The NRL's heat policy is a charade

By Dan Eastwood / Expert

Some of the NRL’s regulations are shambolic. Nothing illustrated this in the first round of the NRL’s 2016 season more than the disjointed and poorly communicated application of the drinks break.

Canberra and Penrith played out a game in near 40-degree Celsius heat, while later in the day at Campbelltown in temperatures closer to 20 than 40, the Tigers and the Warriors enjoyed a drinks stoppage immediately after a try.

Penrith half Jamie Soward had it mostly right when he tweeted: “Drinks break for different games? Canberra has no beach to get breeze form either.”

And then: “Drinks break after a try scored equals 3-4 minute break. Still couldn’t get one yesterday.”

Soward’s right – Canberra doesn’t have a beach and the leafy suburb of Bruce where GIO Stadium is located is too far away from Lake Burley Griffin to enjoy respite from any local water source.

Yet Campbelltown Stadium, at Leumeah in Sydney’s south-west, is also a long way from the nearest beach. If you are brave enough to battle Appin Road with its blind corners, curbside trees and annual fatalities, you can make beachside Wollongong in about 50 minutes.

Soward’s broader point is why the inconsistency? What he should have been questioning is ‘why the drinks break at all’?

There is no need for one. It’s a masquerade, a cloak of outsourced responsibility where NRL club medicos both have to agree a stoppage is necessary. The NRL can simply hide behind its game-day regulations and say, “It’s up to the clubs.”

What a cop-out. All ‘care’ and no responsibility.

How many drinks breaks does an NRL team need? Every time a try is scored water is run out. Every time a team loses possession the team gaining the ball has the benefit of a trainer carrying a bottle offering a sip and some instructions from the coaches. Any referrals to the video review bunker – more water opportunities.

Just watch Allan Langer in his trainer’s shirt next time you see a Broncos game.

To think that another break in play assists the players’ welfare or hydration is a furphy. It only serves to have teams regroup and reinforce their attacking and defensive structures for the next 20 minutes.

Despite these points, the most compelling evidence of this unevenness in application of the drinks break is in the lower grades. Granted they are not specifically under the auspices of the National Rugby League, but the Harold Matthews and SG Ball competitions (NSW Under-16 and Under-18 junior representative games) have been played in the summer months at mid-afternoon timeslots for as long as I can remember.

They all went ahead last weekend in more trying conditions than the NRL games and nobody gives it a second thought.

I have officiated in NRL games in Darwin – where the mercury was still pushing 40 at 7pm – Townsville and Cairns.

I was on the Gold Coast in Round 1, 2009 when, just like last weekend, the Knights took on the Titans. Except that year, the game kicked off at 1pm Queensland time on a Sunday afternoon.

Now that was hot – at the end of that game I had dropped 2.8 kilograms in lost fluid since kick off, and laid down on the change-room floor with a bag of ice under one arm and another between my legs. What a sight that must have been.

Even so, that wasn’t the hottest I’ve been at a footy game. In 2000, the year Sydney hosted the Olympic Games, all sport was shifted a month early to accommodate the September schedule.

At that time I was a lower grade official dreaming of getting into the graded ranks, when I found myself at Windsor on a Saturday afternoon in January as touch judge for both the Matthews and Ball trials between Penrith and Easts.

It was that hot that I was dizzy. The Windsor staff left a hose running at the side of the field the whole time so that the interchanged players and I could seek some solace in some running water on the face or neck.

By the end of it I was wobbly and faint. There’s not the same support for lower grade officials as there is at first-grade level.

I sat in the sheds with a bottle of water but was unable to drink it. The Windsor guys brought in some electrolytes for us and I could take some of that without feeling nauseous. It wasn’t much fun now that I reminisce about it. I hate to think how the players were coping!

After I showered and changed, I left the rooms to find that the Round 1 competition games of the Jersey Flegg and NSW First Division (as it was then known, today’s NSW Cup) had both been cancelled on advice of the doctors. It was too hot, so better to cancel it. And by that time the temperature was cooler than it was when we kicked off!

So what’s going on? NRL players are too precious, while the lower grade players and officials have to simply get on with it? I can’t even call it a double standard when so many standards are applied.

Get rid of the NRL’s drinks break. It’s insulting to every other tier of rugby league.

The Crowd Says:

2016-03-15T20:41:48+00:00

3 Hats

Guest


I mentioned the "others" because of the misconception between many Journos and also Comments.

AUTHOR

2016-03-15T11:44:47+00:00

Dan Eastwood

Expert


Thank you 3 Hats. I mentioned in the article that the NRL Club Medicos had to agree. I don't know why you included things other people have said. The humidity plays a role in heat stress, I gather that. However I don't believe a break is necessary at all.

2016-03-11T15:05:49+00:00

3 Hats

Guest


Barry, The actual LAW states that workers in the Heat of Summer should not have to work in temperatures above 42 degrees Celcius. I know this to be true as it happened to me a couple of years ago.

2016-03-11T14:55:48+00:00

3 Hats

Guest


WELL, Dan Eastwood, and fellow readers. I am going to tell you guys on here some FACTS about these, NRL drinks breaks. The MISCONCEPTION is that some clubs are favoured Souths and Easts while some were not Canberra and Penrith, that is absolute rubbish. ALSO, it has been reported by Television, Radio and Print Journos who couldn't be bothered to find out the correct information! Some have said it was the Coach and/or the players decision... FALSE Some said it was the Officials... FALSE Some even suggested it was the Ground Managers... FALSE The FACTS are these drinks breaks were offered to ALL CLUBS. It is the Team Medicos, the doctors who decide to have a break, AND that BOTH doctors must agree to it. If one says NO, then NO BREAK! Ray Warren on Channel 9 got it 100% correct. They explained exactly how the Whirling Psychrometer measures both the temperature and the humidity. Apparently in Canberra the temperature was HIGH, but NOT the Humidity At the SFS BOTH were high, I know this, I was there enjoying my Rabbitohs smash the hated enemy!

2016-03-11T04:49:33+00:00

Michael gardiner

Guest


It's obvious the summers are getting longer and hotter, the NRL must have the safety of players in mind, so the first few rounds of the comp would have to be played at night. Better to be on safe side heat exhaustion can be dangerous.

2016-03-09T11:12:30+00:00

spruce moose

Guest


But dan, (and my last comment on this i promise) I do actually think you were in a near death experience, you just may not be aware of it. Which is my point. People think they are fine, when in fact they are dangerously close to acute renal failure and why ALL grades should have a mandatory drinks break policy in hot weather.

2016-03-09T11:09:56+00:00

spruce moose

Guest


Indeed so dan! ☺

2016-03-09T11:03:00+00:00

no one in particular

Roar Guru


No, Pepper Jaxck is correct. Off season training in summer has conditioned the body for the heat. The biggest issue during the game is over-hydration, where salt content is diluted and cramps become the least of the issues

2016-03-09T06:26:46+00:00

turbodewd

Guest


Pepper, you are confusing cardio fitness with hydration - completely different things. An unfit person can be well hydrated and survive a situation where a fit person is underhydrated.

2016-03-09T06:25:41+00:00

turbodewd

Guest


Agreed.

AUTHOR

2016-03-09T06:11:52+00:00

Dan Eastwood

Expert


I sincerely hopes nobody dies from heat complications in rugby league. However, if we want to protect players from every risk we won't be able to play the game at all. I reiterate the point that there are many opportunities for hydration at tries, on the interchange bench, in possession and attacking, video ref referrals, scrums - a manufactured stoppage is unnecessary. But we can disagree on this Spruce and we can talk about something else next week!

2016-03-09T05:22:07+00:00

spruce moose

Guest


When someone dies Dan, I look forward to your defence of this article. And don't for a second think it can't happen. You can manage fatigue as a strategic tactic within the boundaries of sensible duties of care towards players. It's laughable you can't see that.

2016-03-09T04:18:27+00:00

Pepper Jack

Guest


If players are conditioned then it isn't an issue. If will effect those that haven't done the pre-season work. Only unfit people like us will be in danger

AUTHOR

2016-03-09T03:35:04+00:00

Dan Eastwood

Expert


Spruce I hope I didn't exaggerate my experience to near death, but it was certainly uncomfortable. Competition games were cancelled when lower games went ahead. That beats whatever lack of logic I might have displayed through my writing.

AUTHOR

2016-03-09T03:29:39+00:00

Dan Eastwood

Expert


Part of what I was saying is we seem to be arguing the lack of fatigue as well as wanting more breaks. We can't have both. I believe there is ample opportunity for water in an NRL game regardless of the temperature.

2016-03-09T02:57:30+00:00

Epiquin

Roar Guru


Mid seventies? Jeez that's hot! ;)

2016-03-09T02:57:05+00:00

spruce moose

Guest


It seemed ridiculously out of touch with his own experiences. He was painting a picture as if he was near death when he was a touchie (and frankly, I’ve no doubt that he probably did his body some serious damage) and yet then essentially said “well, we lower grade stock survived, so I’m sure the pro’s will”, which is a ridiculous extension of an originally flawed logic.

2016-03-09T02:50:06+00:00

Dean - Surry Hills

Guest


If you can't stand the heat then get out of the kitchen. I think a shaded area for a quick break each quarter is warranted when the mercury climbs above 35 degrees Celsius. The hottest day I can remember as a kid was at a Manly vs Balmain match at Leichardt oval in the mid seventies. Swarms of bees were constantly attempting to dive-bomb our cans of soft drink, in an attempt to cool down! I've never seen anything like it to this day.

2016-03-09T02:47:28+00:00

Alexander Clough

Roar Pro


I agree, seemed ridiculously out of touch with current medical science regarding dehydration. There should be a mandatory drinks break every 20 minutes at all levels of the game (and indeed, in every sport) when temperature and humidity reach a combined level. And to equate a quick squirt with a water bottle to actually taking a proper gulp as well as replacing lost salts from say a 5 minutes drinks break is misguided. I'm sure the TV execs would love it as well (extra ad time/time to promote no ads on foxtel), as well as giving the crowd a break to top up with their chosen liquids. Appears to be a no-brainer, and I also agree with an above comment about Canberra scheduling. Would love an insight into Canberra vs Melbourne game times.

2016-03-09T00:58:56+00:00

spruce moose

Guest


Exactly. That's what needs to happen. Expecting the players to toughen up is ridiculous.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar