How to be a man: Lessons from Brendon McCullum

By Anthony Condon / Roar Pro

At the moment I’m writing an academic paper on notions of masculinity in Australian cricket. I’m not going to speak about that here, although I do encourage you to read Roar contributor Geoff Lemon’s work in The Cricket Monthly.

What it means is that I am very much in the mode of thinking about what it means to be a man, and how that plays out on the sports field.

This morning I came across the Colin Cowdry Spirit of Cricket speech given by Brendon McCullum to the MCC.

I, of course, knew McCullum as the wicketkeeper-cum-big-hitting-batsman-cum-Kiwi-captain. I knew he was a class player. But over the last few years, I’ve come to realise he is a man of class.

This was evident during last year’s ICC ODI World Cup. He was gracious in defeat, proud of his team and what they’d achieved; he looked like he’d just spent a day doing something he loved, not like someone had shit in his cereal. He could have easily spoken of “home ground advantage” and how the ledger was 1-1 for the series. Instead, he joked with the media and spoke of the friendships and memories forged during the tournament.

This class came out again at the WACA Test in November 2015, when McCullum got the whole team to form a guard of honour to welcome Mitch Johnson to the crease for the last time. A fitting show of respect for a worthy foe. The Australians just sneered at the ‘altar boy’ attitude.

But it wasn’t always so.

In his speech, he apologised for winning a game in a most unsporting manner; throwing the bails of Muttiah Muralitharan’s wickets as he stepped out of his crease to congratulate Kumar Sangakkara on his century.

He speaks of coming into a team of arrogance and win at all costs. He tells of being bowled out for 45 in 19 overs in South Africa, and that being the turning point. Around a beer with coaches and management, they spoke about wanting to be respected, and came up with how you get respect.

You give it.

He expresses the joy of the game returning to him when he started respecting the opposition. He allowed his team to take risks and to be the best they can be, not to win at all costs.

He recalls another turning point; the Test against Pakistan following the death of Phil Hughes. No one wanted to play. He echoed the advice given to him by team psychologist Gilbert Enoka: “All your preparation, all you have ever thought about in cricket, just throw it out the window for this one game.”

The result was liberating.

In the first Test, they’d suffered their biggest loss against Pakistan ever. In that third Test, they put together the largest ever score by a New Zealand team. In a game where “the result didn’t matter”, the team found the freedom to be their best.

McCullum ended sledging in New Zealand. Sure, there’s still some banter on the field, as there should be, but the ‘abusive’ sledge is gone. Kiwis should be “humble and hardworking”; and it allowed them to be free, to love the game. The reward was arguably the best New Zealand side in generations, probably ever.

Finally, it’s worth mentioning McCullum’s role in the Chris Cairns match-fixing saga.

One has to remember that Cairns was McCullum’s hero. He was the player who took him under his wing when he got his Black Cap. To have testified against him, when he was under no legal obligation to do so, for the virtue of honesty, and the virtue of the game, speaks to the man’s integrity.

Fair play. Respect for your opponent. Love of the game. Integrity. Honesty. Even without holding the record for the fastest century of all time, these qualities make Brendon McCallum a real man and someone worthy of admiration and emulation.

Anthony Condon is a cricket historian at La Trobe university.
Tweet him @AnthCondon

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2016-06-21T22:56:55+00:00

Anthony Condon

Roar Pro


Fair criticism, thanks for your input :)

AUTHOR

2016-06-21T22:56:16+00:00

Anthony Condon

Roar Pro


Isn't that true of everyone? Rolf Harris was a beloved family entertainer. Michael Jackson was the King of Pop. My local parish priest was a trusted and respected member of the community. I totally agree that people shouldn't be put on pedestals. We're Australians; we have a thing with tall poppies: we cut them down. But that doesn't mean you can't point out someone's words and actions and say "yes, this is something to be lauded, something to aspire to". There's a crisis of masculinity in the Western world at the moment. Masculinity is being redefined. And it's the responsibility of all men to say "this is what we should be doing as men, this is what we should be valuing". That's all I'm trying to do here, not to say that McCullum is something better than anyone else.

2016-06-17T01:21:42+00:00

PeterK

Roar Guru


Interesting though that when push came to shove his love of fair play does not always ring true. After looking at big screen replays he then makes a late appeal to umpires for an out which the umpires should not have entertained so they are at fault as well. BTW not questioning that the player was out, just he seemed to revert to win at all costs attitude rather than the saint who would ignore the big screen replay and see that as an unfair way to decide whether to appeal or not.

2016-06-17T00:02:49+00:00

Liam

Guest


Part of the problem for me with McCullum is that I am not sure whether or not his change is real. No-one has ever accused the media of accuracy, and the sporting media is the worst of the bunch. They are caught up in the notions of good and evil, of pugnacity and attack, of creating drama and narrative from sport, and to a certain extent I really wouldn't have it any other way. Who wants to read a table of dry statistics? I wrote an article a while back about how conversations about cricket are so much about the performative, and that exaggerations should be permitted somewhat for the sake of a good story. But, if you follow sport through the media, you will be familiar with the trope McCullum evokes with his bad boy come good story. He's the coach in the Mighty Ducks; he's Keanu Reaves in The Replacements. He's the inspirational leader, who chooses not to play sport by the way the best does, he chooses to be true to himself, and in so doing brings out the best in himself. That is the image he presents to us, the public. My issue here is that, more than anything else, this could all just be another narrative created to sell advertising space. I've had enough of trying to make heroes or titans out of sportsmen and women. Let's all agree that McCullum was a good captain on and off the field, and grew up a lot between the beginning and the end of his career.

2016-06-16T03:57:38+00:00

Tim Vetter

Roar Rookie


Exactly, that's what I'm saying - it's the way of the world and sport has suffered as a result

AUTHOR

2016-06-16T02:54:00+00:00

Anthony Condon

Roar Pro


Professionalism was never quite as big here as it was in the UK. Australian cricketers had second jobs up until the 70s and 80s. However, in England it's always been the case (for at least 200 years) that there are players who make a living travelling around, making nice with the local media (or more commonly, the local landed aristocracy) and who relied on a good show in this match to get a pay cheque for the next. There definitely is something in the intensity of modern life, but that's something we all experience in every aspect of our lives.

AUTHOR

2016-06-16T02:51:23+00:00

Anthony Condon

Roar Pro


If you can't look beyond someone's nationality to praise their exemplary qualities as a human being then you're a racist wanker. So yes, I imagine I will piss off some Aussies.

2016-06-15T08:36:09+00:00

Tim Vetter

Roar Rookie


Yeah I see what you're saying, and I'm under no illusions that money hasn't always played a part, but I think the sheer scale and intensity of not only the sponsorships, advertising, TV rights etc, as well as the level of scrutiny thanks to the 24/7 news cycle and social media, inevitably result in today's sporting landscape being far more commercialised. Obviously I can only speculate, but I would've thought people like Grace and Bradman, ie considered the best of their eras, were extreme anomalies rather than the norm. The fact that today an average state player or T20 specialist playing a couple of tournaments a year can make a good living from the game clearly shows that there is more money involved. And I'm not saying it's the salaries of individual players that contribute to these dehumanising aspects, but rather the business-like strategies that such a sporting environment often forces teams/athletes into.

AUTHOR

2016-06-15T07:45:59+00:00

Anthony Condon

Roar Pro


I saw your article after I'd finished this; thought the eds would have given it a few days rest before putting it up, but oh well! I'm also working on a commercialisation paper, looking at the role World Series Cricket played in bringing neo-liberalism to Australia, but that's probably a year off. I do have to say, however, that the idea that there was a time of purity in cricket is largely a myth (like how every old man remembers his childhood as the "golden era of cricket"). The first Ashes tours were all entirely based on the profit motive; a group would get together, chip in to pay for the tour, then take a share in the profits. Amateur greats like W.G. Grace were rightfully known as "Shamateurs" (his "expenses" payment for his last tour to Oz was about $300 000 in today's money), and Don Bradman was a bigger product pimp than Ricky Ponting. One of the elements I'm exploring at the moment is the way the players of the 70s were essentially caricatures, the "Celebrity Larakin", playing a role to sell (amongst other things) aluminium bats. Cricket was invented as a way for rich blokes to gamble, not much has changed other than the way we remember the past. I think McCullum actually shows that this is true. The purity comes from the leadership within a group; what they value, not from how much money one is making.

2016-06-15T05:51:18+00:00

Tim Vetter

Roar Rookie


Totally agree, Anthony. No-one better to give that lecture. I wrote an article on it too - more focusing on the commercialisation and consequent lack of soul in sport these days, but I'd be interested to read your paper on masculinity in sport - another area of interest for me. http://www.theroar.com.au/2016/06/14/mccullums-message-stop-dehumanising-sport/

AUTHOR

2016-06-15T05:41:18+00:00

Anthony Condon

Roar Pro


I admit I got in a bit late (I'd written this before I saw the other article), but what is it about him that has you so defensive?

2016-06-15T05:27:17+00:00

Marshall

Guest


And the circle-jerk that is Brendan McCullum on the The Roar continues...

2016-06-15T04:48:21+00:00

BBA

Guest


Love the sentiment Anthony, but you might piss off your fellow Aussies if you sing any praise for McCullum. He does get under some Australian's skins.

Read more at The Roar