Awards and reflections from the Australia vs England series

By Matthew Hughes / Roar Rookie

England win 3-nil. To some this was unexpected but to anyone who saw England during the Six Nations, or the Saracens stroll to the European and Domestic double, will have known this was a different England team to the one humiliated in the world cup.

Australia came into the series cold, not having played a Test in anger since the world cup final. The advantage was with England and, through Eddie Jones, they’d found a way to cope with the pressure of playing a southern hemisphere nation in their own back yard.

A series whitewash is an incredible achievement against a team of Australia’s quality, the challenge for both teams now is to move on and develop so they can consistently challenge New Zealand and make the international game competitive again.

But before that there are some awards to give out for what has been an incredible series.

Cotton-Ears
This award is dedicated to the Australian back row for demonstrating a consistent inability to hear or respond to the referee’s instructions.

This is principally for Scott Fardy, but at points in this series it didn’t seem to matter who inhabited the 6, 7 or 8 shirts for the Wallabies, they all ignored the referee.

The final straw came when Australia conceded a penalty in front of their posts from Nigel Owens in the last five minutes of the final Test after he had called ‘contest over’. Discipline killed Australia and an inability to listen to the referee was the root cause.

Redemption
Two candidates for this one. Dylan Hartley, who was left out of the England world cup squad for another unnecessary ban for poor discipline, is a contender. Rather than being the liability many feared, he has been one of the most consistent and calm presences in the England side, guiding England to a series clean sweep for the first time in Australia.

But, he’s not my pick for best redemption story. For me the man who needed redemption most was the previous captain, Chris Robshaw. Like all good 6s they are naturally averse to too much attention and in this series he has been allowed to get on with his job.

Consequently, he has flourished as one of the hardest working players on the field – stealing ball, making tackles or organising the defence, it doesn’t matter what was needed, Robshaw has supplied it.

The Get-it-Right-Eventually Award
This is dedicated to the tactical switch that shouldn’t have been needed in the first place. The obvious contender is the George Ford for Luther Burrell substitution in the first Test but to be fair to Eddie Jones, Ford’s form leading into this series was terrible and Burrell looked the right choice at the time, whereas now I can’t see Ford ever losing the shirt again.

However, the actual recipient of this award is Will Skelton. His performance in the third Test was excellent, he pressured, bruised and intimidated the English forwards, exactly the qualities Australia had been lacking in the previous two games. Will Skelton, I salute you.

Discovery of the Series
This award goes to the player who has appeared from nowhere and changed the direction of the series, the bolter if you will.

For some Maro Itoje wins this hands down, he has been niggle-incarnate this series, a superb athlete and natural leader.

However, if you’re a northern hemisphere fan then in recent years you’ve seen Maro win the Anglo-Welsh cup, the u20s World Cup, the league title twice, the Grand Slam and the European cup. He’s also won the European player of the year award and he might be the first player to complete a perfect season (international and domestic): 26 starts, 26 wins.

Therefore, you can’t really call him a bolter. He’s now pretty much established as one of the best players in the world at the moment.

The actual winner of this award is the Australian wing Dane Haylett-Petty. He gained his first cap in the first Test and produced consistently abrasive and dangerous performances in each game.

At 27, 6’2″ and near 100kgs, he is perfectly positioned to be one of the best international wings for the next three years, if he is nurtured effectively.

Captain Fantastic
Stephen Moore or Dylan Hartley? It’s Dylan Hartley, obviously. Next.

Tactical Genius
The rope-a-dope performance of the second Test has to be one of the best performances by an England side ever. To go to Melbourne, throw the ball to Australia and tell them to run at them would have been suicide with any other England team but somehow they won, and won comfortably. This was down to the tactical kicking of George Ford and Owen Farrell. England’s perennial problem has been the number 12 shirt but now that problem seems to have been solved.

Villain
Scrums, no one to blame but the state of the game that allows this to keep happening.

The scrums are an offensive weapon that you score tries from, not a cynical machine you sneak penalties through. Until props and teams change their mind-set then this will continue to be a blight on the game.

I still recommend fining all props for collapsed scrums that have gone nowhere, or stopping the clock until the ball has entered the tunnel – either way, there’s a long way to go before scrums add anything but three points and frustration to the game.

Player for the Future
Players, and professionals, learn the most about themselves when they lose and this has been a testing series for the Australian players.

Many players have managed to hold their heads up and come out of the series in credit – Israel Falou, Will Skelton, Haylett-Petty are just some of the names that come to mind.

Others have sunk under the pressure – Stephen Moore, Scott Sio and Scott Fardy.

One man, who almost drowned at the beginning of the series but has shown remarkable resilience since then, has been Bernard Foley. The man is quality and will probably get a bit of stick for this series loss but he only got better as the series progressed and when he was given the support of Matt Toomua outside, he was suddenly finding those gaps again.

Don’t abandon this man Australia, he has the potential to win you some big games in the future.

Player of the Tournament
Many candidates but one player stands out for me above all others. Anyone who has followed English rugby over the last ten years will have written him off at some point, he was arrogant when he arrived on the scene, he obviously craved attention and he wasn’t bothered how he got it. The 2011 World Cup was a particular low point, with him being blamed for a lot of the off-field problems that plagued England’s campaign.

It was clear he had potential but it was also clear it was going to waste and then in steps Eddie Jones and James Haskell suddenly becomes a game-winning player. His tackling and work rate around the park has changed the course of the first two Tests and he has inspired his fellow players along the way. As someone who wrote him off in the past, I’m now choking on the humble pie he has forcefully shoved down my throat. Fantastic series for the old man of the English pack.

Final reflections on this series…
England are developing; they have a young side who clearly have the potential to keep winning, the only worry is that they may have peaked too soon, a whole three years before the next world cup. If that’s the case, this series will still count as one of England’s greatest achievements so they should be enjoying the moment.

Whatever happens, Eddie Jones has confirmed himself as one of the great coaches in the game, not necessarily because of his direct input but because of the people he has picked to support him.

This applies to his team selections but also the coaching team he has assembled. Paul Gustard, Steve Borthwick, Neil Hatley and, especially, Glen Ella have been fantastic for England.

Australia are a good side who came up against a better one over the course of 240 minutes of rugby. However, there were periods within that time where they looked irresistible, the first 20 minutes of the first Test being the most obvious example.

Despite the nihilism that will now set in among some fans and commentators, Australia still have quality players, they still have a quality coach, they will hopefully have learnt how to treat the referee in future Tests and they can still improve, a lot.

If David Pocock is fit for the Rugby Championship, then Australia can upset the New Zealand juggernaut. But that’s a conversation for another time. For now, they need to have a beer, identify the things that went well and vow to eliminate the silly mistakes such as discipline and forward selections that have hindered them throughout this series.

The great thing about this series is that it’s made international rugby competitive again. There was a suspicion after the world cup that the northern hemisphere teams had fallen too far behind their southern hemisphere counterparts, fortunately this isn’t the case.

Admittedly New Zealand still look the No.1 side in the world and by some distance but a competitive field is what the other nations need in order to compete in the next world cup. And this has been a hugely competitive series that I have enjoyed immensely.

Thanks to both teams for playing the sport I love the way it should be played – with heart, soul and loads of tries!

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2016-07-01T00:08:48+00:00

Matthew Hughes

Roar Rookie


Thanks, glad you enjoyed the article and it appears that you are not alone in you're view of Skelton. Watching this series, the Australian second rows are a massive weakness and it should probably be taken as a damning indictment of the quality of his competition that for the first time all series i saw a positive in Skelton's aggression. His fitness, game awareness and handling are still poor, but he's a lot better than he was a few years ago. If he continues to improve at his current rate then in two years he shouldn't inspire such a passionately negative response from the roarers. But just to put Australia's second row into context; England Saxons fielded Mitch Lees and Dave Attwood at second row against South Africa B. They are fifth and sixth in the pecking order for England and they are excellent players who would walk into the Aussie second row at the moment. Skelton is a lump but the rest are worse and i really liked him swinging arm challenging everyone, showed some aggression that had been missing. Then he was yanked at 55minutes so maybe i'm totally wrong on this and maybe I was looking a little too hard for positives...

2016-06-29T14:18:10+00:00

Lano

Roar Guru


I enjoyed this article except for the complete misjudgement of Skelton. He is a complete and utter passenger of zero value to the team. Do yourself a favour and wat,ch the game with eyes only on Skelton. Seriously, he is an utter embarrassment to the Wallabys.

2016-06-29T04:27:16+00:00

kiwineil

Guest


Cant argue with much of this .. however three things 1. ........um .. skelton emerges with credit ? sorry, credibility fail .... your view is only correct if you had a very very low starting point to begin with .... .. I read somewhere that Skelton said pre-test III that he doesnt want to be seen as just an impact player ... in my view hes not EVEN an impact player .. at present he would genuinely struggle to get a NZ NPC start .. being a huge unfit nonjumping lump just doesnt cut it in professional rugby, no matter how much mongrel you think you bring to a side. He needs to get out of his own bubble, lose some weight, and stop lumbering slowly forward ... 2. and for a southern hemisphere observer, i thought Itoje wasn't just a revelation, but is already worldclass. Best new talent for the Wallabies - Haylett-Petty .. sure agreed. No issue. But Itoje hands down the revelation of the series ... 3. yr foley view looks very much through a rose coloured prism. But he didnt get much go fwd so im prepared to concede he wasnt as poor as he looked

2016-06-28T06:47:33+00:00

Dave_S

Guest


... and FWIW, I think Mary Magdalene was a hooker.

2016-06-28T06:09:11+00:00

ScrumJunkie

Guest


Absolutely. It's not just the erratic passing that slows the attack, but what is going on in the mind of the receiver because they can't trust that it will be one his good passes. So often they have to stop, or lunge for a low pass or actually jump for high one...

2016-06-28T05:56:12+00:00

Dave_S

Guest


Nah, Jesus played on a wing and a prayer.

2016-06-28T05:53:39+00:00

Dave_S

Guest


Yes, it may not be a representative sample but I specifically watched Phipps's passes for about a 5min period. Only about 1/5th were good passes in front of the runner, and about 1/5th were quite poor passes that put the runner at a real disadvantage or caused an error. The rest, the receiver had to stutter their run or reach up or down for. The problem compounds because the receivers come to expect it will possibly be a poor pass and so don't steam onto it the way AB runners habitually do with Aaron Smith's passes. Hence it is very hard to judge Foley's quality at the moment, playing outside Phipps.

2016-06-28T05:37:14+00:00

ScrumJunkie

Guest


Have to go back and watch again if I can stomach it, but on first impression the receiver had to adjust more often than he got a pass slightly in front of his breadbasket. Some Phipps passes weren't terrible, but how many were perfect? A test level halfback needs to be better.

2016-06-28T05:21:03+00:00

ScrumJunkie

Guest


If AAC is there to cover 13 he gets squeezed out for Taquele Nayivoro. Apologies if I butchered that spelling.

2016-06-28T05:17:20+00:00

ScrumJunkie

Guest


Toomua has much better defence than Beale. Beale's best position is fullback. I agree it seemed likely Beale would start at 12 if he had not been injured, though none of us know for sure. It was unfortunate that Beale and Toomua were both injured at the same time. I stand by my fantasy backline, think they are the best Australian backs. Maybe AAC for Horne if he still has form.

2016-06-28T02:18:10+00:00

pjm

Roar Rookie


Kuridrani is not an impact player so should be out of the side.

2016-06-28T01:03:31+00:00

Lindsay Amner

Roar Guru


Agreed, CUW, but not all Phipps' passes were inaccurate and not all his play was slow. With 70% possession in game 2 he regularly got a good pass away in good time and gave his outsides a chance. But that chance was wasted every time Foley went to the line and then went to ground in the tackle. That's not his role. His role is to ignite those outside him. There are other beefier blokes to smash into the line and take the tackle. Foley should never be doing that, he should be looking to pass every time he takes the line on and his outsides should be expecting that. Obviously the offload was not part of the game plan because he was not looking for it and nor was anyone else. While Phipps was certainly culpable, more for his slowness to pick up and pass, I think Foley was worse.

2016-06-28T00:54:07+00:00

Brisneyland Local

Guest


Foley! An Award. What for the worst kicking I have seen in a series since Jesus played fullback for the Jerusalem first 15. Are you kidding.

2016-06-28T00:08:10+00:00

RubberLegs

Guest


You are 100% right about Skelton. He is big, strong, abrasive and has great hands. The coach needs to find a way to get the ball to him more in the early phases - he ties up the opposition and creates opportunities for the 14 little guys.

2016-06-27T20:21:23+00:00

Carlos the Argie

Roar Guru


Boz, the title of my favorite book is "Thinking, fast and slow". You used a system 1 approach to title recall....

2016-06-27T12:41:46+00:00

taylorman

Roar Guru


Based on this series, there are many options, mostly because the Wallabies have so many weaknesses in key areas. I expect them to turn some of it around as they have time to absorb it all in and look at options, but it's all uphill that's for sure. Especially if Beale and/ or Pocock aren't ready.

2016-06-27T12:28:29+00:00

Loup

Guest


The weaknesses England identified included some of the weaknesses the ABs targeted in the RWC final. ABs will profit if they employ a similar kicking game (but with more variation ala the Highlanders), and attempt to turnover ball at the breakdown more aggressively, starving the Wallabies of both territory and possession.

2016-06-27T11:34:09+00:00

taylorman

Roar Guru


Good points re Englands kicking and I think the way the series went gives the ABs a good look at the Wallabies as well. England have done them a favour in that the kicking option comes into play as well for the ABs. Hansen and Smith and co will be spending a fair bit of time over the next few weeks analysing the oz series so Cheika will need to come up with something fast.

2016-06-27T11:22:44+00:00

Loup

Guest


England were incredibly precise with their kicking and line outs, and this precision is what lifts this England team above the previous one. Kicking and line out dominance really won the 3rd test for England. Wallabies players are short of kicking skills in the backs and need more precision in a whole array of forwards skills (line outs, breakdown, ball-carrying, scrums). These are the most obvious things that need to be remedied in the short term, and the ARU should immediately pull together a skills team that visits the various franchises and provides intensive coaching to all wider Wallabies squad members on skills outside the usual training time for their franchises. Some players e.g. Nayaravoro, Skelton need additional fitness sessions. As far as selections go, Coleman deserves a start in the next test, Phipps' weaknesses are probably uncoachable and he should be relegated to the bench, Kerevi deserves another start and Horne should go to the bench. In the short term the backline should be Frisby, Foley, DHP, Toomua, Kuridrani, Kerevi, Folau.

2016-06-27T10:02:04+00:00

Andy

Guest


Whats wrong with using scrums to get penalties, the other guys have to screw up in order for you to be given the penalty. When you have a gun kicker why not try and win penalties, play to your strengths.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar