Nothing to lose for Maddinson and Wade

By Brett McKay / Expert

I know I wasn’t alone this week in expressing surprise at the selection of NSW bat Nic Maddinson and Victorian ‘keeper Matthew Wade for the Third Test against South Africa starting today in Adelaide.

I know this because Twitter blew up when the announcement was made on Sunday afternoon, and there have been countless articles written about it since.

And text messages. When I’m getting text messages about something, then people are really annoyed.

Like most of you, my reaction to the changes was pretty simple.

– Matt Renshaw: haven’t seen him, but I like what I read;

– Peter Handscomb: happy days, I’ve been raving about him for years;

– Chadd Sayers: yeah, fair enough, he’s been bowling well for a while;

– Jackson Bird: good, probably should’ve been in the squad from the start;

– Matthew Wade: whoa, let’s not go overboard here, and

– Nic Maddison: oh, good grief.

There are numerous reasons why I’m not a huge rap on either Wade or Maddinson, and there are numerous reasons why I don’t think either should have been picked.

But they have been picked, and there’s no point debating their selection any further. They’re both in the side now, they’ll both play in Adelaide, and given the upheaval the selectors have now brought upon the team, they will be in the Test team now for the rest of the summer. At least.

Of course, the last thing either player should be doing is trying to please the masses. The only opinions that count are those of Steven Smith and the selectors.

But both players will be aware of the conjecture; it’s almost impossible to escape the commentariat in this day and age, especially when there has been as much written and said about their selections as there has been.

And that means that both players can play with complete freedom. With expectation around these players set where it is, almost any success they have in this Test will be a welcome bonus. It might be one of those rare moments in professional sport where they can’t lose either way.

For Wade, I don’t really care if he’s prepared to throw out some lip to the South Africans; what’s more important is that he can show the kind of pluck and guile and fighting qualities with the bat that he’s been selected for.

It’s certainly true – in part – that Peter Nevill lost his place because of the batting failings of those immediately around him in the batting order, but Wade can’t be walking to the crease with any other attitude than scoring runs himself.

He’s certainly capable of this. He’s made Test centuries, and one of them was batting at six. He’s batted himself at five for Victoria this season, and that has brought him a degree of success in both the one-day and Shield competitions. He also showed some ability to bat with the tail during the one-day series in South Africa.

A total of 11 Shield catches and a stumping in three matches this season suggests there is some merit to his self-assessment of being a vastly improved wicketkeeper than when he last wore the baggy green, too. There may not be a more anticipated and eagle-eyed study of a single moment of ‘keeping than when the first ball hits his gloves.

For Maddinson, he gets the opportunity to repay the significant faith of the national selectors, an opportunity that feels like it’s been mentioned prospectively in recent years way more and way sooner than perhaps it should have been. The talent is undeniable, but the application thereof remains in question.

But like Wade one spot below him, Maddinson is definitely capable of making the no.6 place in the order his.

He came into First Class cricket as a young opener, a stodgy young opener at that, but has reinvented himself in recent years as a middle order strokemaker of enormous potential. Mark Waugh, Darren Lehmann, and maybe even Greg Chappell around the selection table will have seen parts of their own game in Maddinson, and if the young batsman gets even in the ballpark of their quality, then his selection will have been a huge success.

Hopefully he’s still got a bit of nervous young opener’s stodge in him still, because by his own admission, there will be times in Adelaide where he’ll have to work bloody hard for his runs. But if he can come out the other side unscathed, then his natural game can certainly – and rapidly – turn a game.

We have to go back to the not-so-glory days when relatively unknown kids like Jones, and Ritchie, and Waugh were thrown into the deep-end of Test cricket to remember such a sweeping change of selection direction.

We know more about young players these days, but many of those same puzzled questions of the mid-1980s equally apply today. ‘Are we really sure this is the way we want to go?’

And we’re not sure, if we’re honest. But with Wade and Maddinson now in the Test side, I’m looking forward to being wrong about both of them.

The Crowd Says:

2016-11-24T12:31:25+00:00

Rob

Guest


I don't think we bowled well today. Lyon just doesn't look like troubling a top order batsman for a front line bowler. In regards to playing a spinner, Smith ( needs to bowl more) and Maxwell could do enough change ups to get wickets and cause damage late in the game.

2016-11-24T07:23:56+00:00

John Erichsen

Roar Guru


Agree about Wade. To me, it would make more sense, if Nevill had to go, to use the remaining four tests at home to settle a younger keeper like Whiteman into the test side. Then its off to India, where the quality of the gloveman is truly tested, just as Wade found out during the last tour when he was woeful.

AUTHOR

2016-11-24T04:13:51+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


which is why I said the move "has brought him a degree of success in both the one-day and Shield competitions," Don...

2016-11-24T03:14:49+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


It's a bit of a stretch to say Wade has had success batting himself at #5. His average of 23 this season is the same Test average that had Nevill dropped.

2016-11-24T03:08:34+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


2 innings ago he stuck a wonderful 81. How is he out of form?

AUTHOR

2016-11-24T03:05:52+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


Maddinson over Maxwell (if that was the choice) is a fair question, Rob, but I'm not sure a spinner v seamer was considered. I think it's always been part of the thinking to play a spinner..

AUTHOR

2016-11-24T03:02:48+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


Yeah, I know where you’re coming from Chris, and we might even be arriving at the same point from different directions. My thinking is that expectations of Wade and Maddinson are so low that even moderate success will be seen as a bonus..

AUTHOR

2016-11-24T03:02:21+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


It could be James, but then Maddinson, by his own admission, has struggled against the moving pink ball in Adelaide!

2016-11-24T03:00:13+00:00

Rob

Guest


Let's just support the young blokes and get behind them. I'll stick my neck out and say we are on the way up because these young blokes have been selected. Wade got dropped and told to work on his game with the gloves so lets see before making a judgement. The word is Steve Smith had a bit of input into the selections. That's good but how much favouritism is he giving Lyon over Sayers, and Madison over Maxwell and C. White?

2016-11-24T02:59:34+00:00

Charlie Turner

Guest


Smith has always puzzled me. He was originally selected in the test side as a leg spin bowler and now rarely bowls at all. Is this because he was never any good or bowling fatigues or distracts his batting? In my opinion he is a good leggie and just needs to reign in the gimme he bowls every over.

2016-11-24T02:57:48+00:00

jameswm

Roar Guru


I did wonder if Patterson getting out to spin in both innings (Holland from memory) against Vic showed a possible frailty against spin, and that was considered.

2016-11-24T02:56:44+00:00

jameswm

Roar Guru


And a 50 in the other innings as well, coming in for a similar score. Saved them in both innings.

AUTHOR

2016-11-24T02:50:12+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


Rriiiighttt.. So we're picking players six months ahead of when they're actually required now? I'd have my doubts that's the reasoning, Don..

AUTHOR

2016-11-24T02:48:35+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


Basil, I too though Patterson might get the nod, but as I've said above, I'd be stunned if Maddinson's bowling was a consideration..

AUTHOR

2016-11-24T02:46:04+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


I guess there's really only one way to find out where his 'keeping is, James. We'll see soon enough whether the supposed improvements are imagined or actual soon enough. And Rob, I'm sure Whiteman made a Shield hundred just last weekend, coming in with WA at 4 or 5 for less than 100..

AUTHOR

2016-11-24T02:44:51+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


Matt, Maddinson has SIX first class wickets, and ONE List A wicket. I think describing his owling as 'part time' is very generous! Tim (and Lancey), I reckon you're right about Wade being preferred over a young keeper like Whiteman, too..

AUTHOR

2016-11-24T02:42:09+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


I'd be incredibly surprised if Maddinson's bowling was a factor at all - he's bowled less than one over per FC game played!

2016-11-24T02:34:05+00:00

Tim Holt

Roar Guru


I will laugh if that is the case folr I have called for a while for a traditional top 6 and the likes of Smith/Voges/Warner roll their arms over more

2016-11-24T02:13:43+00:00

Chris Kettlewell

Roar Guru


I don't know that I agree on this. I think they both have lots to lose. If Renshaw and Handscombe have early struggles people are likely to say "they are young, we need to give them time to find their way in test cricket". If Wade and Maddenson have early struggles people are likely to say "told you they should never have been picked". If anything, because people have more reservations about them, these two really need to stand up and prove people wrong from the very start in a way the Renshaw and Handscombe probably don't need to as much.

2016-11-24T01:37:54+00:00

Mike Dugg

Guest


Maddinson hardly ever bowls. He's not a part time bowler but a bit part bowler at best

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar