Australia's batsmen show belated fight in Sri Lanka

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

After a sequence of horrendous batting displays, Australia finally showed some resilience against the Sri Lankan spinners yesterday in the third Test in Colombo.

Avoiding the technical mistakes which had undone the Australian batsmen time and again this series, Steve Smith and Shaun Marsh shepherded their side to 1-141 at stumps, trailing the hosts by 214 runs.

Smith in the last week had talked about the importance of playing the line of the ball against Sri Lanka’s spinners, rather than trying to predict how much each delivery would turn.

Australia’s batsmen, including Smith, continually had been beaten on the inside edge by deliveries which skidded on and bowled them or trapped them LBW.

Yesterday Smith and Marsh repeatedly were defeated on the outside as they played the line of the ball. This may have dented their egos a shade, but most importantly these deliveries ended in the keeper’s gloves, with no harm done.

In a further attempt to minimise the risk of LBWs, both batsmen made a point of playing front foot defensive shots to the spinners with their bat slightly ahead of their front pad.

Australian cricketers are taught from a young age to defend with their bat and pad tucked together snugly, with the face of the bat slightly behind the pad.

By contrast many Asian cricketers aim to have the blade marginally ahead of the pad when defending against slow bowlers. The advent of DRS has made this particular approach even more prudent.

While these two technical matters require only minor adjustments, Australia’s batsmen failed to make them in the first two Tests. Marsh’s knock of 64 not out justified the selectors’ decision to recall him.

But, despite his success at the top of the order yesterday, I still would argue there was little sense in dropping Joe Burns, who has averaged 42 from 11 Tests, including three tons. It was Marsh’s younger brother Mitch who should have made way instead.

With a Test batting average of 23 after 18 Tests, the younger Marsh has survived due to his bowling prowess. Yet he barely has been used with the ball in this series, sending down only six overs per innings on average.

His older brother, at 33 years old, has been bounced in and out of the side many times in his 18-Test career, and has tended to start each stint in fine fashion. His problem has been maintaining that form.

If he holds his place in the team, Marsh immediately will face a test every bit as robust the one he encountered at Colombo. Australia’s next series is at home in November against the dynamic South African pace attack of Dale Steyn, Morne Morkel and superstar-in-the-making Kagiso Rabada.

Marsh has the fine attribute of playing with soft hands against spin, as he showed yesterday. But against pace he has been caught behind the wicket over and over in Tests while sparring at deliveries outside off stump with hard hands. The West Australian has fared far better against spin than pace during his time in the baggy green.

Shaun Marsh has a fantastic average of 59 against spin in Tests, compared to just 29 against the quicks. But with scores of 182 and 64 not out in his past two innings he has made a compelling case to play against the Proteas.

Marsh can give the selectors no option but to stick with him by going on to convert his half century into a big hundred today. After having their confidence torn to shreds at Kandy and Galle, Australia desperately need a fillip ahead of a challenging home Test summer against South Africa and Pakistan.

With bits-and-pieces player Moises Henriques at five and Mitch Marsh at six, Smith and the elder Marsh simply must bat through until lunch today to give Australia a hope of salvaging something from this series.

The Crowd Says:

2016-08-20T12:08:20+00:00

Tanmoy Kar

Guest


S Marsh hits a century, it should have been horses for the courses, Shaun should have played from the first Test itself instead of Khawaja. But choosing Henriques dropping Joe Burns does not make any sense.

2016-08-15T17:18:41+00:00

Prosen

Guest


Too much chopping and changing and knee jerk reactions don't really work in cricket,certainly not in the form of instant results.but to me aus should play to their strength anywhere in the world,that is three seamers along with lyon.john holland has been useless(just have a look at his averages this series to confirm i'm not being harsh),sadly they don't have another paceman in the squad, do they?cummins and pattinson seem to be eternally injured.

2016-08-15T16:04:45+00:00

Broken-hearted Toy

Guest


Smith's captaincy has been uninspired. Glad to see him get some runs, he needed them to have something go his way. Warner made a fool of himself with bat in hand yesterday. Again.

2016-08-15T13:27:37+00:00

TheCunningLinguistic

Guest


Now let's have no more criticism of either Marsh, ok? Starc, Smith & both Marsh's have been the only shining lights in this very sub-par series.

2016-08-15T13:24:40+00:00

TheCunningLinguistic

Guest


I've been banging on for SOS's inclusion since Christ was a child, thank you very much!

2016-08-15T12:55:09+00:00

baz

Guest


I can't believe our No.5 averages 30 that is a bit rude too.

2016-08-15T12:54:20+00:00

CCG

Guest


Rohan I understand your position about retaining Burns, but Australia want to win the match and Burns is sadly out of form. No doubt he will be back.

AUTHOR

2016-08-15T11:06:29+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


"Interested in your thoughts on right bats for conditions (only a couple of spots not wholesale changes). It seems accepted for bowlers but not bats. I think this should be reconsidered." G'day Darren, how are things mate? I must admit that this series has swayed me more towards a horse-for-courses policy for batsmen for series in Asia. I really don't like chopping and changing sides - so much better to let teams grow as a unit - but if Australia are any hope of competing in India in 6 months time they really do need to pick batsmen specifically for those conditions.

2016-08-15T10:50:19+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


I'd love it if Joe could bat as well as Mitch.

2016-08-15T10:20:01+00:00

Darren

Guest


Fair call Ronan. Should have put that out there much earlier can't claim it now. Although I do remember gunning for Mitch Johnson before his comeback on these pages so I'll still claim that one. But Ronan you know much more than me and get many more right. Interested in your thoughts on right bats for conditions (only a couple of spots not wholesale changes). It seems accepted for bowlers but not bats. I think this should be reconsidered.

2016-08-15T09:14:31+00:00

CCG

Guest


On form Warner should be dropped.

2016-08-15T09:12:23+00:00

CCG

Guest


Drop Voges? Why?

2016-08-15T08:33:42+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Ahem! You just might have seen one from me.

AUTHOR

2016-08-15T07:57:36+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


"Nice everyone talking about bringing in marsh earlier.. hindsight much.. ?" Yep, a lot of cricket fans wait until events unfold and then pop up and say, "I knew all along....". They must make a killing at the TAB.

2016-08-15T07:52:21+00:00

riddler

Guest


nice everyone talking about bringing in marsh earlier.. hindsight much.. ;) when he was selected this week, there was not one positive comment!!

2016-08-15T07:25:48+00:00

Darren L

Roar Rookie


Burns and Khawaja have looked awful against spin (Burns the worst). Hard to drop players after one test in a series but with only 2 to go in the series I think the selectors could of acted even earlier and brought in S.Marsh for test two. There is an argument he could have been there from the start replacing his brother but the bowling did look thin. Having said that they didn't bowl Mitch much anyway. Mitch Marsh has then looked better than both Burns and Khawaja with the bat so dropping him after the two tests wouldn't have made sense. Henriques in - I have absolutely no idea on that one. I probably would have dropped Burns for Marsh and left Khawaja in - but is there more to it? Are they unhappy with efforts off the field, who knows. I do think you can change your test 11 depending on conditions. They do it with bowlers why not with batters?

2016-08-15T06:13:53+00:00

Annoyedofit

Guest


Drop Voges and Henriques for Khawaja and Burns. Marsh slots back into his preferred middle order position. Problem solved

2016-08-15T06:11:22+00:00

Annoyedofit

Guest


Sooo. you'd jettison the guy who scored 3 100s and 4 50s in 12 tests and has averaged 50 for the last 3 years in FC cricket for the guy who averages 37? At this point I'm not sure who's more overrated, Khawaja or Bancroft.

2016-08-15T06:00:10+00:00

rtp

Guest


We needed one more spinner, one less pace bowler and one more batter. I would have thought that was obvious. So we replace Hazelwood with Maxwell. Pretty simple really.

2016-08-15T05:58:00+00:00

howzyapappa

Guest


Warner had a shocker. He was livid with himself. Marsh just brought up his ton. Batting beautifully with Smith. They have just brought up the first double century partnership by any Aussies in Asia since 2011.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar