The Wrap: Australian franchises stunned mullets caught in the headlights

By Geoff Parkes / Expert

If Australian rugby fans had known that a Thursday night match riddled with dropped balls was going to be the high mark for Round 2, they may well have found something else to do for the weekend.

It started promisingly enough. Don’t you just love first phase tries from set pieces? Western Force debutant Chase Peni jetted in after only a minute, and while Eta Nabuli soon countered for the Reds, and added another two tries for good measure, a dominant performance by a hungrier Force pack in the second half forged a deserved victory.

Coach Dave Wessells appears to have come good on his promise for the Force to play more expansively and positively and, on this evidence, fans in Perth won’t be waiting another two years for the next home win.

For a side with a battalion of on-field leaders – James Slipper, Stephen Moore, Rob Simmons, George Smith and Scott Higginbotham – the Reds curiously lacked direction and leadership. You could also say that for a side with a lot of tall timber they curiously lacked a lineout. Go figure.

Like the Force, the Chiefs reaped the benefits of competing at the lineout, achieving a commanding position well before Steven Luatua’s early exit sealed the deal. At least the Blues didn’t drop their bundle, and contributed well enough in the final 30 minutes to show their fans that they remain genuine contenders.

Despite scoring two tries from a well constructed and dynamic rolling maul, what impresses most about the Chiefs is the speed at which their backs re-align themselves in open play. From what can look like a jumble of players randomly positioned in the backline – from where inferior players invariably take a hit up or pass to someone else in poor position – the Chiefs’ backs instinctively know how to, in a flash, straighten the point of attack, create and run into holes, and pass to advantage. Delightful to watch.

It’s hard to single players out in such a dominant performance but Dominic Bird was arrogantly imposing, Aaron Cruden smoothly sublime and Tawera Kerr-Barlow is showing the benefits of starting a season free from injury; sharp and decisive in his decision making.

In their two matches so far, the Rebels have started brightly but lacked clinical quality in attack and at set piece. What hurt them most in Wellington, however, was their lack of intensity and line speed in defence, except for one effort to save two points with a rare conversion charge-down.

Once basic disciplines go out the window – things like not communicating and chasing up in a straight line – a quality side like the Hurricanes will pounce and things can very quickly descend into a death spiral. Never before has a Round 3 bye been so necessary and welcome.

Perhaps tries off set play aren’t so rare after all, the Highlanders scoring three on their way to a 27-6 lead against the Crusaders in Dunedin. All of which was only good enough to set the scene for one of the Crusaders’ greatest comebacks.

When Lima Sopoaga first came into Super Rugby, he was tagged as a mercurial but erratic talent, prone to spoiling his good work with failed trick plays and brain explosions. That reputation was put to bed with one performance – in 2015 through steering the All Blacks to an epic victory against South Africa, in the Ellis Park cauldron, with composure and assuredness.

With the Crusaders finishing all over the Highlanders, the home side desperately needed an experienced head to grab hold of the ball, retain it and ride out the final four minutes. Sopoaga got that chance, fielding a clearing kick on halfway, but instead of treasuring the ball he reverted to the old Sopoaga, inexplicably attempting a 50-metre ‘hail mary’ dropkick.

The rampant Crusaders weren’t about to turn down this gift, Seta Tamanivalu crossing in the corner for the winner; Sopoaga enduring the double indignity of missing the final one-on-one tackle.

If there can be an excuse, it might be that an exhausted Sopoaga, like all of the players, had punched himself out, physically and mentally; these two heavyweight sides having slugged it out for 80 minutes in an epic contest.

To Canberra, where the Sharks may have lacked pace and strike-power, but not graft and application, hanging in in a match the Brumbies threatened to run away with early.

The Brumbies will rue two lost lineouts in the final stanza; until then they appeared to finish the stronger of the sides, slick hands sending Tevita Kuridrani over the next to the posts. But the tenacious Sharks finally got around the outside of the defence in the 81st minute, the ball sitting up for centre Lukhanyo Am to stun the home fans.

Lowlights from Singapore included the Kings dressed like they had come from a Star Trek convention, and referee Marius Van der Westhuizen wasting time over a TMO review trying to determine who took the ball dead when, no matter who it was, the only possible outcome was the same – a 22 drop out.

The Sunwolves play their best rugby when they move the ball and recycle quickly. That they should kick so much good running ball away was as mystifying as it was idiotic.

As for the Kings, they aren’t winning this competition but look to be vastly improved on last year. They have some big bodies up front and blistering pace in the back three.

The Waratahs in Johannesburg were not all bad, with 36 points a fair return for their endeavour with the ball. Of more concern was the 55 points conceded, including three tries from lineout mauls; perhaps enough to suggest that the balance in the laws, as to what the defending side can legally do to defend it, is still not quite right.

This was far from a polished Lions side. Elton Jantjies was particularly skittish, but on a dry day on a fast track, they were allowed too many opportunities to rectify their mistakes by the Waratahs missing too many tackles.

Anyone looking for a clue to the Stormers’ game plan might note that halfback Jano Vermaak has now played the better part of two matches without kicking the ball once. It is as if the ubiquitous box kick has been expunged from the Stormers’ vocabulary.

For 60 minutes, the Jaguares read the game well, defending stoutly and gaining in confidence, closing to within two points. But old habits die hard; two yellow cards in two minutes, and a penalty try conceded, killing their momentum.

How typical of the Jaguares too, to conjure a brilliant comeback try with 13 men. But the damage had been done; 32-25 to the Stormers.

It was left to the improving Cheetahs to bring an end to an exhausting Saturday, seeing off the Bulls 34-28 in yet another highly entertaining game. To tell the truth, I might have enjoyed it even more had it not been the seventh straight match at the end of a 15-hour marathon.

Perhaps one game too many for one day, and indeed it was disappointing to find no Friday night game scheduled in Australia for this round.

Recently, I met with Simon Green, CEO of BT Sports, television broadcaster for the Aviva Premiership in England, who explained the importance of building a narrative through the ongoing coverage, where viewers get used to, and look forward to, watching their sport at the same time every week.

It seems that the Force versus Reds game was moved to Thursday to accommodate a Justin Bieber concert (as if he hadn’t caused enough trouble already with Ali Williams). Whatever the excuse, it’s critical that SANZAAR ensures that, every week, there are back-to-back fixtures from New Zealand and Australia on a Friday evening to kick start the weekend.

Hopefully, there will still be an Australian audience watching, with worrying signs emerging very early in the competition.

It is clear that the New Zealand sides have not stood still over summer, upping the ante in physicality and speed of ball movement. And, despite their loss in Hamilton, the Blues’ undoubted improvement means that the New Zealand threat now comprises five franchises, a 20 per cent increase that the rest of the competition didn’t really need.

It is also clear that – as a generalisation – the South African franchises are coming to terms with a more expansive game and have more scoring power than in previous years.

The Jaguares too, impress as a more cohesive, disciplined unit in attack and defence this year. Sure, the wheels feel off in a horror two or three minutes in Cape Town, but this was as much down to circumstance than the flaky, cynical petulance of last season.

The Australian franchises are in danger of falling even more behind the pace. They are indeed, to mangle a couple of metaphors, like stunned mullets caught in the headlights.

What this doesn’t mean, however, is the death of Super Rugby, or that one or two sides need to be cast aside in some kind of knee-jerk, baby with the bathwater reaction. Who’s to say that the remaining three sides would perform any better?

A little perspective is required. The maligned Force fielded nine local players in the match day 23, and beat one of the two traditional pillars of Australian rugby. Anyone who believes that strengthens the case for further concentrating rugby into the eastern and northern suburbs of Sydney surely can’t be serious.

Fitting in a couple of games from the English premiership over the weekend (yes there was time), I’d venture that all Australian franchises, the Rebels included, would be more than competitive, as well as in the French Top 14 and Pro 12 – along with Super Rugby, the world’s other premier professional competitions.

The paradox for Super Rugby is that the closer the rugby is at the top end to Test match level – which is surely a worthy objective – the more the difference between the top and the bottom is emphasised.

The NBA has Cleveland, Golden State and 20 sides that have no hope of winning the title. That doesn’t mean the death of US basketball nor the culling of so-called uncompetitive teams.

Those fans have learnt to admire the elite and to continue to love their own teams for their effort and the wins they do deliver. And they live in hope that the worm will eventually turn their way.

Short-sighted Australian rugby gloom merchants might do well to do the same. The season is shaping as another rough one, but there are no glib, easy fixes. What Australian teams need more than ever is their fans to stick with them.

The Crowd Says:

2017-03-08T08:19:58+00:00

ScottD

Guest


Well I must confess I watched almost every game over last weekend. I couldn't help it. It was me, a bottle of red and the rugby. How could I resist? My wife was very understanding about it, she didn't talk to me.

2017-03-07T08:53:48+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


You can enjoy some brews in KL soon!

2017-03-07T04:44:47+00:00

AndrewMoar

Guest


Just one more thing; I read with interest that there is a real chance that one maybe two Australian super rugby teams. I read that this will help with depth in the sport. I fail to see how reducing the number of team positions can assist. Isn't it going to force those players who can't get a spot in a super rugby team overseas. Further more isn't going to reduce the amount of supporters, I know some will select another team to support but there will be a percentage who just watch without really supporting. No one is going to travel from Perth to Sydney to watch the Waratahs. I feel that yes scheduling etc could be improved but I hope the teams we currently have stay. I believe there is a better argument in keeping five teams. However I suppose we will have to wait and see.

2017-03-07T04:29:50+00:00

AndrewMoar

Guest


I see merit in the NZRU changing some of its rules about players needing to play super rugby in NZ to be selected for the All Blacks. I am a Kiwi but think it would be wise to have a rule similar to the Giteau rule in Australia. This would allow up and coming young players the ability to play top grade rugby and gain all that experience and still be eligible to represent their country. But that would really only strengthen NZ what we need to keep southern hemisphere dominance in rugby is a strong Wallaby side, I tend to agree with the comment regarding coaching. There needs to be more concentrated focus on teaching skill sets etc. at the younger levels. Lets not loose sight of the fact that NZ has an extremely small population but still competes well on a world sporting stage in a number of them so it has to be considered whatever they do within teams to build belief and team work is working very well. Maybe it needs to be introduced in the Wallaby's before rugby looses to many supporters. Just saying........

2017-03-06T23:14:17+00:00

Maroon Kev

Guest


$$$$$

2017-03-06T22:57:33+00:00

ScottD

Guest


Yes, the fact that more quality players in Aus can now get a game of SR has to be a positive. Although how we managed to lose a guy like Gill is beyond me. Hopefully he'll be back before he's too old to be a positive contributor in the WB's. Maroon Kev you're closer to the action than me on that one - what happened do you think?

2017-03-06T22:32:34+00:00

stillmissit

Roar Guru


Agree Geoff, there is no common sense to be had at any price. Our biggest problem is the coaching at all levels and this affects everything, schoolboys aren't taught the basics, colts are not coached in the latest tactics and most players from Subbies to Wallabies are missing basic skills. Take the Rebels as an example, on paper a good enough team BUT the line speed in the D is non-existent, the offloading and catching is pretty poor, the ruck is ignored mostly, their set piece ain't so great and they don't seem fit enough to match the Kiwi's (I don't think any of our teams are to be honest). THIS is a team I thought would be in the playoffs this year. I should have added, 'for the wooden spoon.' Regarding your point of not throwing the baby out with the bath water, there is no baby in that water. The Kiwi's have upped the speed of the game and stepped up again in support play, fast ruck ball and offloading. We are still frigging around with umbrella defence patterns and taking the ball up until our noses bleed or more likely we turn it over. It's coaching mate, plain and simple in my book.

AUTHOR

2017-03-06T21:06:18+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


Mate, why do I bother writing an article when you can distill it down to 3 lines!!

AUTHOR

2017-03-06T21:03:37+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


No risk Sheek - and nice use of querulous and incorrigible btw :)

2017-03-06T20:38:15+00:00

Maroon Kev

Guest


The overseas issue existed for players who couldn't go a go here buddy!!! That's a bit different to losing the players who can get a go!!! You're delusional if you can't accept the moolah has changed!

2017-03-06T14:26:12+00:00

AndyS

Guest


I don't think it is necessarily their own team or their nation's teams, more they will watch matches that affect their team's standing. Nothing in the SA conference really affects Aus or NZ teams - they are not competing for the same finals spots or table standings. Worry about them come finals.

2017-03-06T14:19:38+00:00

Fin

Guest


I do remember one of the reasons given by the ARU for the western force coming in was to give some players an opportunity in Australia so they don't have to go looking overseas to further their career, as well as bring back some players to Australia that may have already gone overseas. So the overseas issue did exist back then and we were lead to beleive that by providing an opportunity for players expansion teams like the Force would play a role in reducing that leakage. I am not convinced they have achieved that objective.

2017-03-06T13:58:42+00:00

ScottD

Guest


And yet the Wallabies were good enough to take on the best in the world and come second at the RWC There are more measures of success than winning the SR The greater the number of Aus players playing in the SR then the larger and better the pool for selecting Wallabies for the World Cup Keep an eye on the main game guys - cos it ain't the SR

2017-03-06T13:36:45+00:00

Fin

Guest


The problems facing Australian rugby is definitely a discussion that draws plenty of views. Even from outsiders. Graham Henry says it is the worst Wallaby side he has seen, Eddie Jones is on record saying that there are too many Super Rugby teams, and Jake White said that Ewen McKenzie did a 'great' job winning the title with the Reds given the squad he had. Steve Hansen and Robbie Deans say it's a difficult struggle because rugby in Australia competes in a crowded sporting market.

2017-03-06T13:06:46+00:00

ThugbyFan

Guest


DaniE is spot on that it has become a borefest. Over the last couple of years the Brumbies have gone from an all-out attack team to an insatiable dependence of the lineout-rolling maul to earn points. My major gripe is by allowing players to pass the ball to the back of the maul, it absolutely removes any one-on-one contest for the ball. In a way, its legalised obstruction as opponents cannot get the ball, because of all the beef between the front of the maul and the ball, so have no option but to organise as a group to somehow legally stop the maul moving forward. I'm sure that the Law makers never intended the maul to be used so such. Look at the World Rugby Law Book, mauls are only ever shown as the ball carrier and a player from each side contesting for the ball. I would like some sort of Law changes making the ball carrier stay at the front, that ensues a fair contest for the ball and the maul can move forward. If the ball is moved behind the front players, the maul must cease. At the minimum Law 17:6 (Unsuccessful End to a Maul) should be changed that there is a genuine contest for the ball aka the ball is carried by one of the front players or the maul must cease. Alternatively one could argue that the ball must stay with the original ball carrier when the maul was formed. Again a simple change to Law 17:6. So add to that law to something like if the original ball carrier passes the ball to someone else, then the maul ceases and the ball must emerge back into play (within 5 seconds Law 17:6 (d)). I doubt if the IRB/WR will do anything as the maul seems sacrosanct in the NH and SA. I guess the "powers to be" consider a maul to be analogous to a scrum, except the ball is played back with hands instead of on the ground by feet. By this I mean in a scrum, the ball is passed back via feet and the group as a whole can motor forward and protect the ball at the back. A penalty is given if the opposing scrum collapses to stop the forward movement.

2017-03-06T12:25:55+00:00

Tuli Bull

Roar Rookie


Super rugby makes sanzaar teams 99% of the time the best in the world. Any nation leaving will fall behind. Super rugby shows your weaknesses after 2009 2010 Nz fixed there weaknesses and improved thats why they are the best. Sa is starting to change school still out on how long it will take but allready Sa teams are creating more tries. Aus teams don't seem to addapt because of weak coaching. Even if you have 1 team if attitude and coaching don't change nothing will.

2017-03-06T11:45:19+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


Thanks Geoff: - NZ teams getting better - SA teams getting better - Oz teams. Not getting better.... YET

2017-03-06T11:38:18+00:00

Redsfan1

Guest


If the long game is important then I wouldn't make too much of the Force's one off win last Thursday. Their long game over 10 years has been terrible. In fact all Aussie teams have been on a downward spiral for years- that's been the "long game" reality.

AUTHOR

2017-03-06T11:31:08+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


Well yes Andy, that's a big part of what's so wrong about the current structure. But it also speaks to whether fans engage with SR only to watch their own teams. Or teams from their own country. Or whether they have pay TV and can watch at all. So many problems... For the lucky ones who do have pay TV and who want to watch quality, exciting rugby no matter who is playing, things aren't so bad. But of course that's no basis from which to build widespread support for the game, particularly in a country were rugby is far from the main sport.

2017-03-06T11:23:28+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


Geoff, At the risk of being querulous & incorrigible, I don't think it is that complex at all, but just the usual fare we get from people in charge - trying to put square pegs in round holes to suit their self-serving agendas.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar