Put Smith at four, Starc at six, and bring back Khawaja

By David Lord / Expert

Four years ago the national selection panel of John Inverarity, Rod Marsh, Andy Bichel and Micky Arthur saw fit to leave in-form batsman Usman Khawaja out of the four Test series against India in India, even though he was in the touring party.

The panel preferred Ed Cowan, Phil Hughes, and Shane Watson in the top order, and refused to release Khawaja to return to Queensland for Sheffield Shield duty.

To make matters worse, Khawaja, along with Watson, Mitchell Johnson, and James Pattinson, was found “guilty” of “Homeworkgate”, a petty, childish questionaire set by coach Arthur, one of the more laughable baggy green decisions that quickly cost the South African his job.

Remember Australia was hammered 4-0, losing by eight wickets, an innings and 138, and two by six wickets – with no Khawaja.

Yesterday, the current panel of Trevor Hohns, Greg Chappell, Mark Waugh, and Darren Lehmann repeated the leave-out-Khawaja dose for the first Test against India at Pune.

Two examples of very shabby treatment, unbecoming the panel. Shaun Marsh took Khawaja’s spot yesterday, scoring a scrappy 16.

Mitchell Starc is a different story, it’s high time he was treated as a genuine all-rounder. He’s obviously a world-class fast bowler, but his batting is rarely recognised.

These are serious numbers in 52 visits to the Test crease:

68 off 41 balls against South Africa at the WACA in November 2012, with nine fours and two sixes.

99 off 144 against India at Mohali in March 2013, with 14 fours.

66* off 71 against England at Old Trafford in August 2013, with nine fours.

52 off 49 against India at the Gabba in December 2014, with six fours.

58 off 108 against England at Edgbaston in July 2015, with six fours and a six.

58 off 52 against England at The Oval in August 2015, with nine fours and a six.

53 off 91 against South Africa at Adelaide in November 2016, with five fours and a six.

84 off 91 against Pakistan at the MCG in December 2016, with three fours and seven sixes.

And 57^ off 58 against India at Pune yesterday, with five fours and three sixes.

With what’s available on tour, Starc would fill the number six batting berth, usually reserved for an all-rounder, currently held by Mitchell Marsh who managed only four yesterday.

But his numbers are seriously lacking in 32 Test digs:

87 off 116 against Pakistan at Abu Dhabi in October 2014, with 13 fours and a six.

And 53 off 92 against Sri Lanka at Colombo in August 2016, with nine fours.

As Starc has a career batting average of 24.33 compared to Marsh’s 22.50. there’s a solid argument Starc would be a far better proposition at No.6 than Marsh.

That would open the door for the addition of very talented leggie Mitchell Swepson, or paceman Jackson Bird, depending on the pitch.

A case of three spinners and two quicks, or three pacemen and two spinners as it is at Pune.

Should Steve Smith batted after winning the toss yesterday?

Ian Chappell, one of Australia’s very best Test skippers, was a strong advocate of batting. If there were indications there was something in the wicket to help his bowlers, he thought about it for a couple of seconds, and still batted.

But there’s a genuine argument for Smith to have fielded yesterday.

To be brutally honest, India has a lot more firepower – with their batting, led by skipper Virat Kohli, and spin attack with Ravi Ashwin the spearhead – than the Australians have to offer.

By sending India into bat, and even if they rattled up 500, it would take time – deep into the second day.

Australia would then dig in as they did yesterday, and the Test would be into the fourth day with not enough time for a decision.

A draw first up would be a major morale boost for the Australians, and one of annoyance for the Indians. But a no result would change the dynamics of the four-Test series.

And where should Steve Smith bat?

The batting order should have been David Warner, Matt Renshaw, Usman Khawaja, and Steve Smith, with no Shaun Marsh who only managed 16 yesterday.

The skipper’s batting stats make interesting reading.

He’s batted 21 times at number three for two not outs, and 1219 runs at an average of 64.15.

He’s batted 28 times at number four for five not outs, 1786 runs, average 77.65.

And batted 23 times at number five with four not outs, 1228 runs, average 64.63.

Brilliant stats confirming the batting order should be David Warner, Matt Renshaw, Usman Khawaja, and Steve Smith.

The Crowd Says:

2017-02-27T20:55:06+00:00

Andrew Young

Roar Guru


HAHAHA SPOT ON

2017-02-27T06:17:07+00:00

Seb

Guest


You are idiots the only three batsmen that have proved themselves in the subcontinent are Warner, S Marsh and Smith. What they also should do is drop okeefe and bring swepson in. Also drop M Marsh and bring maxwell in.

2017-02-26T07:52:18+00:00

Bill

Guest


Shaun Marsh is the biggest boofhead averaging 8 in this series as an opener. Disgraceful performance. He should be dropped immediately.

2017-02-25T11:00:31+00:00

davSA

Guest


I see that Steve Smith's stats are marginally better batting at four , but so should most batsmen's be. They are exposed less to the new ball (assuming the occasional failure of an opener) . For this reason the conventional wisdom is to have your best batsman at 3. I agree with that . Also convention demands batting first when winning the toss. It was absolutely the right call .

2017-02-25T10:43:52+00:00

Bee bee

Guest


I am starting to wonder if Mr Lord is real or just Pobjie taking the p!ss.

2017-02-25T10:17:09+00:00

Bee bee

Guest


We might have to hire Trump to coach so he can drain the swamp.

2017-02-24T15:41:37+00:00

El Loco

Roar Rookie


I love the simple formula for a draw (a draw! such positivity!) Allow opposition to bat, if they get 500 - ha, fell right into our trap! Then just "dig in". Don't deliberately throw away your wicket today boys, just dig in! Then day 4 and we're home. No test in history has changed course in the final 4-6 sessions! Drinks are on Smithy, Gary'll sing the team victory-of-sorts song! It's been asked before - Lord, expert? We're being pranked right?

2017-02-24T15:22:05+00:00

El Loco

Roar Rookie


With Starc at #6, does that mean David will have to move Cummins up to #5?

2017-02-24T14:55:52+00:00

El Loco

Roar Rookie


Aww qwetz, your acerbic intellectualism is often a good laugh, but jeez be big enough to take it on the chin when it backfires. We're all friends here aren't we?

2017-02-24T14:47:08+00:00

El Loco

Roar Rookie


Yeah go back to the home tests, Khawaja was brilliant in the slips. And nobody saves 40 runs a test, certainly not Warner.

2017-02-24T14:42:37+00:00

Dexter The Hamster

Guest


Can you imagine being one of the batsmen in the Australian team and Captain David Lord comes back from the toss and says "good news lads, we are batting last on this pitch!!!". :-) :-)

2017-02-24T14:34:35+00:00

Dexter The Hamster

Guest


Sorry but the teenager in me is still giggling at the "you are on the balls" comment.....

2017-02-24T12:58:50+00:00

broken-hearted toy

Guest


David Lord knows all that. Even he doesn't believe what he writes.

2017-02-24T12:01:32+00:00

Rob

Guest


First David Lord article I've read since his last character assignation of Maxwell. Now he's suggesting our best opening bowler should focus on being a batsmen? I can't even describe how dumb his suggestion is about Smith fielding first in India on that dust bowl of a pitch. I will ban myself from reading his crap once again.

2017-02-24T11:39:37+00:00

Chinners

Guest


Sorry but the last thing you want is your strike fast bowler wasting energy batting all day. He's a number 8. Marsh bats scared to get out, probably looking at the fielders, thinking about his stumps. Sports physcology 101, visualise what you want to do, not what you don't want to do.

2017-02-24T11:27:37+00:00

Steele

Guest


So many ways they could strengthen that batting line up without losing any bowling venom. Hartley for Wade, Agar for Lyon, and Maxwell for Marsh.

2017-02-24T10:12:05+00:00

Bee bee

Guest


Think David forgot to take his meds!

2017-02-24T10:10:34+00:00

Bee bee

Guest


David. To bowl first on that pitch would have been one of the most ridiculous decisions in the history of cricket. That sentence is not an exaggeration.

2017-02-24T10:08:51+00:00

Ben

Roar Guru


People will bag me for saying this, considering we're only 1 test into the series. But considering he wasn't selected for his ability or even his test record... It's definitely justified. One test down. Shaun Marsh is averaging 8. ...Go team 'Australian selectors'.

2017-02-24T10:04:10+00:00

Bee bee

Guest


Maybe he is a backup? Why the complete ridiculous fascination with this. It's a spinning deck. If it was a fast pace green top then you would pick Bird. Yet where is the Bird outrage......? It's a spinning minefield. Khawaja should thank the selectors he didn't get picked.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar