the gym but getting anywhere near what those climbers do in the TDF is nearly super human. I'm red lining when I try to ride at 40km/h for 10 minutes let alone doing it for 4 hours followed by a sprint.

2015-10-27T21:26:36+00:00

Professor Rosseforp

Guest


On the photo finish as the "first major technological development in sport". I would have thought that a measuring stick or a stopwatch would pre-date the photo-finish, and are probably still more important in most sports.

Read more at The Roar