A convenient truth: Mercedes' happy dilemma

By Bayden Westerweller / Roar Guru

Formula One’s constructors, though more pressingly, manufacturers, would envy the position Mercedes finds itself in.

The German marque has been subjected to divided opinion in the wake of the season finale at Abu Dhabi.

Yet the reality is that the Silver Arrows achieved their sixth title in three seasons as light gave way to dark on Sunday evening.

Fifty-one Grands Prix victories from fifty-nine attempts since the dawn of the hybrid era don’t do justice to the magnitude of the Brackley outfit’s accomplishments.

They have conceded no greater than three victories in each campaign.

Seldom has the sport witnessed such sustained domination where both drivers have contributed in near commensurate measure.

That Mercedes will count champions – renewed or bred by their hand throughout the past three seasons – on each side of the garage in 2017, shouldn’t daunt pitwall as some fear.

Each driver on its roster has now tasted the ultimate success. If there isn’t incentive enough to redouble their respective efforts to coincide with the resurrection of the ‘aero’ era rather than resting on their laurels, nothing will be.

Despite having its hands full contending with an intra-team battle lasting the balance of the season, the lure of sustained success through ‘phase two’ of the hybrid age – which would legitimise Mercedes’ claim as the greatest force in the series’ history – is bound to have received the same treatment which propelled them to the forefront in 2014.

To master the notional ‘engine’ PU formula, complemented by the imminent ‘technical’ formula, would be nothing if not dynastical.

Nico Rosberg’s long-awaited realisation of becoming World Champion is in many respects the official culmination of the manufacturer’s return to Formula One in its’ own capacity in 2010. This tenure required considerable time to bear fruit.

Though in 2012 the German gleaned his first victory and the marque’s first since 1955, the Lewis Hamilton juggernaut soon rolled into town, and the Briton was an undeniable benefactor of the former’s earlier toils with successive titles in 2014 and 2015.

While recognition was a primary factor in Daimler’s decision to create its own destiny rather than wait on a scandal prone McLaren, witnessing a compatriot claim the crown was an initial priority.

Michael Schumacher lent gravitas if little else to an operation deceivingly starved of resources.

Time and a rapidly evolving sport, foreign to the one the German had departed in 2006, had passed the seven-time champion.

Thus, belatedly, the objective has come full circle with Rosberg fulfilling the prophecy.

He is Mercedes’ man, having been there since day one.

They should feel no guilt for being further enthused by his triumph than Hamilton’s, and can proceed forth with a nucleus which renders the Briton expendable, should he opt for a scorched earth approach in 2017.

Say what you wish about Hamilton’s antics at Abu Dhabi, they went against team policy.

Alluding to this in a previous piece, if the precedent of the Briton’s assumption that he is greater than the outfit continues, equipped with enviable machinery at his disposal, Hamilton achieved what he was employed to realise.

Though if he believes this entitles him to complete autonomy, Mercedes shouldn’t be afraid to take executive action and install somebody who knows their place and appreciates what an opportunity they have been granted.

Nico Rosberg certainly does, with no indication of dissidence from his camp.

Hamilton has enjoyed many victories throughout his tenure, though there were many others he could have gleaned yet for critical errors at varying stages over a race weekend.

In most instances, Rosberg proved that he could assume responsibility for bringing home a silver car first with minimal fuss, which ultimately forged his path to becoming champion.

Should it come to pass, this is a small headache for an operation which has conquered all before it in recent times to contemplate.

However, it is a headache which is worth nipping in the bud before it manifests into a migraine.

As this is an outfit which could be on the precipice of a dynasty.

The Crowd Says:

2016-12-03T22:27:43+00:00

Simoc

Guest


The Brawn myth so revered by these Roar writers and so totally debunked by the man Ross Brawn. He got sacked because he wasn't up to the job in hand at Mercedes with the new regs. BAR & Ferrari were Brawns heyday.

AUTHOR

2016-12-02T23:32:40+00:00

Bayden Westerweller

Roar Guru


Unless you're Lewis and you saw this coming from a mile away... Nico has arguably made F1 sexy again with this call, you couldn't make it up!

2016-12-02T16:12:28+00:00

Rodzilla

Guest


what a difference a day (hours) makes

AUTHOR

2016-12-02T11:41:08+00:00

Bayden Westerweller

Roar Guru


In contrast to Alonso, who can't buy a bum steer if he tried. The chances of him retiring post-2017 with McLaren resurgent in 2018, you couldn't make it up yet you'd believe it. Or if Lewis joined Ferrari in 2018 just as they're getting their act together...

2016-12-02T09:40:06+00:00

Jawad Yaqub

Roar Guru


It was one of the best career moves in the past decade seen in F1. He timed it right, whilst his rivals around him have largely had it go wrong for them.

AUTHOR

2016-12-02T09:27:18+00:00

Bayden Westerweller

Roar Guru


Everybody believed Mercedes would be a laughing stock at the time, attempting to justify the roles being doled out to their acquisitions, yet each has played a significant role in facilitating the success. Clearly there is a strong synergy there, as you say, competitors who have poached components of this team haven't gone on to recreate their glory to date. The intriguing Hamilton conundrum lies within what he's been blessed with, what he's achieved, yet what more he could have accomplished. Credit must be issued to him for realising he was onto something when Brawn and Lauda convinced him to join the outfit, when many derided the call as career suicide. Yet he didn't have to endure the heavy lifting witnessed by Schumacher at Ferrari, nor the commensurate work the German put in during his tenure at Brackley. Perhaps this is a polarising call, though to have claimed as few victories as he has over the three seasons isn't commensurate to his apparent god status, we really can't place him in the pantheon of Michael, Senna and co when he's leaving close to half the races on the table with the most dominant car in history. Part of this is down to Rosberg, yet he had sufficient opportunities to claim many more over this time, yet the oft overlooked errors which have complemented his slice of misfortune in 2016 has cost him considerably more.

2016-12-02T08:38:46+00:00

Jawad Yaqub

Roar Guru


'Too many cooks in the kitchen,' is what he was criticised for early on, but look at what it has spawned today. Other teams have tried poaching big names as Brackley did, yet it's been of no good to them. Ferrari getting Jock Clear for example. That really backfired. Who knows between the incumbent driver pair. It is really sad that this title for Nico will be marred by the fact everyone believes 'reliability' cost Lewis the title. It wasn't just the mechanical failures, but his own ineptness in certain situations to be the better all-rounder. If it wasn't for the utter dominance of the Mercedes car over the past three seasons and if their rivals were on par, then I'm certain he would not have cavorted away with the 30 odd victories he's enjoyed since leaving McLaren. He wouldn't be the 'legend' he's perceived to be, just yet.

AUTHOR

2016-12-02T06:43:01+00:00

Bayden Westerweller

Roar Guru


Jacques VIlleneuve at Jerez in the 1997 finale is as close to anything in my memory, when he allowed both McLarens to pass him on the final lap - granting Mika Hakkinen his first victory in the process. With an ailing Williams on account of his infamous collision with Michael Schumacher which eliminated the latter, the title was secure so long as he finished fifth, thus third was more than enough to raise the crown.

2016-12-02T05:01:47+00:00

BrainsTrust

Guest


I can't really remember a single driver who slowed down deliberately to potentially give up a race victory and try to back up the driver behind them into a lower placing. Plenty of cases of drivers willing to smash into anyone passing them to avoid giving up a title. Can you name a single other occasion this has happened with or without the driver being a teammate. In some cases you might have someone ask a teammate to slow down and then back up someone to delay them but not when they are in a winning position.

AUTHOR

2016-12-02T04:35:04+00:00

Bayden Westerweller

Roar Guru


Ross Brawn is the forgotten man of the masterclass we've been privy to in recent seasons, and whilst he didn't preside over the glory years, he oversaw the compilation of those who did, ultimately at his own expense. Whether Mercedes continues to dominate or otherwise, a more fascinating outcome is who emerges superior between Rosberg and Hamilton. Certainly if the former comes to grips better with the new regulations, this could have a retrospective impact on the negative perceptions of his title, and further compel Mercedes that with the German in one of their cars, Hamilton is expendable if he upholds his renegade philosophy.

AUTHOR

2016-12-02T04:29:41+00:00

Bayden Westerweller

Roar Guru


It's true that Hamilton was well within his right to do what he did at Abu Dhabi, yet it's the overall notion of acting against the team's policy which will ultimately decide his future. With different contexts in place, Mercedes might be more inclined to allow him to do his own thing, yet if he jeopardises the team's priorities, they need to act. Conversely, if Lewis doesn't like it, he can depart.

2016-12-02T02:05:54+00:00

Jawad Yaqub

Roar Guru


Despite the domination being 'bad' for the sport's image, we should still marvel in what we are seeing. The forward thinking brilliance that Ross Brawn and co had, which compromised their performance near the end of the V8 era, just so they could focus their resources on 2014. Many go on about McLaren's previous era with Honda and how unprecedented their stranglehold was on the sport, and I believe this is the closest we have to that. If they end up nailing the 2017 regs then yes, we will all collectively sigh and prepare for another couple of years of Silver Arrows supremacy - but at the same time hats off to a team who continue to be ahead of the ball.

2016-12-01T21:44:23+00:00

Glyn Ruck

Guest


Toto is a decent chap but he & Niki really need to up their management skills. It is they that bring the brand into disrepute. Any competitive driver would have done what Lewis did. It is both within the rules & spirit of the sport. "Anarchy" what BS. There should be no team orders in such situations & if there are then such orders should be judged for what they are. We don't want fixed races! Toto & Niki should be sent on management & communications courses in the off season! Christian Horner is spot on. It's called RACING ffs! Lauda said before the race there would be no team orders! At the end of the day the crowd response speaks volumes. Lewis was heartily applauded! Team Management should be censured, not Lewis. The only team order that should exist is "do not take one another out!" No ill considered orders & there would have been nothing to defy. It could have been far better handled. Stewart's comments are as irrelevant as that withered thing beneath his kilt.

Read more at The Roar