European rugby makes moves set to end Giteau's Law

By Nicholas Bishop / Expert

The Rugby Championship is all over, and it’s New Zealand first and daylight – or maybe the European clubs – second.

The All Blacks beat the Wallabies by an average margin of 19 points, the Pumas by 26 and the Springboks by 35. (Click to Tweet)

Ultimately, the competition was only for the minor places, and it is hard to see Australia getting much closer to the men in black at Eden Park.

New Zealand wins because of the coherence of it pyramid structure from top to bottom. Everything – from Super Rugby selection, to the integration of All Black coaching in the provinces, to the way the game is played at school level – is designed to help the success of the national side.

The same cannot be said of Australia, Argentina and South Africa.

Argentina has vetoed the selection of their European-based stars and found it difficult to develop further without them. South Africa is being pulled apart by political interference and leakage to European clubs.

Australia is suffering from the same talent haemorrhage to the Northern Hemisphere – rumours have it Tatafu Polota-Nau will be packing his bags for Bristol right now – at a time when the club-country relationship is in danger of falling apart in England.

Over the past week, directors have hit back at the timing England’s recent training camp in Brighton, in the course of which two autumn Test candidates were seriously injured. Anthony Watson returned to Bath with a broken jaw and Sam Jones went back to Wasps with a broken leg. Watson’s wing partner Jack Nowell was also ruled out for weeks to come with a quadricep injury.

All this, two weeks before the beginning of the Champions and Challenge cups – the two major domestic events in the European club calendar. As Saracens director Mark McCall pointed out:

“We already have a league where our best players do not play for half of the campaign. That is a big enough thing but to have them away before a game as big as Wasps on Sunday and 10 days before the Champions Cup is not ideal…our England internationals have had a tough Monday and Tuesday. We have had to be careful with them since they returned and that compromises your preparations, unless you are mad.”

According to Exeter’s director Rob Baxter, Nowell was even sent back to his club from England’s training camp with a clean bill of health, despite having a 10-centimetre tear in his quad.

The CEO of the Rugby Players Association, Damien Hopley summarised the fallout neatly:

“Sometimes the demands of club and country are polar. Clubs want their players peaking for 25 games a year, England want them peaking for 10 games a year. Until you’ve got a properly structured season it’s incredibly hard.”

What does this mean for rugby in Australia and the rest of the southern hemisphere? Long-term, it means that players who go to Europe will probably never play international rugby again, 60-cap rule or no 60-cap rule.

As the rift between club and international agendas widens, the clubs (who after all own primacy of contract) will become more hard-nosed and less willing to cut their Wallabies, Springboks and Pumas some slack with international release. And there can be no doubt that those players will continue to emigrate to secure their own financial futures and that of their families, especially late on in their careers.

Will Genia is one obvious case in point. He has proven in 2016 beyond any doubt that he is the best Australian 9 by far, but he was not available for the summer series against England because of commitments to his club, Stade Francais. His absence helped change the course of those games against England and retarded Australia’s progress over that period.

Fast forward to the end of year tours, and IRB Regulation 9.7 (b) makes allowance for player release over three weekends in November, between the second to fourth weekends. From October 22 and December 3, Australia has six matches scheduled: against New Zealand, Wales, Scotland, France, the French Barbarians and England.

Three of the matches, plus any training commitments fore and aft, fall outside the designated window. Will Stade Francais be willing to release Genia out of their own generous good nature? I doubt it. They will want him playing Top 14 and European Champions Cup rugby, and that means Nick Phipps and back to square one at scrumhalf for Michael Cheika.

The most unfortunate aspect for Cheika and his coaching group is that the Wallabies are making steady progress as his younger players bed into Test rugby. Samu Kerevi and Dane Haylett-Petty in the backs, and Adam Coleman, Rory Arnold and Allan Alaalatoa up front have all shown to one degree or another a definite aptitude for Test match rugby.

Last weekend’s encounter at Twickenham added Lopeti Timani to their number. Timani enjoyed a solid and promising debut as a full-time starter at #8, even though I suspect he will be moved to #6 eventually when Sean McMahon or David Pocock return.

Timani had 32 involvements in his 70 minutes on the field, divided up as follows:

For best viewing on mobile, turn your device sideways to view the full table

Type Total involvements Effective Ineffective Significant positives/negatives
Tackle 22 8 4 3/2
Carry 4 2 0 2/0
“+1” maul driver 3 0 2 0/1

Timani also won one KO repossession, offered one ‘lead block’ on a first phase lineout move, and had one failed jackal attempt at the breakdown. He was not used as lineout ball-winning option.

Let’s add a little more flesh to the statistical bones.

Tackles
Timani made 20/22 of his tackle attempts for an impressive 91 per cent completion rate. More than one-third of his completions I categorised as ‘effective’ and shifting the initiative towards the defence. Among the significant positive events was a line-break stop at 18:22 and two forced fumbles at 29:26 and 30:42.

Timani’s technique in the tackle is sound. Unusually for a man with so much power, he wraps well with the arms and takes the ball carrier’s base away, rather than just speculating with a ‘flying shoulder’. But once he hits them, they stay hit! The only refinement I would suggest is targeting the ball with his shoulder to increase the forced fumble ratio.

On the negative side, his two misses were in space with the target moving away from him (at 29:58 and 41:30), he was ridden over near the goal-line for the Pumas try in the 22nd minute, and the number of ‘effective’ tackles declined markedly in the second half, with the last occurring in the 44th minute. He also conceded one penalty for ‘no roll’ out of the tackle area in the 48th minute.

Ball carries
Only four carries in total, although the drive at 60:19 was significant in giving the Wallaby exit some breathing-space so close to their own goal-line. The most encouraging feature of Timani’s presence as a ball-carrier was his ability to switch back-and-forth from the ‘hard yards’ positions in the Stephen Larkham attacking structure (the 4/5/8 pod bouncing back in off the sideline at 9:29, the goal-line exit at 60:19), to being the wide singleton delivering a nicely weighted pass to cut Samu Kerevi loose down the 5-metre corridor at 11:45.

If he can offload as well as he can carry with power, he will increase the options and flexibility within the Wallaby attack pattern significantly.

The ‘engine’ of the lineout drive
In my very first article for The Roar, I illustrated Pocock’s ability to be the maul engine from lineout, latching on to the receiver before passing the ball back to the ‘driver’ behind him.

The Wallabies began the game by positioning Timani in Pocock’s ‘+1’ spot at halfback from lineouts, but he clearly needs some work on this aspect of his game in order to be effective.

At 12:30 he is static and upright, and the Wallabies only commit three Puma defender to the drive, at 23:34 he is first uprooted, then pancaked by the Argentine loose-head as the referee calls the first maul ‘stop’.

Summary
Lopeti Timani looks to have a big future with the Wallabies as the power-player in their back-row. His tackling is already both sound and sticky, he offers an enticing mix of tight carries and wide offloading ability on attack and I am sure there is more lineout ball-winning capacity waiting to be developed.

The issue for Timani, as with other promising young Wallabies like Kerevi, Coleman, Alaalatoa and Arnold is the volatile nature of the international rugby setting in which they are growing up.

Michael Cheika will never be able to select consistently if the migration of Australian talent continues at the current pace, and if he cannot call upon his top Europeans with ironclad assurances of their availability throughout the calendar year.

As we speak, with the angry noises of the verbal brawl between the English clubs and the national set-up only just subsiding, that possibility is becoming ever more remote.

The Crowd Says:

2016-10-24T22:19:36+00:00

Fin

Guest


Hi Nick, Thinking a little further I am guessing you will also revisit one of your earlier articles around the effectiveness of the wallaby bench as part of your review/discussions around where the wallabies have not progressed this year.

AUTHOR

2016-10-23T20:12:49+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Yep and that will be part of my article this week Fin... The only improvements that matter are the ones that hold up under real pressure. Unfortunately the halves who played on Saturday are now associated with poor exit quality.

2016-10-23T09:22:25+00:00

Fin

Guest


Hi Nick, The Wallabies kicking exits came back to haunt them again didn't they? 3 out of the 6 NZ tries (including the 1st and 3rd) came directly from wallaby clearing kicks out of their own territory.

AUTHOR

2016-10-22T07:32:36+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Thanks once more Fin. I like the idea of Fiji in the the NRC too. It's a novelty that I suspect will draw the crowds. I think there is evidence of Wallaby improvement over the course of the season. Today's game will show whether they can manage to implement all the improvements at once. You often see some improvements take root and stay, while others are torn out in the face of superior opponents. So Eden Park will show how far MC and his group have come.

2016-10-21T11:41:09+00:00

Fin

Guest


Hi Nick, Final episode for the year and this week the coaches were on. - Cheika said the highlight for him this year from a coaching point of view was the way the team stuck together even though they were copping a lot of heat and a lot of bullets from the outside. He said the team has continued to enjoy their work, there's been no finger pointing, and the environment has been good. He said this tough year in the long run will be the making of the team going forward. - Cheika said the most disappointing game has been against South Africa in Pretoria because they should have won it, and played worse the next week and won. He said there is a lot to learn but also a lot that they are getting out of this season. - Mick Byrne said the new players in the team have a strong desire to learn and get better. He said the exciting thing is that 11 players have been blooded this year, but with that comes a hit, and that hit is usually on the scoreboard, but on the training field and around the team room those young players are starting to get a grip of it and walk in some big shoes and they are going to perform well. - Mick Byrne was asked about the difference between the wallaby and all blacks set up. He wasn't sure what the all blacks are doing these days but he said the wallabies work really hard with a lot more work put into the game with no stone left unturned. He said he's not saying that nz and other teams don't but the wallabies are working very hard to get it right. - MC said this weekend the wallabies have to deliver their style of game without having any doubts. - MC said he won't be scared of playing around with the back row combinations in the future because each player offers distinctly different attributes. - MC has said a decision on Foley's role (either as a 10 or a 12) will be made by the end of the season. - MB said he has been working with the players on helping them understand where they want to go in attack - things like getting them in the right parts of the field, going at the line, asking defenders questions and making them make tackles. He said Samu has played well but the players inside him have given him a little bit more room and he came and took that. He said everybody is working hard to get the ball into the hands of their good strong ball runners with a little bit of space and he expects more improvements to come over the course of the year in that area. - MC said statistically the current nz team is the best team of all time. He said it's the result of planning and building for years so that when they had some generational change like this year they are filling the 'new' generation with players that already have 40-50 test caps. - MB said that the decision that nz rugby made after 2007 to keep the coaching group has proven to be a correct and courageous decision because all the learnings that were done in that era that didn't work were understood by the coaches and they were able to put things right and move on with the group. - MC said he has been watching the NRC closely and says the standards are improving each year. He said a few players have caught his eye and when they select the wallaby squad next week for the EOYT a few of those players might figure in the squad and go straight from NRC to wallaby tour selection. - Kafer said the NRC also provides coaches with opportunities for development and is a really important foundation to expand the upward pressure for the wallabies. MB agreed and said it was a great opportunity for the coaches to practice at another level and have their team playing, touring, training full time, on tv every week etc. - MB said even when the wallabies are touring overseas all the wallaby coaches are keeping a close watch on the NRC games and every week there is a comment about another young player that has stepped up and got himself noticed. - MC said the decision to bring Fiji into the NRC competition next year is morally a good thing to do because a lot of Fijian players have played for Australia and are playing in Australia and it's really good for Australian rugby to give back in that area.

AUTHOR

2016-10-20T17:40:45+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


It's just example of how a sensible plan might look - and why not? But a lot of factional interests - like the Six Nations Committee - need to be assuaged first.

AUTHOR

2016-10-20T17:38:35+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Open to debate whether regional rugby with central contracts would have worked in England - it would have been a huge effort by the RFU... But the NH as a whole was miserably ill-prepared for the pro era, and that gave NZ and Australia in particular a huge leg up for few years following...

AUTHOR

2016-10-20T17:35:18+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Maybe I should have been clearer. The changes were led by the English and French clubs, the RFU via Ian Ritchie went 'along for the ride' as mediator. They had some power in the process but not at all in the new structure of the comp.

2016-10-13T14:22:26+00:00

Derm

Roar Guru


Not accurate. The RFU intervened to sort out the row between PRL and the existing ERC unions on their respective deals with BT and Sky. This resulted in a split TV coverage deal - with the competition suffering as a result. The plan to replace Heineken as sole sponsor with five big sponsors has not worked. FFR/LNR made a separate deal with BEIn/Canal+ bidding for their team's games.

2016-10-13T10:03:24+00:00

Garth

Guest


So before Christmas this year then? (at the rate the pound is dropping)

2016-10-13T10:02:20+00:00

Garth

Guest


The RFU was asleep at the wheel.

2016-10-13T09:57:21+00:00

Garth

Guest


An AB jersey in their resume commands a higher pay grade in Europe, as demonstrated time and again in recent years.

2016-10-13T09:53:39+00:00

Garth

Guest


So it's basically just the English rugby establishment and few French "club" owners screwing things up for everyone?

2016-10-13T06:51:04+00:00

Kevin Higginson

Guest


Craig's plan is the most satisfying ever. The unions have got to realise that professional sports is an entertainment business now, (for better or worse), as the riches made come from the selling of a product that people want to watch. As an Englander, I do get fed up that for half the matches international players are not playing for their clubs due to other commitments or having to rest due to the maximum game rule. The only sensible way around this is to split the club and international season up. Craig's plan does this, it put ALL internationals in one block, (and I would also include putting the RWC in this block), instead of the current 3, allowing club rugby to play around them. My plan was slightly different in that the international block started a little later and included the RC at the beginning of a 13 week international season for SH. In the NH the plan would be to play an expanded LV Cup as a pre-season event during September, (warm up games for non internationals) followed by a 22 weeks domestic season, then a six week 6N and finally a 8 week European season. The domestic season would be 16 matches over 17 weeks plus play-offs, (4 rounds over 5 weeks), the play offs of the LV during the 6N, followed by a shorter Euroepan cup of 4 groups games over 5 weeks, followed by 3 play off rounds. An international player would then play a maximum of 38 games including internationals if his team were involved in every play off round. Which is still a lot but would mean only 3 games missing compared to the 10 or so currently.

AUTHOR

2016-10-13T01:59:30+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


!

AUTHOR

2016-10-13T01:59:20+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


The idea of excluding the French and English clubs was discussed at the time they took over the European club comps a couple of years back NB. But the Unions and governing authorities caved in then and it's much less likely they will have the guts to do anything now as a result. Private ownership has its foot in the door now, and in England the RFU really only governs the amateur and international sides of the game (which after all is all it was ever designed to do). A global season would be of huge practical help to everyone and that represents the single biggest step forward. Until that happens, everything else is just tiddlywinks!

AUTHOR

2016-10-13T01:52:24+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Lots of different dynamics at work there Fin. As one of the three traditional SR strongholds Queensland needs to win back its fans pronto, and they suffered the biggest attendance drop last season. Their biggest flaw last year was lack of leadership and direction, and they'll certainly get that from guys you mention. There's a huge amount of knowledge about the game and experience within it there. Ideally they'll all start and the NRC blokes (like McIntyre last season) will be brought along behind them - like Parraka behind Slipper. That's the best way to do it, although some players like Tupou will prob start. Ultimately the NRC has to be seen to be working in the respect you point to though. If it is accepted that players will continue to migrate to Europe. The pathway has to become clearly defined and for lack of a better word, real. That's a problem with administrators sometimes. They tick boxes but don't drive it to the point it has real meaning. :)

2016-10-13T01:28:21+00:00

Fin

Guest


Hi Nick, As a Queensland and Wallabies supporter I am a bit confused with the strategic direction of both the ARU and Reds at the moment. Firstly, I remain an advocate of the NRC, however it has been running for 3 seasons now, and we were told that one of it’s objectives was to bridge the gap for many players between club and super rugby level. You would naturally think then that this would lead to stronger Super Rugby teams, yet the Australian Super Rugby sides have been getting worse since the introduction of the NRC. And now the Reds are bringing back past players (Moore, Smith, Higgers, Houston, Cooper) and recruiting rugby league players rather than NRC players to fill their roster. What do you think is going on? Is the NRC fulfilling its purpose, and is Nick Stiles looking for a ‘quick fix’ rather than continuing the work of developing a strong team so that he can hold onto his job for longer than a season?

2016-10-12T23:53:04+00:00

SP

Guest


Once Brexit officiallybegins and the GBP drops to below the level of the $AUD and $NZD, playing in England won't be so attractive dollar wise

2016-10-12T22:35:01+00:00

Carlos the Argie

Roar Guru


I thought World Rugby wanted to HELP the USA....

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar