The World Cup that was already won: How New Zealand are building a legacy

By Patrick Virtue / Roar Rookie

If success in a Rugby World Cup could be measured in currency, economists would define skill as a more valuable asset than knowledge or physicality.

Proverbially, if knowledge is power, skill usurps the influence of knowledge in the sporting arena by facilitating uncompromising speed, ruthless efficiency and bewildering unpredictability.

The best rugby teams, however, combine both facets with an intimidating physicality that is unrivalled by their opponents. Ultimately, this notion manifests itself in superiority.

Never has this theory been more applicable than to the 2015 Rugby World Cup champions, the New Zealand All Blacks. If the triumphant story of the All Blacks were glorified in a book, you need read only the prologue to gain an understanding of how it may end.

In the four years since New Zealand lifted the Webb-Ellis Cup on home soil, there was an undercurrent of predictability so certain about the outcome of their campaign, you could have forgiven them for not ever considering just how they may have lost it.

Coach Steve Hansen, renowned for his fastidious nature, would never entertain thought so fantastical, such is the unwavering focus on contributing to the legacy of the All Blacks, of building a dynasty and inspiring a generation of future All Blacks.

Consider the sheer disparity of the All Blacks compared to the rest of the world over the past four years. Refreshingly defined by objectivity rather than opinion – the facts and results are so blindingly obvious that the only conclusion is that they have been untouchable, even unbeatable for the majority of the time.

So dominant have they been that it is hard to visualise any weakness or period of decline in the immediate future, let alone leading up to the next World Cup in 2019, irrespective of a string of retiring greats. There is a seemingly eternal line of prodigies ready to make their mark as the next Dan Carter, Ma’a Nonu or Richie McCaw.

Ultimately, the only question to pose is ‘how?’

How are New Zealand so far ahead of the rest of the world that they can safely be regarded as the most dominant side in the history of not just rugby, but all sport?

The answer, neglecting culture and context, is actually very obvious. It is based on skill and ability. New Zealand are renowned for employing the fundamentals to their advantage and striking with the quintessential All Blacks speed that has been the frightening trademark of their craft for so many years.

Since taking charge of the All Blacks, Steve Hansen’s primary ambition has centred on improving ability. But the hallmark of New Zealand rugby lies in its dynamism, in it’s skillset. The thought process is that should the circumstance arise, prop Owen Franks should be able to pass to Julian Savea to effect a try just as easily as Dan Carter or fullback Ben Smith can.

Pigeonholing is not a phrase in Steve Hansen’s vocabulary, there is only ubiquitous skill.

Catch. Pass. Catch. Pass. Catch. Pass.

This mantra brought the Wallabies undone in incredibly efficient style in the shadows of half time of the final. It was a play so successful it had effectively scuppered their chances of snatching ‘Bill’ from the hands of the All Blacks with a half yet to play.

On that occasion, the sniping Aaron Smith combined with the rollicking Conrad Smith who, like he was engaged in a game of ‘hot potato’, offloaded immediately to his captain. McCaw proceeded to smartly shift play to Nehe Milner-Skudder who iced the manoeuvre with the inevitable try.

Catch. Pass. Catch. Pass. Catch. Pass.

Laborious to describe, electrifying to watch. It is the ultimate version of having your cake and eating it too. It is the reason the All Blacks won the World Cup.

The best rugby teams balance knowledge, skill and physicality in order to become the pinnacle of their sport. The coalescence of these principles is the cornerstone of New Zealand’s successful campaign. The contrast to the rest of the world, perhaps with an exception of Australia, could hardly have been greater.

England possessed knowledge, both of conditions and of their opponent’s strengths and weaknesses. Physicality at the scrum has long underpinned their previous successes. But they lacked effective skill – and it is why their campaign ended prematurely.

It was rugby’s version of Occam’s Razor – the simplest game plan is the best.

This approach has worked well when playing northern rivals but when pitted against the attacking southern hemisphere powerhouses, a battle of attrition is an antiquated, ineffectual approach.

Eventually, a penalty goal to Owen Farrell will be overshadowed by a slick try involving the outside backs of the southern opposition – and so it told with the ignominy of a group stage exit.

The Springboks have knowledge but have always lacked the distinguishing attacking flair of the three other southern hemisphere heavyweights.

They march to the beat of their own drum in that respect, imposing themselves with brutality and physicality rather than finesse – and in fairness it has won them more matches than most. But maintaining only physicality and knowledge was not enough to score a miraculous final minute try in the semi-final against the All Blacks when they needed it most – despite a raft of phase play and possession, they didn’t make it out of their own 22.

The omission of skill was notably to their detriment in this World Cup; evidenced by the fact that they never made it close to the All Black try line in their tightly contested semi.

The ever improving Argentina have combined an almost genetic physicality at the breakdown with a string of attacking backs to complement. Steadfastly brilliant against Ireland, they lacked knowledge and patience in the semi-final against Australia which ultimately lead to their downfall.

A speculative approach, disregarding the value of possession rather than playing for territory potentiated a Wallabies intercept try after 67 seconds – from that point on there was a grim inevitability engulfing the rest of the match.

There are signs that Australia, however, possess all three of the traits required to win a World Cup. The Wallabies have built a reputation for running rugby.

Physicality at the breakdown is the reason Australia’s backrow is the best in the world and the leaking of in depth tactics on the eve of the final provided evidence of knowledge. Despite this, they didn’t ever seriously threaten the All Blacks in the final.

But it is one thing to possess these attributes – it is an entirely other concept to implement them accordingly. Perhaps the All Blacks impressed most in the final by adapting and amalgamating all three traits to suit the demands of the circumstances.

They possessed the knowledge to change their game plan to shut down play in the final, when a resurgent Australia threatened their lead with Ben Smith yellow carded. It was an elementary but efficient approach – control possession and territory and run down the clock to protect the lead.

Their imposing physicality at the breakdown meant David Pocock had a relatively quiet game and the skill to complete all three tries, coupled with the precision of Daniel Carter’s decisive drop goal were nothing short of breathtaking.

So where does this leave the future competitiveness of rugby? Conclusively, the All Blacks were deserved winners – and may well be for many years ahead. An approach characterised by precision and improvisation has further reinforced the cherished legacy of the All Blacks.

The first time a side has won back to back World Cups clearly has the potential to dominate in the future, handling any bullish opponents with contempt so ingrained in the culture that no one would disapprove, even if it were misconstrued as arrogance – such is their brilliance.

It almost defies belief, an Antipodean nation with a population of just four million could transcend the previous assertion of what made the best team in the world.

If rugby is New Zealand’s religion, most would rather pray to Richie McCaw than to their own respective deities. In reality, it should surprise no one – given the array of talent available, where a surplus of skill is combined with legendary New Zealand physicality and omniscient rugby knowledge to produce yet another generation of record breaking All Blacks.

New Zealand will reign supreme as the world’s richest rugby nation and most prolific rugby economy for the years ahead. A certainty rather than speculation, it might well force economists to reassess their own predictions of the expected growing global economies – New Zealand might well just top it.

The Crowd Says:

2015-11-08T05:45:48+00:00

Wal The Hooker

Guest


Great article mate, very interesting points. Will be a really eye opening experience to see the upcoming ABs kids stake their claim next year with the old warriors gone.... Somehow I just get the feeling that maybe after a few shaky starts, the machine will just keep on rolling such is the AB's depth

2015-11-06T16:05:44+00:00

Kohatu

Guest


Good article Patrick. Also liked the 7P's Wardad and some good points made Homer and Shrink.

2015-11-06T12:16:14+00:00

frisky

Guest


There has been much praise heaped on the WB back row. There has been much praise heaped on the WB coach. Hanson devised a game plan to neutralise the WB back row, and the WB coach did not have a Plan B. Hanson should have won the Coach OTY for that alone. It will be interesting to see if other teams learn from this next yea, and to see if Cheika can counteract this tactic.

2015-11-05T09:30:08+00:00

Leister Stewart

Guest


I'm not sure if Australia's back row is the most physical and the best in the world. It didn't look that way in the final anyway.

2015-11-04T23:32:22+00:00

shrink

Roar Rookie


New Zealand Rugby Union (2014) revenue A$111 million (NZ$120 million), operating profit $375,000 (down from $2.5mil the previous year), cash reserves $62 million. Three quarters of income is from commercial contracts including broadcast and sponsorship deals. Australia Rugby Union (2014) revenue A$100 million (NZ$108 million), operating loss A$6 million (NZ$6.5 million), cash reserves -unsure. Expected revenue for 2015 A$75 million. Over the same period Australia’s National Rugby League posted an operating surplus of A$49 million, and AFL created an A$316 million surplus. Meanwhile, objectives for the New Zealand Rugby Union in 2016 are two Olympic medals in Rio, sound financial heath, the game is well led and delivered for fans, players and commercial partners, rugby is the sport of choice in wider Auckland, rugby is the sport of choice for teenagers under the Community Rugby Plan, the All Blacks to win the Steinlager Series against Wales, win the Rugby Championship, and retain the Bledisloe Cup.

2015-11-04T22:40:27+00:00

Buk

Guest


Pretty telling insight into NZ rugby

2015-11-04T06:55:57+00:00

Shrink

Guest


Hansen: “The one thing we have got right at home is that the best players are owned by province, franchise and the All Blacks. Sitting down together and working out how you can make a player better – and including that player in the conversation – is something we have got right. The most important thing in the whole thing is the player.”

2015-11-04T01:57:47+00:00

Ken

Roar Rookie


That's great for heavy props, amazed at Crockett Best in team (including the lighter backs) in 2010 was McCaw with 19.2 http://www.topendsports.com/videos/1100/sports/rugby-union/all-blacks-yo-yo-test/

2015-11-03T23:34:49+00:00

wardad

Guest


"Happy Hooker " eh ,I thought Xavieria Hollander was older ,shorter and blonder ! Dont know what her kicking ability is like though ...

2015-11-03T23:32:05+00:00

wardad

Guest


You could distill the All Blacks success down to what the Australian Army calls the 7Ps ,"Prior Preperation and Planning Prevents P!ss Poor Performance "

2015-11-03T23:06:18+00:00

Shrink

Guest


Ah...can't forget the Dane Coles cross kick to winger Naholo when playing Tonga. How many hookers would look to do this, and you would almost groan....but not so with the ABs happy hooker. His tap-on-pass in the back line during the second Bled was perfect, leading to try. Previously the ABs props on the yo-yo test (measures the capacity to repeat sprints with short recovery over an extended time) had to be rated at least 15. The current mark is 17. Ben Franks hits late 17s, Wyatt Crockett registers over 18.

2015-11-03T22:38:26+00:00

CA3ZAR

Roar Pro


Nice read

2015-11-03T22:21:27+00:00

Colin

Guest


Hi Elisha Great article I agree the skills of their forwards are exemplary dan Cole is as fast as all the backs, Maccaw and company pass with the skills of backs. One thing only briefly touched on is the kiwi ability to execute a gameplay and we saw it in super rugby the highlanders Waratahs semi final they kicked to nandolo side and to Falau's weak side and managed to pin the tahs in their half again in the final and semi they found weaknesses in both teams and managed to pin both teams for sustained periods in their half aside from forward skill I think it's their game plan execution that sets them apart they never seem to waiver from the brief yet the wallabies seem to waiver a lot more from the game plan. Food for thought?

2015-11-03T20:02:51+00:00

Homer

Guest


NZ are exactly as far ahead of the rest of the world now as they were back in 1905. And for mostly the same reasons. Their forwards play like backs, they are better organised and they have played the same people alongside each other for dozens of games.

Read more at The Roar