Australia's bowlers need to lift at Adelaide

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

It is not just the New Zealand bowling attack which has a point to prove in the Adelaide Tests. The Australian bowlers must improve significantly, particularly in the way they operate as a unit.

Although heavy criticism was rightly directed at the WACA over the sleepy nature of its pitch, the bowling from both sides ranged from pedestrian to scattergun for large periods of the Test.

It is understandable that Test bowlers have grown frustrated at having to operate on such unfair pitches, but that does not excuse a lack of accuracy or guile.

The Gabba deck offered plenty of assistance to both the quicks and the spinners yet the Kiwi bowlers were woeful and the Australian attack was only passable in all but a couple of incisive spells.

The Australian bowlers also are fresh from an Ashes series during which, for all the failings of their batting colleagues, they were disappointingly loose.

With all due respect to the retired Mitchell Johnson, who had a terrific Test career, he and Mitchell Starc were not well suited to being in the same team unless both were in top form. His retirement may result in a better balance being brought to the Australian attack.

Johnson was meant to be the leader of the attack but instead had been battling with waywardness, averaging 40 with the ball in his past seven Tests while conceding a whopping four runs per over.

His expensiveness heaped pressure on Starc and the third member of the pace unit Josh Hazlewood. Starc has managed quite well and has rewarded the selectors for giving him his first-ever extended run in the Test team after a ludicrously stop-start career.

Since returning to the Test team this year, Starc has taken 38 wickets at an average of 26 from nine Tests. His economy rate of 3.48 runs per over in that period certainly can improve.

But it’s not a major problem and won’t be nearly as much of an issue if Johnson’s replacement can bowl tidily.

Starc is an out-and-out wicket taker, as his phenomenal strike rate of 44 in those past nine Tests has highlighted. He is not likely ever to be a frugal bowler but is so penetrative that he doesn’t need to be.

What would make Starc even more effective is the building of pressure from the other end. The same way Johnson was at his peak with Ryan Harris, Peter Siddle and Nathan Lyon suffocating the batsmen, Starc should benefit from frugal colleagues.

Batsmen are more likely to ill-advisedly drive at one of Starc’s slanting deliveries or swingers if they have been tied up by the bowler at the other end. Johnson’s profligacy in recent times made it harder for the remainder of the attack to ratchet up pressure.

Media reports suggest Siddle is his probable replacement, and while the Victorian has lacked penetration in Tests for some time he is a master at connecting dot balls. But Siddle won’t be opening the bowling with Starc. It is Hazlewood whom Starc really needs to return to his accurate best.

Against India last summer and in the tour of the Caribbean which followed, Hazlewood almost dug craters on a good length just outside off stump such was his remarkable consistency.

With Starc seeking wickets as a priority at the other end, they looked close to the perfect new ball pairing, a wonderfully balanced pair.

In the Ashes series which followed, Hazlewood lost his radar and his confidence. Back on home soil he has been better and seemed to regain his groove as the WACA Test wound on.

The selectors clearly have tremendous faith in Hazlewood, sticking with him while the Ashes were on the line and immediately recalling him for this current series after a rest.

Siddle, though, is a threat to him as the selectors clearly favour the balance of fielding two attacking, express pacemen together with one steady, accurate seamer. Going forward it is hard to see both Siddle and Hazlewood in the same side, with only a spate of injuries to another paceman likely to see them play together at Adelaide.

Hazlewood has a brilliant first-class record at Adelaide, having taken 11 wickets at an average of 13 despite the ground having the flattest pitch in Australia. His ability to extract bounce and subtle seam movement from benign decks is the reason he is in the Test team.

At Adelaide, he has the chance to show the selectors that it is he, not Siddle, who should be Australia’s holding paceman this summer and beyond.

The Crowd Says:

2015-11-27T00:54:18+00:00

SP

Guest


hey, they came 2nd in the World Cup as well.

2015-11-27T00:44:11+00:00

Bobbo7

Guest


The pitch will be a road despite reports to the contrary and the team batting first won't lose and will probably win, much like the first two games. NZ were underdone in the first game and thoroughly outplayed. In the second Test the pitch was a joke, NZ turned up and it was a draw.

2015-11-26T13:35:09+00:00

Quitwhinging

Guest


Burgs, that doesn't give him the free rein to bowl crap in test matches!

AUTHOR

2015-11-26T11:50:48+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


"My prediction that NZ would step up in Perth by either winning or drawing was correct". Not sure I'd be too excited about NZ's efforts at Perth, where Australia was 2-416 after day one! NZ "really lift against Australia"? Again, I wouldn't be getting carried away with that thought...the reality is NZ have won just 1 of their past 25 Tests against Australia. If that is "lifting" then they need to find another approach.

2015-11-26T11:21:07+00:00

Burgs

Guest


The boys club that dominated the Matador cup? I thought that would have silenced the NSW conspiracy theories.

2015-11-26T08:07:56+00:00

Quitwhinging

Guest


Yes they were brilliant at Brisbane when there was something in the pitch weren't they? If your using the Perth pitch as an argument then it's really weak. Tell me, how many times have they bowled Australia out? 0 the answer is 0

2015-11-26T08:05:57+00:00

Quitwhinging

Guest


His average befoee the Ashes was 21, his average is now 26. Oh and for all the talk about him being line,length and economical he's been awfully expensive. But hey, who can talk sense and facts to the NSW boys club?

2015-11-26T07:17:42+00:00

AlanKC

Guest


Again DA - 11 tests, 44 wickets average 26 and he bowls pies? What do you drink?

2015-11-26T07:16:23+00:00

AlanKC

Guest


11 tests, 44 wickets at 26... and you reckon Hazelwood has been getting a "lot of test cricket" on "potential" - I'd love to see what you'd accept as "on ability".

2015-11-26T07:00:51+00:00

Republican

Guest


Quitwhinging There was much bluster post Brissy re Australia blowing NZ away in this series, across media and opinion generally. My prediction that NZ would step up in Perth by either winning or drawing was correct and I expect it to be again re Adelaide. Despite never quite inheriting what is a national trait of bombastic bravado, believe me when i say, there is not a skerrick of Kiwi running through these veins, while I do believe Australian sporting teams are way too complacent, bar in Rugby Union, when pitted against them. We really should respect their absolute obsession if nothing else, to defeat us at all and sundry, which is why their international status is often inflated, i.e. they really lift v Australia while we tend to assume victory v them. Having said that, this is a very good NZ test cricket outfit, one that i believe has the potential to humiliate us on their home turf.

2015-11-26T05:55:27+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


20? Really?

2015-11-26T05:28:54+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Is that his career average...or these last 2 games on roads? If it's the latter, it means nothing. He's doing well.

2015-11-26T05:07:49+00:00

Quitwhinging

Guest


There was also the small factor of Johnson bowling at 150km/h+

2015-11-26T05:06:43+00:00

Quitwhinging

Guest


Big talk for the Kiwi who masquerades an an Australian. New Zealand's claim to fame this decade is beating the West Indies away

2015-11-26T05:05:15+00:00

Quitwhinging

Guest


Average of 68, economy over 3. Yes, he's doing brilliant isn't he?

2015-11-26T02:46:20+00:00

Pedro the Maroon

Guest


S Marsh has about 20 tests under his belt. All on "potential"

2015-11-26T02:20:40+00:00

Jameswm

Guest


Taylor was challenged enough before that one innings.

2015-11-26T02:20:17+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Perhaps you are missing something, QW. You often do. Hazle's doing ok.

2015-11-26T01:48:21+00:00

The Bush

Roar Guru


No doubt Jameswm that by all accounts Hazelwood is struggling with his fitness under the second category you refer to and this is why he's not completing series. My concern is that whilst Pattinson might by lean, toned, aerobically fit etc, is he "bowling fit". I think this falls under yet a third category. For whatever reason, it doesn't seem to matter how fantastic you are in the gym or how good you're smashing the beep test, there is no substitute for bowling to be fit for bowling, and I question how many competitive overs Pattinson has bowled since returning from injury with his new action. His own Shield team question his selection in the Test side for this exact reason.

2015-11-26T01:22:11+00:00

Serg

Guest


Its interesting that Smith seems to bowl his fast bowlers for longer spells then Clarke did. Clarke seemed to bowl his quicks for short spells with the exception of Siddle. In the last Ashes on home soil it was our tight bowling and pressure built for this that created wickets. This came from a very balanced bowling unit in Johnson, Harris, Siddle and Lyon with Watson able to bowl a few overs and keep it tight also. Since Harris has gone our bowling has seemed a lot more scattergun, firstly in the UK for the Ashes are now in Australia. Starc has bowled well but I tear my hair out when he takes the new ball and fires it all over the place.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar