Australia derailed by India's spinners

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

India’s rookie wrist spinners derailed Australia yesterday as the visitors tried to chase down 164 from 21 overs in a rain-shortened match in Chennai.

The hosts made the bold move of overlooking veteran finger spinners Ravi Ashwin and Ravi Jadeja in their squad for this five-match ODI series in favour of leg-spinner Yuzvendra Chahal and chinaman bowler Kuldeep Yadav.

Chahal and Yadav had just seven ODIs each to their names before yesterday but expertly exploited a dry surface to bore a hole through Australia’s middle-to-lower order. Aside from Glenn Maxwell, who smashed 39 from 18 balls including 22 off one over from Yadav, the Australian batsmen laboured against spin.

Before that, it was Indian seamers Jasprit Bumrah and Hardik Pandya who combined to reduce Australia to 3-29. Bumrah bowled West Australian all-rounder Hilton Cartwright, who looked liable to get out any ball during his innings of one from eight deliveries.

Then captain Steve Smith and young gun Travis Head played a pair of woeful shots to gift wickets to Pandya. The Indian all-rounder had earlier rescued India from 5-87 with a daring 83 from 66 balls, a knock which included five sixes and helped the home side make a respectable 7-281.

A brilliant spell with the new ball from Nathan Coulter-Nile had shocked the hosts. The West Australian quick took three wickets in his first four overs and India could have been reduced to 4-11 if not for a bad drop by captain Steve Smith at slip after Pat Cummins had induced an edge from opener Rohit Sharma.

Bowling at up to 150kmh, Cummins rushed the Indian batsmen on a surface which offered nice pace and carry with the new ball.

(AFP PHOTO / THEO KARANIKOS)

Coulter-Nile was not as swift, operating in the 137–142kmh range, but it was his ability to swing the ball which set him apart. Maintaining a perfect seam position, the 29-year-old earned a tantalising shape which elicited a slew of false strokes from the Indian top order.

First he had Ajinkya Rahane caught by keeper Matthew Wade, then he drew superstar Virat Kohli into an optimistic square drive which flew high towards Glenn Maxwell, who completed an extraordinary one-handed catch. When Coulter-Nile earned another catch for Wade, this time from the bat of Manish Pandey, India were in disarray.

It was yet another impressive display in coloured clothing from Coulter-Nile, who has performed admirably across his stop-start ODI career, taking 30 wickets at an average of 26. Coulter-Nile’s 17 ODIs have been spread out across four years, partly because of several injury-enforced absences and partly because of the wealth of pace options Australia possess.

Over his career, he has had to compete for a spot with the likes of Mitchell Starc, Josh Hazlewood, Mitch Johnson, Pat Cummins, James Faulkner and John Hastings. Coulter-Nile has only earned his opportunity here due to injuries to three of those quicks. Starc and Hazlewood are the top-two ranked ODI pacemen in the world, while Hastings was the second-highest wicket-taker worldwide in ODIs last year.

Despite his fine efforts to date, Coulter-Nile looks destined to remain on the fringes of the ODI set-up, called upon only when others are injured. With his nasty bouncer, deceptive changes of pace and natural swing, he is a fantastic back-up for Australia to boast. For the remainder of this series, he certainly should be picked ahead of Faulkner, who once again laboured against his bogey side.

As I argued in my series preview, Faulkner should not be picked when Australia play India, whose batsmen have well and truly figured out the left-armer.

(AAP Image/Dave Hunt)

Faulkner doesn’t swing the ball, doesn’t earn sharp bounce, and bowls at a gentle pace in the 128-135kmh range. What makes him effective as an ODI bowler is his array of change-ups. But India’s batsmen pick those variations far better than any other side, which is why Faulkner has such a bad bowling record against them – 17 wickets at an average of 47 and a sky-high economy rate of 6.58rpo.

Yesterday Faulkner proved a liability with the ball once more, giving up 67 from his ten overs, while Australia’s other three quicks (Cummins, Coulter-Nile and Marcus Stoinis) went at a miserly 4.6 runs per over. That’s despite Faulkner being spared having to bowl at the two Indian batsmen who dominate him more than any other, Kohli and Rohit.

On the positive side, Australia’s other pacemen did a fine job, with Cummins bowling accurately and unlucky not to take one or two wickets, while Stoinis again showed he is a hugely-improved bowler. Stoinis only started bowling regularly in domestic cricket three years ago and in that time has progressed from a rank part-timer to a skilful fifth bowler.

Unusually for someone who doesn’t possess startling speed, Stoinis’ short ball is his greatest weapon. He deploys it sparingly and when it arrives it does so with an extra level of pace which often surprises the batsman. Yesterday he rushed Rohit with a bouncer which was 5kmh faster than any of his previous deliveries in that over, earning a catch in the deep.

Then he bowled a slower short ball to Kedar Jadhav, who was through his pull shot too early and lobbed a catch to midwicket. Like Coulter-Nile, Stoinis is only in the side due to an injury, with first-choice all-rounder Mitch Marsh unavailable, but is also making the most of his chances.

This depth bodes well for Australia just over 18 months out from the next World Cup.

The Crowd Says:

2017-09-21T23:41:22+00:00

Ross

Guest


Yeah Cowan was spot on with his comments

2017-09-21T12:53:54+00:00

Bakkies

Guest


India is a far superior T20 team than Australia. I don't think that Australia has even got close to a World T20 semi final and only plays a couple of them a year as an international team.

2017-09-21T12:51:19+00:00

Bakkies

Guest


The umpires probably let Smith off due to the amount of unscheduled drink and glove change breaks that Dhoni had.

2017-09-21T12:48:20+00:00

Bakkies

Guest


Stoinis was excellent took wickets and didn't get carted for well over 5 an over. It was Zampa and Faulkner that released the pressure and no surprise that they were left out of for the second match.

2017-09-21T12:45:04+00:00

Bakkies

Guest


It was in another World Cup where Shaun Pollock was captain and SA reckless lost a wicket while in control than the rain start. The wicket put them behind on Duckworth/Lewis.

2017-09-21T05:11:14+00:00

Stephen

Guest


For me we need to make two changes, if Faulkner doesn't pick up his bowling then Stonis for me is our allrounder who we need to backup for future series. We also need khawaja openign instead of Hilton. Khawaja there specially given Finch is injured. Khawaja was last taken out of the NZ one day series in Feb with the excuse by Trevor Hohns that khawaja was focusing on the India series which he didn't play. Then after that Khawaja was denied even a spot on the champions trophy and for some reason is on the outer even though he is one of the best domestic one day batsman in Australia, an average of above 50 in domestic cricket shows that. A warner, khawaja, smith top 3 would be something. And i respect Cartwright as a allrounder, but how can he possibly open and Khawaja be sitting back home. Ed Cowan made his points on this and i agree with him

2017-09-19T05:28:54+00:00

TheCunningLinguistic

Guest


For mine, the problem was the lack of a decent back-up bowlers. Once Cummins and Coulter-Nile were finished, 3,4 and 5 just couldn't keep the pressure on (though Stoinis was pretty reasonable).

2017-09-19T05:23:55+00:00

TheCunningLinguistic

Guest


I concur, your honour!

2017-09-19T04:52:38+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Agar is not a Holland, SOK nagging trundler. He turns it, he bounces it and has control. His trend over the past 4 seasons, when he hasn't been dealing with shoulder surgery, has shown a prolific wicket taker. That bounce is what we want when Pandya or Dhoni are on fire. This is the year of Ashton Agar. The Dorff, of course, as well.

2017-09-19T04:36:58+00:00

Tock

Guest


Dead right Joe Australia playing India will always get me watching

2017-09-19T04:34:36+00:00

matth

Guest


Zampa is pretty much a rookie as well.

2017-09-19T04:32:29+00:00

matth

Guest


I love Agar and I hope he gets a run this series, but he appears more of a containing bowler in ODI's. Yes he will take wickets but he will not run through a side that plays sensibly. What I was saying is that, Cummins and NCN aside, we don't have any other strike bowlers in the squad to turn to for a breakthrough. I'm sure you would agree that if Smith is thinking that he really needs a wicket at some point, that he would rather have a Starc type strike bowler out there. I don't see Stoinis, Faulkner, Richardson doing that. I would have loved to see one of your other WA pace bowlers in the team, Behrendorff maybe.

2017-09-19T04:27:37+00:00

matth

Guest


Which is exactly the point. Once this was a T20, they should have moved Maxwell, their experienced T20 player, who has hit a T20 hundred opening, up the order. Cartwright was on a hiding to nothing. I'm sure he will have better chances in the coming games, but I would have thought Head, who has been a success for Australia already opening in ODI's, would have had first go at that spot, with Cartwright at 4.

2017-09-18T23:13:44+00:00

blanco

Guest


Any system that has a team chasing 162 in 21 overs when a team scored 281 in 50 overs at 5.62 rpo has serious lope holes imo. don't take it from me though.

2017-09-18T22:07:25+00:00

Chris Kettlewell

Roar Guru


I'm certainly not saying Australia would have won if it wasn't shortened, but there's no way you can really equate a chase of 164 from 21 overs with a chase of 280 from 50. They are such completely different things. Australia picked a 50-over team, not a T20 team. I'm not so much having a go at D/L. I don't think there actually is a fair way to have one team bat for 50 overs and the other for 20 and call it a fair contest.

2017-09-18T21:07:45+00:00

McThug

Guest


I said rookie leggie

2017-09-18T14:02:23+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Of course it was scratchy. You don't, however, summarize a man's career and write him off as out of his depth on the basis of his first innings having to bat unnaturally under D/L. It was just a dumb summation. Did you see Smith bat? Wade? Head?

AUTHOR

2017-09-18T12:25:52+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Don it sounds like you didn't even watch Cartwright batting, which is not a surprise given it was closing in on midnight in Perth when he went out to bat. I'm a huge wrap for Cartwright as a red ball batsman, but Ryan is correct, his 8-ball innings yesterday was extremely scratchy. He played and missed twice, was almost bowled another time, and edged the ball just short of slip from a different ball, before eventually having his stumps disturbed.

2017-09-18T10:00:09+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Cartwright has been opening for the Warriors in Matador. Wade is not an opener either but I guess he may as well get his scratchy few off 10 balls at the top. It is an interesting judgement on Cartwright after 8 balls, Ryan. Did you think Wade's 10 balls were more assured?

2017-09-18T09:23:04+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


Actually that rookie leggie Chahal recently had the 3rd best T20 bowling figures of all time (6/25 I think) against England. So he has some confidence going in here. As an aside, I just thought it a nice trivia, he has represented India in chess international tournaments :)

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar