It's time for Australia to pick a leg-spinner

By Ben Sewell / Roar Pro

It’s now been ten years since Shane Warne retired from international cricket and in that time, Cricket Australia has unearthed a total of zero competent leg-spinners.

In total, Australia has handed twelve spinners baggy greens since Warne’s retirement, which doesn’t include Nathan Hauritz, Stuart MacGill and Brad Hogg, who were also used as replacements at times.

Nathan Lyon currently has made the position his own with 247 wickets in 67 Tests. But he remains part of the issue facing Cricket Australia in this day and age.

Lyon is a finger-spinner who simply does not impart enough turn or bounce on the ball during delivery to have a serious impact outside of the subcontinent.

In the recent home Test series against South Africa, Lyon struggled tremendously, taking only six wickets at an average of 57.66. Lyon really struggled in Perth and Hobart – both traditionally non-spinning wickets – which underlines the issue he currently poses.

[latest_videos_strip category=”cricket” name=”Cricket”]

For Australia to return to their dominant era of the early 2000s, they must show faith in a young leg-spinner and allow them time to grow within the team.

Currently, Australia has three leggies playing consistently for their state sides who have been in and out of the Australian setup throughout the past few years. These players are Tasmania’s Cameron Boyce, South Australia’s Adam Zampa and Queensland’s Mitchell Swepson.

Cameron Boyce
The oldest player on this list, at 28 years of age, Boyce has long been considered Australia’s next leg-spinning option since former Test great Ashley Mallett declared him to be the “best spinner in Australia not playing first class cricket” back in 2007.

As a result, Boyce, then playing in Queensland, was watched closely by the Bulls organisation until he was raced into the side for the Sheffield Shield final of the 2009-10 season. Boyce performed well in that final, taking 6/181 in the second innings which got Australian selectors interested.

Since then, Boyce has unfortunately failed to fully capitalise on his bright start, currently sitting with a record of 96 wickets in 48 games, at an average of just under 50. Boyce has, however, found success in the shortest form of the game, being a consistent performer for the Hobart Hurricanes and being rewarded with seven Twenty20 caps for the Australian side.

Boyce is also an exceptional athlete and is a real asset in the field, owing greatly to his early years in indoor cricket.

Boyce is probably the least likely of the three on this list to make the Test side. Most likely, he’s a long term consideration for the short forms of the game.

Boyce should at least be considered for the Test side as he has been around for years and offers seven years of first class experience. Not every spinner Australia has ever picked in the past has offered exemplary first class resumes and Boyce may be the diamond in the rough selection the national side needs going forward.

Adam Zampa
Zampa probably has the best resume of the three in terms of being selected as Australia’s next Test leg-spinner. Zampa is currently the first-choice spinner in both short forms of the game and has performed well.

(AAP Image/SNPA, John Cowpland)

In 24 ODIs, Zampa has taken 36 wickets at an average of under 30, with six three-wicket hauls. In T20I’s, he has taken 14 wickets in ten games at the outstanding average of 15.14.

While Zampa offers a tremendous resume from his time in the short form, he doesn’t have the best record in first class cricket. In 30 matches, Zampa has taken 83 wickets, but at an inflated average of 46.26.

Zampa especially struggled in last year’s Sheffield Shield final, taking a combined 3/261 as Victoria claimed victory by holding South Australia to a draw.

Zampa does, however, possess a respectable strike rate in first class cricket, taking a wicket every 68 balls which highlights how dangerous leg-spinners can be. Even though Zampa concedes around four runs per over in the long form of the game, he is likely to take you a wicket each spell he bowls, which makes him a valuable commodity.

Mitchell Swepson
Finally, to the youngest and probably most likely player to make the cut from this list. Mitchell Swepson is currently in the Australian squad set play Bangladesh in a two-match series.

At 23 years old, Swepson is extremely raw, but possesses quite the first class record at this tender age. In just two seasons, Swepson has played 14 games, taking 41 wickets at the very respectable average of 32.82 and a strike rate of under 50.

Incidentally, the great Shane Warne was also 23 years of age when he made his rather forgettable debut against India all those years ago.

Warne has showed support for Swepson, calling for him to make his debut in the Australian Side. Warne said he “wasn’t ready at the time the selectors threw me into the playing XI versus India, but the experience helped me for the rest of my career.”

Warne is right, the selectors need to take a leap of faith with Swepson who possesses real upside for the Australian side both home and abroad in the future. His ability to impart turn and bounce on the ball makes him a real asset in the long form of the game.

(AAP Image/Craig Golding)

He’s also shown in the shortest form of the game that he has the ability to bowl accurately consistently with very few long hops and full tosses. Swepson is the complete package for a leg-spinner of his age and can become Australia’s next great spinner if the selectors can show some faith in him.

In Test cricket, to win a game, you have to take 20 wickets. It’s that simple.

If Australia are serious about returning the side to the number one status it enjoyed a decade ago, then an attacking leg-spinner is a must heading forward.

This list is not to suggest that Australia should only look at these three leggies heading forward. But as of right now, all three are under 30 years of age and have been in and around the Australian set up in the past.

They’ve shown enough for the selectors to press the go button in the near future. Australia owe it to themselves to give them a go.

The Crowd Says:

2017-08-30T00:11:37+00:00

Liam

Guest


Still down for dropping Lyon, Ben? Nine wickets and a run-out isn't bad...

2017-08-18T05:23:01+00:00

armchair expert

Guest


Lyon took 6 wickets@67 in 4 county matches.

2017-08-18T05:17:48+00:00

armchair expert

Guest


I also recall Yardley taking crucial 5th day wickets at the MCG vs West Indies in the early 80s, maybe Higgs and Miller also.

2017-08-16T01:36:04+00:00

Liam

Guest


Really? Could you show his stats, please?

2017-08-15T09:25:46+00:00

DavSA

Guest


One of the problems of not have a quality leggie is that in practice sessions you do not get too much exposure to them . Goes to state cricket as well . I may be wrong and am too lazy to sus the stats but I have always seen offspinners as defensive bowlers with the leggies being the real wicket taking threat . In South Africa we had the same problem for years . Pat Symcox commanded a place in the test side but at best was a holding off spinner and despite on paper the Proteas being a terrific team it was a glaring weakness of ours not having a quality leg spinner . The superb Australian team under Ponting was not that much better than them player for player but one huge exception was that man Shane Warne.

AUTHOR

2017-08-15T08:56:18+00:00

Ben Sewell

Roar Pro


Yeah, I do.

2017-08-15T07:42:56+00:00

Liam

Guest


... yet you want to drop him for someone untried, someone whose economy rate in the last shield season was around 4.5 an over? How about we wait before the house is actually on fire before showering it with water, eh?

2017-08-14T23:19:02+00:00

Chris Kettlewell

Roar Guru


That's just dumb. I know the batsmen are the ones relied on to score the majority of runs, but if you can average 50 more runs from your tail than the opposition, that makes a massive difference. If you pick a tail of bunnies that puts lots of pressure on the batsmen, especially if you have a batsman in and some wickets fall and he's now batting with the tail. If you have a tail where they can bat, it gives him some confidence to just keep going, if not then suddenly he's got to think about trying to farm strike and things like that. A tail that is stronger with the bat makes a big difference. Sure, don't select significantly worse bowlers because they are better with the bat. But if it's a bit of a toss-up between two bowlers and one is a significantly better batsman than the other then of course that's going to work in his favour.

2017-08-14T20:49:55+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


I realise that Ben, I listed Agar's "domestic" first-class record, as I think that is the more accurate figure when comparing him to other spinners who have only played domestic first-class cricket.

AUTHOR

2017-08-14T20:44:27+00:00

Ben Sewell

Roar Pro


His FC record is 114 wickets at 40.24. I think Agar can play a part in this side if he can improve his batting. A genuine allrounder could be in his future, but me personally, I wouldn't pick him as a spinner.

2017-08-14T13:27:25+00:00

Mike Dugg

Guest


Nathan Lyon most recently got pasted all over England in division 2 county cricket

2017-08-14T11:34:27+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


"But I completely disagree with the premise that Agar should be anywhere near this side. His overall FC record is as bad as Zampa and Boyce." Domestic first-class records: Agar ................... 112 wickets at 38 Zampa ................ 83 wickets at 46 Boyce ................. 96 wickets at 50

2017-08-14T11:30:29+00:00

Troy Merritt

Guest


This is like the argument that we must have an all-rounder, therefore we pick the best one we have, despite the fact they aren't of test quality. This is the kind of thinking that kept Mitch marsh batting in the top six despite being nowhere near good enough with the bar at test level. Pick the best spinner you've got. That currently in Nathan Lyon, who will probably retire with over 400 test wickets and an army of keyboard warriors insisting he shouldn't have been in the side. Maybe Steve O'Keefe should have displaced him, but either injury or behaviour has kept him out of the side. If Swepson or Zampa are to displace him, it will be through a sustained period of performance. I don't think either are there yet, at least not in red ball cricket. Zampa is improving, but Swepson needs another solid season to prove his credentials. I think taking on tour is great for his development, but the selectors would be a long way off picking him for home matches.

2017-08-14T11:25:13+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Interesting article Ben, I've always loved leg spinners. But Boyce can't even get a game in the Sheffield Shield and Zampa's bowling style is much better suited to white ball cricket at this stage. Swepson right now is comfortably the best Test prospect of those three. But it doesn't augur well that Swepson was absolutely obliterated in Darwin yesterday, taking 0-94 from just 13 overs in the Aussie practice match. That is Swepson's big weakness - he too regularly has bad spells/session/days where he gets smashed to all parts, hence his extremely high economy rate in FC cricket.

2017-08-14T10:50:12+00:00

Jameswm

Guest


I agree. Not sure the selectors do.

2017-08-14T06:56:07+00:00

Kopa Shamsu

Guest


as a pure cricket fan Bangladesh,i'm terribly disappointed James pattinson is not in the team,what does Australia investing medical issues of players?if Pattinson can't play cricket,we will loose a diamond from cricket world :/

2017-08-14T06:42:29+00:00

AGordon

Guest


Fair call and I hope a) he get's that chance and b) he's as good as you seem to think. I reckon he's obviously a chance to get a run in Bangladesh, but might miss out in the Ashes. After that though, according to the cricket schedule, there are upcoming Tests in South Africa then Zimbabwe and Bangladesh tour Australia in June/July next year. They're the games where he might get more of a look. Again, if he's any good, it would be criminal to throw him to the wolves, so to speak http://www.cricschedule.com/ftp/team/australia.html

2017-08-14T05:55:17+00:00

Giri Subramanian

Roar Guru


Lyon is still Australia's number 1 spinner. Yes it will be great for young Swepson or Zampa to be picked in tests but Lyon will continue to be the premier spinner.

AUTHOR

2017-08-14T05:01:39+00:00

Ben Sewell

Roar Pro


I've never once said Lyon hasn't done his job for Australia. Statistically speaking, he's the 9th best bowler in Australian Test History which is an amazing feat, given that he's playing in this tough post Warne era. My point is that I think he was found out against South Africa last Summer on pitches that didn't turn which makes me worried for this Ashes series and all future series outside of Asia.

AUTHOR

2017-08-14T04:58:25+00:00

Ben Sewell

Roar Pro


AGordon, all I'm asking for is a chance :D Give him a season or two to show his worth. If after that, he's taken nothing and gone for plenty, then I'll be the first to put my hand up and say I was wrong. I don't think I'm wrong on this guy but.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar