NRL Expansion funding long overdue, but only the beginning

By NF / Roar Guru

The NRL recently announced $3 million National Footy Facilities Funds to non-heartland areas is long overdue. This is something the administration should have focused on a long time ago.

At $500,000 per year among six states and territories (VIC, WA, SA, ACT and NT) the money spread annually is pretty thin if equally split. Grassroots funding and promotion of rugby league in Victoria should have been a priority with all the Storm’s success.

The Storm have been one of the most successful NRL clubs in the past 15 years, and it is a shame to think this has not been capitalised upon by the NRL.

Compare this to the AFL with its multi-million dollar investments in Queensland and NSW to attempt to grow the game. The money spent annually on the GWS Giants and Gold Coast Suns is more than any expansion funding the NRL has ever provided.

The NRL since the Super League war has neglected areas such as Western and South Australia the moment the Rams (97-98) and Reds (95-97) folded.

All that lost time since 1999 has created the very situation the NRL is in right now, having to reboot potential expansion from scratch once more.

Every year gone in a potential expansion area in Western Australia is another opportunity lost for rugby league to expand and nurture the game into having a national footprint. To think, it’s 2016 and out of all the professional competitions in Australia, the NRL still doesn’t have teams in Western Australia or in South Australia.

This is an embarrassing reflection on the lack of long-term planning and vision from the NRL.

Being heartland focused for decades has blinded the NRL into short-sighted, myopic thinking. Expansion is always put on hold to tend to clubs who had decades to get it together financially.

How much longer do we have to wait to clubs to be financially stable? The current 16 clubs have been given numerous chances to get it together. Surely, the NRL in the future will come out with a clear plan and outline for expansion teams.

As the Footy Facilities Fund is one small step for expansion, and expansion itself will be the biggest step the NRL needs to take in order to remain competitive in a cutthroat sports market.

The Crowd Says:

2016-10-20T06:59:11+00:00

Crosscoder

Roar Guru


Rugby league has been played in WA for decades Clip since 1948 ,it's hardly a new arrival, but do go ahead.In fact WA is more other code friendly(rugby) than Vic.More NRL clubs are planning to play there next year.Get used to the fact. The Storm by comparison to GWS Clip did not had the money nor the marketing ,nor the grassroots funding poured in .They have not had the luxury of getting star players ,they developed the Slaters,Cronks,Smiths. News Ltd and the NRL as partners were involved in the club.They were fined a decent sum fro the salary cap debacle.They lost sponsors and some fans as a result.They have not had the tens of millions delivered to them in a short space of time.News Ltd did stuff all for grassroots, they were only interested in pay TV. They get minimal support or SFA from the Vic media.To suggest it 's anywhere near what the GWS has received ,suggests you ar e on another planet. Mel as a kid used to attend Brookvale with her father .One would suggest her position in ch7 and the fact they have the Tv deal may have had an influence in her GWS ambassador's role. Keep spinning .

2016-10-19T22:52:33+00:00

clipper

Guest


NF -agree with you that WA is not an all code city- it is an AFL dominant city, quite different from NSW which has had a long history of both Rugby codes. Crosscoder - you're being disingenuous - the Storm have had heaps of money poured into them, still have a couple of years of very good subsidies - and why wouldn't Mel promote GWS - ch7 paid out a record fee, they would want a return on their investment.

2016-10-19T02:34:51+00:00

Crosscoder

Roar Guru


Grant stated the NRL will be allocating an extra $100m pa for grassroots, part of the new TV deal. That would include those areas of current neglect .

2016-10-19T02:32:44+00:00

Crosscoder

Roar Guru


I would consider closing in on 18,000 a success, with little expenditure, liittle media coverage, in a territory where no other Nrl club exists and has a very little grassroot;s base .And where a private consortium deems it to be so. Compared to a club whose majority support by crowds and membership is a few hours from Sydney,where million upon millions of dollars have been spent on promotion,where the media gives on a regular basis 1/2 page ,where TV ch7 's Mel is constantly singing its praises.Who had to move home base in Blacktown because it was not suitable after much Council and Govt expenditure.Which is not virgin territory because teh Swans have been here 35years. I'm sure you will Clip,any opportunity to have a shot needs no inducement.

2016-10-19T01:49:50+00:00

Maroon Blood

Guest


It is interesting that the Knights, even with their massive junior catchment area in the Hunter, have signed three lads from my local RL Club, the Rockingham Coastal Sharks, in Jayden Hocking, Curtis Dansey-Smaller and Brandon Wright. This is only from one of the junior clubs here in Perth, no idea how many have been signed to NRL Clubs from the other 7 Perth clubs. I am only aware of these fellas as my sons used to play with them. When I read comments about how there is no interest in League in the West, no junior development in the West etc etc it does get me a little hot under the collar. And this is WITHOUT our own NRL team to encourage more participation in the game. I dobut very much that Victorian junior league can boast as many players in NRL team junior development programs.

AUTHOR

2016-10-19T01:33:32+00:00

NF

Roar Guru


Clipper In other expansion articles, I noticed you state that WA can't handle two 'rugby' teams. So in other words, WA is not an 'all code city' that you continually state about NSW. I'm confident WA can hold both rugby and league in the future if not it said alot about the sporting landscape down there. Considering how more open QLD/NSW is to other codes, to see it be the completle opposite elsewhere is a interesting dichotomy as AFL has dominance over in WA/SA.

2016-10-18T22:30:16+00:00

clipper

Guest


Well, at least we now know that you would consider 'closing in on 18k' a success, but 15k not a success for a new team. Will remember that for Perth after 5 years.

2016-10-18T20:39:50+00:00

Crosscoder

Roar Guru


Well no they are not. Evading LOL ,I stated it is not ,because of the very reason I gave.Cannot be any more explicit.Because AFL already has a club in Sydney which has been a pioneer for the later club.The Storm did not have that luxury. Just like a fair swag of Swan's members are from South Melbourne.

2016-10-18T14:18:18+00:00

81paling

Roar Rookie


Great millions of dollars more going to people who support other codes outside League heartlands, whilst areas where the game is becoming less popular are told that there will no longer be referee's supplied to mini League games, coaches have to run it themselves. Reality is for every dollar you spend in NSW or QLD you have to spend $100 in Victoria to get the same result at grass roots level and the same is the case for other codes. So spend the $3m in NSW and QLD and get rid of the competitors because they will go broke trying to push $300m a year into QLD & NSW jr markets.

AUTHOR

2016-10-18T06:37:25+00:00

NF

Roar Guru


Mike It's truly a pittance the non-heartland investment is pathetic compared to the AFL. It's amazing that despite that stagnation the NRL is at, the NRL still survives one way or another. To think how far it can go with an actual progressive vision and plan for once.

AUTHOR

2016-10-18T06:35:14+00:00

NF

Roar Guru


Maroon It seems WA had a greater development in juniors than Victoria despite the Storm's existence. That what I mean is failing to grow grass-roots all those years, the Storm by now should have some sembelence of junior system in Victoria. This is a indictment on the NRL's heartland thinking, comple neglect of growing a player base by growing in non-heartlands. It would solve the issue of player depth, by growing the overall talent pool but the NRL is so short-sighted and insular.

2016-10-18T03:34:12+00:00

Maroon Blood

Guest


One of the many things an NRL team would have in it's favour is that there WOULD be the liklihood of home grown talent in the team. Waqa Blake and Curtis Rona are WA juniors (the latter defecting to Union just so he could come home) and I know of at least four WA boys running around in Holden Cup, Keeylan Tuuta Edwards at the Dragons being one of them with a ton of talent. Good crowds to the three games held here this year, the test being a sell out, growing junior base, sponsorship coming out the ying yang, great weather, great city, East coast-firendly time slots........just make it happen NRL!!

2016-10-17T22:24:00+00:00

clipper

Guest


Whether the bulk is from Canberra or not (considering that many of the Storm supporters would be outside Melbourne), it's evading the question - do you think that 15k plus is a success or not?

2016-10-17T13:37:42+00:00

BigJ

Roar Guru


I really think that the time is now for the Nrl to expand, and they need to do it probably, there is virtually no grass roots in Victroia and this is where they need to start, get another team in Melbourne and then go after NZ, Adelaide/perth in a bit of gamble and will take time to achieve. The nrl needs to learn from the afl example, expand where they already have teams and built on that. They have successfully built up the GWS and the Gold Coast, with a very simple formula. Get the best player to captain the new team (ablett on the Gold coast) and get the best coach to coach the other (sheedy I know he is not there anymore but you get the point). Finally be happy about the teams, the Nrl has (Sydney) never really been that happy about it expansion teams (particulary the storm) they need to promote with happiness and pride not reluctance.

2016-10-17T13:10:52+00:00

The real SC

Roar Rookie


I think its about time that NRL should expand to 18 teams as the start of 2018. A lot of people across SA, TAS and WA are playing grassroots footy through the community. SA - last time was the Adelaide Rams back in the Super League Comp back in 1997. Back then in the 2000s, the state have limited support for Rugby due to lack of funding. TAS - Have played a few NRL Games at York Park and Bellerive Oval back in the days. On the other side, there are a lot of Melbourne Storm fans WA - A huge amount of South Sydney Supporters and Canterbury Bulldogs fans around the place. They have played a few games back at NIB Stadium. A few other teams have visited the venue. I think that the future for NRL in WA would be on the cards for 2018.

2016-10-17T09:44:10+00:00

Crosscoder

Roar Guru


That,s additional to the current monies expended.It's for grassroots clubs to build clubhouses ,or posts or buy gear.Not expansion money.The comparison with AFL is flawed. The NRL is tied up with ATM,money expended on the Titans,Newcastle both for sale.Money lent to the Balmain part of the Wests Tigers.Money lent to St George.Rest assured in runs into the tens of millions. You can't spend what you don;t have until 2018.The AFL has had the money availability for quite a while.. Our beloved leader in the joint partnership with News,was screwed by the Tv deal..When a News journo noted referring to one deal,as being less than expected,you know there is a problem.We;ve been playing catchup ever since with increased salary caps.

2016-10-17T08:47:37+00:00

Mike

Guest


To get back to the actual story - 3 mill over 6 years for 5 states???????? That is pathetic!!!!! The AFL has pumped hundreds of millions into NSW and Qld over the last 20 years and the best the NRL can do is 3 mill. over 6 years?????? I think it's amazing how the NRL still holds up with TV ratings and interest with the leadership we've had since Quayle and Arthurson left the room albeit we were hamstrung by the SL war and Uncle Rupie under paying for TV rights year on year. Surely the NRL can do better than 3 mill over 6 years - that's just embarrassing.

2016-10-17T07:42:57+00:00

Crosscoder

Roar Guru


NF. Grant made a comment in the Australian on Saturday. The thrust was expanding the NSWRL/QRL cups by bringing in PI teams and another NZ team. He did say he was uncertain about expansion,did not think it would happen within the confines of the next TV deal.But again he left the door open,by suggesting perhaps re expansion but would depend entirely on participation rates. Suggesting to me Perth will continue to receive NRL teams etc for games,but the need to increase the grassroots base is a pre requisite .Stretching the competitive quality of teams is not good for the code.Newcastle struggled this year and the AFL: has its problems. Bringing players back from the ESL may help, The code needs to increase its revenue stream in addition to the new TV deal. I don't want the NRL wasting money,when grassroots is screaming out for more.

2016-10-17T07:36:34+00:00

Crosscoder

Roar Guru


I also agree with M.F.He is one of the few AFL people who actually provides considered opinion, when he comes on rl threads. More power to him.

AUTHOR

2016-10-17T07:32:17+00:00

NF

Roar Guru


PGNEWC The N in NRL stands for National not NSWRL which seems to be the mindset to those in the heartland still. What does hatred for Sydney have to do with a national footprint, it's irrelevant. I'm all for 2nd Brisbane team and in hindsight should of being introduced as the same time as the Broncos so there be competing against each other from day one. By the time, the Crushers enter the Broncos already won 2 premierships and were well established in Brisbane. To think the Broncos didn't want to support or back the Crushers existence at all, instead just let it wither away. As a result, the other codes got a equal share in Brisbane with each code having one team (Roar, Reds, Lions). Something the Broncos prefer instead of keeping 2 Brisbane teams to maintain a league presence in Brisbane. It's the equilevent of the likes of Port Adelaide or Fremantle gone instantly and just keeping it a monopoly for one team only as it only benefits themselves but not the code overall. Something that has always hinder the code, self-interest and insularity over the long-term vision and greater good for the code. Something the other codes see the bigger picture see the AFL, ARU but not the NRL.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar