The Wrap: Can the Wallabies shift the focus back to rugby?

By Geoff Parkes / Expert

In any bereavement situation, there are stages of shock, grief, anger, acceptance and recovery.

Since Friday’s announcement by the ARU that the Force are to be “discontinued”, the first three of those elements have been prominent, with Force fans and sympathizers from around the country unified in denouncing both the decision and those at the ARU deemed responsible for chopping Western Australian rugby off at the knees.

For those emotionally invested in the Force, the ‘acceptance’ and ‘recovery’ phases are a long way into the future. Australian rugby can only hope that the anger will subside over time and that good rugby people – players, coaches, officials, club volunteers, parents, casual followers – aren’t lost to the sport as a result.

That there has been significant damage done to the sport in a key market is indisputable. No matter that there are important mitigating circumstances – many of them outside the influence of the ARU – angry fans are understandably in no mood for alternative or rational assessments of the bigger picture.

In normal times, changing the subject and shifting the attention of the rugby community towards the Wallabies might be considered a smart strategy. But for the ARU, come 10pm next Saturday night, dealing with the situation around the Force might be seen as the lesser of two evils.

Every rugby Test is important, but for Australian rugby, there is a sense that this opening Bledisloe Cup/Rugby Championship match is as important as any played in recent memory.

The ARU desperately needs an injection of positivity into an arena that remains persistently negative. All of the good work done by the Wallabies to engage the communities of Cessnock and Penrith in the last week has counted for nothing, because their bosses have stolen the headlines.

With their bed now made, and CEO Bill Pulver having announced his exit, there is nothing that the ARU can do in the short term to improve their situation other than let the venting run its natural course, pray like there’s no tomorrow that a decent crowd rolls up to ANZ Stadium to support the players, and that TV viewer numbers don’t fall off a cliff.

These are modest goals, but then again, these are extraordinary times.

Michael Cheika is a redoubtable character who is not afraid to do things the hard way. But even he, when he signed on for the job of Wallabies coach, would not have expected that his job description would entail ‘last remaining potential saviour of Australian rugby.’

(AAP Image/SNPA, Ross Setford)

Cheika has that responsibility because the fastest way – and right now the only way – for Australian rugby to climb out of its funk is for the Wallabies to start winning. Against anybody; but most importantly, against New Zealand.

Fans who have pledged this week never to support Australian rugby again or cancel their TV subscriptions in protest will deny it, but if the Wallabies were somehow able to reclaim the Bledisloe Cup, most of them would be back on board faster than Romain Poite changes his mind about an offside penalty.

All of which is far easier said than done.

The language from the Wallabies camp over the last few weeks has been defiantly optimistic and positive, as it must be. The British and Irish Lions have provided a blueprint for other teams to follow, and prised open a hole in the All Blacks’ shield of invincibility for the Wallabies to storm through.

Moreover, fans have been promised a different Wallabies. Lard-arses and passengers have been dispensed with and no more will a side coached by Cheika fade out of games in the final quarter due to inferior fitness or indifferent attitude. As ever, Cheika is striving to put only the players onto the field who resemble himself and who mirror his values and worth ethic.

Kurtley Beale is back in the fold, (although may need most of this week to fully confirm his recovery from injury), Michael Hooper is a popular choice within the camp as captain, and leading players such as Israel Folau and Adam Coleman finished the Super Rugby season off strongly.

Therein lies a significant problem. For Australia, Super Rugby finished weeks ago. The Wallabies camp has provided an opportunity to get the side fit, build spirit and bake in a robust defensive system, but the danger for sides that spend too long without playing is that the mind can get ahead of the body, and that the metrics used for measuring improvement are internal, artificial and don’t take full account of an opponent like the All Blacks.

(AAP Image/SNPA, Dianne Manson)

By contrast, most of the All Blacks’ squad played deep into the Super Rugby finals, many of them are flush with success, and they are match hardened. Further, searching for the accuracy and clinical finishing that was missing from the Lions series, coach Steve Hansen put his squad through a useful final tune-up on Friday night in Pukekohe, against Taranaki and Counties.

Whatever lessons the Wallabies may have taken from the Lions’ performance, it is another thing altogether for a side that lacks the Lions’ class, experience and confidence to put them into practice.

In reality, the Lions haven’t done the Wallabies a favour at all; it would have been far preferable for them to have copped 40-point thrashings which potentially might have left the All Blacks without a hard edge.

Instead, the All Blacks arrive in Sydney with the reinstatement of key players like Ben Smith and Ryan Crotty, desperate to reimpose itself as the world’s dominant side.

That cannot be good news for the Wallabies.

In past years, the convention was that Super Rugby results had little correlation with Test rugby. What that theory doesn’t take into account however, is that when the ledger sits at three Australian wins from 53 matches over the last two seasons, and a single Test victory from the last 14 matches against the All Blacks, there is a real psychological barrier that no amount of positive reinforcement and bootcamp training can easily overcome.

Simply put, there are players in this Wallabies team who have no idea how to win against New Zealand. In that respect, it is easy for minds to play tricks and lead to sub-conscious acceptance of an honourable loss and a good personal performance as worthy enough.

Further, there is insufficient depth within the Wallabies squad to maintain pressure on the All Blacks throughout a series, once injuries and rotation ensure changes to the playing side. Sef Fa’agase, Ned Hanigan, Jack Dempsey, Adam Korczyk, Jordan Uelese, Marika Koroibete, Campbell Magnay and others are good players, but they are by no measure star players in Super Rugby who demand inclusion because of consistent, dominant performances over time. They are merely the next players in line.

All of these players use Super Rugby to suggest that they have something to offer at higher level. Reiko Ioane, on the other hand, doesn’t suggest anything; his performances demand selection, pushing a 54-test, 46-tries star player, Julian Savea, out of the All Blacks squad.

(AAP Image/SNPA, David Rowland)

Korczyk put in a couple of decent shifts in Super Rugby and finds himself pulled into the Wallabies squad and written up in newspapers as the next potential saviour.

Meanwhile, what about Matt Todd, with eight Test matches and all of Richie McCaw’s wisdom under his belt, who consistently stands out for the title winning Crusaders? ‘Thanks Matt but we’ll call you if we get any injuries.’

Whatever boost the Wallabies might take from the All Blacks’ drawn series against the Lions must be tempered by realistic analysis of their own form. Italy and Scotland are the two worst-performed sides in recent Six Nations history, yet Australia, playing at home in June, lost to one and only just squeaked home against the other.

The best thing that can happen to lift the pall of gloom that envelops Australian rugby right now is for the Wallabies to somehow do the impossible and conjure a win on Saturday night. In a two-horse race, anything is possible, but there is no logical measure that points to such a result.

Perhaps some will consider that the next best option is a ‘respectable’ loss, but that will only be if that is achieved through spirited effort and skilful play, not by using blatant niggle as a clumsy device to fracture the match and keep the score down, such as happened in Wellington last year.

Perversely, the best outcome for Australian rugby might be a thorough towelling. There is a genuine fear that the events of last Friday are not the low point for Australian rugby that many report it to be, and anything that hastens the arrival at ‘true south’ might, in the long run, be worth the short-term pain.

The prospect of ‘rock bottom’ potentially bringing on a South African-style ‘indaba’, where stakeholders (including a new ARU CEO) would present themselves with good intent and an open mind to reconstruct a model for Australian rugby that ensures all amateur and professional participants are pulling in the same direction, is a subject for another day.

A day that may well be approaching fast, but for now it is fanciful to suggest – as some have done – that the Wallabies’ task has been made easier by the decision to exclude the Force from Super Rugby, because it will somehow draw the players closer together and stiffen their resolve. After all, their grievance is not with the All Blacks.

In the meantime, the best thing that can happen – for everybody’s sake – is for Michael Cheika and the Wallabies to reclaim the back pages with talk about the game.

This will be an unusual week because there will be many who will want to talk about anything but. Cheika will insist that there is no distraction, but there is the prospect that if everyone involved with the Wallabies does not have absolute focus on the match ahead, Australian rugby stands to be ripped to shreds by a ruthless All Blacks side who care nought for all of the domestic wrangling.

If that happens, it will make the events of last Friday look like a school picnic.

The Crowd Says:

2017-08-15T12:23:34+00:00

DavSA

Guest


Gotta say .. and I am going to be hammered for political incorrectness , ..... but those girls are pretty Mensch .

2017-08-15T12:19:23+00:00

DavSA

Guest


ditto that Fionn

2017-08-15T07:46:32+00:00

MitchO

Guest


A problem with elite sports now that wasn't around back in Campo's youth is the amount of physical training the guys need to get up for it. You need to lift a lot of weights for a long time to get your body tough enough and need to run a long way to be fit and fast enough. In the AFL they say it takes at least three full preseasons to be physically up to it. There are always exceptions (like Chris Judd) but just not many. That was actually talking about the youngsters though so an 18 or 19 years is going to a few years of age in the muscles anyway. Most of the guys who could step up are physical fitness junkies. Guys you put the work in anyway. How does an amateur find time to train and where do they find the desire if they are only playing first grade for fun and then going to work on Monday.

2017-08-15T07:20:26+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Professional organisation should always have a scouting system good enough to be aware of talent at the lower club levels Glider - so nobody (in theory) should get missed. Ofc they still do in practice! Joe Launchbury has an interesting tale to tell over in the UK. He was dumped out of the Quins academy in his late teens and went to play for Worthing - small club a few leagues down on the South coast. It was because Will Green (an ex Wasp of the great era) spotted him there that he was eventually offered a contract with Wasps. But at one point he felt he might be slipping through the net - now he's one of the top 10 second rows in world rugby.

2017-08-15T05:32:58+00:00

soapit

Guest


yep, said with absolutely no responsibility for finance of course. might spike interest tho putting more emphasis on tours than the rc which has become stale. contonuing on till everyones bored with it might not be the best strategy long term and sometime less is more (hard argument to convince bean counters with i admit).

2017-08-14T23:57:38+00:00

glider

Guest


scheduling for this test match is crazy - Shute Shield Finals this weekend so many people will be at their local ground and club afterwards to celebrate or commiserate and then watch test on TV.

2017-08-14T23:55:25+00:00

Ex force fan

Guest


I think WA supporters could have accepted a decision to axe the Froce provided that the axing process was fair, transparent and independent. Clyne excluded Stookes from Board discussions about axing a team, but not the Vic of ACT representatives, three ERU executives left as soon as they could and the whole process was engineered as an PR exercise to come up with a decision to axe the Force. The decision was and cannot be explained. The unfair process, the sense of betrayal, the disrespect shown to the WA rugby community and the ignorance and neglect of the ERU Board and Executive means the WA rugby supporters will NEVER EVER accept this incredibly dumb decision. Neither should any other rugby supporter in Australia. This is just not what rugby is about.

2017-08-14T23:54:17+00:00

glider

Guest


Nick - why is that ? are they too scared to pick someone in club rugby who might be better than a contracted player? I have been watching Shute Shield games and the standard looks pretty competitive , hard running rugby with some lovely tries being scored. Its obvious that many of these guys can play and that they are being coached well, they know how to run and catch under pressure and back up making the overlap; they have a play book which has obviously been well practiced ........so why wouldn't you pick someone from obscurity? It couldn't be much worse than some of the stock we have now going through the motions Not so long ago it was obvious when good rugby players came through the ranks - they played first xv at school or college and not all GPS; if they were good enough they into first grade and if they were really good - they went on to representative rugby and the Wallaby's. It didn't take years to develop a talent and go through the long process of rugby institutes before they got game time. I know this because i played with and against a couple of these guys - one being D Campese who came from 1st Grade at Queanbeyan Rugby and went straight into the wallabies, Given our history I dont think we should ever forget fantastic rugby players that came from relative obscurity. Perhaps we have become so stilted in our model that we are disregarding our available playing stock and therefore our selection process and review of talent has become unconsciously incompetent.

2017-08-14T23:44:58+00:00

Ex force fan

Guest


And the ERU's legal cost increases, the ERU operating deficit increases and the new CEO and new ERU Board gets fed up with the amount of time and money this take that could be used better elsewhere, the sponsors loose interest in the shambles of an internally divided sport.... cost savings from cutting the Force disappear and everyone asks Clyne WTF was this for?

2017-08-14T22:22:07+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


I don't see that really viable though. Test rugby, specifically the rugby championship is far too lucrative. It would kill SA and Aus to have their TV income drop every 2nd year and it wouldn't be great to maintain NZ's strong position.

2017-08-14T20:58:24+00:00

soapit

Guest


honestly i wouldnt mind if RC went down to a short run every two years like it does at the wc (or even just have it every 2 years) and better accommodate lions tours and others.

2017-08-14T20:57:04+00:00

soapit

Guest


cricket is perhaps a little different tho as there plenty of stats to enjoy when your team is winning (people racking up 100's /wickets etc.). i liked watching oz in that period, was younger then with much more time tho.

2017-08-14T20:54:59+00:00

soapit

Guest


without being churlish the answer lies in other sports. i would think (without thinking too hard) interest in the league snd cricket contests go up when oz lose a few.

2017-08-14T14:39:58+00:00

Ex force fan

Guest


Thanks ajg. That is the only way this injustice can be reversed.

2017-08-14T14:36:49+00:00

Ex force fan

Guest


Neither would the ERU

2017-08-14T14:33:53+00:00

Ex force fan

Guest


There is nothing as bad as a CEO that hangs around like a bad smell and the organisation loose respect for him while everyone maneuver for his job. The ERU will be a mess, so business as usual.

2017-08-14T14:13:56+00:00

Fox

Roar Guru


The key point RahRah is they did what they agreed to do and that was drop two sides - there was no proviso - even though mentioned as you rightly point out - that they had to filter the players from those sides into the remaining sides. Australia needs to do this though if they can because it is clear they need to strengthen the remaining teams in their conference which will be a good thing long term. I think in fairness SA has more players coming through the ranks than Australia as well.

2017-08-14T13:16:39+00:00

RahRah

Guest


Actually no SA did not do their bit, they moved two teams to another comp, they did not use the "excess players" to strengthen the SR comp as we have been told would be the case.

2017-08-14T12:37:57+00:00

Train Without A Station

Guest


And with each court it goes to, the less likely they will grant any injunction as they wait to consider the merit of the appeal.

2017-08-14T12:33:39+00:00

Train Without A Station

Guest


Because the Brumbies own their licence.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar