Championship lessons learnt in Barcelona

By Michael Lamonato / Expert

What. A. Race.

Formula One has been fortunate enough to have had four opening rounds of pretty decent racing, but the 2016 Spanish Grand Prix offered the perfect blend of wheel-to-wheel action, strategic variation, and championship-defining permutations to make it a modern-day classic.

Most critically it featured a new winner – the lifeblood of the sport – and at just 18 years old and in only his third year of racing any sort of single-seater car Max Verstappen’s first visit to the top step will prove to be a pivotal moment in the sport’s history.

We can put aside that big-picture thinking for a moment. We’ll surely have the better part of 20 years, if not more, to talk about Verstappen’s Formula One successes. The Spanish Grand Prix could prove pivotal in the (relatively) short-term prospect of the 2016 drivers championship.

It was easy to forget after a tense 66 laps that the grand prix was made a thriller by the elimination of both Mercedes cars mere seconds after the lights went out when Lewis Hamilton and Nico Rosberg collided on the run down to turn four.

Rosberg, realising from the lead that his car was in the wrong power unit mode, was travelling as much as 17 kilometres per hour slower than his teammate out of the third turn. Hamilton pounced, choosing to make a move down the right-hand side, which would win him the inside line to turn four – but Rosberg claimed the space at the latest possible moment, closing the door just as Hamilton reached his car.

Feeling he had earnt the space and thus choosing not to back off, Hamilton put his car onto the grass, at which point he lost control of his W07, which spun into the sister Mercedes and eliminated both from the race.

It was a flashpoint similar to that at the 2014 Belgian Grand Prix, when the pair collided on the first lap after Rosberg rejected Hamilton’s attempt to close the door through the chicane.

Rosberg, halfway through Mercedes’s first championship year, had already grown tired of Hamilton’s bullish – though completely legal – racing style. His clumsy and belated response punctured Hamilton’s tyre and put him out of the race, pushing the team on the brink of civil war.

It’s fascinating to reflect on how far both Mercedes and Nico Rosberg have come since they first awkwardly grappled with the championship lead two years ago.

Then Mercedes wasted little time coming down hard on Rosberg. He was chastised publicly after the race by team leaders, a later press release reaffirmed this decision and added that he would be suitably punished, and he was mandated to release a written public apology to his team and teammate.

It was psychologically devastating for a driver in the heat of his first championship fight, and Rosberg wilted to concede all bar one of the seven races remaining that season and the subsequent year’s championship.

But that isn’t the same Rosberg we’re dealing with today.

This is a Nico Rosberg who has nothing to lose after being mercilessly beaten into submission last season and who conceded the title in Austin both by allowing Hamilton to push him wide at the first turn and by later making a crucial mistake in the final stint to gift his teammate the lead.

This is a Nico Rosberg who has developed an aggressive streak – a position defined by holding the lead at all costs by forcing the attacking driver to avoid contact.

This is a Nico Rosberg who is wielding his championship lead to neutralise Hamilton’s psychological advantage.

While it was a simple racing incident, those who suggest Rosberg earnt more blame neglect to give weight to the fact that only Hamilton could see the full extent of the risk of the move. Closing the door did exactly what Rosberg intended it to do – it put the responsibility on Hamilton to pull out.

“It was a clear, strong move to make sure he understood there was not going to be any space there,” said the German after the race. “I was very surprised he went for it anyway.

“I wasn’t surprised because I didn’t see him, I was surprised he still went for the inside gap.”

Certainly aggressive – but, inversely, imagine the response Rosberg would have earnt had he swerved back to the left to make way for his teammate.

This time last year my column noted that Rosberg’s timid response to coming second made him vulnerable to the type of on-track bullying to which Hamilton frequently subjected him.

At the time Niki Lauda sided with Hamilton: “All racing drivers are selfish, egotistical bastards. That’s the only way you can win,” he said.

But little more than 12 months later, change is in the air.

“Lewis was too aggressive to pass him, and why should Nico give him room?” the Austrian asked rhetorically. “He was in the lead; it was very simple for me. I blame him more than Nico.”

Is this the long-awaited dawn of a Nico Rosberg capable of taking the fight to Hamilton? With a healthy championship lead and 16 races to defend it, there’s no time like the present for him to find his inner bastard.

Follow @MichaelLamonato on Twitte

The Crowd Says:

2016-05-18T12:56:00+00:00

Rodney Gordon

Expert


It's valid to say that the car was an unknown, but as the tyres proved the experts just got it wrong and two stopping was ultimately the right strategy to be on.

AUTHOR

2016-05-18T12:24:01+00:00

Michael Lamonato

Expert


But even in the situations that Rosberg was leading the title in 2014 I don't remember him being aggressive with Hamilton — or, really, the only time he tried to bully him back was in Belgium, which was poor craft. Aside from raw qualifying pace Rosberg has never had the track presence Hamilton's had, at least until this week. I thought it was also interesting that there wasn't much defensiveness on Rosberg's part after the crash — he's comfortable playing this part, whereas I've never felt he has been before. Yeah, I don't dispute Verstappen was lucky RBR outsmarted itself when Ricciardo was in the lead (or, as Mark Webber suggested, Red Bull just loves records...) but his weekend as a whole was fantastically impressive. It wasn't just managing his tyres against Raikkonen, it was managing his tyres in a car he'd had only a couple of hours of experience in during a stint length that hadn't been considered before the race. And that's before you consider his qualifying performance, which only a Ricciardo ace was able to defeat (and even then Daniel had the benefit of four GP weekends and testing to know how to find the RB12's sweet spot). He was just on it immediately despite the situation, which I think entitles him to credit for earning that win. A lesser driver thrown into that car wouldn't have pulled it off.

AUTHOR

2016-05-18T12:07:36+00:00

Michael Lamonato

Expert


Yeah, it was great — it was just so well balanced between the top four from the very beginning. I can't remember the last time I was so attentive for 100 per cent of the distance.

2016-05-18T12:03:34+00:00

Naveen Razik

Roar Pro


Who'd have thought Kimi Raikonnen would be 2nd in the Drivers Standings after 5 races! This year certainly seems earmarked to be that of a classic. Rosberg's lead will make the chase from Hamilton even more exciting, and the best is yet to come...

2016-05-18T10:35:13+00:00

Rodney Gordon

Expert


Two things I'd say. 1) Rosberg in the past needed to finish the race and score points, which led to some vanilla racing and half-hearted challenges (for which he was heavily criticised), but this year is completely different. For better or worse, Rosberg has a huge points led, which means he can challenge/defend as aggressively as he likes because if they take each other out it only strengthens his position. 2) We can heap praise on Verstappen, and it's a fantastic result for the sport, but there was a huge amount of luck to his win - frankly it was far from hard-earned. Granted he had to manage his tyres and defend against a former world-champion, but part of me thinks that even Kvyat could almost have won the race from the same position that Max found himself in. If he can get another few wins this year I'll be more convinced.

2016-05-18T10:07:24+00:00

Nicholas Belardo

Roar Guru


I used to do that pre Fox days, but it didn't even click to me until about an hour later to do that. Lucky I found a way to get past the Sky block on their website because they had already loaded up a few clips like Ants analysis, Ted's notebook, and a few of the paddock interviews. But seriously, what a race. I don't think I've been that engulfed in a race from start to finish, since.. probably Brazil 2012 is the one to stick in my mind, and that includes the few live blogs I've done.

AUTHOR

2016-05-18T09:52:11+00:00

Michael Lamonato

Expert


Ha! Turns out Foxtel isn't the only broadcaster in the whole wide world to show Formula One. Some of the others even broadcast on the internet...

2016-05-18T09:43:53+00:00

Nicholas Belardo

Roar Guru


Gah. Hear*

2016-05-18T09:37:33+00:00

Nicholas Belardo

Roar Guru


Wait, how did you here what Rosberg said after the race??

AUTHOR

2016-05-17T23:09:06+00:00

Michael Lamonato

Expert


Yeah, you couldn't be sure Max would win until that very last chicane, pretty much. A real thriller, I loved every second of it. I'm still buzzing!

AUTHOR

2016-05-17T23:08:22+00:00

Michael Lamonato

Expert


I do love that phrase — and important one, too! Particularly as Hamilton now has one fewer race to close the same points gap.

AUTHOR

2016-05-17T23:07:19+00:00

Michael Lamonato

Expert


Haha, I'm glad I had an influence — though there's probably some rule whereby you have to complete more than three corners to be eligible! I mostly agree that many other drivers could have done what Max did (Pastor did...) with the one significant exception that he had to nurse super-worn tyres against one of the most experienced tyre managers in the business in a car he'd never driven before that weekend. I think that was just so impressive, particularly as he never put so much as a wheel out of line for all 32 laps.

AUTHOR

2016-05-17T23:05:03+00:00

Michael Lamonato

Expert


I don't think Daniel was a sore loser — I think he was understandably gutted to have strategy turn his confident lead of the race into a fourth place, especially considering, as I understand it, no-one at Red Bull so much as mentioned a three-stop strategy before the race had started. Christian Horner paradoxically said himself after the race that they knew the three stop would be hard to make work, but they went for it anyway. I think both Ferrari and Red Bull Racing outsmarted themselves with Vettel and Ricciardo. Both took their eyes off the ball assuming both would just be in contention for the victory. On the second point, possibly! I think it'd be good if the FIA took more of a hands-off approach when the clash involves teammates (unless it's a really, really stupid accident), just because it can be left to the teams to discipline them. But I also agree with the ruling that the closing speed is what was the root cause of the crash — 17 kilometres per hour is heaps.

2016-05-17T10:03:48+00:00

Simoc

Guest


Poor old Daniel Ricciardo. Proved to be a poor loser. But if you're desperate, that is required. And I doubt Mark Young can see at all. There can't be to many bods slower than him. As time will show. You can bet your life that if the names on the cars were reversed , Rosberg would be banned for taking Hamilton out. Hamilton got lucky and got out of a 10 grid penalty for Monaco.

2016-05-17T05:02:28+00:00

Cortez

Roar Rookie


Definitely the most enjoyable race of the last season or two simply because it was a contest right until the final lap. I wonder how many people actually continued to tune into the coverage once the two Mercedes were out when they would have otherwise changed channels staring down the barrel of another lifeless procession masquerading as an F1 race.

2016-05-17T03:59:42+00:00

Cento

Guest


Good assessment Michael and Mark Young is right too. I missed the start of the race as my long anticipated stream dropped out on the warm up lap and didn't come back until lap 11. I'm glad Nico held his ground. As you suggest Michael, it's in Lewis' court to explain why he persisted with the move given he could see everything and Nico very little. What is it they say? To finish first, first you have to finish."

2016-05-17T01:11:14+00:00

Mark Young

Roar Guru


I voted for Nico Rosberg as the Driver of the Day, simply because of what you said.. by indicated to Lewis that he was not going to get pushed around on the track he has guaranteed us a fine season. You are spot on, he has been meek in the past few years and this is a real change. Well done also to the FIA for declaring it a racing incident. Max? Nice Race win but there are fifteen other drivers who could have delivered that result. But he is 18? Yes but he has been racing seriously for years and years. I need to see more from him before I jump on the bandwagon!

Read more at The Roar