Renshaw must open every innings in India

By Chris Love / Roar Guru

It seems only yesterday a few cricket ‘Johhny come latelys’ were jumping all over the debutant Matt Renshaw as he made his debut at the Adelaide Oval pink ball Test for his slow batting.

I remember just before the Test thinking that I was only concerned at how many balls he faced. I was thinking of the traditional openers role of seeing off the new ball and shielding the middle order from the fresh quicks.

While commentators like Ian Chappell made correct comments regarding the need to turn the strike over, others criticised him. I remember thinking: “give the kid a break, he’s 20 years old in his first ever Test.”

While he managed 10 off 59 deliveries in the first innings, with only a target of 127 to chase in the second dig he was on a hiding to nothing.

Dave Warner, his partner, hit near a-run-a-ball 47, yet Renshaw backed his own game and showed the selectors the only thing he could and that was to bat. Managing 37 not out after facing 137 deliveries, it was a feat that few Australian batsmen had achieved throughout the South African series. He salvaged the only thing he could in that second dig.

Renshaw responded to the criticism in his next outing in the first Test in Brisbane. In the first innings he kept pace with Warner before Warner fell for 32. Renshaw went on to make 71 in the first and 6 in the second, leaving him averaging 40 after his first two Tests. Then came Boxing Day and an uncharacteristic slog sweep on 10 saw him in the sheds early while Warner, Khawaja, Steve Smith, Peter Handscomb and even Mitchell Starc all cashed in on a good deck that failed to deteriorate due to rain.

Only a short turnaround between the Boxing Day and New Years was enough to see squad changes for an anticipated spinning pitch. With the series wrapped up and one eye on the India tour, there was already talk of where Shaun Marsh would fit back in the order.

Would Shaun Marsh come in for the expense of Renshaw in a horses-for-courses policy with Marsh’s most recent red ball form glowing?

I think day one of the 2017 New Years Test should have put that to bed. For a man of only 20 to be at the other end watching David Warner’s record-breaking century before lunch on the first day of a Test match to maintain the temperament to go back and stick to his own game, even as lunch approached, said mountains about how good this guy could be.

Even at 167 not out at stumps there was still talk of a possible switch for Shaun Marsh in India, with Michael Clarke defending Renshaw on Nine. Even Chris Rogers was suggesting that the selectors may not play Renshaw in the opening role for all or any of the India Tests.

If that turns out to be the case, I think it’s a massive mistake.

No one expects Australia to win the series in India. I doubt few honest followers of Test cricket would even wager that Australia will even win a game. This current Indian side is as strong as I’ve ever seen and may be the most difficult to beat at home of all time.

I’d suggest that beating this side in India would be every bit as hard as touring sides visiting Australia in the Waugh-Ponting prime era. That’s why I think it would be a massive mistake to not play Renshaw as one of the opening batsmen in every Test.

Matt Renshaw is only 20 years old and has the potential to be in this side for a very long time. We know already that he has the shots, ability and most of all, the perfect temperament to be a long term opener for Australia.

He may or may not score many runs on the Indian tour of 2017, but picking and sticking with him in this Indian series could play a major role in how many runs he scores in the following three Indian series to come over the next decade or so.

How many class batsmen have we seen struggle in the early part of a series as they take a while to adapt to unfamiliar conditions? Gone are the days of old when touring teams would have a mountain of lead-up games against first class sides prior to the Tests starting.

Renshaw and Handscomb need as much time playing in these conditions as possible. If not for this series, but every series in the sub-continent for the foreseeable future.

Shaun Marsh has to tour, there is no doubt about that. Shoehorn him in there somewhere if you have to or select him as cover. While the same line of thinking had me disappointed that Khawaja was dropped in Sri-Lanka last year, he may make way for Marsh after a couple of Tests.

Assuming that Nathan Lyon and Steve O’Keefe will accompany Mitch Starc and Josh Hazlewood, Hilton Cartwright and to a lesser extent Glenn Maxwell make sensible fifth bowling options batting at 6.

With un-Indian like pitches faced by England in the recent series, Smith will need as many options at his disposal as possible on tour.

There are two things that should be set in stone though, Renshaw should open the batting in every Test (barring injury) and Matthew Wade should be keeping to Mitchell Swepson and Adam Zampa in the T20s.

The Crowd Says:

2017-01-04T11:53:49+00:00

jonty smith

Roar Guru


Hopefully he gets a game when in february when we can't field our best xi due to fixture overlaps

2017-01-04T08:17:24+00:00

Amrit

Roar Guru


Another Stiann Van Zyl waiting to be doomed, if he opens every innings here in India, he will feel very homesick and would perhaps like Van Zyl, sign a kolpak,ha

2017-01-04T02:13:09+00:00

matth

Guest


It's a difficult one, who to leave out of the top 6 for India. S Marsh was in top form before being injured and is our most proven batsman in spinning conditions (I know that's a low bar). But no matter where he comes in, it causes problems: Renshaw - established now and the experience for future tours would be invaluable. A 15 year player Warner is a lock Khawaja - our third best batsman and should be given every opportunity to adapt Smith is a lock Handscomb is a lock and looks great against spin. Number 6 - if we want to play two specialist spinners (which we obviously will), we need a third medium pacer. Alternatively if we play three pace bowlers, we will need a matting all rounder that can spin the ball. S Marsh is neither. I'm glad I'm not a selector. Let's face it, we are odds on to lose in India, so whichever way the selectors go, we are going to lose and they are going to be blamed for making the 'wrong' selection. I frankly have no idea what they should do. Can we play 12?

2017-01-03T23:49:45+00:00

Mr Bean

Guest


Paine should be keeping in the T20s his recent form is outstanding

2017-01-03T23:19:16+00:00

Paul Potter

Roar Guru


Hi Chris. The only point of disagreement from me is that I'm not worried about fifth bowling options. If that means Smith and Warner have to bowl a few overs, so be it. They'll make up for it with their batting. The top six should be picked on the sole proviso of batting, without bowling coming into it at all.

2017-01-03T23:17:10+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


On the other hand, he knows that a good fist of it here will lock him in for India and maybe beyond.

2017-01-03T23:15:12+00:00

Paul Potter

Roar Guru


Playing for Australia? Undoubtedly. But I can see Linphoma's point. He will probably come out to bat when Australia want quick runs before a declaration, and then will bowl knowing that Australia may not need his bowling too much, meaning he needs to be spot on in both disciplines from the jump. It is a challenge for him. As I've said elsewhere, I wish him the best of luck.

2017-01-03T22:35:48+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


Feel for him? Is there a single person on this Board who wouldn't want to be in his position?

2017-01-03T22:30:13+00:00

Linphoma

Guest


You gotta feel for Cartwright today in this audition for India. And later when his bowling comes under examination.

2017-01-03T22:03:04+00:00

jameswm

Roar Guru


Agree with the last bit! Wade is a poor keeper to spinners and is unlikely to score many runs. I don't know that we can say now that renshaw has to open every test. If he is drowning and can't buy a run, we're better off giving him the last test or two off and putting Marsh in. No point ruining all his confidence. Same goes for Khawaja. Both are must picks to start pff, but Marsh goes as cover if either is foulndering (same for Handscomb, though this seems unlikely). Areed that Cartwright and Maxwell go as our no.6s. Cartwright did well in limited Aust A opportunities in the subcontinent. That's all we have to go off at the moment. And Maxwell can score runs against spin.

Read more at The Roar