Whatever happens to Des, things look grim for the Dogs

By Stuart Thomas / Expert

Tomorrow’s meeting involving the board of the Canterbury Bulldogs and Des Hasler sees the current and future direction of the club under discussion.

The allegations of a perceived lack of understanding of club culture that have been levelled at Hasler by former players such as Terry Lamb and Steve Mortimer have somehow grown legs, and the board have acted on an issue that has simmered away since the club’s meek exit from the finals at the hands of the Panthers.

The real issues that lie at the heart of the Bulldogs’ poor semi-final performances and inconsistency over the last two years need to be addressed, rather than the meeting being some pointless esoteric talk-fest about culture.

Whatever decisions are made, the attacking potency of the squad needs urgent attention. This will take time and could see the club experience a short-term period of poor results.

I predict a two to three-year period of rebuild and adjustment – unfathomable a few short years ago.

That prediction, if true, would be an unfamiliar situation for the Bulldogs’ faithful, whose high expectations have been matched by remarkable consistency over the last 40 years.

Ten grand final appearances over that time have produced six premierships, however since the arrival of Hasler and the initial promise of the 2012 season, things have taken an obvious turn for the worse.

2012 saw a skilful forward-back move the ball consistently around the ruck and execute some of the best combinations we have seen from a big pack in NRL history. They were a delight to watch and Ben Barba’s breakout season added to their potency.

It appears that Des put the cue in the rack immediately after and the Dogs have been impotent in attack since. In two of the last three seasons, they have been the lowest scoring team among those that qualified for the top eight.

In a nutshell, Hasler has continued to assemble an intimidating pack of forwards to execute a rather bland and boring style of football, at the expense of developing a more attacking and aggressive brand that could result in more points.

The conservative approach towards developing the team is starting to show enormous cracks, as teams like Canberra, North Queensland and Cronulla are trailblazing their way to success through a refreshing emphasis on scoring points and expansive attack.

Of course, there is always a happy medium to be found and this is the magic formula that Melbourne has been able to achieve over the last decade or so.

At times, they do look stodgy, yet over the course of the journey, the Storm have managed to score points far more easily and consistently than the Bulldogs.

Rather than concerning themselves with the DNA of the club and its identity, I suggest a closer look at the football department and some of the decisions that have been made during Hasler’s reign.

Much of this was pointed out in my article ‘A letter to Des Hasler from a confused, frustrated Doggies fan‘, which looked at the issues in a somewhat sarcastic manner, however the time for smiles is gone. Something is seriously foul in the kennel.

The failure to regenerate the backline has been alarming. The 30-year-old Morris twins will once again provide the best opportunities for tries next year, with Curtis Rona moving on after a somewhat disappointing season. Kerrod Holland has not lived up to the hype that surrounded his debut game and warrior Sam Perret has retired.

The retention and acquisition decisions made around the backline are mystifying and I am finding it difficult to pencil in a starting seven for Round 1, 2017.

Back-up Sharks half Josh Cleeland was signed with an eye to the future rather than the present, and doesn’t solve the serious ball-playing and kicking deficiencies.

Mid-season recruit Asipeli Fine has a limited three games of experience with the Tigers and Richard Kennar arrives from Melbourne with great promise yet only eight games under his belt.

Former Canberra winger Brenko Lee has also been recruited to fill the void in the backline, yet with only ten games in the NRL doesn’t bring experience or proven quality.

These three will be a part of the backline at some stage, particularly if Will Hopoate isn’t playing on Sundays and one, or both, of the Morris twins are involved in representative football again. Their limited experience is concerning.

Lachlan Lewis is a promising young half with royal blood in his veins, yet with Cleeland waiting in the wings and incumbents Josh Reynolds and Moses Mbye around, one wonders why a marquee centre or winger wasn’t the number one target.

The signings are young and with the additions of Rhyse Martin and Lamar Liolevave, both second rowers, the coach is adding stocks to areas in which the Bulldogs are already quite blessed.

Other decisions must also come into question. The signing of Tony Williams is the most farcical decision I have ever seen from the club. Obviously, the connection between the coach and ‘marquee’ player led to his signing, and Hasler must answer to that.

The release of Michael Ennis and Dale Finucane, for different reasons, are also errors made under the watch of Hasler.

Ennis has shown that he can still be an attacking weapon and his success this season highlights that it wasn’t his play that was the issue, more the role that Hasler insisted he play.

Michael Lichaa has been the victim of the same role and shown nothing in attack throughout the course of the season. I’m not sure what Lichaa is capable of apart, from 40 to 50 tackles per game. The signing of hooker Zac Woolford is interesting and rumours of a move away from the halves for either Mbye or Reynolds complicates the picture even further.

Finucane showed enormous potential and Craig Bellamy has tapped into it well. It’s hard to comprehend why money wasn’t spent to lock up Finucane, who was developing as a wonderfully consistent first grader.

Whichever way you look at it, the squad appears weak in terms of point-scoring potential. Perhaps Tyrone Phillips will take another step forward after some promising performances, or maybe Fine, Kennar and Lee will find their feet early and provide some more spark.

Somehow this seems unlikely, as the depth in the backs looks to be seriously tested again.

What concerns me most is that Hasler may, once again, have the mandate to attack through his forwards, who remain one of the biggest and meanest packs around.

The problem is, the game seemed to shift this year, and the Bulldogs were left eating the dust of those more daring and cavalier.

Whether Hasler is still the coach on Friday night or not, it will take this team a few years to develop the potency and consistency they will need in attack, if they are to match the front runners of 2016.

I hope I am wrong, yet there might just be a few years of pain ahead, as the premiership window is closed in the short term.

The Crowd Says:

2016-10-14T10:23:54+00:00

Dean - Surry Hills

Guest


Storm retention envy.

2016-10-14T09:29:43+00:00

john johnson

Guest


Some say opinions can't be wrong. You have clearly proved otherwise

2016-10-14T08:19:48+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/des-hasler-arrives-at-bulldogs-hq-for-board-meeting-20161014-gs2p7c.html

2016-10-14T07:20:22+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Online news reports but unconfirmed by the club that Hasler will coach in 2017 and that Mortimer has resigned.

2016-10-14T07:16:56+00:00

Ches

Guest


Too many coaches. Got paid too much for how good isright now. If he was Anthrax of 5 years ago well probably worth that much. People were all over him for this and that and too good a deal any man should get. So big he became bigger than the club. So much it cost 700K to break ties with him.

2016-10-14T05:25:27+00:00

matth

Guest


The Storm have let go Hoffman, Widdop, Neilsen and Hinchcliffe from the names you listed above. You seem to have come down with a severe case of Storm envy.

2016-10-14T04:34:55+00:00

MAX

Guest


The 4:10 to Belmore.

2016-10-14T03:53:08+00:00

Dean - Surry Hills

Guest


I thought the forwards outperformed the backs as far as consistency goes. Holland, Mbye, and Hopoate all got off to fliers, but then fell apart late in the year with a plethora of errors and poor decisions. B Moz was out for an extended period but came back strong. J Moz has lost a yard or two of pace. Reynolds rated an A+ in terms of effort, but yelling like a ten year old and having a hissy-fit whilst verbally abusing a team-mate needs to be eliminated from his game. Save that $hit for the changeroom behind closed doors. Jackson was exceptional throughtout the year, though Graham's game has been worked out with teams defending him better as the year progressed. All that's needed for next year is a bit of magic with some sleight of hand.

AUTHOR

2016-10-14T03:22:17+00:00

Stuart Thomas

Expert


Now you are agreeing with the original point, no regeneration of the backs and not enough emphasis on attack and point scoring potential relying on old Morris' and slow Hopoate. I'm sure we both have strong views on things Dean and that's a good thing, yet the issues about the dogs squad are pretty commonly held beliefs. And the games I were watching were the powerful Melbourne Storm, led by the big three making some reasonably decent players look a lot better than they actually were. Turner and Tandy both also good examples.

2016-10-14T03:12:34+00:00

Albo

Guest


Yep ! Too much selfish politics here ! Not enough realism being displayed ! The Dogs have done marvellously well under Des, making the last 5 years final series' including two ground finals, all without one creative player in the team ! Their "not winning a premiership " problem is simple, they have no creative on-field general and a very ordinary 1, 6, 7 & 9 spine. Compare this Dogs spine to the current Storm, Raiders, Panthers, Cowboys, Broncos, Sharks spines for starters ? Unfortunately the Smith, Cronk & Thurstons are very rare ! I am sure Des has been looking desperately for one of these types, but they are very rare ! The Panthers have been searching for 25 years for an Alexander replacement, and have luckily stumbled over Nathan Cleary and Matt Moylan finally . The Dogs need to turn over more rocks to find an on-field general . Maybe Mortimer can spend some time developing some juniors to become game managers ? Mbye is not the answer in my opinion. He is running 6 or maybe better still a 9 ! Reynolds is probably the same type vying for the same positions . What is coming through the Dogs juniors ?? Seems even Noel Cleal couldn't find an emerging general around the countryside ?

2016-10-14T02:39:43+00:00

Dean - Surry Hills

Guest


Hinchcliffe and Widdop were quality. Not sure what games you were watching. Nothing was at odds. I stated that the Storm have somehow retained the bulk of their stars despite the salary cap. Hasler, who appears to be playing by the rules - did not. Hopoate had a two year sabatical, and hasn't been the same since. Williams has always been hot and cold. Eastwood is getting old, as are The Morris twins. None of them are playmakers like the Storm's spine. Reynolds is just hitting his peak. He's improving every year. Des has been at the Dogs for 5 years, and made the semis every single year, including two grand finals. 6 out of the last 7 origin series have been won by QLD. In the two years prior, where Des was not coaching the Bulldogs, they finished 9th and 13th.

2016-10-14T02:36:22+00:00

Gray-Hand

Guest


I assume Hasler got Kasiano and the others as physically prepared for the new interchange and ruck rules as was possible. But there is a limit as to what can be done in one off season, and several of the Bulldogs forwards were simply never going to transition to the new rules and be as effective as they had been under the old rules anyway. Their ideal playing weight and playing style was perfect for the old rules, but times have changed. The rule changes played perfectly into the hands of certain teams, but others have been left behind, and the Bulldogs are one of them. Hasler probably knows what he has to Doo, he just doesn't have the tools to do it properly at the moment. He's being treated very badly. This is the type of idiocy that you see at basketcase clubs like parramatta. It's surprising to see it at Canterbury.

AUTHOR

2016-10-14T02:11:25+00:00

Stuart Thomas

Expert


Agreed Barry, Yesterday I sat here with my colleague at work, Parramatta fan, and I turned to him and said, 'I can't believe I'm talking about the dogs like this.' This sort of nonsense is usually done so well by the Eels, Tigers, Manly etc, but not the dogs. Stability in the boardroom through Peter Moore's days and even under Greenberg has kept the Club, strong, competitive and unified. This is untenable for Hasler. With prospects looking grim for the short term, in my opinion, perhaps we would be better off to move on. Moving a coach on doesn't necessarily mean he is a bad coach unlike some are attempting to imply. I know Hasler can run a team however the game is evolving at the moment and I think you need to be on the cutting edge of that evolution. Maybe this is all an over read and we should just love the fact we have been in the eight every year. Then again, it's the next two years that scare me. ps who has a board meeting at 4 o'clock? Most people are at the pub by then on a Friday.

2016-10-14T01:54:50+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Meeting is at 4pm...

2016-10-14T01:52:27+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Haven't heard mate. I don't pretend to have any insight into this and it could go either way. Personally, I think moving Hasler on is a mistake - on the basis that there's not a better available coach out there. Only one club wins a premiership each year and Hasler has put this team in the mix every season he's been in charge. Yes - they've had a good roster but so do six or more clubs in any given year. He's made two grand finals in five years. In both they ran into a red hot team with massive motiviation to win. It was disappointing to lose both but I wasn't terribly surprised either time. We all want a premiership. Every fan does but how realistic is it to expect more than what Hasler has delivered? Unfortunately I think The eye might have it right though...how tenable is Hasler's position having been publicly bagged by a board member? Not to mention having his budget cut and staff members sacked. I have a feeling that he might volunteer to walk and the board may not have a decision to make, other than negotiating a settlement. That's what disappoints me most about this. Turvey talks about the club's DNA while running to the media to bag the coach and threatening to quit if he doesn't get his way. That's so far removed from the Bulldog's way it's not funny. Club legend or not, I hope Mortimer is held accountable for his actions.

AUTHOR

2016-10-14T01:01:57+00:00

Stuart Thomas

Expert


HI Barry, any news yet, I can't find anything on news yet. I'm busy at work and worried I'll miss the big announcement. Whats your gut tell you? Public hanging or suspended sentence?

2016-10-14T01:00:01+00:00

morley101

Guest


Grant Garvey is under contract for another 2 years.

AUTHOR

2016-10-14T00:56:39+00:00

Stuart Thomas

Expert


Hey Gray, I tend to agree with you, however all I heard about at the start of the season was the lean Kasiano and how fit the dogs pack looked and how the super-coach had them ready for the new rules. This was obviously bogus info. By the end of the year they looked so far off the pace it wasn't funny. Pace being the operative word. I totally agree with the time notion you present as well, that was indeed the point of the article, a couple of bad years ahead potentially before a few retirements help us recruit something to attack with in the backs. Thanks for reading, well said.

AUTHOR

2016-10-14T00:47:59+00:00

Stuart Thomas

Expert


Dean, you seem to be jumping time periods a lot. Discussing Hasler yet then going nearly a decade back in origin speak. I was pointing out to you that your question about the dogs not having a squad near the capabilities of other teams seems inaccurate considering the players I listed. In addition, it is more prudent to say that Reynolds, Williams, Hopoate, Eastwood and J. Morris are actually on the downward spiral rather than Hasler making them 'rep-duty worthy' as you point out. In your first post you state that the dogs don't have the quality of players to compete, in your next you state that Des has turned mediocre players into great ones. Seems at odds. Hinchcliff, Widdop? wow

2016-10-14T00:17:34+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Pretty good point...makes much more sense than Turveys DNA argument. There are other concerns though.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar