Football TV ratings for 2016

By Mister Football / Roar Guru

It’s that time of year when we review the Australian TV ratings for all the football codes for the previous year.

I am relying on the data already collected by good friend to The Roar, Wookie, using his excellent site: Footy Industry.

I will start with the free-to-air broadcasts (5 City Metro) for all football matches for 2016.

The top rating football match for 2016 was the AFL grand final featuring Sydney and the Western Bulldogs, with ratings of 3.04 million.

The NRL then takes up the next four spots, with the NRL grand final and three State-of-Origin matches, underscoring its ongoing strength in attracting mega TV audiences.

Origin 1 was in 2nd place with ratings of 2.708 million, while the NRL grand final featuring Cronulla and Melbourne was in 3rd place with ratings of 2.647 million.

The remainder of the top ten is filled by AFL finals:

Free-to-air’s top rating football programs in 2016

1. AFL – GF – Sydney v Western Bulldogs: 3,040k
2. NRL – SOO – NSW v Queensland: 2,708k
3. NRL – GF – Cronulla-Sutherland v Melbourne: 2,647k
4. NRL – SOO – Queensland v NSW: 2,404k
5. NRL – SOO – NSW v Queensland: 2,111k
6. AFL – PF – GWS v Western Bulldogs: 1,355k
7. AFL – PF – Geelong v Sydney: 1,032k
8. AFL – QF – Hawthorn v Geelong: 1,022k
9. AFL – SF – Hawthorn v Western Bulldogs: 989k
10. AFL – SF – Sydney v Adelaide: 951k

The most surprising result might be the preliminary final in sixth spot between GWS and the Western Bulldogs with ratings of 1.355 million.

It’s worth noting that all of the lesser finals in the AFL were also broadcast on Fox, where very good ratings were also recorded, which we will note further below.

The AFL’s Brownlow night received a high enough rating to actually make it into the top ten: 989k.

Two NRL Tests made it into 12th and 13th spots with ratings of 852k.

The highest non-final rating was the AFL’’ Rd 5 clash between Hawthorn and Adelaide, played on a Friday night, it came in at 18th with ratings of 766k.

Of the top 100 ratings, the AFL took 51 spots, the NRL took 47 spots and the ARU took two spots.

The ARU’s highest spot was in #50 for the Wallabies Test with England which had ratings of 556k.

The top 100 cuts out at 442k. There was no A-League or Socceroos match which made it into the top 100.

As I mention above all the AFL finals apart from the grand final are shown on Fox. It’s a similar situation for the NRL, except their preliminary finals are not shown on Fox as well.

As a consequence, it’s unsurprising that the two AFL preliminary finals take first and second place in the Fox ratings for 2016.

However, many might be surprised to discover that the preliminary final between GWS and the Western Bulldogs took first place by some margin, with ratings of 565k. If that’s not an outright record for Fox, it would be very close to being one.

The other preliminary final between Geelong and Sydney was in secon=nd spot with ratings of 497k.

The NRL took 3rd place, with a regular season match no less, the Rd 26 game featuring Melbourne and Cronulla-Sutherland achieved ratings of 486k.

Five AFL finals and one home and away game, and one NRL final make up the remainder of the top 10:

Foxtel’s top-rating football programs in 2016

1. AFL – PF – GWS v Western Bulldogs: 565k
2. AFL – PF – Geelong v Sydney: 497k
3. NRL – Rd 26 – Melbourne v Cronulla-Sutherland: 486k
4. AFL – QF – Hawthorn v Geelong: 442k
5. AFL – EF – West Coast v Western Bulldogs: 439k
6. AFL – QF – Sydney v GWS: 437k
7. AFL – SF – Hawthorn v Western Bulldogs: 432k
8. AFL – SF – Sydney v Adelaide: 403k
9. AFL – Rd 13 – North Melbourne v Hawthorn: 398k
10. NRL – SF – Melbourne v Canberra: 375k

The AFL’s highest rating home-and-away game was the Rd 13 clash between North Melbourne and Hawthorn in 9th spot with ratings of 398k.

Of the top 100, the NRL took 61 spots, showing that it still bats very deep when it comes to ratings on subscription TV. The AFL took 37 spots.

Once again, the ARU took two spots, with its highest rating game being a Test between the Wallabies and England, coming in at #33 with ratings of 318k.

No A-League or Socceroos game makes it into the top 100. The highest rating A-League game was the grand final between Adelaide and the WS Wanderers, coming in at #155 with ratings of 237k.

The Socceroos game against Japan comes in at #183 with ratings of 224k.

For Super Rugby, the highest rating game was the Round 2 clash between the Brumbies and the Waratahs coming in at #425.

I also took the opportunity to do a quick scan of the club football games which had the highest attendances in 2016. These are the 14 club games which had attendances higher than 60k last year:

Most-attended football matches in 2016

1. AFL – GF – Sydney vs West Bulldogs: 99,981
2. AFL – SF – West Bulldogs vs Hawthorn: 87,823
3. AFL – QF – Geelong v Hawthorn: 87,533
4. AFL – Rd 5 – Collingwood v Essendon: 85,082
5. NRL – GF – Cronulla v Melbourne: 83,625
6. AFL – Rd 1 – Richmond v Carlton: 75,706
7. AFL – Rd 1 – Geelong v Hawthorn: 74,218
8. AFL – Rd 2 – Collingwood v Richmond: 72,761
9. AFL – PF – Geelong v Sydney – 71,722
10. A-League – Rd 1 – WSW v Sydney FC – 61,880
11. AFL – Rd 9 – Hawthorn v Sydney – 61,552
12. AFL – QF – GWS vs Sydney – 60,222
12. AFL – Rd 7 – Collingwood v Carlton – 60,222
14. AFL – Rd 12 – Melbourne v Collingwood: 60,158

Unsurprisingly, the AFL grand final featuring Sydney and the Western Bulldogs tops the list with an attendance a tick under 100,000, followed by two AFL finals.

The NRL grand final comes in at 5th spot with an attendance of 83,625.

The highest home-and-away attendance is the ANZAC Day clash between Collingwood and Essendon with an attendance of 85,082.

The biggest surprise packet of all is this season’s Rd 1 clash between the Western Sydney Wanderers and Sydney FC breaking all records with an attendance of 61,880, finishing in 10th spot on our list.

The Crowd Says:

2019-04-13T03:32:13+00:00

tricolours

Guest


Do people from Melbourne have some sort of inferiority complex . Every time there is a poll on tv ratings you only want to count the area that best suit you. Surely if your doing any meaningful comparison of tv ratings in Australia they need to be Australia wide. You cant just cant leave out the 30% of the country that favours the NRL. When all areas are shown Rugby League has the highest matches not only on FTA tv but also on PTV!

2017-08-15T10:42:12+00:00

tricolours

Guest


The Last time I looked at a map of Australia it consisted of more than 5 cities.

2017-01-26T08:40:16+00:00

Rick Diznek

Guest


You are not the quickest on the uptake are you? Probably a Collingwood fan sans teeth... You can have the one game and we will take the year. lol 112 million NRL v 107 AFL - rugby league, even with less games, wins easily.

2017-01-25T05:58:34+00:00

Footy Fan

Guest


I'm glad to hear it :) They ARE the ratings. I can't give you any link, because they were messaged to me & it was only two games anyway (the two prelims). Why would I even attempt to make up those numbers by the way? As Wookie commented, the AFL Grand Final ratings are publically available for Tasmania & always top the year... Hence a good figure to make a presumption

2017-01-25T05:53:43+00:00

Footy Fan

Guest


Woah.......................................... I don't even understand most of the above comments, from when I last commented!? There's only ever been one clear statistic for 'dick measuring' & that's TV ratings (well, most people believe so anyway). Which the AFL has always dominated. OFFICIAL OzTam + RegTam TV RATINGS: 2016 AFL GF: Metro: 3.201m Regional: 1.051m National: 4.191m National peak: 5.160m 2016 NRL GF: Metro: 2.5m Regional: 1.14m National: 3.64m END OF DISCUSSION :) (I'm happy to provide the numerous links, if you're still confused)

2017-01-25T05:48:11+00:00

Jonno

Guest


Punchline - the ratings are about the same yes so when the AFL is on FTA and Pay its not taken into consideration. Week to week the AFL is higher but midweek winter prime time SOO is a big winner for the NRL and they are rewarded with advertising but impacts on their week to week. So the AFL getting more dough relates to week to week ratings, their different demographic and national code.

2017-01-25T05:40:59+00:00

Jonno

Guest


Ben Cummins strikes again...

2017-01-24T07:53:40+00:00

Rick Diznek

Guest


You've still got nothing. lol Go back to your pathological hatred of RL. It suits your quality of argument.

2017-01-24T05:48:30+00:00

clipper

Guest


Rick, you commenting as much as me! You must have nothing else better to do either. It's obvious that this is just going around in circles. You won't supply any independent sources for you supposed figures, just the same old insults and rhetoric. So be it, you and you alone think you're right, which if fine. You think I'm all these people, that's fine. You rubbish every other source except your own, you rubbish everyone's view except your own, you say you've rebutted the above posts which you haven't.

2017-01-24T05:22:46+00:00

Rick Diznek

Guest


How is your Moore Park ammunition going? Withered on the vine?

2017-01-24T05:20:34+00:00

Rick Diznek

Guest


It is YOUR logic. AFL figures do include Auskick - a kicking drill not a variation of the game. The NRL includes touch - universally acknowledged as touch rugby league (bar the lying RFU). lol Both NRL and touch acknowledge the relationship. It is hardly an 'NRL beat up'. lol You really have nothing do you? lol I am sure you have been running the aliases for sometime; others have pointed out your pathological hatred of rugby league. It bleeds out of your every post. lol

2017-01-24T03:03:01+00:00

clipper

Guest


So.. the AFL can't include Auskick, but the NRL can include touch? Some weird logic there. The 'evidence' you supplied has already been rebutted - you have not supplied any independent sources, just NRL beat ups. I've been using clipper for many more years than your hijacked moniker, I don't need to use aliases. If you have been around other tabs you would see these other names as well, don't know if they would appreciated being referred to as my aliases!

2017-01-24T02:55:49+00:00

Rick Diznek

Guest


And it doesn't matter how many aliases you use...

2017-01-24T02:55:04+00:00

Rick Diznek

Guest


AFL figures include the kicking drill that is Auskick and soccer participation levels have always been the highest of the football codes. Sorry I provided the evidence, it is up to you to rebut it. And you can't. Shame. Also keep running from the SCG thread too. Hilarious.

2017-01-23T22:25:40+00:00

clipper

Guest


I don't know why you don't understand, as I and other posters have pointed out the NRL 'review' is meaningless and not independent. It would be like asking Benson and Hedges if smoking was as bad as they say. Both the AFL and FFA annual reports have participation at way over 1m, even without having to include other sports, but you have to take those figures with a grain of salt. If you do have a link to an independent source, please provide it, otherwise my original comments stand and you are wrong.

2017-01-23T06:52:51+00:00

Rick Diznek

Guest


I see you disagree with the content of two documents I referred you to and I am wrong? haha Feel free to add another post claiming nothing.

2017-01-23T04:27:56+00:00

clipper

Guest


so.. you still have no verifiable figures, just wild ones you made up, even though you have had countless chances to enlighten us. So far 14 people say you're wrong, you're the only one that thinks you're right - but keep trying to convince everyone.

2017-01-23T04:01:37+00:00

Rick Diznek

Guest


Gee that 1.4 million really hurts you don't it? Lol

2017-01-23T04:00:47+00:00

Rick Diznek

Guest


So you still have nothing I see? All code 11,000 spectators and 0 on TV. lol

2017-01-22T22:21:40+00:00

clipper

Guest


northerner - I have actually notified the other 'rick'. Although it is spelled slightly differently, I thought the same. Rick Disnick replied that he thought the other Rick was a 'rugby league hommie' and that the writing style was so different that no one would confuse the two. I totally agree with that - the original Rick is reasoned and provides verifiable data from independent sources, unlike Rick Diznek who just throws figures in, has no independent verifiable sources and links to back up those figures and who thinks by saying 'you're wrong' is all you need to do to win an argument - unfortunately, in the real world, this is not so.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar