TJ's adventures in the Reds' back garden

By Nicholas Bishop / Expert

Ask most rugby folk who is the best scrum-half in the world is, and the reply that comes out of their mouths with metronomic regularity is Highlanders and All Blacks No.9 Aaron Smith. But that may be changing, if TJ Perenara’s performance in the Reds vs Hurricanes match is a reliable measure.

Not only did TJ control the game with the excellence of his play, he was probably also the best referee on the field.

Angus Gardner is one of the best young officials around – I have no doubt he will go on to enjoy an illustrious career at the highest level – but in this game, both he and his support crew off the field (led by TMO Damien Mitchelmore) had an evening to forget.

There has been a lot of talk over the last week based around ‘equalisation’ – the need for Australian teams to equalise their talent levels to make the two expansion sides more productive, the need for Aussie franchises to be in a position to play their New Zealand counterparts on an equal footing – but on this occasion, the term took on an entirely different inflection.

The officiating crew turned a blind eye to incidents which have been recently highlighted in red by World Rugby.

Tackles above the shoulder line which can be classified as ‘reckless’, and tackling opponents in the air (typically under a high ball) now receive the same severe level of punitive action: a red or a yellow card.

At Suncorp Stadium, the decision-making cards tended to fall out heavily in favour of the home side.

I have to admit that I had not realised just how good a halfback Perenara has become. The Reds’ game opened my eyes to the true excellence of his play at No. 9:

The foundation – sound passing technique
Only one of Perenara’s 55 passes was off the mark. Like most scrum-halves from New Zealand, Perenara whips the ball away from a low position with the power of his wrists and forearms, and there is never an elaborate wind-up to increase the length of the delivery.

In the final clip, at 6:36, the objective of the Canes’ first-phase lineout play is a simple one. They want to achieve ‘overlapping shoulders’ between their #10 (Beauden Barrett) and the Reds’ defensive #10 (Jake McIntyre) in order to create space out wide for Julian Savea.

It is the speed and accuracy of Perenara’s delivery which takes the inside defender, George Smith, out of the game and gives Barrett that overlap when he goes to pass the ball at 6:37.

Two passes later and the Canes have what they want – Savea receiving the ball with time and space to build up some muzzle velocity against the last defender, Karmichael Hunt.

The add-ons – attacking the first defender
Perenara also identifies situations where the halfback can fix the first defender and create a domino effect outside him.

At 14:00, he sees that Sam Talakai is late into the open-side guard spot and that Rob Simmons is momentarily exposed. A couple of steps with square shoulders are all that is needed to encourage all the defenders outside Simmons (Taniela Tupou, and beyond him Samu Kerevi and Chris Kuridrani) to plant their feet.

When Brad Shields receives the ball at 14:06, all are late folding to the outside and McIntyre is left isolated in an impossible one-on-one with Savea.

Outstanding defensive reads
Perhaps the single most impressive aspect of Perenara’s game is his ability to read and anticipate the play a couple of steps ahead of time, both with ball in support, and without it in defence.

In my previous article on the England-Scotland game from the Six Nations, I observed England’s ability to exploit situations where the hooker was the first defender around the end at the lineout.

The Hurricanes, along with other New Zealand teams, defend differently, with the halfback as the ‘tail-gunner’ and the hooker in the tram-lines.

At 17:40, we can see what a difference this adjustment makes. Perenara rushes out aggressively at McIntyre as he throws the in-pass to Kuridrani and insert himself into the gap between passer and receiver.

At 23:02, Perenara has already anticipated the direction of the attack by scanning the Reds’ #9, Tuttle, and Hunt angling from right to left behind the set-piece. Perenara drops off five metres to the right and rushes out all the way past McIntyre and on to Kerevi to break up the play. But for a late hit by Ngani Laumape, this would have resulted in a third try for the Canes only 23 minutes into the match.

At 48:09, in the second period, Perenara again has McIntyre covered from the end of the lineout, then slips into the sweeping role behind the first ruck after the play goes past him. At 48:12, he is already anticipating the switch-back play with his right arm out, and Tuttle’s foot position confirms it shortly afterwards.

At 48:21, Perenara wins this mini-battle of the 9s conclusively, getting over the top of the ball before Reds’ support arrives to win the turnover. The Kiwi No.9 has been two steps ahead all through the sequence.

When they’re defending close to their own 22, the Hurricanes revert to a more orthodox set-up at lineout, with Perenara back in the tram-lines and the heavier forward defenders in midfield. When Kerevi makes a promising half-break and looks for inside support at 51:45, who is there to block the crucial pass to Taniela Tupou? None other than TJ Perenara.

Cover and support work
Perenara’s work-rate in cover defence and in support of the attacking break is prodigious.

At 39:44, he is already reading the break by Matt Proctor and ‘tacking’ to converge on him – at 39:52 he authors a decisive clean-out on one of the Reds’ danger-man in the tackle area, Hunt.

At 49:32 he is right at the top left-hand of the screen in defence as play moves away from him to the far sided-line, but by the time Eto Nabuli throws the errant pass inside, Perenara is there, having run 50-plus metres to dive on the ball in cover.

Scrum-halves have been trying to referee matches with their background commentary for as long as anyone can remember, and the ability to influence refereeing perception of the situations that arise on the field has become an important factor in the professional game.

The ongoing conversation between Gardner and Perenara was every bit as interesting as the Canes’ scrum-half’s involvement in actual play – and there was plenty of evidence to suggest that Perenara understands the laws at least as well as the ref.

At 36:08, the contact dilemma which dominated the England-Italy game (and agitated Eddie Jones no end after it) has been repeated.

Simmons steals the lineout ball, but as he goes to ground there are only Reds forwards involved in the ‘ruck’. All the Hurricanes are on their feet and out of contact, so as Perenara rightly calls out, there is “no ruck” and hence no offside line.

Despite that, Gardner asks the defenders to “stay on” and observe an offside line.

The “no ruck” disagreement was typical of the verbal fencing between Gardner and Perenara throughout the match, which led to the official reprimand at 38:54. Once again, it was the scrum-half who had the last word.

After his ‘try’ from the tapped penalty at 55:43 (see first reel) had been ruled out by the TMO for not touching the ball with his foot, Perenara reminded Gardner that he had given the Canes a penalty advantage previously.

It is amazing how quickly Perenara has moved on from the denied score and kept his mind fully focused on the game. Gilbert Enoka would indeed be proud of his ‘blue head’ clarity.

If Perenara had been given the chance to review some of the TMO’s decisions (or non-decisions) during the game, I’m fairly sure he would have extracted the same kind of admission of error he received from Gardner – who, to his credit, acknowledged his mistake and took it on the chin in the 56th minute.

Particularly odd were the incidents that the TMO ignored, and therefore, were not deemed important enough to review:

Firstly, Nabuli’s slap-down of the pass at 7:18 is a clear yellow card and penalty-try offence, with the Canes having an unmarked three-man overlap outside Laumape. Instead, Gardner failed to award even a penalty against the Reds, while Mitchelmore upstairs completely ignored the incident on review.

Secondly, the tackle in the air by Chris Kuridrani on Julian Savea at 36:19 is likewise a yellow-card offence, which went unpunished on the field and received no further review off it.

Ironically, Gardner himself had explained the rules of interpretation to Rod Kafer in this video interview less than a week earlier.

There is no realistic contest for the ball in the air, and hence by Gardner’s own interpretation, Kuridrani should have received a yellow card.

Thirdly, the final high tackle by Izaia Perese on Matt Proctor at 62:52 qualifies under the new ‘reckless’ ruling for head-high shots (and hence at least a yellow card) – if anything does. On this occasion, Gardner gives the penalty, but there is again no further review.

Finally, the two Reds’ tries at 28:04 and 33:52 curiously received no TMO review, even though both derived from, at best, border-line offloads by Scott Higginbotham. Perhaps these still images will help clarify the situation:

The first offload is perhaps, marginally forward. The second is definitely one metre forward, if not more. Both deserved and demanded a proper review by the TMO.

Summary
The issue of neutral officials will raise its head again after the Reds-Canes debacle, especially up in the TMO booth.

As Geoff Parkes pointed out in his excellent column earlier in the week, the Japanese referee Shuhei Kubo emerged from the Blues-Force game with flying colours, so perhaps Japan can become a fertile ground for growing neutral referees.

Queensland showed some resilience and their senior players stood up, but ultimately the closeness of the contest for the first 71 minutes owed as much to significant omissions by the officials as it did to the excellence of the Reds’ own play.

Meanwhile, TJ Perenara ran the game. Mostly he ran it by the superb quality of his vision and skills as a player, but sometimes he ran it by the accuracy of his law interpretations.

While the British and Irish Lions begin the debate over whether Ben Youngs or Conor Murray should be their Test halfback in New Zealand this summer, the host nation can be confident that they possess probably the two premier players in that position globally, in the shape of Perenara and Aaron Smith.

It is truly not an equal playing field.

The Crowd Says:

2017-05-03T02:09:01+00:00

hcouture8

Guest


I do not agree Best regards, Herminia

AUTHOR

2017-04-10T19:58:20+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I do like that idea Fin - it seems like an eminently sensible idea and a move for the better!

2017-04-10T17:03:27+00:00

Fin

Guest


Hi Nick, This may please you. A shift towards a focus on the grass roots! Being able to strike a deal with FoxSports that saw them maintain the same amount of TV money — but with one less team — gave the ARU the chance to make a cut and use savings to spend on the neglected grassroots. “I acknowledge the mistake of that decision (to sign up for Super 18) but at the time, there wasn’t an option to drop to four teams,” ARU Chairman Cameron Clyne said. “Yes we heard those warnings but we didn’t have the option of reducing teams without compensation. “This was the opportunity. Had we been given opportunities at other points in time to reduce the competition teams and maintain revenue, would we have taken it? Absolutely. “This was the first opportunity we had and we took it. It will have consequences, we accept that. We think those consequences will be offset in the grassroots and the investments we are going to make.” The ARU said it would use the approximate $6 million a year saved from funding one less team to plough into the grassroots and player/coach development areas. Clyne said they plan to release a multi-year funding package for grassroots when they announce which team is shut down. “Over the years we have not had concrete solutions on how you get more money in. It is said we are not doing enough for grassroots, well this is a decision we have made today to put money into grassroots,” he said. Clyne said while it was understandable that cutting a team would cause anguish for the players and fans of that franchise, the ARU chairman said he also encountered dismay at community levels. “I am not in anyway dismissing the players’ uncertainty but I am at community rugby every weekend ... and I see there anguish that the volunteers and those people have as well,” Clyne said. “That’s equally valid, and they see money going in and they see losses being generated at the professional end of the game. That is an equal concern. We feel that is not healthy for the growth of the game.”

AUTHOR

2017-04-10T15:11:31+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I'd be inclined to cut him a little more slack, but the lack of discipline and cohesion in nearly all areas is very worrying. You cannot really say that the Reds are any better now than they were this time last year, and that is pretty damning with the increased talent base available. They should have picked up a coach of international calibre when they had the chance Fin.

2017-04-10T09:15:33+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


If only I had a clue what you are on about Soap I would give myself a pat on the back. I feel I would have earned it. I'm not sure you have provided any facts - not relevant ones at least. You are the one that has gone off in a tangent and I might add I'm not the person that involved himself in a discussion re air resistance, wind, gravity, forces, horizontal motion, forward speed and goodness knows what else. I have not spoken about specifics of referees taking physics into account - you've done that - so how am I on a tangent. Why would I need to do that. My point is not about that. I wish you would not say that I have said things when I have not and also I wish you would not say that I am wrong and then carry on to say the same thing using different words. You to can do with that what you please. But the scary thing about this is that I think we both know what constitutes a forward pass. I wonder if potential referees have to reveal their school physics exam results when submitting their applications to train as referees.

2017-04-08T18:13:42+00:00

Fin

Guest


Hi Nick, Do you think the jury is still out on Nick Stiles as a head coach, or do you think the jury is now in?

AUTHOR

2017-04-07T09:34:01+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I think that the majority of rugby folk would still say Aaron Smith, Henry. Murray is unquestionably a good one, with different qualities to Smith (better defender for instance) but Smith is probably the best in the last ten years or so. I'd take Youngs ahead of Rhys Webb because he has been one of Eddie Jones' best players since 2015, has become a leader in the team... he has a superior kicking game to Webb, and prob to Murray too. You may well be right that Webb is playing better rugby than Youngs atm, but coaches tend to have longer memories than the immediate past... In any case, all three are likely to be on the plane to NZ :)

AUTHOR

2017-04-07T09:28:27+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


No-one Fin, so it's quite a fragile situation. As long as the financial goodwill of Rupert maintains, Sarries will be okay with him absorbing all of their losses. If a situation arises like that in Paris recently for example, or Rupert decides he has somewhere else he wants to put his money, I doubt Sarries would have anywhere to go...

2017-04-07T09:15:24+00:00

Henry Honey Balls

Guest


"Ask most rugby folk who is the best scrum-half in the world is, and the reply that comes out of their mouths with metronomic regularity is Highlanders and All Blacks No.9 Aaron Smith" To be honest I would say that Conor Murray is a better player than Smith at the moment. I am biased of course but Id be surprised if everyone thought Smith was better. "While the British and Irish Lions begin the debate over whether Ben Youngs or Conor Murray should be their Test halfback in New Zealand this summer, the host nation can be confident that they possess probably the two premier players in that position globally, in the shape of Perenara and Aaron Smith." Most Lions fans would contest that the two best scrum halves in the NH at the moment are Murray and Webb. I dont think many people would put Youngs ahead of these two.

2017-04-07T07:40:19+00:00

Fin

Guest


That sounds like a ticking time bomb. Who's going to bail these clubs out when the money runs dry?

AUTHOR

2017-04-07T07:07:53+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Money is the short answer Fin - plus Skelton seemed genuinely to enjoy his time at Sarries from what I've heard. I think he will improve markedly as a player there... Problem is that that the English clubs are in reality doing no better economically than their French counterparts, although they do a good job of hiding it in the account books. Only one will be in the black this year, and that is due to a certain amount of creative accounting. Sarries themselves will be £50m in the red and only Johan Rupert will be propping them up.

2017-04-07T03:30:26+00:00

soapit

Guest


difficult to quanitfy obviously (at least for me). it would be more pronounced the faster they were running forward in the first place. in the stills the ball is behind h bum when caught by a reasonable amount. not sure it would make that much difference over that distance to make its resistance free destination in front of him instead.

2017-04-07T03:26:50+00:00

soapit

Guest


clarke . if you still believes that physics has no relevence to the rule then theres not way i can say ur anything but wrong. talking about the specifics of how refs take into account the physics is a tangent. the facts are above and you can do with them as you please.

2017-04-07T01:46:12+00:00

Jerry

Guest


I dunno, I think air resistance would be a factor. It's the reason spiral passes are more accurate after all, so presumably there's enough of it to affect the ball's trajectory.

2017-04-06T22:22:08+00:00

Fin

Guest


Hi Nick, Will Skelton has decided to leave Australian rugby and head to England for family reasons. It's not the first time I have heard a player say this. Can I ask why don't European players ever seem to want to move to Australia for family reasons? Loads of British people migrate to Australia with their families each year but we hardly ever see any international British or European rugby players move here with (or without) their family.

2017-04-06T12:19:42+00:00

mzilikazi

Roar Pro


Yes, could be the only option....might be a bit cold down in the South Island though.

AUTHOR

2017-04-06T11:39:58+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Thanks for bringing some 'holy simplicity' back tot he convo Clarke!

2017-04-06T11:20:53+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


Yeah - I was wrong at the weekend now I'm on a tangent. No I'm not.I have been very consistent on one specific point. The only point that is relevant. This is what I said ..."Referee says to himself – at point of release did the ball go forward from the passer’s hand/s." You said..."referees ask themselves about whether the ball is thrown forward..." That's what I said. Releasing the ball is throwing the ball. There is no need to account for anything else.

2017-04-06T08:38:46+00:00

soapit

Guest


ah jerry i think i have you now. potential slight difference yes but as i said i cant see momentum changing enough for it to really matter much except perhaps in decent winds.

AUTHOR

2017-04-06T06:10:22+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Aye MZ, and it may already be too late to book ahead on one of the longer tours! Tent-on-back may be the best solution!

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar