The anatomy of a win: Why hard-working Hawks keep getting lucky

By Cameron Rose / Expert

The Hawthorn story continues to inexorably roll along, seven wins in a row seeing them a game clear on top of the ladder, and two games clear of fourth. The sense of impending doom has gripped all non-Hawks supporters.

Irrespective of whether their form is questionable, they are in a dominant position from which to mount their continued quest for a fourth consecutive premiership, even if I wrote them off four weeks ago.

I can assure you, Hawk fans have continued to remind me of it as each win is accumulated!

But, how did they orchestrate the last-gasp victory against Sydney? It’s as much about what the Swans did wrong as what the Hawks did right. Let’s dissect the crucial, match-winning play.

The first still below is taken just as the boundary umpire is about to launch the ball towards the ruckman. Hawthorn are kicking to the right, Sydney to the left.

Two players are letting the Swans down here, Jake Lloyd (44) and George Hewett (29).

We can see on the left that Isaac Smith (16) is Hawthorn’s spare player close the contest, in a much more dangerous position than Hewett in the foreground, who appears to be wondering whether or not he should push over to Josh Gibson on the far left, rather than focussing on what he should be doing – getting an extra number at the contest to force another stoppage.

Hewett should be directing Dan Hannebery (4) to push into the contest to surround Sam Mitchell (the most dangerous stoppage player in the AFL), with Hewett pushing to cover Taylor Duryea (8) himself. Hewett should also be letting Josh Kennedy, currently manning Mitchell, know that Isaac Smith is approaching the contest behind him.

Jake Lloyd is committing two cardinal sins by not being either closer to Jordan Lewis (3), or goal-side of him. Lewis is a renowned third-up specialist, with the second most hit-outs of any standard-sized midfielder in the competition (Ollie Wines is number one). Lloyd here is allowing him a free run to be third-up.

And if Lewis was to win the ball instead of hitting it out, Lloyd is in no position to stop him, especially given Lewis is a left footer and is likely to run toward the boundary, where there is plenty of space and he can freely swing onto his left, with Shaun Burgoyne in a position to shepherd Kieren Jack as you can see on the right.

This is a lack of football intelligence from Lloyd.

Here we see the continuation of Lloyd allowing Lewis to launch third-up, but also Josh Kennedy allowing Sam Mitchell to separate from him. Kennedy is in a tricky position here though, if he is aware of Smith behind him. If he covers Mitchell, he opens up the space for Smith. If he stays where he is, which is what he chooses, Mitchell gets a free run at the ball. All because Hewett and Hannebery weren’t more aware in the first place.

We can see below that Lewis has won the hit out, with Sam Mitchell having a free run to the drop zone. Jake Lloyd is caught in no man’s land – having not been able to stop Lewis, he is also in no position to prevent Mitchell.

If Hewett had done the right thing before the throw in, he would be covering Duryea here, with Hannebery in at the drop zone with Mitchell. Instead, we can see Hewett in the foreground doing nothing. Isaac Smith is now ostensibly Josh Kennedy’s responsibility.

Here we see Mitchell swinging his left boot and connecting a volley to send it 40 metres forward, straight down the line. Now, this is a superb act of skill from Mitchell, but there must be an element of luck involved. The Hawks claim to have trained this type of thing, but this ball could also have gone out on the full, or dribbled off the side of the boot into Kieren Jack’s path.

The ball is in flight, towards Jack Gunston and Dane Rampe. The Swans have good coverage, with all players goal-side of their opponent. Jarrad McVeigh is in the best position to win the ball, and Callum Mills is best placed to support, with Heath Grundy also in a good position to break clear of James Sicily and receive the ball.

Gunston doesn’t mark the ball, but it fortuitously bounces off his right foot onto his left thigh before ricocheting into his running path, and away from McVeigh.

Gunston also maintains his strength in the contest, while Rampe loses his balance.

Remember Isaac Smith, who was left alone at the initial stoppage? Here he is accepting the ball off Gunston, having covered the most territory of any player who was at that boundary throw-in. Josh Kennedy, who should have taken responsibility for him from that point on, is nowhere to be seen. Kennedy doesn’t have Smith’s running capacity, but should have been thereabouts to put pressure on.

Kieren Jack was the other player who had a chance to pick up Smith on the way through, but Shaun Burgoyne worked harder than Jack to get there first, and can now block for his teammate, as he is doing.

Smith sends a shanked tumbler forward. If he kicks a penetrating drop punt as he usually does, Nick Smith (40) is actually in a better position to mark the ball than Cyril Rioli (33), or at least force a neutral contest. Gary Rohan, seen on the right hand side slipping over, would also have been in a better position to win or neutralise the ball.

Cyril marks the ball and the rest, as they say, is history.

There are a few things to note about the above passage of play, which takes place in about 13 or 14 seconds of real time.

Firstly, Lewis only came up with the idea to flick the ball over the Mitchell as they approached the stoppage, and they gave each other a nod and a wink. So much for exhaustive planning and strategies taking place over the summer months for this very situation. This isn’t the NFL. Most of what happens on the football field is made up on the spot.

Secondly, this was not a victory that relies purely upon Hawthorn’s experience and skill. That’s a minor part. Sydney’s poor set-up and lack of smarts plays a bigger role. Luck is the most defining factor.

There were over 100 stoppages in this game. Hawthorn didn’t kick 100 goals. These type of plays are attempted every time and fail far, far, far more than they succeed.

There is no art to winning close matches, as this excellent post from Hurling People Now breaks down for us.

It was the Hawks’ good fortune that Hewett was in the vicinity of the stoppage instead of say the more experienced Luke Parker or Jarrad McVeigh, who may have acted more decisively and with more wits.

Sam Mitchell’s flung left boot connecting perfectly. The ball bobbling off Gunston’s body parts into the right channel for him to run onto. Smith’s shanked kick was a blessing, but would usually be a curse.

All of these events conspire to create the play that ended with the ball in Rioli’s hands. And he was able to deliver under extreme pressure, as Burgoyne did before him earlier in the quarter, consummating his best on ground performance.

But what about some credit to Hawthorn, I hear you ask. And you’re right, they certainly deserve it.

As stated earlier, Lewis is probably the best third-man up at stoppages in the league, so it’s a skill he has honed. Mitchell’s instincts and skill on either side of the body is renowned, which he put to perfect use.

Smith and Burgyone worked harder than their opponents. Gunston and Rioli were in front of their opponents, which is usually the percentage play in any situation.

These Hawks worked harder and smarter for longer than their counterparts. And it was to Hawthorn’s credit that they were in the contest to begin with, which is a simple but overlooked fact. You can’t win if you’re not there. That play is a lot less significant if they were seven points down instead of one.

As Ben Hogan said, “Golf is a game of luck. The harder I work, the luckier I get.” The same can be applied to Hawthorn. Yes, they are getting the breaks at the right time in their close matches, most of which are outside their control.

But the Hawks are doing the things they can control better than the opposition in these tight finishes. In each individual circumstance, luck and good fortune is playing a large role, but it is up to them to maximise it, which they’ve done.

Can it continue? Personally, I don’t think it will, and they are not playing well enough across four quarters to sustain they type of football that wins premierships. But it is still a pleasure to watch their champions go about their business, and try to lift the team over the line under pressure.

The Crowd Says:

2016-07-20T11:52:31+00:00

andyl12

Guest


Hear hear.

2016-07-20T10:18:31+00:00

Mark

Guest


Errrr, no.

2016-07-20T10:14:14+00:00

Mark

Guest


Yes, they are. You are wrong. Accept it.

2016-07-20T09:53:48+00:00

Penster

Guest


True!

2016-07-20T07:45:11+00:00

SHIFTYXR

Guest


i'm amused with all the comments relating to a minute either way and the swans would have won it. A minute before yes. A minute later Hawks could've kicked another goal and won by 11pts.

2016-07-20T02:10:52+00:00

Lroy

Guest


Im not a Hawks fan in the sense I support the Eagles. But I am a fan in the way they play their footy. I watched them earlier this year in one of those tight games and everyone was talking about how lucky they were. but when you analyzed it, you realized a couple of the ''easy'' goals the Hawks got were from blokes working very hard off the ball. Hawks have a short kickout from goal. Play is dead, everyone has manned up, we all expect a long kick down the boundary line.. A Hawks player sprints 20 yards to stand 2 metres behind and slightly off to the side of the guy on the mark.. The Hawk with the ball now plays on, the opposition player on the mark moves laterally to cover him and runs straight into the other Hawk who was waiting for him. Perfect shepard. Now... you have two Hawks running forward, one with the ball, another a few yards in front ... he can act as a blocker, receive a handpass, or move laterally, receive a short kick and make the switch of play. Boom boom boom, 3 kicks downfield, goal. They created something out of nothing, super stuff. It looked easy, but the only reason they got that goal, was because of the discipline of one player, to sprint to stand in a position where he could help a teamate. He wont get a Brownlow vote for it, most people didnt notice it... but for the purist it was poetry in motion. Every week, the Hawks get a couple of goals, that they shouldnt, simply because they work a bit harder, no luck in it whatsoever So for me, (depending how my team go), Ill be cheering the Hawks come finals because I love the way they play.

2016-07-20T01:19:59+00:00

Garry

Guest


Great analysis of a single play. Most prudent comment you make is "But the Hawks are doing the things they can control better than the opposition in these tight finishes. In each individual circumstance, luck and good fortune is playing a large role, but it is up to them to maximise it, which they’ve done". They do it better than anyone, even my mighty Blues.

2016-07-20T00:12:07+00:00

Luke

Guest


Good article. Hawks had their best & cleanest 5 involved as well which helps. Harsh on Hewitt in my opinion, yes his positioning was all out but he had an experienced Hannebery behind him who could have seen this and also pushed into the stoppage. The biggest error was for them to leave Smith unchecked behind the stoppage, Swans player should have pushed up to him and run with him.

2016-07-19T23:31:35+00:00

Sydneygirl

Guest


Interesting frame by frame analysis. I have to say Lloyd is one I have been critical of in a couple of games. Not that he is the only one. A couple of the other young or less experienced players too. I agree with the person who said they needed to man up. Too often players are ten metres away from their opponents. Hawthorn played well though, no taking away from that. Don't like those chicken wing tackles though. They are dangerous but apparently the AFL has no problem with them..

2016-07-19T23:22:22+00:00

Rossco

Guest


"Can it continue? Personally, I don’t think it will, and they are not playing well enough across four quarters to sustain they type of football that wins premierships." Tell us which team does is better? And why aren't they on top of the ladder?

2016-07-19T13:28:45+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Guest


lol not me

2016-07-19T12:25:51+00:00

AR

Guest


Each pre-season, Clarkson travels overseas to learn more from other sporting clubs, and bring back those innovations to Hawthorn. In fact, Hawthorn actually has an 'innovation budget'. I'm not sure if any other club does. One year (I think after the 2011 Prelim) he brought back a countdown clock. Sounds simple enough, but apparently the Hawks trained for hours and hours and hours in what to do in the dying 2 minutes of a close game. They now *know* what to do in the dying minutes of a close game. And when you add that *knowledge* to the incredible natural football IQ of the likes of Mitchell, Hodge, Burgoyne, Lewis, Gibson, Rioli, (Roughead) etc...well, they'll probably keep getting lucky in those close ones.

2016-07-19T09:29:40+00:00

Football Head

Roar Rookie


Alrighty, time for a spot of dissection. Remember Isaac Smith, who was left alone at the initial stoppage? Here he is accepting the ball off Gunston, having covered the most territory of any player who was at that boundary throw-in. Josh Kennedy, who should have taken responsibility for him from that point on, is nowhere to be seen. Kennedy doesn’t have Smith’s running capacity, but should have been thereabouts to put pressure on. Kieren Jack was the other player who had a chance to pick up Smith on the way through, but Shaun Burgoyne worked harder than Jack to get there first, and can now block for his teammate, as he is doing. Certainly, you can say the Hawthorn players got lucky that the Sydney players didn't follow up like they did, in more or less the same way as you could say GWS were lucky that Brisbane didn't pressure their ball movement. But heres an alternate point of view that you seem to have spent the last four weeks avoiding/ running from/ screaming "sacrilege! Sacrilege!" at: Hawthorn are just good at outplaying their opponents, and can play top class footy. Firstly, Lewis only came up with the idea to flick the ball over the Mitchell as they approached the stoppage, and they gave each other a nod and a wink. So much for exhaustive planning and strategies taking place over the summer months for this very situation. This isn’t the NFL. Most of what happens on the football field is made up on the spot. Two possible scenarios here: 1- Lewis winks and nods at Mitchell, who has no idea what the plan is and just tries to get into space, because a wink is not a full on discussion where newly formed tactical plans are proposed. A wink without context is just a wink. 2- Lewis shoots a knowing look at Sam where he lets Sam know that they're going to do the thing they planned and trained for over summer. Sam knows immediately because a wink and a nod was all he needed. Secondly, this was not a victory that relies purely upon Hawthorn’s experience and skill. That’s a minor part. Sydney’s poor set-up and lack of smarts plays a bigger role. I'd love to know what you think experience provides, if it isn't a knowledge of how to set up around the ball or an ability to apply footy smarts. I'd suggest having a better set up around the stoppage and playing smarter footy is exactly the kind of thing that comes with more experience and being the better team, but thats just me I guess. I could keep going, but I'd just end up repeating myself, so I'll leave it there

2016-07-19T09:23:21+00:00

Football Head

Roar Rookie


More manic yes, but I'd say that in a close game every act during the entire game is important. A touch on the line in the second quarter to keep the margin under three goals is just as pivotal as anything in the final 10 minutes of a game where every score counts

2016-07-19T07:56:45+00:00

justinr

Guest


All I see is Hawthorn being heaped with endless praise. Cyril would PM for life if McAvaney had his way.

2016-07-19T07:44:16+00:00

justinr

Guest


This game followed a familiar pattern from the Hawks' 2016 season: one outstanding quarter, three patchy ones; opponents losing their nerve; and umpiring that didn't cause any obstructions to their cause. Cam is right to stick to his guns at this stage. Until the Hawks show 2013-15 form they are just one team with a shot at the title.

2016-07-19T07:28:03+00:00

justinr

Guest


No, they are not.

2016-07-19T06:59:13+00:00

Birdman

Guest


Fair call, I agree the Crows deserve to be in the conversation but I'm not sure Sydney or GWS have been consistent enough from game to game to qualify.

2016-07-19T05:44:01+00:00

Penster

Guest


A minute before or after the Cyril goal and the Swans would have won it. Could as easily have been a draw.

2016-07-19T05:24:41+00:00

andyl12

Guest


Last year when Hawthorn lost 4 games by less than 10 points in the first 8 rounds, were people saying "Hawthorn deserved to win those games" in the way that they're now saying we deserved to lose our 2016 nail-biters? The answer is No. Because too many in the media focus on how to downplay Hawthorn's achievements rather than congratulating them.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar