The factor in Taumololo's contract everyone is overlooking

By Robert Burgin / Expert

How many years would you have signed Sam Burgess for at the end of his debut NRL season in 2010?

What about in the emotional aftermath of the epic 2014 grand final, when he won the Clive Churchill Medal with a fractured cheekbone?

At the end of 2010, a season where he was an All Star before he played a sole NRL fixture, a 10-year contract would have taken Burgess through to the age of 31.

At the end of 2014 a decade-long agreement would have pulled him up at a much riskier 35.

It was an interesting scenario to mull over last night as Burgess went head-to-head with opposite number ‘Daddy Megabucks’ Jason Taumololo in a comfortable 20-6 win to the Cowboys.

There have been all manner of factors analysed since Taumololo was announced as the recipient of a reported 10-year, $10 million deal to keep him in Cowboys colours until he is 34.

Straight away there were people who pointed at the prospect of injury, of fluctuating form, of complacency, and the general unknown.

This was balanced by those who pointed to the rate of inflation, the likelihood of salary cap rises, potential loopholes that could be exploited, and benefits to the stability, reputation and culture of the Cowboys.

It could be argued there is nobody better in the sport to compare Taumololo to at this stage of his career than Burgess.

Big Sammy has previously exuded the same sense of dominance, influence, and all-round ability that the Cowboys lock is currently cashing his cheques upon.

While it’d be unduly rough to say Burgess is just an average footballer now, he’s so far in 2017 not quite the same unstoppable force we’ve witness in previous campaigns.

If he was still signed until the end of 2020 or 2024, would you be comfortable banking his output will continue to be worth $1 million a season?

Here’s the kicker too, although I will preface this by saying I only believe a tenth of what is written in the gossip pages.

Every now and then a story will bob up about how Burgess is on the nose with teammates or that there are those in the team’s inner sanctum who resent his star billing.

Whether this is completely false or carries just an ounce of credibility, it raises the often-referenced fact that a team is more than the sum of its parts.

Taumololo could continue to gobble up 200m per game and destroy the confidence of defenders for another ten years, but we need to consider the chemistry of the Cowboys into the future.

Combinations and interactions, both on-field and off-field, are what separate great teams from good teams.

The Cowboys team of five years’ time is going to look completely different to this year’s.

Right now, Taumololo is the right fit and gels with the people around him.

What happens when a new halfback comes along that barks orders slightly differently? What happens if incoming players around Taumololo have different ideas on how deep they like to receive their passes or what angles they prefer to hit holes on? What about something as simple as them liking different musicians or movies?

All these things sound like minor considerations, but under the magnified glare of the NRL spotlight, they will shape factors like confidence, performance and relationships.

Even if – and this is a big if on its own – Taumololo himself remains the same character, delivers the same output and manages to steer clear of controversy over the next decade, those around him will continually present variables.

On a law of averages you’d have to say there will be at least one, if not several teammates who come along in the next few years who just don’t see eye-to-eye with Taumololo for whatever reason.

They might covet his position, might covet his money or simply want the Cowboys to play their way, rather than his.

I’m not here to say it’s right or wrong that North Queensland outlaid such a long-term deal.

What I do think is that people who are preparing to measure the success of this contract by tackles broken or line breaks made will be overlooking an even more engrossing aspect.

The sideshow of how management assembles the 16 players around him and keeps it one harmonious, humming machine is going to be compulsive viewing.

Being spectators, we’ll enjoy every minute of it, whichever way it plays out.

If club administrators can pull it off successfully for a decade to come, they too will have well and truly earned their money.

The Crowd Says:

2017-04-03T03:33:03+00:00

Chop

Roar Guru


Except it's been announced that it's 8.3mill for 2018

2017-04-02T00:56:58+00:00

kingcowboy

Guest


What? It's a legally binding contract. It means plenty!!!

2017-04-01T21:00:37+00:00

Switch

Guest


I don`t believe it is $1M per year but staggered to reflect inflation and an increasing salary cap, beside that the Cowboys will be showing how to turn that money into to a lot more it`s already bankable. Imagine they get Hess and McLean on the same deal, these types of contracts will be the norm.

2017-04-01T20:50:40+00:00

Succhi

Guest


The cowboys will have a few higher profile players off contract in 2-3 years, and I guess they are looking into the next part of the decade. But let's face it - when does signing an NRL contract mean anything?

2017-04-01T11:01:49+00:00

Sleiman Azizi

Roar Guru


Is it actually a 10-year contract for playing? Or does that ten year deal include a coaching or some other role at the club? Greg Bird signed a 5-year deal with Catalans with the final two years of that as an assistant coach.

2017-04-01T10:49:36+00:00

no one in particular

Roar Guru


NRL forwards performing at a high level for what will be 12-13 years are very, very rare.

2017-04-01T09:49:34+00:00

LIDCOMBE OVAL

Guest


the cap looks like it will around 9 million or so - a mill or so short of what clubs were expecting meaning there could be some players that need to be moved on due to salary cap pressure- players will be after more cash coming off contract too

2017-04-01T09:46:45+00:00

LIDCOMBE OVAL

Guest


lot of pressure being the million dollar man though - Didn't Buddy Franklin ( AFL Swans) sign a 1 million a year 10 year contract too years ago?

2017-04-01T09:33:53+00:00

Oingo Boingo

Guest


How can anyone know what they are doing, when nobody has done it before?

AUTHOR

2017-04-01T06:17:38+00:00

Robert Burgin

Expert


What I'm alluding to is that different tastes form different cliques. Especially as you age in a team and instead of being the same age as the bulk of your teammates, you are suddenly not as 'with it' or similar in background to the next big thing that comes along (and his mates). Yes it is trifling, but it shows how minute and varied the factors are that can cause imbalances to team harmony. How come Michael Clarke and Shane Warne got along fine, but had personal issues with other members of their team? Different lifestyles, different sorts of blokes.

2017-04-01T02:27:40+00:00

Big Willy TBU

Guest


You lost me when you claimed players having different tastes in music or movies could affect on-field performance. Tying up elite players on very long term contracts carries a huge risk to that players motivation - The very special people will give their all every week no matter what, but the majority will get into cruise mode after a while because they know they'll get paid anyway. Read the book Moneyball for more on this mental aspect of the game.

2017-04-01T01:37:31+00:00

Flea

Guest


If the salary cap does jump to the rumoured $11m per season who is going to blink at this deal? I think the Cowboys know exactly what they're doing.

2017-04-01T01:17:40+00:00

Rob

Guest


Dammed if you dammed if you don't. I like the life deals because the players and supporters have some security. I think the salary cap manipulation would be reduced which is a major frustration for everyone. Mangers wouldn't be holding clubs to ransom every 2 or 3 years which can be damaging to teammates and fans. I think clubs will be doing more of these deals in the future. In my Opinion the only downside is injuries and the desire to play. Anyone can get hurt, but JT junior is a massive human and physically built for Rugby league. He also just loves playing from all reports. While many playmakers are often given the role of guiding the team around the park they are nothing without the boys up front leading the way. Steve Price, Glen Lazarus, Proven (second row), Beetson, Craig Young all proved to be great leaders and premiership winners.

2017-04-01T01:13:39+00:00

bigbaz

Roar Guru


The glass is 1/2 empty , right ?

Read more at The Roar