China syndrome: Why it's better to be great than rich

By Ben of Phnom Penh / Roar Guru

While Bangladesh and Australia fought it out in the dust of Dhaka, many in Asia were tuning in to what would normally be little more than a novelty match: Hong Kong versus China.

In early September, Hong Kong travelled to the Middle Kingdom and through some structured defence, managed to hold the Chinese to a 0-0 draw.

The draw saw China placed third in their group, three points adrift of Hong Kong, albeit with a game in hand.

The Chinese threw all they had at the reverse fixture and played with far more endeavour, rattling the woodwork twice and seeing a goal denied for ‘not crossing the line’.

However Hong Kong also came to play, and not only held out the Chinese but managed to control the midfield. China played technically well but were tactically bereft.

The result was greeted like a win from the local crowd, who – if the boos ringing out during the Chinese national anthem is any indicator – were somewhat partisan. This wasn’t just due to the fact that it was a point against China, but also because the result leaves China unlikely to proceed to the next round of World Cup qualification.

For football fans, nothing garnishes a result like a liberal sprinkling of schadenfreude.

So how can it come to this… Again?

The performance of Guangzhou Evergrande in the ACL over the past few seasons has some of the Chinese players engaging successfully in the highest level of football in Asia – certainly higher than what anyone in the Hong Kong squad contends.

Yet here lies part of the problem. Chinese players are at risk of emulating their West Asian counterparts, where the best players remain in the domestic competition, as opposed to testing their abilities in the tougher sporting climes of Europe.

In Japan and Korea, the talented are encouraged to be the best, not just the richest. This leads them to play in many leagues around the globe, leagues where foreign imports are under immense pressure to prove themselves worthier than local talent. They are expected to perform, to sparkle, and to think.

The amount of money available in the Chinese Super League means clubs can purchase substantial, creative foreign talent, talent upon which local players rely. When these imports are removed, there are few Chinese players remaining with experience in delivering creative spark on the big stage.

It is no accident that Zheng Zhi, the only Chinese national team player with significant European experience, remains the side’s lynchpin.

The result of this is seen in the difficulty the Chinese side has in changing tactics mid-game, which leads to the side running out of ideas and growing frustrated as games wear on. The spark and creativity are lacking, and as the pressure grows so do the ugly tackles and the backchat.

The game is evolving in China, with substantial investment in youth football and a changing attitude to child rearing. However the Chinese national side risks being held down by the glass ceiling of domestic football hubris.

The Chinese need to encourage their players to test themselves in order to be the best, not just the wealthiest.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2017-01-04T23:15:12+00:00

Ben of Phnom Penh

Roar Guru


Yes, Macau has a side. Single countries having different national sides within their borders is nothing new; Denmark, UK, France, US, New Zealand etc.

2017-01-04T22:47:06+00:00

clipper

Guest


I thought the same - is there a Macau team as well?

2017-01-04T12:01:54+00:00

Mister Football

Roar Guru


Ben really good observations, agree 100%.

2015-12-03T02:18:05+00:00

Lionheart

Guest


Why does China have two national teams? I'd like to see a Chinese player in Brisbane Roar colors, a marquee maybe, given the number of supporters at China's game in Brisbane during the Asia Cup. They came from Sunnybank, or a lot of them anyway, in many thousands and they obviously knew their football. And what great supporters. We should lure them to support the A League.

2015-12-02T23:47:57+00:00

Chris from Shenzhen

Guest


I watched both those games and was denied the ability to go to both games. Firstly, foreigners were not permitted to go to the leg in Shenzhen because of some bizarre ruling by a local bureaucrat. The away leg in Hong Kong was played in a 6500 seat stadium because 9 days earlier, some rugby 7s games had been played in the national stadium and ripped the turf up so badly it was practically unplayable. I agree with the substance of the article. The substance of the Chinese team has been weak for quite some time and reliance on Guangzhou Evergrande, despite their ACL success, could cause problems in the future. However, I would point out that China should have been awarded a penalty in the first leg by Australian referee Strebre Delovski for a handball in the box in about the 90th minute that I saw instantly and I am convinced he saw right in front of him. Similarly, the game in Hong Kong was a much better affair than the one in Shenzhen, with both sides hitting the cross bar and a goal each way being disallowed (Hong Kong) or not counted (China).

Read more at The Roar