Who are the 'greats' of modern Test cricket?

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

A Test cricket ‘great’ is an elusive thing. England haven’t had one for decades since Ian Botham. New Zealand’s last ‘great’ is similarly distant in Richard Hadlee. Mitchell Johnson wasn’t a ‘great’, so who from the modern generation is or was?

As Roar colleague Alec Swann argued last week, Johnson wasn’t in the absolute elite bracket of Test cricketers – he was very good rather than great.

Johnson sits on the second rung of brilliant Test cricketer below the modern greats. For two periods – in 2008-09 and 2013-14 – he was comfortably the best cricketer on the planet, and won the ICC Cricketer of the Year award twice as a result.

But those stratospheric achievements are balanced out by several periods during which his performances ranged from terrible to mediocre. No Test cricketer I have watched ever has lurched from the extraordinary to the execrable like Johnson.

It is for that reason that he never managed to catapult himself onto the lofty level occupied by the true greats of the modern game. Yet that hardly is an embarrassment. On the second rung he enjoys the company of some phenomenal players who never quite made that leap either.

Sitting below the greats are the likes of former teammates Michael Clarke and Michael Hussey, both of whom had sensational Test careers.

Clarke and Hussey, just like Johnson, had periods during which they were truly great. Hussey unbelievably made eight centuries in his first 20 Tests while averaging 85 with the bat. Clarke, meanwhile, was utterly unstoppable in 2012 when he made 1595 runs at 106 in Tests.

But the sum of their efforts falls marginally short of permanent ‘great’ status. That highest of standings is granted automatically to Glenn McGrath and Shane Warne.

Warne is the best bowler Test cricket has ever witnessed, a man who took by far the most difficult skill in the game and produced it in its most ferocious form while somehow also displaying complete control.

McGrath is quite possibly the most consistent paceman we will ever see – a machine who averaged a brilliant 22.43 at home, but was even better on the road, where he averaged 21.35. No matter how unsuitable the conditions for fast bowling, he remained effective.

Steve Waugh, Allan Border, Ricky Ponting and Adam Gilchrist join that pair as Australian greats of the modern era. Waugh was so good that he for many years competed with no less than Brian Lara and Sachin Tendulkar for the title of Test cricket’s best batsman – enough said.

Border inherited a poor Australian side and hoisted them on his shoulders, averaging 51 in an era when that really meant something. Ponting is the second-highest runscorer in Test cricket and averaged well above 55 throughout the core of his career before hanging on two years two long and eroding his overall figures.

Gilchrist, too, averaged in the mid-50s for years while he was the most feared batsman in the world – something entirely new for a wicketkeeper.

Those five greats played with a host of cricketers who sit roughly alongside Johnson just below them – the likes of Ian Healy, Matthew Hayden, Jason Gillespie, Craig McDermott, David Boon, Justin Langer, Ryan Harris, Stuart MacGill, Hussey and Clarke. Listed among such a wonderful group of players, Johnson should feel immensely proud.

The Test greats of the past 20 years:
Australia (5) – Shane Warne, Glenn McGrath, Ricky Ponting, Steve Waugh, Adam Gilchrist
South Africa (4) – Jacques Kallis, Shaun Pollock, Allan Donald, Dale Steyn
West Indies (3) – Brian Lara, Curtly Ambrose, Courtney Walsh
Sri Lanka (2) – Muttiah Muralitharan, Kumar Sangakkara
India (2) – Sachin Tendulkar, Rahul Dravid
Pakistan (2) – Wasim Akram, Waqar Younis
New Zealand – zero
England – zero

Close to great status: Anil Kumble, Shiv Chanderpaul, AB de Villiers, Matthew Hayden, Mahela Jayawardene, Younis Khan, Virender Sehwag.

The Crowd Says:

2015-11-28T00:27:06+00:00

Clavers

Guest


Kumble with 613 wickets must come close to consideration. Also notable that there is not one opening batsman included in the list of greats. Matthew Hayden was one of the very few opening batsmen, and to my knowledge the only Australian, to have averaged fifty over his career. Graeme Smith also went very close to achieving that mark and was a significant force in the game, playing 117 tests and captaining a very well-performed side.

2015-11-26T03:15:25+00:00

Rugby Realist

Guest


Ian Bishop was similar from memory, although probably outside the scope of this debate

2015-11-25T12:00:41+00:00

Matth

Guest


But Mcgrath's averages all over the world are remarkable, so it isn't just longevity. And this was in the eras of the exploding batting average

2015-11-25T11:55:09+00:00

Matth

Guest


I'm a fan. I think people's opinions have been prejudiced by the bad series in 2005 and his post playing "career"

2015-11-25T07:47:52+00:00

danno

Guest


Tough on Kumble not to be called a great. Sure his average was 29 but most spinners averages are a bit higher because they also do the donkey work when pitches aren't doing much. K Dev was a great with a similar average. He also had little support compared to Pollock. I still recall Kumble winning many series for India, one against Australia when Ponting/Blewett were his bunnies. He is also the 3rd highest wicket taker of all time. A great imo.

2015-11-25T00:55:39+00:00

pedro

Guest


McGrath was a great bowler over an extended period. I could probably name at least 10 fast bowlers who were at least his equal over the 40 years I have followed test cricket. It depends whether longevity and the ability to remain injury free are factors in calling someone a great. Also being from a country where you play a lot of tests helps. As for Warney on the sub continent I am surprised his average is that low. It would be enlightening to see the figures for opposition spinners in these games. No doubt Warne is the best spinner I have ever seen in Australian conditions. Perhaps I am a bit harsh on my assessment of who is great but for me it is someone who regularly looks like they are performing at level well above their teammates in difficult conditions. Watching deVilliers bat in the first test against India recently is an example that comes to mind.

2015-11-24T13:51:42+00:00

Duke

Guest


Lmao! Doesn't he keep wicket to Whoblew Updabus?

2015-11-24T13:50:49+00:00

Duke

Guest


AUTHOR

2015-11-24T12:14:10+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


And Murali really struggled against Australia, averaging 36 over his career.

2015-11-24T11:39:53+00:00

Brian

Guest


But you would also need to factor that Murali bowled to the top 8 bar Sri Lanka whilst Warne bowled to the top 8 bar Australia, easily the best team for the vast majority of his career.

AUTHOR

2015-11-24T09:41:28+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


"Not so sure about McGrath." Hmm.... Pedro you reference Warne's "less than fabulous record on the sub continent" yet on the subcontinent he took 127 Test wickets at an average of 26.81.

AUTHOR

2015-11-24T09:34:20+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Murali's overall stats are misleading because of the way in which he cashed in against minnow Test nations like no other bowler in history. Murali took a massive 176 wickets against Zimbabwe and Bangladesh, at an average of 15, compared to Warne's 17 wickets against Zim and Bang. If you remove Test wickets taken against minnow nations these are the new career stats: Warne: 691 wickets at 25 Murali: 624 wickets at 25

2015-11-24T09:32:05+00:00

Sameer Murthy

Roar Rookie


Ronan, Where would you rate Kevin Peterson? He isn't an all time great but definitely one of the most outstanding batsmen of the past decade. The man was an incredible match winner, helping England win series against Australia and India both at home and away as well as blowing away Dale Steyn (who is an all-time great) at Headingley in 2012.

2015-11-24T09:17:13+00:00

Matt from Armidale

Roar Rookie


Harmy? I just checked his website, no sign of greatness there. If you want to look for yourself: www.wwwwwww...

2015-11-24T06:18:23+00:00

Bobbo7

Guest


Agree, averaging 50 in Tests and ODI for a long period is pretty special and he just plays at another level

2015-11-24T06:16:58+00:00

Bobbo7

Guest


Hayden was obviously a good player but a flat track bully and it was a period of not so great bowlers outside of Australia.

2015-11-24T06:13:14+00:00

Bobbo7

Guest


Stats wise Bond was right up there but could only play about half his career because of injury. I read that NZ won half of all Tests he played in which is an amazing stat for NZ at the time.

2015-11-24T06:11:32+00:00

Bobbo7

Guest


Agree. Chanderpaul was a wonderful player in a messy team. And not sure I would include Hayden as an almost great. A flat track bully if ever there was one playing in a period of very poor bowling outside Australia.

2015-11-24T06:07:08+00:00

Fox

Guest


[Mods. snip. Do not call other people names] jumps on here after everyone has made comments and then sticks your juvenile tag comment at the end You are either very young - pretty young - or just plain juvenile

2015-11-24T06:05:05+00:00

Fox

Guest


Yes but you are a silly immature little boy so that is not hard now is it?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar