The Wrap: Ireland finally have their day, Wales lose their way

By Geoff Parkes / Expert

After 111 years, at the 29th attempt, Ireland finally have their much-treasured win against New Zealand, thrilling a buzzing Soldier Field in Chicago by winning by 40-29.

If there is any regret that the maiden victory wasn’t achieved in Dublin, it will be only fleeting; there were large swathes of green spread through the crowd and most ‘neutrals’ riding the Cubs bandwagon, keen to keep the roll of underdog winners coming.

And anyway, on this showing, who’s to argue against the notion that a win on Irish soil is only three weeks away? One thing for certain is the Irish won’t be paying $12 to win that match!

The All Blacks scored from their first use – Waisake Naholo slicing through for George Moala’s try – but they wouldn’t be acquainted with the ball for much of the remainder of the first half, possession running at about 70 per cent to 30 per cent.

Ireland followed the blueprint that served them well in 2013, their 25-8 half-time lead matching the All Blacks’ biggest ever deficit at the break. Once this was extended to 30-8, even with thirty minutes remaining, and with some form of comeback inevitable, a four-score margin was asking too much of a side which was fraying and bending in unusual places; like their engine room.

Interestingly, Ireland did many of the things touted in last weeks’ Wrap, most notably controlling the pace of the game. The first half was studded with injury breaks, numerous TMO reviews, and a yellow card that Joe Moody will be feeling very foolish about today; valuable points come while he was sitting down.

The All Blacks thrive when they control the rhythm – as they did for twenty minutes in the second half – but mostly it was Ireland, sucking in air during the stoppages, re-gathering their composure, before firing again in short, sharp, staccato bursts.

Tactically too, they got their mix just right. Kicking high to contests, from 9 and 10 and kick-off, many of which they won, but not overplaying it, as halfback Conor Murray has been prone to do in the past. Critically, they also stayed positive, moving the ball to the edges and backing the mobility of their support players to recycle effectively.

Last week, we identified 30 points as a winning score which would have got the job done by one. In the end, they threw in a few extra for good measure; only the fifth time in their history that the All Blacks conceded 40 points.

There were two telling plays, Ireland in the 48th minute turning down a 45m penalty attempt in favour of Johnny Sexton drilling it to the corner, which set up the maul which in turn created the space for an easy run in by Simon Zebo. Talk about seizing the moment.

And at the end, with the All Blacks within a score of a miracle result, Ireland spread the ball wide to Zebo, whose superb kick and chase helped pin Julian Savea in goal. With Sam Cane head-down in the scrum, Jamie Heaslip breezed into so much space it almost turned Robbie Henshaw’s winning try into an anti-climax.

Another year, another side, and that initial set piece ball, back on the other side of halfway, would never have got past the flyhalf, and Ireland would have fumbled around, nervously trying to hold on for the win.

But Joe Schmidt, his superb ace-in-the-hole Murray, and now all his men, some of those not even his first choice, understand that to beat these All Blacks, you actually have to beat them by playing rugby. By being relentlessly positive, but in a way which blends your natural strengths with the requirements of the modern game.

As a side note, Ireland also got their response to the All Blacks’ haka just right; a poignant tribute to the late and much loved Munster coach Anthony Foley, which all at once respected and enhanced the haka, not trespassed upon it.

While the result brings New Zealand’s run to an end at 18, it is far from a disaster. Ireland’s day was always coming and, to be fair, many were expecting it to be in Dublin.

They fought back gamely, like the champion side that they are, but what was missing compared to 2013 was the clinical edge to their handling and decision making, that players like Richie McCaw and Ma’a Nonu provided that day.

And while their depth remains light years advanced of their competition, it isn’t limitless. Imagine what the bookies might have offered earlier in the season for a second half middle-row combination of Keiran Read and Scott Barrett? Assuming they’d even heard of Barrett.

New Zealand will have taller and stronger timber for the return match, and they will trust that Aaron Smith re-acquaints himself with the cut and thrust of Test rugby; he was very rusty after his enforced lay-off.

Also, whatever credit Steve Hansen gives Ireland – and it will be plenty – he and Wayne Smith will not again tolerate leaking five tries. That is the number, more than any, which will be burning them up as they head to Europe.

For now, at least, we can forget Eddie Jones and England, and even a potential Wallabies grand slam. The rematch shapes as a compelling, mouth-watering climax to end the year.

Earlier, carefully stepping one’s way around the Choeung Ek Genocidal Centre, or what is commonly known as the ‘Killing Fields’, on the outskirts of Phnom Penh, was hardly a typical Saturday preparation for Test match rugby, but one that provided a sober perspective.

Those fans who again this week who took to their keyboards to pillory Wallabies halfback Nick Phipps – whose crimes against humanity include pushing an Argentine medic, throwing Malakai Fekitoa’s boot into the Wellington crowd, and flinging passes near, but not always directly to, his fly-half – might pause to consider that, in the bigger scheme of things, Phipps is one of the world’s good guys.

As it happens, he and flyhalf Bernard Foley distributed the ball so quickly and fluidly in Cardiff, that Wales were unable to gain any foothold in the match, the 32-8 score-line, if anything, flattering the Welsh dragons.

While Foley got most of the accolades from TV comments man Jonathan Davies, it was the platform provided by the Wallabies forward pack that told the real tale. They owned the advantage line, in both attack and defence, in what was most noticeably a true a team effort; forwards seamlessly interchanging roles in ball carry, cleanout and tackle.

The effectiveness of their cleanout allowed a speed of recycled ball that Wales, fatally, weren’t able to slow down. In turn, they were ponderous on their own ball, halfback Rhys Webb too often tickling the ball with his toe before deciding what to do with it which, as it turned out, was no laughing matter.

It reflected both a lack of organisation and a lack of confidence, and Wales will eagerly await the return of key players like Alun Wynn-Jones, Sam Warburton and Talupe Faletau to provide them with on-field direction and leadership.

Australia’s opening was reminiscent of their first quarter against England in Brisbane, and while there were some nervous moments when tries were bombed by Tevita Kuridrani and Dane Haylett-Petty, this was never going to result in the same outcome.

For one, Wales aren’t as assured as England were, and also the Wallabies have improved in the time since June. The signs in Auckland of better cohesion and mental strength were taken to another level here. Not to mention the extra grunt in the middle row.

When a superb piece of interplay between Foley, Reece Hodge and Israel Folau sent Hodge away for a 27th-minute try, the result was never in doubt. It was as if the players decided ‘if our coach is going to be portrayed as a clown, the least we can do is make him a happy clown.’

An indelible memory of my childhood was watching matches from the Arms Park, framed by beautiful, stirring singing from the Cardiff crowd. Granted, there was little for the home crowd to sing about here, but even if there had been, that space has sadly been filled by nondescript, irrelevant and intrusive pop music.

A once unique and iconic venue has become ‘Principality Stadium’. For ‘Principality’, read ‘just another homogenous arena doing the same vanilla things other stadiums around the world are doing’.

At least New Zealand grounds tend to use local artists, even if many of them have long since retired. I’m not sure which Welsh valley Bruno Mars hails from.

So if Welsh rugby might have lost some of its soul off the field, they will surely come again and find it on the field. A gaze to the west, across the Irish Sea, should teach them all they need to know.

The Crowd Says:

2016-11-11T02:35:21+00:00

Daz

Guest


So ask Craig Dowd, a 60 test All Black legend for his opinion Chivas if you don't believe me.

2016-11-09T05:03:42+00:00

Daz

Guest


Only a pagan, warlike culture like in NZ demands blood for blood in the modern era. These people killed Cook and by ambush and none of them had the mental capacity to do what he did. To sail the uncharted seas. Faark me dead a round wheel was a million miles away to them.

2016-11-08T18:52:10+00:00

Jerry

Guest


"it seems the idea / tactic (for a lot of teams not just AB’s) is too normalise infringing so that it is ok" Do you even rugby, bro? Joking aside, I'd say this has been an intrinsic part of rugby - especially forward play - for as long as I've been watching the game, to be honest. I'd say the horse has bolted.

2016-11-08T16:34:49+00:00

Carlos the Argie

Roar Guru


This is an asinine comment. To say that you referee children thereby you know how to call an offsides at AB test level speed is beyond ridiculous. You must be the SA Donald with that hubris.

2016-11-08T16:30:53+00:00

Carlos the Argie

Roar Guru


Geoff, I mentioned that I saw the AB-IRE game from the sidelines. Up close you realize how fast the defensive lines move. Even when I was watching them instead of focusing on the ruck, I couldn't pick when they were offsides or just lightening fast. From the TV, with a pint in hand, everything looks simpler. I can tell you, the ref has a very hard time if he has to focus on the ball in the ruck and the defensive lines. These athletes are amazing.

2016-11-08T13:55:21+00:00

shootermacg

Guest


The reason why the ref calls this pretty quickly is. It stops foul play when the attacking team's forwards hurl themselves at players that are legally allowed to be in that position. In other words it prevents retaliation. I can tell you if the ball was at all visible the ref would allow play, but in a wrap tackle its rare that a defender isn't on top of the ball.

2016-11-08T10:46:43+00:00

Stu. B.

Guest


Well Geoff it started out as a top article but as I have now read all the blogs I have learned how to beat the All Blacks,bring them down to your level and then give them a tough game,making sure the ref, asistant refs and TMO all watch and not be distracted by the other team and one tip only dont argue with a Yarpie.

2016-11-08T09:13:33+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


There was no knock on when Moala picked up. The TMO review confirmed this. The Ben Smith try was probably similar to the Murphy try in that there was no clear and obvious evidence to suggest the try should not be awarded in each case. Presumably the ref or his asst saw grounding of the ball in Murphy's case as the TMO was asked if there was a reason not to award the try and the TMO was specifically asked to check for a possible knock on at the lineout (the suggestion of this come from the asst ref). As there was no clear and obvious knock on then the try had to be awarded. In Smith's case there was no question he grounded the ball and on the TMO review he was not clearly and obviously in touch before he grounded the ball so the try had to be awarded.

2016-11-08T08:57:46+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


Yes - he has made much of the 'Richie impression' elsewhere hence my comment. I agree with your post.

2016-11-08T07:51:05+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


Bakkies - Healey is a good commentator/analyst when he says things that suit your agenda. You said 5 then Healey counted at least 4 side entries. I have not heard the whole coverage but I heard him say "2 or 3". So what is it - 5 or 2 or - geez talk about moving goalposts. As I said I thought the ABs were reasonably clean at that maul. There was certainly no side entry that was blatantly obvious. I think you're being pedantic for the sake of playing out your agenda. If you are to be pedantic then maybe you should consider the formation of the maul also. I do know what the offside line is at mauls. Have you managed to grasp the law around forward passes yet after all this time? Yep I have not forgotten. Certainly hope so if you are refereeing youngsters.

2016-11-08T06:19:00+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


One last time. What Murray did is a penalisable offence.

2016-11-08T06:13:15+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


Bakkies - Jerry and Geoff brought up an area of the game that is absolutely worthy of reasonable discussion. Yet your contribution is to revert to snide, irrelevant, pointless comments towards NZ rugby and then personal abuse. Very classy indeed. One try was scored off penalty advantage being the try scored by Stander.That try and Murphy's try were scored while Moody was under the YC. There was absolutely nothing to suggest a penalty try could have been awarded in the Stander try so that leaves us with the Murphy try. If the Murphy try was certain to be a penalty try then the referee would have simply awarded a penalty try rather than deferring to the Asst Ref and TMO. So unless there were other tries and YCs in the match that I missed I have no idea what you are ranting about.

2016-11-08T06:10:29+00:00

Coconut

Guest


Both sides were penalised for offside. Both sides were playing offside as much as they could get away with it. Ireland was penalised in the 19th minute for offside, and it was blatantly obvious too.

2016-11-08T04:45:54+00:00

soapit

Guest


i know ive said it before but easy fix is to get the tmo to police it while he's waiting to be needed for reviews. thought for a while that some rules should work on a warning system so you only get a penalty every second one. (or every time if cynical)

2016-11-08T04:37:05+00:00

soapit

Guest


my issue with it all is that they NEVER allow the maul to turn back into a ruck if the team somehow manages to get the ball to the ground. at least they have cleaned up the intentional collapsing that used to go on when these first started being used

2016-11-08T03:45:47+00:00

taylorman

Roar Guru


Didn't know Healey was a kiwi. ?

2016-11-08T02:06:54+00:00

Kesmcc

Guest


If the ref saw the grounding why did he ask the tmo to check the grounding?? I thought smith's was very close but it looked like he got the ball down just before his knee hot the ground and there was nothing wrong with Reids tackle. Stander tries for the intercept and knocks the ball up into the air. He's allowed to be tackled. If you think those were close calls you could look the other way at Connor Murray's try where Owen Frank's is slightly blocked behind the ruck from an offside Irishman. Not much in it but if you want to split hairs about the other trys then you have to be open to both sides.

AUTHOR

2016-11-08T00:31:17+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


Thanks for helping me out there Bakkies. I had thought that NZ losing for the first time in 19 matches, and losing to Ireland for the first time in 29 matches was a key component of the article. But apparently not.

2016-11-08T00:01:56+00:00

Muz

Guest


That would be a wonderful compliment to any young rugby player. Being compared to the great man McCawesome!! But yeah. Can imagine bakkies squeezing any fun out the game for the poor wee kiddies.

2016-11-07T23:09:26+00:00

Fin

Guest


Hi Geoff, Ireland also had a huge advantage from where that scrum was set (left side of the field in the attacking zone). They could play their 11 & 9 on the open field whilst the ab's wing and halfback had to stay and defend the blindside in case the Irish backrow went blind off the scrum. It was Sensible play by Ireland to take full advantage of their position with regards to where the scrum was set. You can tell they are well coached.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar