Boy, did we get it wrong!

By Glenn Mitchell / Expert

I am quite happy to admit I have substantial egg on my face. In fairness though, I am not an orphan.

Before this series, I predicted India would win all four Tests, just as it did when the two countries met in India in early-2013.

Over the past four years, if anything, India has become a stronger side.

So much so, heading into this series it had not suffered a loss in its past 19 Tests and in the process assumed the number one world ranking.

On face value, I saw little in Australia’s progress in the past four years – a 2-0 loss to Pakistan in the UAE and a 3-nil loss in Sri Lanka – to indicate that the 2017 tour would be much different.

Yet, after two days at Pune, the series has been thrown on its head with Steve Smith’s men taking an iron grip on the opening Test, and in the process, landed some telling blows.

Barring a couple of Indian batsmen channelling Laxman and Dravid circa 2001, the hosts are doomed.

From the moment the Indian skipper, Virat Kohli, opted to take the second new ball late on day one the momentum started to swing Australia’s way.

Shortly after claiming 4-15 with a ball that was reversing for the quicks he took the new ball only to see Mitchell Starc deposit it several times into the stands.

In just 12 overs, the tourists rollicked from 9-201 to 9-256 at stumps.

Starc’s efforts would have buoyed the dressing room and added pep to the Australian step.

He added a boundary in the first over of day two before falling in the deep for 61 in a total of 260.

Despite the tenth wicket getting away from India, a 260-run first innings would not have overly disappointed them.

In its recent home series against England, the visitors amassed over 400 runs in the first innings three times only to draw one Test and lose the other two.

Despite the advanced wear and tear on the pitch heading into its first innings, India would have still liked its chances of securing a first innings lead.

Instead, it was dismissed for a meagre 105, gifting Australia a 155-run lead.

It was a calamitous innings by India, one that nobody surely could have seen coming.

Starc and Josh Hazlewood knocked the top off the innings – Hazlewood snaring Murali Vijay (10) and Starc claiming the key scalps of Cheteshwar Pujara (6) and Kohli (0).

The Indian skipper, who has made a double century in each of his last four Test series, chased the second ball he faced wide of off-stump only to see Peter Handscomb snaffle it at first slip.

Starc’s dismissal of Kohli was the most vital moment of the match to date and one that help set the tone for the Aussies in the field.

India went to lunch at 3-70.

Fifteen overs later the innings was all over with eight batsmen failing to reach double figures as the hosts lost a staggering 7-11.

Steven O’Keefe was superb, bowling the spell of his life, capturing six wickets in 25 balls, including snaring three in the one over to finish with 6-35.

Earlier, he had opened the bowling with Starc.

There was nothing at that point to indicate the destruction he would later produce. In fact, O’Keefe, after the day’s play, described his first six overs “as pretty ordinary”.

As soon as he swapped ends, so too did his fortunes.

All of a sudden, everything came together as a combination of flight, spin, and bounce wrought havoc.

He was aided by some wonderful fielding close in by Peter Handscomb and a couple of slogs into the deep by top-scorer, Lokesh Rahul (64) and Ravindra Jadeja.

For O’Keefe, it was a just reward for a consistent first-class career.

Coming into this Test he had collected 225 wickets at 23.8 in 66 first-class matches.

He had looked good in Sri Lanka late last year. A ten-wicket haul in the warm-up game ahead of the first Test was followed by 3-74 from 27 overs at Pallekele.

Injury saw him miss the last two Tests of the series.

With an innings with the ball still ahead of him in his fifth Test, he now has 20 wickets at 24.7.

He has never been a big spinner of the ball and has relied primarily on subtle changes of flight and relentless accuracy, much in the mould of former Black Cap skipper, Daniel Vettori.

Yesterday at Pune, in the space of four overs he produced a spell that may define his career.

It has also put pressure on Nathan Lyon, the country’s lead spinner. While tidy, he picked up 1-21 from seven overs while O’Keefe was making merry at the other end.

By stumps yesterday, Australia had taken its lead to 298 with Smith leading the way with an unbeaten 59.

India looked deflated in the field late in the day.

Smith was given three lives by the time he reached 37 and Matt Renshaw was also given a chance.

Kohli was visibly agitated by his side’s lacklustre showing in the field. No doubt, Indian fans would have also been shaking their heads after a day that belied the sides number one ranking.

Not everything has come up roses for Australia.

Shaun Marsh followed his first innings 16 with a 21-ball duck.

He was recalled to the side on the back of his previous performances in Asia (399 runs at 79.8) and a century in the warm-up game against India A in Mumbai last week.

The man he replaced, Usman Khawaja, has been a serial struggler against spin – England offie, Graeme Swann picked him up five times in Test ranks (more than any other bowler) and in four Tests in Asia he has averaged 19.2.

Marsh will hold his place for the second Test at Bangalore but another twin failure may see what happened in Sri Lanka last year reversed with Khawaja returning to the side at Marsh’s expense.

David Warner’s knocks of 38 and 10 leaves him with an average of 32.2 in Asia after 20 innings against a career average 48.7.

As a senior player, he needs to do more at the top of the order.

Mitch Marsh contributed just four in the first innings at number six and was not called upon to bowl in India’s 40-over first innings.

He will resume today on 21, in search of runs to help vindicate his selection in the all-rounder’s role.

All-in-all, however, it is hard to fault Australia’s overall showing to date.

It last won a Test in India at Nagpur in October 2004. It was a victory that secured its only series win in India since 1970.

From then, in 11 Tests in India, Australia has lost nine (including the last seven) and drawn two.

In the next few days, barring an absolute calamity, it is going to end its losing streak.

And, in doing so, set up the possibility of a series win.

That is something I never imagined two days ago.

The Crowd Says:

2017-02-27T07:10:42+00:00

Dave

Guest


Continually selecting M Marsh shows an inability to cope with basic maths. How can you have a guy with a Test average of 23 and a mediocre Test average batting at 6? What predictive probabilistic basis do you have for thinking he is likely to succeed? Or just evidence from plain eyesight that he's good against spin? Why do we need a fast bowling all rounder in India? There should be less worry about workload if the spinners can take up the slack? And why not S Smith or Maxwell rolling the arm over for a few is really necessary? Is Marsh really going to worry Indian batsmen on their home tracks? Who do you think the Indians would rather we picked - M Marsh or Maxwell, or even Khawaja? Why did they even think we needed a 5th bowler for that minefield? Sadly the answer was that M Marsh got a score in the warmup match on a road, and Maxwell failed. But can't agree with those criticising Shaun Marsh for low scores in Pune. Sorry, anyone can get low scores on tracks like that against good bowling. The real question is what logic you apply to selection, and Marsh had a good record against spin and a Test average of 40 before this match. Khawaja's record against spin is abysmal - out twice to mediocre Sth African spinners in that series, apart from bad record in Sub-continent and against Graeme Swann. Doesn't put front foot to line of ball. If they did his career average against spin I'd guess it was less than 20.

2017-02-26T05:57:40+00:00

J.T. Delacroix

Guest


Glenn, I recognise all of that, & I'm as surprised as anyone by the win, let alone by its magnitude. But I still can't recall an Australian Test team being given so little hope by so many. If it were a two horse match race, the pundits had India as Winx, & Australia was a struggling country maiden at its 45th start. Such was the imagined gap in class.

AUTHOR

2017-02-25T12:27:48+00:00

Glenn Mitchell

Expert


JTD, in defence of the naysayers ... AUS's last three visits to Asia had been white washes - 4-0 v India, 2-0 v Pakistan & 3-0 late last year in Sri Lanka. AUS had not won a Test in India since October 2004 and had suffered eight losses in 11 Tests since then. India had not lost a Test in 19 matches coming into this series. So, on face value, there was not a lot to indicate that AUS was going to be a realistic chance of winning over there. Having said that, it was a wonderful result in Pune and AUS dominated the world number one in every aspect of the game.

2017-02-25T11:28:34+00:00

Tanmoy Kar

Guest


Ultimately Australia won the Pune Test match by 333 runs with-in 3 days! An amazing performance by the Australians, particularly Man-of-the-Match Steven OKeefe (12/70).

2017-02-25T11:01:54+00:00

Gray-Hand

Guest


Don't insult Graeme Hick like that.

2017-02-25T10:45:22+00:00

Broken-hearted Toy

Guest


Well, Jadeja was very unlucky, he bowled beautifully. But he wasn't helped by the Aussies, they were not chasing the ball too much. Even Mitch Marsh was doing his best to play for the straight one rather than the turning one.

2017-02-25T10:42:24+00:00

Broken-hearted Toy

Guest


Lyon bowled fantastically and had catches dropped off his bowling. They bowled excellently in tandem.

2017-02-25T10:39:30+00:00

Broken-hearted Toy

Guest


Hazelwood has been more consistent than Starc since he joined the Aussie test team. He's also far more economical.

2017-02-25T09:46:38+00:00

Rob

Guest


Maybe because its India. I know if you ask someone in authority a question it's important you wait for their answer. Walk at umpires with arms out yelling. You really are pushing the envelope as player.

2017-02-25T09:37:46+00:00

Ants32

Roar Rookie


Many slow left armers aren't big turners. And have been proved to be greats of the game. S. O'Keefe just may well become one of them. :)

2017-02-25T09:06:07+00:00

davSA

Guest


Spot on J.T . I sit here 8000km away and was in fact astounded at what was coming out. Possibly I had the luxury of not becoming emotive over Maxwell exclusion , the Marsh bros inclusion , Nathan Lyons recent lack of form etc. But what really got me was people actually saying that Australia , the worlds greatest cricket country (results wise anyway) were actually talking about going to lose as graciously as possible. It made no sense.

2017-02-25T08:45:39+00:00

J.T. Delacroix

Guest


Surprising result no doubt, but the sheer negativity by the media in the lead-up was unprecedented. It was as though, suddenly, overnight, Australia had become a cricket 'minnow'.

2017-02-25T08:06:08+00:00

davSA

Guest


Yeah sorry , I didn't factor in that possibility. Some of these headline changes tend to set up the Authors a bit.

2017-02-25T08:05:25+00:00

Armchair Expert

Guest


Separate argument Josh, MacGill didn't have a 14 run better career 1st class bowling average than Warne.

AUTHOR

2017-02-25T07:38:56+00:00

Glenn Mitchell

Expert


That was not the headline I supplied which was, "Boy, did I get it wrong". Fully aware that some fans were bullish. However, I wasn't one of them.

2017-02-25T07:32:34+00:00

davSA

Guest


Your headline emphasises the "We got it wrong". Not all of us Glen . There were a few of us who saw Australia's chances positively. Anyway series not over , just begun so I will be a dash careful what I say. For me however the best outcome in this first test for Australia is that the Indians will be very reluctant to produce similar wickets for the rest of the series. Australia winning the toss and playing well has rattled them more than we think. We saw that on the field. Fielding disintegrates a bit and bowlers becoming less sure of themselves.It will force a change of thinking . Just an element of doubt and that's all the Aussies need.

2017-02-25T06:36:20+00:00

Bee bee

Guest


There recent wins on roads against England may tempt them back into becoming road warriors. However, Australia's bowling attack was a disciplined machine on day 2. Starc is still a weapon on a road and the other three can be miserly and still create chances. Can they produce green tops in India? Works for England.

2017-02-25T06:10:36+00:00

Junior Coach

Guest


Peeling omlette off my face as i watch. Great and unexpected performance so far . I thought Lyon bowled really well but didnt get the reward. I will now go back to the eggs

2017-02-25T06:03:00+00:00

josh

Roar Rookie


Ronan, SCG MacGill out bowled SK Warne each time they played. You'd pick MacGill over Warne?

2017-02-25T05:43:57+00:00

Tom from Perth

Guest


Classic

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar