The Lions: Worthy African finalists

By Brett McKay / Expert

Amid all the talk over the weekend around the finals format, and particularly how the 2016 format gives the South African teams a rails run, one little detail was consistently overlooked.

The Lions will earn a playoffs spot on pure performance, not charity. And further, they will take some beating.

Second on the Super Rugby table heading into the recess – and second however you want to frame it; outright, or by conference format – the Lions have one hand on the Africa 2 conference title already. They can wrap that up properly with a win over the Sharks in Round 15 when the competition resumes.

Their super-impressive thumping of the Bulls was notable for two reasons.

Firstly, it broke the duck of the Lions’ franchise at the Bulls’ Loftus Versfeld home fortress. Though the Cats beat the Bulls in Pretoria several times in the first few seasons of the original Super 12 competition, the Lions as a franchise had never won in the Capital. The closest they had been was a two-point loss in Round 12 last season.

Secondly, with the Chiefs losing in something of an upset to the Waratahs of Friday night, and without so much as a bonus point, the Lions’ seven-tries-to-three demolition of the fairly pedestrian Bulls pushed them ahead of the men from the Waikato by 30 differential points.

The Lions genuinely have the second-best record in the competition, now, and they trail the Crusaders by less than a win. Their record sits very comparably with both the Crusaders and the Chiefs, too.

Importantly, they also have a six-point gap over the third-placed Stormers as the Africa 1 conference leaders, with the Brumbies a further two points behind atop the Australian conference.

After the Sharks, the Lions will host the Kings before heading to Argentina to take on the Jaguares, who may or may not have enough non-suspended players to field a team by then.

As long as they keep winning, the Lions will hold onto second place overall, which not only gives them the home advantage for the Quarter Final, it also puts them in the box seat to host a semi at Ellis Park, should they win through in the first week.

On their effort at Loftus, this is beginning to look very, very probable.

You might recall late last week I was rather nervous about the Bulls-Lions tip, and I have to admit that most of the angst was self-inflicted.

Had I just read the team announcement email from the Lions when it came through on Thursday, I’d have seen that coach Johan Ackermann solved his lack-of-Elton Jantjies problem by ending the season-long exile of Marnitz Boshoff. This was the first surprise when the teams flashed up in the very early hours of Sunday morning.

The second surprise was that Marnitz Boshoff was still at the Lions! I honestly thought he’d left last season, though perhaps I was now processing the news from earlier in the season that Boshoff will be joining new Pro12 Champions Connacht as something that had already happened.

Whatever the reason, he wasn’t at Murrayfield beating up on Leinster, he was at Loftus kicking the Bulls out of the game, and maybe, the run to the playoffs.

Ackermann had said in the team announcement reports that he wasn’t expecting Boshoff to play like Jantjies, which was pretty sound thinking. But it was clear the expectations were high.

“Marnitz has played at the highest level, played in finals and so we can’t ask for more in terms of experience. He must just enjoy the moment and know the team will back him and look after him,” Ackermann had said.

“He can handle the pressure and obviously he is a good goal kicker so that is a plus. He brings something different.”

And that something different is poise. Elton Jantjies is a wonderful player, an instinctive player who relies on his speed and his creativity to make things happen. Boshoff is pretty much the complete opposite, but you could easily make the argument that his vision and game management – as much as his tactical and goal kicking – actually make the Lions a stronger team.

Because just as I pondered the other day about the Waratahs without Kurtley Beale, the Lions now know they can’t rely on one brilliant individual.

Their performance across the park was the complete team effort as a result; 15 very good matadors working together, rather than 14 others waiting for the one brilliant matador to deliver the one fatal sword.

The Lions were well in control at 25-8 at the break, but four converted tries in the last 25 minutes was commanding. The Bulls were blow out of the contest early and never let back in.

Boshoff directed the Lions to where they needed to be, and kicked nine from twelve for good measure, but it was the Franco Mosterts and the Faf de Klerks and the Rohan Janse van Rensburgs and Jaco Kriels – among many others – that delivered the spark.

The Lions were already a good team; they were already second on the table coming into Round 14. Now though, they look much more dangerous in that they’re a much more rounded team.

Their forwards are very good set piece exponents; maybe the best scrum in South Africa, and definitely the best backrow. Warren Whiteley is finally getting due recognition, Warwick Tecklenburg is pictured in the dictionary next to ‘underrated’, and well, we all know how good Jaco Kriel is.

The top five try-scorers for the season all come from different clubs. That’s not so surprising. Extend the range out a bit further, and you get an idea of the depth of the Lions’ strike power.

Of the 13 players to have scored six tries or more for the season, three of them are from the Lions. Eight other sides feature on the list, and the Chiefs have two in Damien McKenzie and Seta Tamanivalu.

Lionel Mapoe (9), Courtnall Skosan (7), and Ruan Combrinck (6) have 22 tries between them, but the Lions’ 33 other tries come from 16 different players. They’re sharing the load.

In many ways, it’s a shame that the Lions’ clear threat to the Super Rugby title is being lost among other peripheral discussion. Because here’s a South African side right now who, if the playoffs started tomorrow, would – or should – have just as much claim to the title as any side you’d care to name.

A quarter final and a very possible semi at Ellis Park give them a very real advantage, and so it should. Because it’s completely deserved on their 2016 record and current form.

The Crowd Says:

2016-06-01T08:20:48+00:00

Jerry

Guest


"The referee is sole judge of whether or not a team has gained an advantage." Play to the whistle. Don't assume the ref will say you haven't gained an advantage, no matter how self evident that may seem. Don't assume anything.

2016-06-01T03:40:24+00:00

CUW

Guest


@ ClarkeG the second one happened more or less at exactly the same place , like 5 minutes later. only difference was the proximity of the dummy and ball carrier was not so close , but still the ball carrier ran behind the dummy. the whole issue the way i see is , Joubert made up his mind very quickly the first was a try. maybe just like he did against crusaders and sctoland , he jumped the gun. but unlike in those cases he had an opportunity to refer the telly , which he did not. maybe the adrenaline rush of his 100th match got to his brain. however , once the replays went on over and over (remember it is bull country) maybe he was second guessing. but when the second crossing happened he could not blow a penalty - becoz he had already set the precedent in his first judgement. after that he was just being stubborn and not owning upto his first mistake. the downside was Bulls got disheartened by the decision. they started playing like " the ref is against us there is no hope".

2016-06-01T03:31:42+00:00

CUW

Guest


so JERRY , r u suggesting that the LAW BOOK in rugby union take out the multitude of hand signals and just play to the whistle??? " I’m not suggesting Naholo should guess the ref’s intent, I’m saying the exact opposite. Even if the ref has signalled advantage, don’t assume. " when there is a signal , there is no assumption ! maybe u need to read the definition of assume :)

2016-05-31T23:34:49+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


Cheers Harry, will check it out.

2016-05-31T19:23:03+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


That's not a bad idea Harry, if you could be sure to find the right base for it. Or maybe a Pac island team bolstered by extra South Africans. Important to give the Pacific islanders a foundation in Super rugby, atm too many opt for the French academies and end up in Top 14 :)

2016-05-31T19:18:44+00:00

Jerry

Guest


Play to the whistle, it's that simple. I'm not suggesting Naholo should guess the ref's intent, I'm saying the exact opposite. Even if the ref has signalled advantage, don't assume.

2016-05-31T19:15:21+00:00

Jerry

Guest


One big difference with the conference system in the NBA is that - while a team may make the Eastern Conference playoffs and a team with a better record miss the playoffs in the West, the playoffs are kept separate until the finals. And, while division winners do qualify for the playoffs, they don't get automatic home advantage - that's still based on overall record.

2016-05-31T17:01:17+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


If they were paid NZ level wages, I could see many Saffas going to ARG even.

2016-05-31T17:00:45+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


Possibly OZ could add a team that was half SA half OZ

2016-05-31T16:32:56+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


Nic, there are a few teams in the Top 14 and in the Celtic leagues so full of SA players, I think the real issue is how to bring them home (not with bans on test play; but with more money).

2016-05-31T16:30:51+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


If the Jaguares had played as well as the Pumas have in the last two years, Africa 2 might have been the strongest conference.

2016-05-31T15:58:16+00:00

hopalong

Guest


Kings are shameful.But not the players.

2016-05-31T15:56:09+00:00

hopalong

Guest


Mary will reply,

2016-05-31T15:50:58+00:00

hopalong

Guest


Good and balanced article.Thanks Brett.

2016-05-31T15:48:16+00:00

hopalong

Guest


The only SA team who have given me both hope and enjoyment for 10+ years. A team of no namers(1reluctant Bok selection,and that for 1 game.) Their pleasure in the game is self evident.Sorry Abe. As a Sharks supporter,I doff my hat.

2016-05-31T15:46:57+00:00

JT

Guest


Thank you for this piece, it gets tiring reading Spiro and Lordys sensational articles, who like to have a jab at South African rugby whenever they can.

2016-05-31T15:24:56+00:00

AndyS

Guest


I suppose the flip side to that would be the proposition that Aus and SA only have the pool for three or four teams precisely because that was all they had for so long, while NZ have always had five. The old principle of things growing to fill the space allocated to them, even if it takes time. Go back to where it was, it may well be all there ever will be.

2016-05-31T14:32:25+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I certainly think it shows the parity of the top 9 or 10 teams in the tournament Harry. But as an outsider it looks to me like there is too much dilution of the talent available in South Africa and Australia. My gut feeling is that - purely in terms of the talent pool available - 5 teams from SA and either 3 or 4 from Australia is where the expansion in those countries should stop. That would enable all the best Argentine and Japanese players to go back home - appearing for the Jaguares and Sunwolves, plus a bigger foreign talent pool that could also potentially transfer to those teams. The same thing has happened in the English Premiership. There are three teams in it who are below the standard of the others, and now it appears possible that the 12 team league could be expanded to 14 and then ring-fenced (no relegation). I don't believe England has anywhere near enough good players to support such a structure!

2016-05-31T14:09:08+00:00

harry corrigan

Guest


I was told I needed a total knee replacement two years ago, I then tried this http://www.apostherapy.co.uk/en/home I now walk normally with no pain, I can recommend it without reservation.

2016-05-31T12:19:20+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


“So what”? – Jerry I am surprised that you can not see that it makes a difference. The reaction of Naholo and Faddes defending nearer camera says it all. Naholo turns back to where the non knock on occurred probably thinking – what just happened there – and Faddes gesturing with his arms probably thinking the same as Naholo. It was bizarre. I don’t think I have ever seen this happen before. Naholo did not need to guess the referees intentions as the referee had already indicated to all and sundry what his intentions were. What Naholo should and should not have done is irrelevant. He could not be expected to guess that referee would allow play to carry on under these circumstances. His team as far as he was concerned was playing under advantage and his team received no advantage. A player’s mindset changes when he knows his team is under advantage. I don’t see how what Sopoaga did or didn’t do has anything to do with it. That is another issue. It’s not a matter of complaining – it’s a matter of the referee doing the right thing. Yes Jerry I did see that Osborne made a chase after Savea but you can not be sure he did not momentarily relax due to the referee indicating advantage to his side.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar