Uzzie or The Big Show to replace Mitchell Marsh?

By Piyush Pal / Roar Rookie

Steven Smith’s men bear a strong resemblance to Allan Border’s side of 1987, defying expectations and succeeding in India. All that could have gone right for them has. Well, almost. The one chink in their armour has been the all-rounder spot.

Scores of 4, 31, 0 and 13 don’t do Mitchell Marsh’s reputation as a top-six batsman any good, and it isn’t as if he has been terrorising the opposition with his mid-120 kmph bowling.

Used as an afterthought thus far in the series, bowling a grand total of five overs in four innings, one does wonder what Marsh brings other than family name.

It might be a blessing in disguise that Marsh has been ruled out of the series due to a shoulder injury. A change in the playing XI for the Aussies is thus inescapable when the two teams head to Ranchi.

But while Marcus Stoinis has been called into the squad, the real shoot-out could be between Glen Maxwell and Usman Khwaja for the vacant spot.

The familiarity of Khawaja
Before being made a scapegoat along with Joe Burns after the series against Sri Lanka, Usman had scored 1726 runs at an average of 47.94 in 23 Tests, with five hundreds and eight fifties. He also had a productive home season – scoring close to 600 runs at an average of 58, with one hundred and five fifties.

Having been unfairly dropped for Shaun Marsh after such a good season, it is only fair that Usman is allowed a chance at reclaiming his place.

That said, there is a growing perception that he is not at ease in the subcontinental conditions. When he last played in Asia, Usman was axed for his ineptness against spin, Rangana Herath and Co. exposing his technique. Caught in the crease a few times, Khawaja fought his way to a highest score of 26 in four innings against the Lankans, which isn’t what one expects of a top-order batsman.

The team management too, seems to have lost confidence in Khawaja’s abilities in Asian conditions, preferring Shaun Marsh and even Matthew Renshaw over him.

If the Australians do finally decide to give Khawaja a heads up, it will be based more on hope rather than rationale.

The lure of Maxwell
Flown in as all-rounder who could roll his arm over when required, Maxwell could swap in for Mitchell Marsh without altering the overall composition of the team.

That he has plenty of experience of batting at number six, albeit in limited overs format, only adds more weight to his claim.

Further, Maxwell doesn’t have the ghosts of subcontinental failures hovering. To the contrary, it was in India that Maxwell first became a world-known commodity, after he was bought by the Mumbai Indians in the IPL auction for $1 million in 2013.

His performances in the IPL pushed him into Australia’s limited overs teams, he held his own against Ravichandran Ashwin and Ravindra Jadeja in the 2013 ODI series, scoring 248 runs at an average of over 40 and a strike rate above 150. Even in the yearly carnival that is the IPL, Ashwin and Jadeja have often been tamed by this Victorian.

Maxwell’s off-spin will also be a welcome addition. Starting with a third seamer in Indian conditions was a mistake to begin with, which can easily be corrected by including Maxwell, who could give a well-deserved break to other bowlers.

And while critics argue that Maxwell’s devil-may-care attitude might be his undoing in Indian conditions, players such as Virender Sehwag and Kevin Pietersen have shown how an attacking approach is not an impediment to success in India. Mitchell Starc’s exploits as a batsman in the series so far also point to the fact that having an attacking batsman in your team is not such a bad thing after all.

One can only wonder what might have been had Maxwell walked out to partner Peter Handscomb chasing 188.

With the series wide open at 1-1, this decision could very well determine the outcome.

The Crowd Says:

2017-03-16T10:02:20+00:00

John Erichsen

Roar Guru


So far Maxwell is rewarding the selectors' faith in him and showing a newfound maturity. Perhaps, Smith at the other end is a calming influence, but whatever the factors I am very impressed with Glenn's discipline today. Khawaja can still feel hard done by but Maxwell is stepping up where others haven't. Warner is all over the shop in India, Shaun Marsh looks like a novice and Handscomb looks a million dollars every time he bats, but gets out after making a start. He did get a very good pill though. Renshaw again showed his class and was out to some good bowling by Yadav who certainly deserves his wickets.

2017-03-16T03:39:44+00:00

Blackfish

Roar Rookie


Is Maxwell an all rounder now. Only used as a part time occasional in the short game but in India he is an all rounder.

2017-03-15T12:19:27+00:00

Brasstax

Guest


I would prefer Maxwell if it is another low scoring game. A blistering 40 from 25 balls from the big show will be akin to a double hundred on an Aussie road. An attacking 30 or 40 from Maxwell in the last game might have changed the result.

2017-03-15T11:29:44+00:00

Linphoma

Guest


Cannot agree with that. I've said elsewhere on this forum, if Warner foes his job then Maxie is redundant. Having said that, ""It might be a blessing in disguise that Marsh has been ruled out of the series" No truer sentiment could be said.

2017-03-15T11:21:49+00:00

Adrian

Guest


Warner on a bad day is better than Mitchell Marsh on a good day.

2017-03-15T11:19:00+00:00

Adrian

Guest


It was the best damn 4 you've ever seen.

2017-03-15T10:34:32+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Guest


That's them.

2017-03-15T10:27:50+00:00

Jameswm

Guest


Last I heard Maxwell will be in.

2017-03-15T10:24:18+00:00

John Erichsen

Roar Guru


I understand what you are saying but I wonder how many have missed the reality that Warner and Smith have scored about the same number of runs this series, except that Smith made 109 after India missed 5 chances. Perhaps, all our batsmen, bar Renshaw, should be feeling like they haven't really pulled their weight. Warner certainly has the reputation for struggling away from home more than most.

2017-03-15T08:27:54+00:00

Rob JM

Guest


The same S Marsh who top scored last test and the same P Handscomb who was left stranded in the last innings? If anything Its warner who is the big disappointment, If we seal the series and he fails again then Khawaja should take his spot.

2017-03-15T08:23:51+00:00

Rob JM

Guest


Not quite as unlucky as Mitch Marsh though.

2017-03-15T07:45:48+00:00

AlanC

Guest


Got unlucky a lot in England too...

2017-03-15T06:10:25+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Guest


A bit of trivia regarding Khawaja being shunned in India because of performance in Sri Lanka Khawaja is the only current aussie test player (assuming he get's another game some time) who has actually played in a winning test in Sri Lanka.

2017-03-15T05:22:43+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Guest


Handscomb and S Marsh (average vs India 22) are teetering on the brink. I suppose that doesn't matter?

2017-03-15T05:13:00+00:00

George

Guest


And what of Warner's capability in 'Asian conditions' across a far-greater sample size of innings?

2017-03-15T04:30:47+00:00

matth

Guest


"Scores of 4, 31, 0 and 13 don’t do Mitchell Marsh’s reputation as a top-six batsman any good". The really sad thing is they didn't do his reputation nay harm either.

2017-03-15T03:24:22+00:00

Adrian

Guest


I'd much prefer Khawaja. I don't for a moment believe he is bad in India. He hasn't even played in India before. The fact he was born in Pakistan probably makes him predisposed to do better in those conditions, I would have thought. He just got unlucky in Sri Lanka, I reckon.

Read more at The Roar