This mess makes it clear: It's time for major change in global rugby

By moondoggie / Roar Rookie

The lesson to learn from the Western Force’s drawn-out culling is that rugby must transition into the next stage of professionalism and become a united game globally.

Andrew Forrest’s proposed Indo-Pacific competition will create more headaches in the short term.

For example, will Australian players be eligible for the Wallabies if they play for the Force (or indeed another team)? I suspect the ARU will say no, as a major reason for culling a team was to concentrate talent.

Will it be financially viable? How much money will Forrest sink into it if it doesn’t make money? Will they be able to attract star players? What effect will the rival competition have on Super Rugby? Will it stem the flow of players from south to north?

And what happens in 2020 when a new broadcast agreement is made? Will the Force be invited back? Would they accept?

Messy stuff.

But it presents an opportunity for World Rugby, SANZAAR and local unions to redesign the global calendar and competitions, to make rugby a truly professional, global sport.

The first era of professionalism has been successful, and the game is in strong health, but to build on this foundation the time is right for evolution, so the game can strengthen existing markets and expand into new territory.

[latest_videos_strip category=”rugby” name=”Rugby”]

The current Super Rugby model has run its course. Fans have lost interest, crowds are down and South African franchises want out. We should let them go north, but to accommodate this, the global season will need to be tweaked.

I doubt the Springboks will want to stop playing the All Blacks, so the national team will stay in the Rugby Championship. But if their club go north, the global season must accommodate this. Therefore, Southern Hemisphere competitions may have to align their seasons with the Northern Hemisphere season to allow the best players to be available for Test Matches.

This may mean rugby in summer, but why not? It worked for the A-League.

I like the idea of having the Jaguares in a professional competition, but logistically this is not working for Super Rugby. A new professional competition needs to be established in the Americas, possibly involving Argentina, Uruguay, USA and Canada. It’s a massive market, with huge room for expansion.

This leaves space for an Asia-Pacific competition involving clubs from Australia, New Zealand, the Pacific Islands and Japan. Drop the Super Rugby brand, do away with illogical conference arrangements, play a simple home-and-away competition.

If the quality is there, it will be marketable.

This also leaves room for expansion further into Asia, particularly China, in the future. Ideally, the current Rugby Championship will remain, with the possibility of adding Japan and Pacific teams once they are more consistently competitive.

Aligning club seasons to timezones in this way will provide for more stable and marketable local competitions, while retaining the quality and integrity of Tests. Ideally there will be more incentive (financial and otherwise) for Southern Hemisphere players to play locally, especially Pacific Islanders, who for too long have been poached by the bigger unions.

Sadly, I doubt anyone involved in the game at the moment has the foresight to implement such a change, but major change is needed.

The Crowd Says:

2017-09-08T17:44:41+00:00

DavSa

Guest


I hear you P2R2 , but if rugby does go global as incidentally is being propagated by none other than the NZRU then buying and selling of players becomes a huge reality . Money is money . Would a Messi , Neymar or Renaldo prefer to play for their home clubs , I don't know but they do prefer playing for cash.

2017-09-06T20:02:24+00:00

P2R2

Roar Rookie


...NZ in particular are staring down a barrel with NH teams itching to sign their stars....why down the barrell, the lure of the AB Jersey is what keeps NZ players in NZ...anyone can go North and earn money for their pension....AMAZON is about to buy into the TV Rights for the ABs....BIG MONEY....so financially the NZRU will be looking good. But I do agree, a GLOBAL CALENDAR...but it will be the NH who will put up the barriers, as long as NZ/AB's continue to dominate world rugby, all other teams will want to play them.... I watched the first round of the Aviva P/Ship and couldn't believe how many overseas players are playing in it, add to that the PRO14 and that is alot of players who are keeping OUT UK and FRENCH players.....it will end up like the EPL where any of the big teams will be lucky to have 2 or 3 English players in their teams...now that can't be good for NH rugby??

2017-09-06T11:29:37+00:00

TheyHaventThoughtAboutIt

Guest


How do you expand a competition or a sporting code by culling a viable club with a 12 year history??? Has anybody at World Rugby given this more than a passing thought and the message it sends to people at the new expansion clubs? You can give all the guarantees you like to new clubs but this thought will be sitting in the back of peoples minds eating away at the sustainability of any new club.

2017-09-06T09:36:42+00:00

markie362

Guest


Play in summer.now we know why they cut the force.it hits mid 40s for weeks on end here in perth

2017-09-06T06:32:39+00:00

Jacky

Guest


Having been a rugby supporter for more 60 odd years I have become totally frustrated and disillusioned with the current position that the game has been forced into by a bunch of people who seem to think that they own it.Every time I see Clynes uncaring face it reminds me of a bank manager foreclosing on some poor cow cocky who has slogged his guts out and gone without for years only to have some bugger in the city who has no understanding of rural matters shut him down without a care in the world.I have seen that happen many times and now I see it happen to the Western Force.Out of sight out of mind.Clyne seems to think he can scatter a few dollars here and there in the west and it will go away.In my opinion humble as it is I believe that Mr Forrest can benefit rugby in this country much better than a Sydney Centric ARU with the help of a couple of gutless Directors from other Eastern franchises.Why did Clyne allow the South Africans to walk all over Australian rugby.I am a Queenslander and one eyed Reds and Wallaby supporter and have been for longer than Mr Clyne has been alive,I have given up many years coaching junior rugby and served on club rugby committees sold chooks in the pub and did all the coaching courses available in the 1980's.I will still support the Wallabies as long as the team is selected from a truely national base including what ever is going on in WA but if I see or feel that players from that state are excluded for any reason other than ability I would have to rethink my allegiance How any organisation in the financial position that Australian Rugby is in can not spend time exploring opportunities with the financial windfall that Mr.Forrest would create is beyond me.If the ARU goes bankrupt because ARU backed a South African idea then I hope that there is a class action against the people who have made these terrible decisions.I hope that WA supports their National team and that there is a sea of blue at Saturdays game in Perth..I also hope that all those wonderful players and the coaching staff are not lost to our game in our country because of decisions made by a few big headed buffoons

2017-09-06T06:22:06+00:00

The Neutral View From Sweden

Roar Guru


This leave NZ with much reduced competition in test matches. It would leave them with much less money also. But that could be an option also. If rugby in Japan really takes off, they could become a much bigger golden goose for NZR than SARU ever has been. I actually think that keeping SA in the SH and not involving Japan in the Tasman rugby is a handbrake on rugby's potential growth. If it all plays out well, everyone would become richer and fans would be able to see all games at reasonable time slots.

2017-09-06T06:16:00+00:00

The Neutral View From Sweden

Roar Guru


Thanks, for this. Many valid points here. It has been debated before here at The Roar that the SH should start following NH season. It would be very hot in some places in OZ, SA, and Arg, but overall I think it is doable (smart scheduling, late kick offs, extra water breaks etc.) For union in OZ, I think it would be a major advantage hence union would compete against cricket and soccer instead of AFL and NRL. And away games in the cooking sun could be a challenge for any team visiting OZ, hence the OZ players would probably be more used to it. SA clubs are indeed looking to the north and we shall see about the Springboks eventually. I doubt the Springboks would join the north right away after the broadcast deal for 2020 is done, hence they have an incoming Lions tour to look forward to 2021. Most likely if the Boks would go north also, that means no more Lions tours to the Republic. But to stay in the TRC just because of playing against NZ is a rather thin argument me think. They could play each other during the summer Tests or in the November window. Maybe we could even see Test series between the Boks and the AB's again. Totally agree that an AsiaPacific league and championship is the future. NZ, OZ, and Japan provide the foundation (and Japan provides the money). Japan could already today have its own conference in SR if one look at the quality of the players already in the country playing in the Top League (and the money floating rugby in the country). And Japan have all the other infrastructure in place also. If this future "Janzar" would fly and be a success, then it would easy to look at an expansion to the Pacific Islands, HK, Korea and China.

AUTHOR

2017-09-06T05:48:55+00:00

moondoggie

Roar Rookie


Thanks for the comments. Maybe I focussed to much on Australia at the start. When South Africa plays in Europe (likely inevitable) what happens to the Rugby Championship? If it continues to run when the European club season runs, then the Springboks may want out aswell, or not have players released. This leave NZ with much reduced competition in test matches.

2017-09-06T03:18:01+00:00

Jacko

Guest


It will be interesting on Sat night....The thing is most would already have had expensive tickets before the cut...which may have been deliberate...so it may not affect attendances much but it would be funny to hear a blue crowd cheering a SA try and not an Aus one.......we will see

2017-09-06T03:15:56+00:00

Jacko

Guest


But...But...But...But...But...But...But...But arnt they moving towards a global season anyway?

2017-09-06T02:44:09+00:00

puff

Guest


Julius, you are correct, we have numerous impractical dreamers who think playing a sport out of season in Europe will resolve all ills. We struggle to tread water in this environment, do we honestly believe NZ / SA will play follow the unorganized dysfunctional ARU and have a 12 month season, with their best teams playing on distant shores. In most countries sport is seasonal and it is juvenile to think the populous will change their lifestyle to accommodate a code the public are becoming frustrated with. As noted it is time to clean house.

2017-09-06T00:50:42+00:00

ThisHasToEnd

Guest


Okay, so you clearly didn't read the article then. Or is comprehension a bit tough for you?

2017-09-06T00:41:47+00:00

julius

Guest


Oh yes I did. It is yet another in the stream of inane ramblings by Australians who think that everyone else should abandon what works for them just to make it easier for Australian rugby. When did Australians become such snowflakes?

2017-09-06T00:32:09+00:00

Ex force fan

Guest


The ARU did not only burned their bridges in WA, they blew it up! There is no prospect of a return of anything that the ARU are part of in WA, the lost their license to operate. You will see it on Saturday when the ARU Wallabies play the Boks - few people will even turn up and those that do will not turn up to support the ARU. I will not be surprised if the ARU Board members that wanted to attend decide not to do so because it will not be a pleasant experience.

2017-09-06T00:32:09+00:00

ThisHasToEnd

Guest


You didn't bother to read the article, did you Sherlock?

2017-09-06T00:30:11+00:00

julius

Guest


So Australian rugby has a problem and the solution is for EVERYONE ELSE in the world to change. Here's a radical thought: clean up your own mess and stop the incessant whining.

2017-09-05T23:42:49+00:00

Mac

Guest


I tend to agree with the direction of the article. The zone need to realign to take up the new opportunities although tradition is a strong component of Rugby. Forrest's Asia Pacific idea is one I have held for some time as a second tier comp to Super Rugby. And these could be cross referenced as well with the a qualifying Wild Card from one to the other. Top team in T2 replaces lowest T1 team. Anyway the code needs to develop to offer the talent pool or they will simple go OS, as they are already. As for China, don't bother with that. Too big and too far away to develop. But Pacifics and Japan and closer location should be part of new comp. And their population will secure the funds and TV rights as they open up more players in that market than FOX and some ailing free to air station in Australia. And lastly without Free to Air, the NRC, Super Rugby and new comp just won't fly to far. Just watch the ABC and see who gets the news headlines every day and consider who has the Free To Air component of those main sports get. Rugby, has Free to AIr, Test at all hours, poor repeats if any, No Super Rugby, can't say on NRC, never heard if they get any FTA. I don't watch Soccer and don't know a single player so I imagine if you can't watch Rugby you'd have the same issue and same lack of interest.

2017-09-05T23:38:43+00:00

Objective

Guest


You say major change is needed globally, but that statement is incorrect. The game is powering ahead in all the major Rugby nations except Australia. This is OUR issue, not the rest of the world's. They are not going to implement major change just to accommodate Australia.

2017-09-05T23:35:07+00:00

puff

Guest


This article is almost a play on words, the author believes because the ARU are so dysfunctional and inept at managing their purview the rest of the SH needs to change direction. Australian rugby at the top end of town is poorly coached, trained and managed when you peel back the layers, if we are not competitive against NZ teams. Highly motivated European clubs would be less than excited about our inclusion. If we are struggling to attract lucrative sponsorship now because gate receipts and the viewing public are becoming despondent, how would this venture be financed? The only teams that would capture NH curiosity would be NZ teams as they are the sporting bench mark. As reiterated before, at this time we can’t even cross the ditch and make a splash.

AUTHOR

2017-09-05T22:33:47+00:00

moondoggie

Roar Rookie


Fair point, I can't deny Australia bias! But my the rationale for aligning the southern hemisphere with the north (so the northern season may not change much) was more about allowing South Africa to play in the Northern club season and also have their best players readily available for the Springboks to play in the Rugby Championship. If not the rich/powerful european clubs may not always release players (despite the current WR laws), or players may make themselves 'ineligible' for selection. I think it would be in New Zealand's interest to keep regularly playing the Springboks at their peak, and if they only have a potentially weak Wallabies and Argentina to play every year, they wouldn't be tested regularly enough. And it would only need the professional side of the game to alter the season, not the lower levels.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar