There's more than ten ways to get out in cricket, including some you've never seen

By mds1970 / Roar Guru

On Friday night, ten minutes after Australia had been dismissed, the umpires and the Aussies were on the field, but the Pakistani batsmen were nowhere to be seen. So a radio broadcaster asked the question, “Can you be timed out before a ball has been bowled?”

The answer of course was no. That’s not how timed out works. And no sooner had the words been said than the Pakistani openers made their belated entry to the Gabba.

Timed out. It’s one of the more obscure forms of cricket dismissal.

Law 31 of the MCC Laws of Cricket states that an incoming batsman must be in a position to take guard within three minutes of the fall of the previous wicket. There’s a variation for T20 cricket, where the limit is 90 seconds.

Hence, the Pakistani openers were in the clear, as there hadn’t been a previous wicket; and in any event, they were less than three minutes late. No one has been dismissed timed out in any form of international cricket, and only five instances have ever happened at first-class level.

Every cricket trivia night is guaranteed to have the question of naming ten ways to be dismissed in cricket. Some are and common – Caught, bowled, LBW, stumped, run out; anyone who’s ever watched a cricket game has seen plenty them.

Hit wicket isn’t quite so common, but we see it occasionally.

A more obscure method of dismissal is handled the ball. This is covered by Law 33 of the Laws of Cricket. A batsman is dismissed handled the ball if they deliberately touch the ball with a hand that is not holding the bat, with an exemption if the batsman is doing it to avoid injury.

Only ten times in Test cricket and three times in one-day internationals has a batsman fallen this way. Most of the dismissals involved a batsman knocking the ball away to stop it hitting the wicket, but the dismissal of Andrew Hilditch in 1978/79 was controversial.

Late on a hot day, after a wayward throw towards the stumps, Hilditch picked up the ball and returned it to the bowler; only for the bowler to appeal and Hilditch to be dismissed.

Hilditch would go on to become an Australian vice-captain, and later chairman of selectors, but he’ll forever carry this rare form of dismissal in his Test record. Also dismissed in this way at Test level were Russell Endean, Mohsin Khan, Desmond Haynes, Graham Gooch, Steve Waugh, and Michael Vaughan.

Obstructing the field is another rare form of dismissal. Law 37 provides that a batsman is dismissed if they deliberately obstruct or distract the fielding team, such as by changing their course while running between the wickets to deflect a throw, or calling out to prevent a catch being taken.

Only once in Test cricket has a batsman been dismissed obstructing the field, in 1951. England’s Len Hutton top-edged the ball and it flew directly upwards. Thinking the ball would hit the stumps, Hutton hit the ball away, preventing the wicketkeeper from completing a catch.

Six batsmen have been dismissed obstructing the field in one-day internationals; four of the six being from Pakistan. Rameez Raja, Inzamam Ul-Haq, Mohammed Hafeez and Anwar Ali. Also out that way have been England’s Ben Stokes and India’s Mohinder Amarnath. Amarnath is also one of the three players to have been dismissed handled the ball in an ODI.

Probably the most obscure and certainly the rarest form of dismissal is Law 34, hit the ball twice. This states that a batsman is out if the ball, while in play, strikes any part of their person or is struck by the bat and then, before being touched by the fielder, the batsman deliberately hits the ball with the bat or any part of their person. The exemption is if they’re doing it to prevent the ball from hitting the stumps or to prevent injury.

No batsman has ever been dismissed hit the ball twice in any form of international cricket. Only a handful of instances at first-class level, mainly deep in the early historical days of the game, exist. The threat of dismissal seems to be enough to prevent anyone trying it on.

So your ten ways of getting out in cricket, for those ready to blitz their next trivia night, are: caught, bowled, LBW, stumped, hit wicket, run out, timed out, handled the ball, obstructing the field, and hit the ball twice.

There’s an 11th form of dismissal: retired out. Not retired hurt.

A batsman can retire hurt and return later, but if they choose to stop batting for any other reason, they can’t come back.

It’s happened twice at Test level, both in the same innings. Sri Lanka’s Marvan Atapattu with a score of 201 and Mahela Jayawardene on 150 withdrew from their innings to give other players a bat during a lopsided Test against Bangladesh, at Colombo in 2001.

Depending on the circumstances, it can be agreed that a player who retires is not out. This has happened once at Test level, when West Indies opener Gordon Greenidge dropped out of his innings to be with his critically ill daughter and it was agreed by all involved that he would be recorded as not out.

I’ve been involved in plenty of cricket in my time, played a bit (very badly) in my younger days, and attended more games than I care to count.

I’ve never seen, live or on TV, anyone dismissed timed out or hit the ball twice. If any of us ever do, we know we’re watching something that will earn a place in cricketing rarity.

The Crowd Says:

2022-12-22T05:02:03+00:00

Gomathi

Guest


The Batsman is out when stumped when out of his crease whether he plays a shot or not, the wicket-keeper must be the only person involved in putting the wicket down In any case it is a runout. Current live and upcoming matches of all India domestic T20 tournament updates right away and can remain with 22Yards.

2021-06-01T13:52:10+00:00

Loïc A,

Guest


Nah, under the rules that's a run out. Mankad's just a nickname for that particular way of running out the non-striker.

2021-02-24T22:37:43+00:00

Aditya Manjrekar

Guest


You missed one form of Dismissal/ Wicket: Mankad

2020-10-28T01:47:15+00:00

Leslie Bailey

Guest


Our team was on the receiving end of a bowler who took 5 wickets, four of which were Caught and Bowled in an innings. I do not recall at any level FOUR C&B's. Has this feat been achieved anywhere ?

2020-10-07T05:27:01+00:00

Henry Hiatt

Guest


By the way. Handling the ball is now not an individual dismissal it is part of the obstructing the field rule. Thanks

2020-09-09T20:27:54+00:00

shafaqayaz

Guest


Helpful Information..

2019-12-09T14:45:14+00:00

Maddy

Roar Rookie


Probably the most obscure and certainly the rarest form of dismissal is Law 34, hit the ball twice. This states that a batsman is out if the ball, while in play, strikes any part of their person or is struck by the bat and then, before being touched by the fielder, the batsman deliberately hits the ball with the bat or any part of their person. The exemption is if they’re doing it to prevent the ball from hitting the stumps or to prevent injury. So rule 33 and rule 34 contradict each other . By hitting the ball a second time with the hand (Gooch) to stop it hitting the stumps as in rule 37 should be not out?

AUTHOR

2016-12-21T05:38:53+00:00

mds1970

Roar Guru


Can't find any record of it.

AUTHOR

2016-12-20T20:42:56+00:00

mds1970

Roar Guru


Timed out is something that will rarely if ever be used; but the threat of it is sufficient deterrent to extreme time-wasting.

2016-12-20T00:58:02+00:00

Paul D

Roar Guru


It is pretty hard to get players to hurry up when they don't want to. Plus it makes for a much harder, more frustrating day once you get into the mire of deductions and hassling people about poor over rates and most umpires would rather the game go for a bit longer than spend all day dealing with that rubbish. I always let the game go at its own pace unless a captain approaches me about it. I don't mind an extra half hour out in the field if it means the day is less stressful. If players have a problem they're always welcome to speed things up.

2016-12-20T00:26:03+00:00

Arky

Guest


I'm sure we asked the umpires to time people out in junior cricket. Probably stood around counting to 120 out loud, because we were kids and it was our job to be annoying rules-lawyers and not fair-minded cricketers. I'm just as sure we never ever saw anyone given timed out even by the cheatiest of umpires. It really may as well not be in the rule book at all, and the umpires can just deal with slow play and delays the way they do with all other instances of slow play and delays (e.g. completely fail to do anything about it).

2016-12-20T00:23:23+00:00

Arky

Guest


I remember that one well, because the 2001 India series was so memorable generally and because it was so unusual. It was also, as handled-the-balls go, completely plumb. It must have been around the same time that Michael Vaughan was ALSO done handled-the-ball, and that's the controversial one I would have mentioned. Vaughan was adamant (with some justification) that the ball wasn't anywhere near the stumps and he was just throwing the ball back to the Indians and that it was very poor sportsmanship on their part.

AUTHOR

2016-12-19T04:49:18+00:00

mds1970

Roar Guru


Correct. Especially in these times when a touring team usually only has one warm-up game before the first Test, they'll want to give as many of their batsmen some game time with the bat as they can. But they call it retired out to make the point that once you do it, you can't change your mind and come back. Unlike an injured batsman who can return.

2016-12-19T02:50:49+00:00

Macca

Guest


A small part of the great fun that is low grade cricket - it generates many more stories than runs or wickets!

2016-12-19T02:42:09+00:00

Paul D

Roar Guru


Mohinder Amarnath did it in a one dayer too. Pulled his hand back like he'd been stung and immediately walked off. He knew exactly what he'd done, great sportsmanship as usual from him http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GpA_2zkksp8

AUTHOR

2016-12-19T02:39:28+00:00

mds1970

Roar Guru


I remember watching that. It was late night our time but that one made me sit up & take notice. The commentator seemed a bit confused for a few seconds until he remembered the rule. Not something you see often. Steve Waugh was also dismissed handled the ball in a Test. I had no recollection of that at all and possibly didn't know until researching this article.

2016-12-19T02:30:50+00:00

Paul D

Roar Guru


I remember umpiring a game where the incoming batsman came in after a few quick wickets, the last one falling at the end of the previous over - the new batsman spent the whole next over doing up his pads and putting on his kit at the non strikers end and told the other batsman to just block everything or hit boundaries till he was ready

2016-12-19T02:27:45+00:00

Macca

Guest


I thought I remembered De Silva doing it in Australia.

2016-12-19T02:25:05+00:00

Macca

Guest


I heard a commentator on 774 just this weekend (I didn't catch who it was) talking about how he was playing a county game and thought there was no chance he was going to have to bat so he was out warming up for the imminent stint in the field when he was called on to bat - he thought it would have taken him at least 5 minutes to take the field. I have also played in many low grade cricket with largely shared equipment where a clump of wickets has fallen and under the apparently mistaken understanding that the player merely had to be on the field all the gear was thrown out to the incoming batsman who hastily attached it.

2016-12-19T01:30:18+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


I remember Graham Gooch's handled the ball - 1989 or 1993 Ashes tour. Merv Hughes was the bowler from memory, and after Gooch defended, the ball bounced straight up in the air - like it was in slow motion. Gooch just instinctively punched it away, but took his hand off the bat to do so..

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar