Amid last week's mud-slinging, some rugby was played

By Elisha Pearce / Expert

It’s been some kind of week in Australian rugby. If you squint hard and put the windscreen wipers on full bore, you’ll be able to see through the mudslinging to where the rugby was played.

We are a weird bunch in rugby, aren’t we?

It doesn’t take much for us to go into complete meltdown, then a couple of days later we’ve basically resumed our normal places as if nothing happened.

A week ago we were cruising into the normal prepare-for-a-thrashing week of the third Bledisloe Cup Test, then all hell broke loose.

Suddenly the game was falling apart, the grassroots had been uprooted, there were rogue leagues announced, Perth won a championship but was also trying not to get closed down, some Sydney rugby-types threw grenades at the ARU CEO, a referee robbed the Wallabies, our national coach was dressed up as a clown, and people shouted and ranted.

It wasn’t quite over by the new working week either, because everything was cranked back up to 11 to support or ridicule the decision to select Marika Koroibete for the Spring Tour without having played a professional game in Australia yet.

I don’t quite believe everyone’s hearts were into the Spring Tour squad bashing as much as the other stuff, but we were in an outrage groove and nothing was going to stop us.

Without starting a code war, I’d suggest football fans are the only other Australian sports group as ready to lose their collective minds.

Here are four takeaways to help you digest what has been a tumultuous week.

Was it worth blowing up the rugby and drawing new battle lines over a club funding argument?
I don’t know all the people involved in the fabled letter to ARU CEO Bill Pulver. I love rugby, but I’m not really an insider. Perhaps that hinders my understanding, but hopefully that allows me to see things more clearly, from a detached vantage point.

When the letter and accompanying dummy-spit erupted last week, I was concerned that it was hijacking an important week for rugby in Australia.

Sure, the Wallabies had already lost the Bledisloe Cup, so for the traditionalists it wasn’t the epic week you’d expect if the series was up for grabs. But for modern rugby fans that see what is coming down the pipeline it was important. The Wallaroos were playing a Test in Auckland against the women’s New Zealand side and the NRC was coming to a close.

In terms of the letter and email conversations themselves – what I saw of them – the concerning thing was a tone of anger without many constructive ideas about the future.

The ‘grassroots’ aren’t likely to be saved through a rogue, eight-team club championship. For a start: where does that leave room for representation from the state that just supplied the National Rugby Championship winner?

Yes, there needs to be more rugby on free-to-air television, we’ve all known that for a long time. But surely a solution to putting club rugby on television could be found without resorting to public recriminations and a ‘damn the torpedoes!’ approach?

If the ARU is being asked to pay another $500,000 to get club rugby on television after paying $300,000 last year it’s hard to blame them for thinking twice about it.

But you wouldn’t stage a stunt like this at this particular time only over putting one club game a week on television would you?

It wasn’t hard to see this outburst coming
When I wrote about the ARU’s release of their strategic plan in April, I said they were walking a tightrope. One of the concerns I raised was whether the traditional rugby base would be patient.

They aren’t.

The strategic plan heralded a new approach to growing ‘grassroots’ rugby in this country. It seems like the loud viewpoint of the traditional crowd is that premier club rugby in Sydney and Brisbane is the grassroots.

It’s clear by their strategic plan the ARU see things differently. Their grassroots view includes getting into public schools, women’s rugby, sevens rugby and VIVA7s as well.

The ARU is now walking a tightrope and club rugby seems determined to knock them off it.

The question is whether the broader community thinks rugby can and should broaden its appeal to new students, new formats and with women. Or would they rather rugby plunge all of its money back into traditional baskets?

Based on results, our women’s sevens team, the Pearls, are the best success we’ve had this year. Do we turn our back on that now?

I said in September rugby in Australia must balance a grassroots and professional path to growth in Australia. The letter hasn’t changed my mind.

Club rugby shouldn’t be left to die. But the ARU must also invest in new areas that will strengthen the game overall. Rugby doesn’t have the money or the cultural capital to blow it up and start again right now, so calmer heads must prevail.

Rugby has shifted its focus slightly away from its traditionally narrow gaze under the new strategic plan. I for one applaud that outlook on the world; rugby tends to naval gaze far too much. And, presumably, a lot of consultation and work went into that new direction. It would be a shame to call it all off now, if that is indeed what some hope or expect.

We actually saw some improvement from the Wallabies this weekend
Aside from being very poor at securing the attacking breakdown, the performance of the Wallabies was much improved on Saturday night – and it was a better contest than the 37-10 scoreline indicated.

One standout was the performance of Bernard Foley. He was being crowded by the sideways movement of Quade Cooper in recent Tests, and unleashing his straight running at 10 again was exactly what the team needed.

The Wallabies were able to control possession for large stretches of the match when they paid attention to their own ruck. They beat more defenders than the All Blacks did, gave more than their usual amount of offloads, weren’t physically beaten often, and won most of their set pieces. In fact, the overall tone of the Wallabies’ play had a new strength to it, especially in the forwards. New selections with larger frames are starting to do their job.

There was weakness in the back line defence, where Samu Kerevi still isn’t up to standard. And with new combinations on both sides, the backline was leaky all night. Bringing Henry Speight into 13 on some set pieces was a complete mess and shouldn’t be repeated.

Fixing that midfield is a top priority now. Reece Hodge is actually a 13, and will battle with Kerevi for years over that jersey. The real blank is at 12, where neither of those two quite fit. The selection of Kyle Godwin for the Spring Tour squad made me smile – he might be a long-term solution down the track if he returns to old form.

Without quite being back to his best, Israel Folau had a much better game. He was very threatening at times and was generally more involved. Dane Haylett-Petty was again solid and went looking for work.

There are signs the Wallabies are starting to find their feet again after a horror Southern Hemisphere season. On the Northern Hemisphere tour, the Grand Slam is the ultimate aim, but finding a consistent level of play, developing a plan A and B and then beating England should be the goal.

The All Blacks deserve their win streak record
‘Awesome’ is completely overused this century, but the All Blacks right now are awesome in the true sense of the word.

The Oxford dictionary defines awesome as “extremely impressive or daunting; inspiring awe.” And that about summarises New Zealand at the moment.

They’re truly inspiring the way they can farewell all-time greats of the game and roll out the next generation without a hiccup. You could argue that the form they’ve found at times this year is even better than what they displayed last year – without all the talent that said goodbye.

The power of the team is extremely impressive. The ferocity and fearlessness with which they twist the knife to make the opposition pay for any mistake is incredible. It’s hard to feel anything but awe when a hooker chases a break to knock the ball loose and not long later is the first man to support his own winger on the break in the corner to score a try.

Dane Coles is the embodiment of this All Blacks side, full of people the best in their position, but with enough extra to make you wonder if there is a position they couldn’t play.

Others such as Ben Smith bide their time on the wing and when finally given a chance at fullback unleash a display of elusive running and link play that leaves you with your jaw hanging open.

Players like Keiran Read have absorbed – apparently by osmosis? – the ability to read the game from Richie McCaw and combined it with an even more athletic body to have an impact on the game in new and fascinating ways that even McCaw himself wasn’t able to.

Truly awesome and extremely deserving.

The Crowd Says:

2016-10-28T12:12:15+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


I have acknowledged elsewhere in this forum that Savea and Read checked HP. If that amounts to ignoring then it's ignoring - in your world i.e. But what is even more hilarious In Brief is that you are seemingly unable to separate the two incidents. "Two wrongs don't make a right" - I'm sure you have heard that phrase before. Think about it.

2016-10-28T07:58:41+00:00

In brief

Guest


'Get away with'??? He was actively encouraged by Owens.

2016-10-28T07:57:00+00:00

In brief

Guest


Really? Argentina have a weak underbelly, I'm always waiting for the next major screw up or injury when they play based on poor technique and lack of game sense. They have some great players and potential but a long way to go.

2016-10-28T07:53:04+00:00

In brief

Guest


Hilarious- you conveniently ignore fact Reid and savea tried to hold back DHP when the break was made.

2016-10-27T19:19:14+00:00

watcher

Guest


I have no problem with the half back taking an advantage, isn't the team putting the ball into the scrum supposed to win it. Wallabies fall down with failing to select players who fulfill the fundamentals of a position. i.e. Pocock at 8, magnificent 7 but unsuited at 8 as he is not a lineout option or gain line reacher. Folau needs to be used wider in more space, he is wasted hitting it up. Same as Hodge, his build and the way he moves screams Centre to me. My view is that Cheika does not address issues long term. A lot of comment about lack of depth, which is actually an argument for long term planning. The first question to be asked in selection, can a player fulfill the requirements of the position for the team. Sorry, but I think Cheika is a 'smoke and mirrors' Coach.

2016-10-27T16:01:03+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


Cuw - that is a load of......... HP is not a small man - slightly shorter - maybe few kgs lighter. HP was determined to knock Savea off his stride and succeeded. Have a look at the head on ground shot. The only way Savea was going to prevent that was to shoulder HP before he shouldered him. Savea was in full stride trying to chase down his man. He is not braced for a knock like that. The last thing he would be expecting is HP coming across like that. If that was a horse race HP would have been relegated without doubt. Usain Bolt a big guy right - Gatlin shorter and much lighter. 25 metres into a 100m dash Gatlin decides to move across the lane and shoulder Bolt out of it like HP did to Savea. You think Bolt will recover from that - of course not. Again regards Coles - Foley it would not have surprised me if it had been a penalty try. Can't disagree regards the overall TMO process however. I'm all most to the point where I don't celebrate tries any more and this is because I'm waiting for the double blast on the whistle usually meaning the referee wants to check something. Initially the TMO was introduced to review grounding of the ball for tries. They then opened up a hole can of worms when they extended it to virtually everything. It is out of control. Much of the stuff that has come out of the Mitre10 NPC has been awful.

2016-10-27T03:57:24+00:00

CUW

Guest


@ ClarkeG i disagree. |Savea is no midget ; if he cannot shake off a push or a fend , that is sad. on the other hand Coles' hand is pulled. in slow-mo its looks like nothing , but in real time he loses the hand that would have touched the ball. i have no issue both going to ground ; its just that coles loses his hand that matters. anyway its water under the bridge. however my biggest issue is silly TMO's who choose sporadically to intervene. if he could intervene at the try then surely ther were many other things he could have intervened in. i have seen specially in AVIVA the TMO get in the refs ear about foulplay and off ball things. if all 4 are just watching the ball then u dont need all of them. it looked liked the touchies did not look at anything else but the ball , which the ref was also watching. there was so much going on in that match outside the ball. the 4 guys earn their $ in a match like this if they get it right. for eg. the match between leicester and racing had zero incidents on or off ball. it was more like a friendly.

2016-10-26T18:55:01+00:00

jaysper

Roar Guru


I looked at that and thought penalty try myself but at the end of the day the only decision that matters is the ref's. I don't think Ruck's comment about Barrett leaving 6 points on the field is a fair call. At the end of the day, you select a player for both his strengths and weaknesses and Barrett has a well known weakness in the place kicking department. That said, Ruck is correct in saying the Wallabies are still a long way from beating the ABs.

2016-10-26T12:00:13+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


Cuw - There is no issue if there is minimal jostling between players running alongside each other shoulder to shoulder.That does not mean however that one player can just blatantly bowl an opponent out of his way which is what HP did in this instance. Foley initially reaches from behind and puts his right hand across Coles chest which he is not allowed to do. One could even argue that he has slightly pushed Coles from behind. The impact is minimal however and I think that is what saved him. Initially Owens said it looked like Coles was tackled without the ball then he said Foley did not interfere at all. I have looked at it several times and I can't be sure the actions of Foley prevented Coles from getting to the ball first so I'm ok with the outcome on that one.

2016-10-26T11:46:14+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


Iv got green and gold glasses and on? I'm one of the few not complaining about any decisions.

2016-10-26T10:37:58+00:00

CUW

Guest


and GOLDBERG came out of retirement to "fight" LESNER !!! WOW Justin Bieber dropped the mike and walked out of his Manchester concert , becoz the fans booed him for talking too much and singing less :) AT & T offered $85 BILLION to take over TIME_WARNER INC (nucking futs LOL) what a week it was.

2016-10-26T10:34:56+00:00

taylorman

Roar Guru


Yeah agree ruggerphil. I thought the Speight try should have been given, but I also thought Coles was directly interfered with by Foley, so in the end it was probably even in terms of the scores though despite our kicking the conversion was much easier.

2016-10-26T10:27:11+00:00

CUW

Guest


@ Train Without A Station IMO , the DHP - Savea thing was what they call "shoulder to shoulder" , which shud have not been penalized. Savea gets the medal for the milking. and before people climb on Savea , all scrum halves milk penalties when ever an opponent is on the other side of ruck - irrespective of interfering or not. on the other hand Foley caught Cole's right arm , which is similar to a shirt-pull. he went down and caused Coles to go down. prevented Coles from diving which i assume he is capable of. so as the guy in front , if Coles dived he would have got to the balll first. even in football a lot of shoulder-to-shoulder challenges are let go , where as actually grabbing at a hand or arm or shirt is penalized. they got both decisions wrong IMO; i hazard a guess - maybe Owens realized he got the Speight try wrong and balanced out the Coles thing. that also happens in footy , where refs miss clear penalties and then give a penalty for trivial things - just to balance.

2016-10-26T10:22:16+00:00

Ruggerphil

Roar Rookie


Foley tackled Coles without the ball.Should have been penalty try and yellow card for Foley. I suggest you watch the incident again without your green and gold glasses on. Funny how the Aussie media and Cheika have totally focused on the Speight incident and conveniently forgot the Coles-Foley incident that was just as controversial as far as I'm concerned.

2016-10-26T10:15:04+00:00

Lube Goat

Guest


Dane Coles may be a quality footballer - but he is a grub. Watch what he does after tackling and dispossessing Dean Mumm when Mumm grabbed that interception; as Mumm is going to ground Coles can't miss the opportunity to palm Mumm in the face. Wouldn't be out of place in rugby league.

2016-10-26T09:29:19+00:00

Mike

Guest


Dual international Andrew walker??

2016-10-26T08:55:39+00:00

OJP

Guest


Yeah, I saw this and its true that Phipps does momentarily pause as Owens is moving ... you say he's the best AB this year, I say even the ref was surprised by the wallabies playing to that side hence his positioning. It seemed pretty clear to all and sundry that passing to Hodge wasnt going to end well, including Sharpie in the commentary, who noted that even as a second rower he could see the set up was all wrong. + what Shane D said.

2016-10-26T08:46:11+00:00

Garth

Guest


by some 50 - 60,000 years I believe...

2016-10-26T08:45:26+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


meh, I'll take that however it was delivered... :lol:

2016-10-26T08:39:39+00:00

Garth

Guest


The first time Phipps tried that, it rolled back into the centre off the knee of one of his locks.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar