Five tricky teasers for Super Rugby Round 6

By Brett McKay / Expert

Round 6 could be something of a moving week in Super Rugby, with all but one game pitting teams in close table proximity against each other.

The eighth-placed Lions host seventh-placed Crusaders. The Blues in 13th host the 12th-placed Jaguares. The third-placed Brumbies host the competition-leading Chiefs.

The two cellar-dwellers meet in Port Elizabeth, and the South African derby pits the 11th-placed Bulls against the Cheetahs in 14th. To finish, the Waratahs in tenth host the Rebels in ninth.

It represents an opportunity for all winners to jump ladder positions, and when viewed like this, it does add some further overall intrigue to the round.

Michael Hooper vs Sean McMahon – the start of something?
This has been one contest I’ve been looking forward to for a few weeks. Michael Hooper has been one of the Waratahs’ best in 2016, but equally, the Melbourne Rebels captaincy – even if only temporary – seems to have lifted Sean McMahon’s game to new levels, too.

I’ve very deliberately not looked at the numbers, but my own perception is that both players have lifted their work rates, and impressively so. To my eyes, it seems as though Hooper is playing a little tighter with a couple of younger backrow partners, and though he’s still not necessarily winning a lot of turnovers, it feels like he’s having a bigger impact on slowing down the opposition.

McMahon, to me, feels like he is winning more ball this season, but that could easily be put down to him playing the genuine openside role. I don’t know that he’s carrying more than last season, but it does feel like he’s getting though more work in defence.

EVERY SUPER RUGBY GAME LIVE ON FOXTEL

If someone has looked at the numbers, it would be interesting to see whether my perception matches reality.

Regardless, it shapes as an interesting battle on Sunday, even if they won’t necessarily come into contact with each other that much. With Liam Gill practicing his French, and David Pocock preparing to cover new school books, it feels like these two could be setting up a nice little rivalry for the Wallabies No.7 in 2017.

What would constitute a moral victory for the Force in Dunedin?
At the time of writing, and of around 250 votes for this match among The Crowd’s tips for Round 6, just eight of you clicked the Western Force to beat the Highlanders tonight. How many of the eight actually believe they can genuinely win is an entirely different story.

The Highlanders are unbeaten in Dunedin this season, and it’s actually just over a year since their last loss under the roof. Further though, since their horror season in 2013 when they ran second-last, the Highlanders have lost just four of 19 games. Two of those four were to the Crusaders, and the first of those four losses, coincidentally enough, was to the Force in Round 5 of 2014.

In 2016, the Highlanders are scoring 3.2 tries per game and conceding two, at an average scoreline of 27.8 points to 18.6. The Force have the worst attacking record in the competition – just four tries in five games – and only the Kings are conceding more tries in defence. The Highlanders rank fourth overall for clean breaks, while the Force rank fourth overall for missed tackles.

(Interestingly, the Highlanders rank quite highly for missed tackles, too, but the Force make so few breaks themselves – and beat only an average number of defenders – per game that it’s unlikely to make a difference.)

So what’s a good result for the Force? A bonus point loss? Two tries? Not conceding a three-tries-plus bonus point?

Given the Force battle to score points themselves – they barely average 14 points per game, but remember they’re not even scoring one try per game – I would think keeping the Highlanders to less than three tries ahead would be a massive effort for the Force in their current form.

Unless someone really thinks they can win. In which case, I’m all ears as to how that can happen.

Off-field issues versus a lap of the southern hemisphere?
The Brumbies-Chiefs game shapes as a cracker, probably the match of the round, and not just for what will be an intriguing match-up on the field.

The Brumbies’ off-field saga is now well documented – albeit missing some crucial details – and is no closer to a resolution.

The Chiefs, since their last home game in Round 2, have travelled from Hamilton to Port Elizabeth to Buenos Aires to Hamilton and now to Canberra. With transit legs along the way, including piling into three tiny planes from Sau Paulo in Brazil down to BA, they’ve conservatively covered more than 33,000 kilometres, and have spent anywhere up to 80 hours in the air!

The Chiefs have something of a lengthy injury toll building, while the Brumbies have just Henry Speight unavailable currently. Their on-field form is good, very good. Currently the best in their respective countries according to the tables. They will both, pending some kind of spectacular implosion, play finals rugby this year.

So where is the edge between them? Can the Brumbies’ defence and breakdown negate the Chiefs’ offload and broken play game? Can the Chiefs win enough territory to create the chances? Can the Brumbies keep the penalty count down?

All good questions, questions I look forward to seeing from my plastic Bunnings chair on the sideline.

18th versus 17th a potential match of the round?
The Sunwolves seem to have become everyone’s second team, and the Kings were actually quite good for 50-60 minutes last week against the Hurricanes. Neither team have had a win in 2016, but the desperation to break the duck will be its highest this season.

And I’ll guess I’m not alone in thinking this, that this game could actually be a cracker! The Kings are the worst defenders in the comp, but will it matter? The Sunwolves play a wonderfully up-tempo game, and are even starting to finish things nicely – is there a better finisher in the comp than Akihito Yamada? – but are they actually creating enough opportunities?

I reckon this game could be quite high-scoring, maybe 40-35 or something like that, but it will be close, and it’ll be entertaining. Well worth the late night Saturday.

Method to the madness in Benn Robinson’s honesty?
The revelations this week from Waratahs prop Benn Robinson certainly triggered some hearty discussion on The Roar. For every Roarer saying he was out of line, there was another saying it refreshingly honest to hear a player speaking so openly.

I was and am of the latter opinion, for what it’s worth, but I get the point of those believing he was out of line.

So what if it was all staged? What if Robinson was staying ‘on message’ and the whole thing was about a young Waratahs pack getting an ideally private rocket in a very public way?

Though they’ve changed a few combinations here and there, there hasn’t been any improvement to speak of. So could it actually have been a very public challenge from the coaches and senior players to the younger guys, and the guys who’ve been on the fringe for a long, long time, to all lift their collective scrummaging game?

We’ll find out on Sunday if it had the desired effect. If it was all staged – and I have no idea if it was or wasn’t – then it might just be Darryl Gibson’s biggest coaching masterstroke yet.

The Crowd Says:

2016-04-01T22:07:54+00:00

Machooka

Roar Guru


So Zero you've never been called out to lift your game by a colleague?

2016-04-01T21:23:19+00:00

Zero Gain

Guest


If it was scripted then it is deceitful and will have the opposite affect on team morale. If it wasplain honesty from the player then it is much more valuable and praiseworthy, isn't it.

2016-04-01T11:48:14+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


Digger, what I am gleaning from our Argie friends (I'm working with Carlos on a referee article) is that the Jaguares bought into the "we're the RWC Semifinalist" and thought they could play 100% attack in the games against the SA teams and then rotate young players in after winning a few of the first five rounds. The first win probably fed that narrative

2016-04-01T11:38:12+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


The Wolves will howl lonely cries of sadness as their over mindedness is overcome by the savage mindlessness of the Kings

2016-04-01T06:41:08+00:00

ThugbyFan

Guest


You could be on a good thing ClarkeG. On TV now and Force scored the 1st try after 3 minutes. Hodgson killing them in the rucks. Just 76 minutes to hold on. :)

AUTHOR

2016-04-01T06:14:27+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


Nothing more than what I've reported over the last week or so, Will. As far as the actual reason for Michael Jones being stood down, I'm very much in the dark as everybody is. Both Stephen Moore and Stephen Larkham today said that it's just not something the players have been worrying about, mostly because a lot of them don't know themselves. Moore said he stopped reading about it last Sunday - because he couldn't follow it any further himself! Fingers crossed the players are as unaffected as they're saying they are..

AUTHOR

2016-04-01T06:10:28+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


I just genuinely lol'd :lol: I can't remember the last time you made me do that...

2016-04-01T06:05:58+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


5? Lazy.

2016-04-01T05:54:32+00:00

The power of Will

Roar Pro


Brett, do you have any information on what is really happening in the brumbies boardroom as the fans are not being told, because of these off-field dramas the brumbies will have an even harder game against the chiefs

2016-04-01T05:38:51+00:00

Old Bugger

Guest


Cheers Brett for the research and update.

2016-04-01T05:31:43+00:00

Digby

Roar Guru


Thanks Harry, must of missed their posts. It seems the planning has left a bit to be desired.

2016-04-01T05:30:36+00:00

Digby

Roar Guru


Yes, sorry that was supposed to say 6 against, that's what happens when you rush. Really odd stance to me, at the start of the year looking at the draw you would have surely been rapped at not having to play the Highlanders and Chiefs in NZ and could really target this tour to make a mark on the competition. For a new franchise, I just can't understand the reasoning at all. Surely, for the strength of their squad they would have ambition to be in the semis?

2016-04-01T05:19:19+00:00

Allanthus

Guest


He's an absolute machine FF. No respect for his own body at all.

AUTHOR

2016-04-01T05:10:19+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


OB, as you well know, Home teams have had the advantage in Super Rugby since time immemorial. In 2014, Home teams won 85 games to Away's 33, and in 2015, it eased back a bit, 70 Home, 54 Away. But, this time last year, the Away teams held the advantage, and did so until about halfway through the season before things started turning back toward the Home sides. By the end of Round 5 last season, it was Home 14, Away 20 - meaning that over the remaining 13 rounds and 3wks of Finals, Away teams won only 34 more games. So the further the season goes, the harder teams become to beat at home..

2016-04-01T05:09:15+00:00

AndyS

Guest


My recollection is that something like 45 minutes constitutes a match played. The Force seems to stay in touch in the first half before wilting, so maybe their best bet is to stay close, find some way to get their nose in front and have someone standing next to the stadium power box with an insulated axe...

2016-04-01T03:49:51+00:00

ForceFan

Guest


Totally agree with the comments about Missed Tackles. I report it for completeness. I'd rather add the two numbers together as another measure of work rate. I don't think that Hodgson cares about Missed Tackles. The Stats won't prevent him running half the width of the pitch to attempt to grab a ball carrier who has gone past several Force players. Some of his missed tackles have been a last ditch effort to make an ankle tap when most other players wouldn't even have tried. He's been known to save a try by bringing down an unsuspecting ball carrier with no more than a thumb and two-finger grab of the jersey. The reality is that he's still making so many more tackles than many others.

2016-04-01T03:44:31+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


You may have a point and that is why I foolishly picked the Force over the Chiefs last week and look how that turned out.

AUTHOR

2016-04-01T03:35:40+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


I don't have an answer for this OB, but I do want to add something to it - but I'll have to come back to you!! (lifts suspense, walks away... :) )

AUTHOR

2016-04-01T03:34:12+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


I don't know of anywhere that counts rucks even as remotely close as you do, FF, so I reckon you'll be really up against it trying to find a 'pens forced' number. I bet the teams have it though - I remember Laurie Fisher years ago telling me how the teams see missed tackles numbers much differently to how we the punter sees them. He gave me an example where in a game one particular player ( a forward, from memory) had missed three tackles from maybe only ten attempts. To us, a 70% success rate doesn't look great, but Laurie was able to pull out his numbers which showed of those three misses, two of them were well before the advantage line, and enabled tackle assist players to have a crack at the ball. So what we saw as not real flash, they actually saw as really good..

2016-04-01T03:29:12+00:00

Allanthus

Guest


Hey CP, how did you go at Byron? Who impressed the most? Must say, despite plenty of sport to watch I really missed it this Easter. Hopefully we'll be back to normal next year. Caught Allen Stone last night and Vintage Trouble on Weds night - that was a heap of fun!

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar