Australia should play three spinners in Bangladesh

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

Australia have a host of problems to deal with as they head towards the second Test in Bangladesh at serious risk of a humiliating 2-0 series loss.

Bangladesh yesterday completed arguably the greatest win in their 17-year Test history, dismissing Australia for 244 to claim a 20-run victory.

That was only Bangladesh’s 10th win from 101 Tests, and only the third victory they have registered over one of the stronger international teams, with the other seven wins coming against Zimbabwe and the West Indies.

Significantly, all three of those major wins have come in the past ten months – they hammered England in Dhaka last October, beat Sri Lanka in Colombo this March and then yesterday earned what might be their most significant victory.

After being considered minnows for so many years, Bangladesh have blossomed into a highly-competitive and skilful Test team. They thoroughly deserved to win this Test and should now be favourites to win the series.

Yet a week ago it Australia who were the favourites with the bookies after an impressive display in India, where they were in a position to win the four-Test series midway through the final match. But, as I flagged in June, Australia were always going to be vulnerable heading into this series without superstar quick Mitchell Starc, who is neck and neck with Steve Smith as their most important player in Asian conditions.

In that article, the other player I predicted Australia would miss badly in Bangladesh was left arm spinner Steve O’Keefe, who was left out of the squad for this series seemingly due to off-field indiscretions.

Now O’Keefe has landed in Bangladesh after being called in as the replacement for injured paceman Josh Hazlewood, who strained his side at Dhaka. I would send the veteran tweaker straight into the XI in place of Hazlewood for the second Test, giving Australia three frontline spinners.

(AAP Image/Paul Miller)

Australia also have the choice of introducing reserve quick Jackson Bird, who has a fine Test record with 34 wickets at an average of 27 from eight matches. But Bird has never played a Test in Asia and is similar in style, yet not quite as good, as Hazlewood who had no impact in the first Test and has struggled for penetration in Asia, taking just 16 wickets from eight matches.

At Dhaka, Bangladesh barely used their two pace bowlers, who combined to send down a minuscule 15 overs for the Test. Australian Pat Cummins was the only fast bowler who posed a threat the whole match and that seemed to be due to his intimidating pace as he pushed the speed gun up to 149kmh.

Bowling in the gentle 130 – 135kmh range, it is hard to see how Bird would be any more effective than Hazlewood. The other option would be to replace Hazlewood with 23-year-old leg spinner Mitchell Swepson and leave out either O’Keefe or fellow left armer Ashton Agar.

Bowling with an enticing loop and heavy side spin, Swepson is the most attacking spinner in the Australian squad. He certainly would add some nice variety to their attack.

The major drawbacks with Swepson are his lack of experience, having played just 14 first-class games, and his tendency to be very expensive, as evidenced by his lofty career economy rate of 4.04 runs per over.

This latter weakness was underlined in Australia’s sole trial match prior to this series. On a turning deck in Darwin on which both Lyon and Agar performed well, Swepson was absolutely mauled by his Australian opponents, finishing with match figures of 0-118 while conceding more than five runs per over.

With the series on the line in the second Test, O’Keefe’s selection is a no brainer. The experienced New South Welshman snared 19 wickets at an average of 23 in the Tests in India and is similar in style to Bangladesh left armer Shakib Al Hasan, who ran amok at Dhaka with a 10-wicket match haul.

While that would leave Australia with two left arm finger spinners, O’Keefe and Agar are not overly similar bowlers. O’Keefe is six inches shorter than Agar and also bowls with a lower, more round-arm action, meaning he has a significantly different trajectory. Where Agar often gets the ball to leap off the surface, O’Keefe is a skiddy operator.

They also bowl at different speeds. Agar’s height helps him to dart the ball through without bowling too flat, and he was mostly in the 90 – 98kmh range at Dhaka.

O’Keefe, meanwhile, tends to operate in the 80 – 88kmh bracket. Australia would be stronger for the presence of O’Keefe.

They would also be boosted if they put Hilton Cartwright in place of Usman Khawaja, who made just two runs at Dhaka, and now averages 14 from his five Tests in Asia.

(AAP Image/Dan Himbrechts)

A composed and well-rounded batsman, Cartwright would also offer Australia a handy second seam option should they decide to play three frontline spinners. Khawaja was not alone in having a poor match at Dhaka. Wicketkeeper Matthew Wade badly let down his team with a shoddy keeping performance and two failures with the bat.

Another calamitous display in the second Test will surely jeopardise Wade’s position for the upcoming Ashes. Number six Glenn Maxwell also failed to press his case for Ashes selection by wasting a pair of good starts. Australia also need a lift from young batsmen Matt Renshaw and Peter Handscomb.

That pair have shown great promise over their five Tests in Asia this year but, like Maxwell, need to begin cashing in on their starts. All of a sudden, Australia have a lot to fret over.

The Crowd Says:

2017-09-05T06:32:26+00:00

qwetzen

Guest


"suspended from all bbq games...". Wow. That's underwhelming. (And would he have been picked anyway? Esp with Goat available.) "CA contract torn up". No he didn't. It wasn't renewed. That's a big difference. But anyway, here he is shortly after trundling away in a Test. Would you please name the Roy incident(s) that were more "public" than any of Warners or O'Keefes?

2017-09-03T17:42:46+00:00

Chris Love

Roar Guru


Light slap on the bank account? suspended from all matador cup games and had his CA contract torn up. Hardly light. As much as I hated the Symonds sacking his weren't all "in house" either.

2017-09-01T23:33:08+00:00

qwetzen

Guest


It may be problematical. The 'Big Four' were going to blow the poms off the park but I note that Cummins is the only one in working order atm.

2017-09-01T23:28:38+00:00

qwetzen

Guest


Indeedy. And let's have a quick game of Pick the Difference! Six boozy incidents of Oz Test players, each has two. Symonds: Two 'in-house' incidents = Contract torn up. Career ended. Warner: Two *very* public disgraces, one involving assault = Made v-c. O'Keefe: Two *very* public disgraces = A light slap on the bank account and still selected in Test squad. There's something there. Can't quite put my finger on it...

2017-09-01T23:15:49+00:00

qwetzen

Guest


"the first subcontinent player in our team" was Dav Whatmore. Unless you count Tasmania as sub-continent. In which case I think it was Ken Burn.

2017-09-01T21:28:53+00:00

Brian George

Guest


Oh poor rossie copped a slap and can't cope...aww

2017-09-01T21:27:21+00:00

Brian George

Guest


After that comment Stephen I suspect your description of yourself as a "humble second grader" is really stretching the truth.

2017-08-31T23:50:09+00:00

Stephen

Guest


matth i think a man by the name of mike hussey knows cricket better then you and he is righly backing khawaja. Hussey's comments are gold. If Warner can stay persistently with the team with absolute failures why can't Khawaja stay with the team? If Australia will exclude Khawaja from the first xi for the next game, it will help Bangladesh to go to a whitewash victory over Australia for the first time. Australia should need seven specialist batsmen. So availability of Khawaja is extremely essential. Australia can't use either Agar or Catwright as a top order batsman.

2017-08-31T15:47:31+00:00

Chris Love

Roar Guru


If they can fly in Okeefe they can fly in Neville.

2017-08-31T12:53:09+00:00

Ross (not that Ross)

Guest


I'm a different Ross by the way, so sorry for whoever it was who commented earlier. My point is I think Cartwright doesn't obviously strengthen the team, and he doesn't demand selection. The biggest case for him is his bowling, but there are options to cover the few overs he would need to bowl.

2017-08-31T10:48:40+00:00

nickbrisbane

Guest


Pity Chris Hartley was treated so badly

2017-08-31T07:53:50+00:00

Ross

Guest


Ronan tjads offensive mate, can the admin staff please look at this as I am not Matt but have my own views, can't do that mate just because I don't ageee wirj you

2017-08-31T07:06:36+00:00

armchair expert

Guest


The selection of the only spinner who has bowled Australia to victory on the sub continent over the last 6 years or so, a head scratcher or a no brainer?

AUTHOR

2017-08-31T06:44:16+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


"I don’t know why people keep bracketing Handscomb along with Renshaw as promising players of spin." Brasstax I agree that Handscomb hasn't produced enough with the bat in his five Tests in Asia. But the reason that I bracket him as a "promising" player of spin is that he's looked calm and quite confident in all 10 innings he's played in Asia, which is why he has reached at least 16 runs in nine out of 10 innings. 72no, 33, 24, 22, 20, 19, 18, 18, 16, 8 ...... those are Handscomb's scores in Asia. If he was struggling against spin in Asia it would be a very strange situation he had somehow reached at least 16 nine out of 10 times. But he Handscomb absolutely needs to improve his returns in Asia because he is constantly making a good start and then wasting it.

AUTHOR

2017-08-31T06:25:50+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


I can't fathom the thought process of picking the XI for the second Test in Bangladesh based on who should play in the Ashes. They are two completely separate series and Australia may well lose 2-0 in Bangladesh if they don't actually pick a side for the conditions rather than picking a side to play in the Ashes.

2017-08-31T05:58:34+00:00

Stephen

Guest


Make handsombe the keeper, simple

2017-08-31T05:56:35+00:00

Stephen

Guest


Lancey fair points but what you are missing from Ross is that khawaja got picked on straight away after getting run out first innings. Yes it was not the best dismissal but so many folks with pre exisiting issues with the guy got on his back whereas a Handscombe or a Maxwell would not have got that until after 4-5 games. This point is a valid one and even you have to admit this one.

2017-08-31T05:46:16+00:00

Worlds Biggest

Guest


Congrats to the Bangers, a great win for them. As soon as we lost Warner and Smith I knew we were toast. The inevitable collapse ensued as it generally does in the sub continent. Thought we turned a bit of a corner after the Indian series.

2017-08-31T05:41:02+00:00

Stephen

Guest


Ok fair points matt, like you i also rate khawaja as the 3rd best batsmn in the team, my point to add to that is that class players like that find a way through if we give them time and confidence and what better way to give that then to put him in a pressure second game against Bangladesh.

2017-08-31T05:37:55+00:00

Stephen

Guest


I will give you some Matt, well done mate, finally a postive comment haha

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar