Flipping the Bird: The case for a cap on off-field spending

By Tom Rock / Expert

Money buys success, if you can afford it. There is a correlation between the amount of money spent outside of the salary cap and success on the field.

Perennial finalists like Brisbane, Melbourne and Canterbury routinely outspend their opposition, while cellar dwellers like Newcastle, Wests and the Gold Coast struggle just to pay the bills.

So how much does it cost to win a Telstra Premiership? That’s the question that the Newcastle Knights must be asking themselves. In an all too familiar scene, the Knights were left Bird watching as their marquee target spurned their advances and elected to sign with the Brisbane Broncos.

The offer from Newcastle was incredible. Bird was handed a blank cheque, and was set to become one of the highest-paid players in the game.

He was also gifted the number 6 jersey, a position that he openly covets and one that’s unavailable to him at Brisbane.

Matt Gidley even had the Screaming Jets on standby to play at the contract signing, but apparently Bird had never heard of them.

So why did he choose to sign with the Broncos?

For a promising young player like Jack Bird, the chance to play for the Brisbane Broncos is about much more than the number of zeros on your payslip. It represents the opportunity to be mentored by coaching royalty.

It represents having the finest of training and medical facilities at your fingertips. It represents the high probability of playing finals football each and every season. And that’s without even delving into the murky waters of TPAs.

The reality is that any offering tabled by Brisbane can’t be matched. There is no cap on spending outside of the salary cap, meaning well-resourced clubs like the Broncos have a competitive advantage over the likes of the Newcastle Knights.

The AFL cottoned on to this issue a couple of years ago. Concerned about the spending differential between the haves and have nots, they introduced a cap on off-field spending. Any financial investment above this threshold currently attracts a luxury tax, with the goal of eventually moving towards a fixed ‘hard’ cap similar to the salary cap.

True to form, once the AFL identified this problem and actioned a suitable solution, the NRL begrudgingly acknowledged that the problem exists. They talked about it, formed committees around it, discussed the issue with their clubs, released plans on how to address it, and then failed to follow through. And so the problem remains.

As it stands, the competition is imbalanced and unfair. Despite rugby league championing parity, there is no getting around the fact that wealthy clubs give their football team a higher probability of success. Until the NRL implements a cap on off-field spending, clubs like Newcastle will remain at a competitive disadvantage.

A Bird in the hand is worth two in the bush
So now that they’ve got him, what are they planning to do with him? Despite winning a premiership at the position, Jack Bird has made no secret of his displeasure at playing centre for the Cronulla Sharks. In true millennial fashion, the 22-year-old concedes that he gets bored lurking on the periphery, and wants to get his hands on the ball more often.

It’s easy to see why. Bird has excelled when given the opportunity to play in the halves, and the Sharks were equally impressed when he trained at fullback. His natural footballing instincts, powerful running game and brute strength would make him a dominant five eighth in the mould of Laurie Daley, or a Greg Inglis style force at fullback.

But Brisbane doesn’t need a five eighth. Or a fullback. Anthony Milford and Darius Boyd are superstars at their respective positions, and Wayne Bennett has made it clear that neither will be shifting to accommodate the new recruit. So where does he play?

In the short term, he’ll likely line up at centre. But in Wayne’s world, there’s always a plan. And my money is on Bennett viewing Bird as a lock forward in the long-term. He possesses ideal size, he’s very strong defensively and his ball-playing ability will make him a threat from the back of the scrum.

Bird also has the potential to develop into the leader of the Brisbane forward pack. With Corey Parker now retired, and Sam Thaiday soon to join him, the Broncos will have a substantial void to fill.

Matt Gillett is an outstanding player, and Josh Maguire is well-suited to the enforcer role, but neither has the natural presence and or confidence of Jack Bird. Whether he means to or not, Jack leads by example, and I wouldn’t be at all surprised if Wayne grooms him to eventually take over from Darius Boyd.

So despite the money and opportunity on offer in Newcastle, I think the move north will be a positive one for Bird. At the Broncos, he has the potential to join the prestigious alumni of Brisbane forwards that includes the likes of Gorden Tallis, Shane Webcke, Brad Thorn, Petero Civoniceva and Parker, just to name a few.

Thank goodness he had already pledged his allegiance to the Blues!

5th Tackle Option
Here are five quick thoughts on the action from Round 7:

1. You have to feel for the Gold Coast Titans. The club travels with a M*A*S*H unit these days just to keep a team of healthy bodies on the park. But despite a Stefanovic salary’s worth of talent stuck on the sideline, they never stop competing.

I hope the club persists with Neil Henry. He deserves the chance to show what he can do with a full squad of healthy players.

2. Nathan Peats looks poised to pull a Bradbury. Who else is there? On current form, Robbie Farah doesn’t deserve his spot in the NSW side. Laurie Daley needs to take a Gough Whitlam approach to selecting his number 9, and make the change. It’s time.

3. Wild scenes on Saturday night. It was sugar rush footy at its best: the boys must have tucked into their Easter eggs a day early. There were 9 tries scored in the first half alone between the Storm and the Sea Eagles, while up in Townsville, a Thurstonless Cowboys almost overturned a 24 point deficit in the space of ten minutes! It was blink and you’ll miss it stuff.

4. Cronulla are such a physical side. I wondered if some of the niggle would fade out of their game with the departure of Michael Ennis, but his legacy of grubby tactics lives on. There were cheap shots, late hits, forearms rubbed across the bridge of noses. It reminded me of playing footy against my older brother.

5. St George Illawarra are top of the table. You read that correctly.

Follow Tom on Twitter @_TomRock_

The Crowd Says:

2017-04-19T00:34:30+00:00

matth

Guest


I don't like the concept of restricting the better supported and run teams from spending what they want. In fact, I'd even be happy with more flexibility in the cap (or a higher one). No surprises from a Brisbane supporter. However there should be a 'tax'. For every dollar spent over the cap (and you could make this both on field and off field), say 2 dollars must be placed in a marquee player pool and a facilities pool (depending on the source of the overspend). This is then distributed to teams who are under the on-field and off-field caps and they can use it outside of their cap spend. So the incentive would be for all but the richest teams to spend only up to their caps and then wait for a hand out from the three or four richer teams. The size of the 'tax' would discourage poorer and even mid-tier teams from going over, because let's face it, they wouldn't have enough funds to go sufficiently over to make it worth their while. the very big teams could go over by a fair way and still afford it, but then they give the same leg up to two poorer teams each (because the tax is 2 for 1). The way I see it, is that this would grow the game as a whole. Currently clubs like Brisbane are actually restricted in how much money they can pump into the league. This way, they get to take their advantage, but in doing so also strengthen the other teams as well.

2017-04-19T00:26:17+00:00

matth

Guest


Absolutely. In Rugby League the difference is that the rich teams still only win their "fair share", but when they don't win they are still there or thereabouts - Brisbane, Canterbury, Melbourne are good examples. The poorer teams shine for a season or two then head down for a period in the doldrums - Wests, Manly, St George.

2017-04-19T00:24:10+00:00

matth

Guest


This is a similar model to one that has worked in the US to some extent. It's done with the actual cap I think, where the rich teams can pay overs, but a tax goes to a pool. The poorer teams don't necessarily become better, but they become less bankrupt.

2017-04-18T08:18:58+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Well said. The concept that there are haves who always win and have nots who never do in rugby league is flawed by facts.

2017-04-18T08:15:48+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Haha...

2017-04-18T07:56:29+00:00

Gray-Hand

Guest


Thurston went to the Cowboys so early in his career that you could arguably say he was homegrown.

2017-04-18T07:53:22+00:00

Gray-Hand

Guest


Excellent comment. I sometimes think that rugby league's eternal battle against its tall poppies will lead to limits being set on how many hours players are allowed to train or how heavy the weights are on their gym equipment... A serious solution though: set a soft upper limit on off field spending and if a club wants to spend above that amount, they can, but they have to pay an extra amount to the NRL that gets paid into a general pool to be paid out to poorer teams. Doing it that way would still allow Russel Crowe and James Murdoch to spend their own money to get the best support they can buy for their teams (albeit at a premium), but it would help keep teams like Newcastle in the hunt.

2017-04-18T07:49:12+00:00

Rob

Guest


Try 4- 6 hours there and 4-6 back. They fly down the day before and sleep in a different bed. They get back a day later to start their recovery. The Storm and Broncos is a lot less of an imposition. Sydney clubs fly 5 times a year and they find it difficult away against Broncos, Storm and Cowboys? Have a look at a map sometime. The other thing is they are doing it every other week.

2017-04-18T07:40:38+00:00

Emcie

Roar Guru


its not just the flight mate, its the having to play a game of proffesional footy after a 3 hour flight plus customs and boarding times plus the impact that has on recovery sessions which can mean its not even worth travelling home if you're playing back to back away games. And forget short turn arounds

2017-04-18T07:05:08+00:00

John

Guest


AFL would be the last place I would look at for a fairer competition. If you look at the premiers from 2000, you will note there have been 2 teams that have won it 3 times in a row. In the same period of time you had 3 teams that won 10 premierships between them. Over that same period of time, NRL has had zero back to back premiers those 3 teams you singled out as having the advantage has won 4 premierships between them and the 3 your singled as have nots have won 2 between them. Even if you included the 2 stripped premierships from the Storm in that tally it's still only 6 collective premierships and still no back to back premiers.

2017-04-18T03:49:45+00:00

matth

Guest


I missed Sezer for Canberra, Tamao for Penrith, Miles for Manly and I completely forgot the Eels - Corey Norman and probably Moises

2017-04-18T03:15:00+00:00

PNG Broncos fan88

Roar Guru


This should have been the 1st comment yesterday.

2017-04-18T03:05:04+00:00

Gray-Hand

Guest


Worth remembering that the stuff with Gee was actually self reported to the NRL by the Broncos and to ASIC by the leagues club. While some players probably got some failed TPAs paid by the leagues club, and that's definitely against the rules, it's not the same level of dishonesty that occurred at Melbourne or Canterbury for example.

2017-04-18T03:00:28+00:00

matth

Guest


Every team seems to have one or two big stars, half a dozen 'very goods' and the rest first graders (or less). Brisbane doesn't actually appear much different, nor Melbourne or the Bulldogs. Also most teams big stars and very goods are generally long terms developed players, the salary cap does ensure that the playing field is somewhat level, because you always spend less keeping players than attracting them. Off the top of my head Brisbane have Milf, Blair and now Bird and their non-developed players. That is not a massive number. Melbourne are home grown Canterbury have Hoppoate, Graham and Morris Cronulla have Lewis and had Ennis Warriors have Foran, Luke and RTS Souths have various Burgesses and Inglis Easts are basically home grown these days but say Keary Wests are home grown Newcastle have bugger all Cowboys have Thurston and Coote Canberra home grown plus their hooker. Titans have Hayne and had Bird. Dragons have Widdop and Dugan and now Hunt Penrith are home grown Manly are home grown I don't see massive differences here.

2017-04-18T01:54:26+00:00

Dutski

Roar Guru


Farah is already stuck behind a better Cook (and hooker) at Souths.

2017-04-18T01:14:40+00:00

PNG Broncos fan88

Roar Guru


http://www.nrl.com/hodges-where-players-are-going-wrong-in-cash-grab/tabid/10874/newsid/105770/default.aspx That's Hodges take on the Broncos. It's not all about the money, Tom.

2017-04-18T01:12:58+00:00

PNG Broncos fan88

Roar Guru


2017-04-18T01:10:50+00:00

PNG Broncos fan88

Roar Guru


2017-04-18T00:37:38+00:00

jeff dustby

Guest


Scott, Melbourne spend the big money on the best 16 year olds.

2017-04-18T00:36:56+00:00

jeff dustby

Guest


the gee fiasco is the biggest cover up this century

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar