Let's call the Ashes what it is: Fifth vs third in the ICC rankings

By Grahame Barrett / Roar Rookie

Two national teams ranked third and fifth in the current ICC Test rankings are to commence a much-vaunted series in Brisbane, hosted by Cricket Australia and promoted in the media as the Ashes.

The traditional battle between England and their ‘colony’, both with the Queen as their head of state, will fight out five Tests at venues prepared to suit the home team.

The media will try to attract a vast audience, and consequently advertisers.

The lead-up to the first Test is being filled with speculation on who should be Australia’s No.6 and wicketkeeper and, yes, even the outcome.

Match-ups between players, teams or even coaches will be examined in depth. Fan interest will be hyped as each media outlet wants them to return to their channel or publication for post-game reporting and analysis, seeking to create a loyal audience.

Viewers can be choosy, they can flick channels or apps or – even worse – switch them off and realise there are other things happening. To try to overcome this, the favoured Network seems to feel obligated to include former players and coaches on their broadcast crews, regardless of whether they can ask intelligent questions. Often they seem to be more intent on entertaining than informing.

We are becoming used to well-dressed commentators with straight ties and constant smiles explain all – and I emphasise all – the ins and outs of the game, but most importantly the pitch.

[latest_videos_strip category=”cricket” name=”Cricket”]

The pitch will be poked, prodded, unlocked, walked on, viewed from drones by ‘expert eyes’ and continually revisited. How many times will it be compared to past pitches, both in Brisbane and of course the WACA?

The umpire’s decisions will be questioned, referred to dubious video options, especially replays and close-up shots that are assumed to be superior to actually watching the game in person.

The fact that both national teams have struggled away from home in recent years will not really be mentioned – all will be forgotten in the media blitz and the fact that Australia are the fifth-ranked side in the world of ten teams will be blown away in the wind from the southern end as the first ball is bowled.

The advertising signs will continually roll in the background as the lines between news, entertainment and culture become less distinct.

Whether you retire to the lounge, turn down the sound, or venture to the ground to join the Mexican waves and the roar of the crowd, when the flames die down and the embers are dimmed, the Ashes will be cold and new ICC Rankings will begin.

The Crowd Says:

2017-11-16T19:42:06+00:00

amit raj vats

Guest


Very well written article.....both these teams are even not regularly winning in their home conditions unlike asian teams ....india has continuously dominated in home conditions

2017-11-14T07:17:31+00:00

matth

Guest


And your point is? My footy team didn't win a premiership for 35 years. Didn't stop supporting them though. And we are in Australia and presumably following cricket, so the Australian cricket team might just get in the news a bit.

2017-11-14T02:33:01+00:00

JohnB

Guest


I'd dispute that the pitches in Australia are prepared to suit the home team. If they were, they would vary much more than they do from year to year.

2017-11-14T01:32:25+00:00

Jake

Guest


Not sure why the rankings of either team matter. The number 1 ranked team lost here and couldn't even take 20 wickets in a couple of tests. SA are the only team that regularly challenge Australia at home.

2017-11-13T23:08:39+00:00

not so super

Guest


yep, we are obsessed with beating England rather than the decent test playing nations

2017-11-13T22:04:38+00:00

Matt P

Roar Rookie


Yeah, no, I failed to see the point as well. Just a bunch of loosely related ramblings.

2017-11-13T21:35:52+00:00

Wayne

Roar Guru


Glad I'm not the only one who missed the point

2017-11-13T21:08:44+00:00

Liam

Guest


What was the point of this article? Was it a tongue in cheek take on the mercantile nature of the coverage? Was it a lamentation that cricket is boring? Could just be way over my head, but this seems to me to be an article without a topic, much less an argument.

2017-11-13T20:29:32+00:00

Rob West

Guest


How true.Cricket is controlled by the Media sponsors. When it starts and ends to fit programming to say the least. And the pitch. Australia gets overseas personnel to coach teams and skills so why not groundsman. How about getting a Bangladesh or Indian groundsman to prepare the Australian Test Pitches. Surely we might see first hand that some "stars" in both teams will cry foul.

Read more at The Roar