Wallabies trying to be better in their interaction with refs

By Adrian Warren / Wire

The Wallabies are working on improving their relations with referees after some testy moments earlier in the year.

The three-Test series against England was marked by some terse exchanges, with referees making it clear they didn’t always appreciate the way they were talked to by the Wallabies.

Vice-captain and openside flanker Michael Hooper said he felt relations improved towards the end of the series and players also made more of a conscious effort in that area at the tail end of the Super Rugby tournament.

He emphasised it was still a work in progress and it was sometimes hard to remain composed in the heat of a fast-paced physically demanding Test.

“It’s a learning thing, it’s hard,” Hooper said.

“You’re out there in the heat of the battle you’re getting hit by massive guys.

“You’ve got to run kilometres, so your mind is at million miles an hour.

“It’s a skill, it’s not something you can develop overnight.

“It’s something we’re enjoying working on because I think it can be an improvement in our game.”

The Wallabies host New Zealand in Sydney next Saturday in the opening Rugby Championship and Bledisloe Cup contest of the year.

Australia hasn’t held the Cup since 2002 when Hooper was just ten-years old.

Asked what it would mean to the Wallabies to regain the symbol of trans-Tasman rugby supremacy after such a long time, Hooper said “in the short term, a pay off for hard work”.

“It would be fantastic to get hold of this trophy… it’s something that none of us has held,” he added.

“We want the public and our fans to be proud of us and the way we’re playing and we grew that last year.

“To see `Moorey’ (Wallabies captain Stephen Moore) holding that cup would be very nice.”

With David Pocock available again after missing the last two Tests of the England series and uncapped Lopeti Timani making his presence felt at training, Hooper emphasised there was plenty of competition for back-row spots in the Wallabies team.

“There’s so much competition in the back row, `Seany’ (Sean McMahon) is outstanding, Lopeti is in the mix now – you’ve got guys across the board (and) `Fards’ (Scott Fardy) is always solid.”

The Crowd Says:

2016-08-16T07:14:59+00:00

levelheaded

Guest


Starts from the top Adrian, just watch Cheika's behaviour with Referee decisions - disgraceful. His players would pick up on that and of course the rest as they say is history!

2016-08-15T07:46:00+00:00

Jokerman

Guest


Hoopers on the money. Talking to the ref can be dam difficult. People don't realise. You have a mouth guard to contend with, you could stutter because you're nervous and if you mumble to your team mate "Mumm" the ref could think you're talking to him and send you in the bin for 10 for accusing him for being your mother.

2016-08-15T07:30:54+00:00

Jokerman

Guest


Unfortunately Moore got used to Wayn Barnes who acts like he's one of his mates at his barbecue. "We will have a beer after this mate and how about a yellow?! Common cobber just one yellow mate?!" So when a normal ref turned up Moore thought it was same old. But no, mates rates only applied to Barnes and he came across as a whinner. Learn to change the tricks Moore. Only Barnes likes the one trick Poney...neigh neigh (sound of a pony).

2016-08-15T06:19:13+00:00

Ryanno

Guest


"even if u recall that famos penalty which cost crusaders the title against waratahs, Joubert publically stated that mccaw was correct and he was wrong in interpretation. in fact this was the only time joubert did something like that ( he never said anything about the scotland decision)" Joubert never publicly said any of this. It was McCaw in a radio interview some weeks later saying that Joubert called Blackadder after the game and allegedly apologised for the penalty. I'm not calling McCaw a liar but this is third hand information that you and may other Kiwis now share as gospel.

2016-08-15T06:09:27+00:00

CUW

Guest


maybe Mccaw read Art of War. “If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.” Sun Tzu

2016-08-15T05:56:02+00:00

John R

Roar Guru


Apparently the bloke would sit the refs exams and everything, such was his dedication to understanding the laws.

2016-08-15T04:55:45+00:00

R2D2

Guest


Knowing what you are talking about, helps a lot and only bringing up issues of relevance to the ref makes them more conscious of what they are doing, hence putting pressure on them to make the right call...mind games and if the ref cocks up, they know that you know.Great captains and the leadership group on the field of play can really put pressure on the ref, if they know their stuff.

2016-08-15T04:43:36+00:00

CUW

Guest


i think one way to be on the right side of the referee , is by being well versed in the LAWS of the game. that is where Ritchie Mccaw was a great dealer with refs. He really knew the Laws. i can vaguely remember once, after getting penalized he had a chat with the ref and said to him what the correct Law was ; and to my amazement the ref said something like like " yes u r probably right there" (but did not reverse the penalty :) ) even if u recall that famos penalty which cost crusaders the title against waratahs, Joubert publically stated that mccaw was correct and he was wrong in interpretation. in fact this was the only time joubert did something like that ( he never said anything about the scotland decision). another way which anyone can adopt is to go easy and humoros. JDV was a master at that. even when things went his way , he would crack a joke or a smart line , and then things were just fine. i remember one time when he got clothslined by a tuilagi , he just got up and shook his hand with a big smile and then wiped his brow at the ref. the ref gave a red to tuilagi but the whole incident looked more palletable than a big brawl for a dangeros tackle. on the other hand , pestering the ref like a little child crying for an ice-cream only irritates the ref. any parent will tell u that. :)

2016-08-15T03:20:20+00:00

Hoy

Roar Guru


Ah, I never said Australian rugby had no leaders, I said the playing group... by that I meant the Wallabies... Of the players you mention, I guess they are all better captains than the Wallabies have had for a period, Mowen inclusive of course, but as you say, he was only in briefly... All OK leaders, not captains though are they? If we had a great captain, would JOC be here still? Would Beale have had the issues he had? Would Cooper have felt the need to speak out? Would we have the mental lapses that we do?

2016-08-15T03:10:03+00:00

Markus

Guest


As much as opposition and even some Wallabies fans hated him, Gregan was a great captain. Strong decision making, and with the exception of Andre Watson he had a great rapport with referees. I disagree that Australian Rugby has been lacking true leaders. Matt Hodgson, Ben Mowen and Dave Dennis have all been good captains and leaders, then players like Greg Holmes and Christian Lealiifano among others have been good leaders even if not really being captaincy material. The problem you will notice with the list above is that all the best leaders have not been good enough players to consistently make the Wallabies, so instead the Wallabies have been stuck trying to find the best remaining captain and leaders out of the best players.

2016-08-15T02:11:11+00:00

Hoy

Roar Guru


Wallabies have not had a great captain since Eales... Mortlock was OK. When you look at the playing group over the last 5 years or so, there really has been an absolute lack of leadership. Not just captaincy, but leadership. The rotation of captains the Wallabies have had shows that really. Horne being one of the VCs during the English series shows that. It is a sad indictment on Australian Rugby that we have so very few true leaders. And I can't see any on the horizon really.

2016-08-15T01:55:21+00:00

Dopplerman

Guest


The wallabies ploy of questioning referee decisions regarding opposition penalties is purely about slowing the game down ,similar tactic used during lineouts with infringements prior to the throw in ......and you will likely see similar tactics prior to setting scrums as well...additionally the odds of them starting a ruckus are higher when under pressure in their own 22 .

2016-08-15T01:55:19+00:00

Dave_S

Guest


to be fair, on re-reading it, the story might be a bit of a beat-up to the extent it's based on Hooper's actual quotes.

2016-08-15T01:34:56+00:00

Chivas

Guest


What?!? It's hard not to keep your mouth shut because you are hot and bothered. And when you do speak you come across as petulant. That has little to do with being hot and bothered and more about a persons ability to compose themselves. If the captain and vice captain can't do that you have to wonder at their credentials to lead or speak for the side.

2016-08-15T01:33:42+00:00

Hello

Roar Rookie


Well put scrum

2016-08-14T23:53:47+00:00

Scrum

Guest


Moore after having a great World Cup let himself & the team down badly in the English series. Constantly badgering Referees is not smart. Some may think that by applying constant pressure on the Ref he will end up favouring your team. This is naive in the extreme. As it happened the Referees basically told Moore his approach was unacceptable & by this stage Moore had destroyed his relationship with the Ref. Opposed to this was the bad boy of Rugby Dylan Hartley who took the correct approach & worked with the Ref. One can only think that the respective Coaches were pivotal in these outcomes.

2016-08-14T22:46:53+00:00

mania

Guest


talking to the ref is easy. i train my kids to always say sir, please and thank you. I even have them say thankyou when the ref penalises them. they hate it but they have a better chance of the ref listening to them when they have something to ask. the ref faced with these kind of manners cannot help but respond well .

2016-08-14T21:59:22+00:00

Dave_S

Guest


Extraordinary admission of failure. sheeesh!

Read more at The Roar