Wallabies busted by the benches - not the refs - at Twickenham

By Nicholas Bishop / Expert

It was the 69th minute at a very wet, dank Twickenham stadium in West London. New Zealand referee Ben O’Keefe and TMO Simon McDowell spent over five minutes deciding that Marika Koroibete’s try near the posts was, in fact, an obstruction by replacement hooker Stephen Moore, and therefore a penalty to England.

It was probably the most contentious decision of a game in which none of the 50-50 calls went Australia’s way. It was also the tipping point of what had, up to that point, been a very evenly-fought contest.

There is no doubt that the Wallabies would have fully earned their way back to 13-all with ten minutes to play. Nonetheless, I believe it is highly unlikely that they would have gone on to win even if the try had been awarded.

While the two starting sides slugged it out punch for punch for the first three quarters with neither giving an inch, the introduction of the two sets of bench replacements tipped the game decisively in England’s favour.

To say there was a huge imbalance in the relative impact from the pine would be an understatement. The shift from a (potentially) tied game to a 24-point margin of defeat accurately represented that imbalance.

Stephen Moore’s influence on Koroibete’s try was symbolic of it, but he was by no means the worst offender. The problems began at the beginning of the second half when Ben McCalman had to be introduced earlier than expected in the back-row to provide some ball-carrying grunt and an extra lineout target in place of the ineffective Ned Hanigan.

As a rough guide, replacements are ideally expected to provide 60-75 per cent of the impact (or number of significant involvements) of a starter in the 20-30 minutes they are on the field. McCalman was introduced early because of the flawed initial selection of Ned Hanigan.

(Photo by Mark Kolbe/Getty Images)

That, in turn, diluted his ability to provide impact, particularly in the last ten minutes of the game, and that is the time where the impact of the substitution should be at its most pronounced.

Although England also had to play their joker early in the game when number seven Sam Underhill was injured in the 16th minute, it actually strengthened their hand immeasurably.

Given the likely weather conditions, Maro Itoje should have been starting in any case.

His presence gave England a fourth very big man in their back five (one more than Australia) on a day when play was closer to source than normal. Itoje has never had a problem remaining fully effective for 80 minutes (or more).

Between the 63rd and 70th minutes, all of the Australian bench replacements entered the fray except for Lopeti Timani, while the English bench was emptied between the 56th and 69th minutes, beginning with two British and Irish Lions in Jamie George – the starting hooker in the recent Test series in New Zealand – and Joe Marler at loosehead.

This gave England a noticeable boost in the fourth-quarter scrums, which had previously been going well for the Wallabies with their starting trio on the field.

But nowhere was the contrast in bench impact more brutal than in the comparison at scrum-half.

Will Genia has been one of Australia’s two outstanding backs this season, and the drop in the level of performance down to Nick Phipps was, as refs now like to say, clear and obvious.

On the other hand, the entry of Danny Care off the bench for England actually improved their play at the position.

While Care created two tries directly through the vision and accuracy of his kicking game, Phipps made two crucial errors resulting in their concession.

Let’s take a look at the second England try scored in the 71st minute.

The build-up to the try is as interesting as the scoring play itself.

With Kurtley Beale (out of shot in the close-ups but over on the far side in the panoramic overhead view) defending one half of the backfield, the player responsible for the near side is Phipps.

A couple of phases earlier he’s just about right, able to cover in behind the defensive line or drop back to cover the kick in behind.

Fatally, he makes the decision to come up into line outside Reece Hodge in the second frame, and at least three England attackers notice it immediately – Jonathan Joseph and Antony Watson on the near-side and Care looking up behind the base of the ruck.

Once the kick is made, neither Phipps nor Hodge has much chance of matching Joseph or Watson for speed on the turn, and JJ duly gets there first to score the try.

England’s third try of the game came from another attacking kick by Care, this time from a scrum in the 78th minute (see reel).

The key moments of the try can be pinpointed in the following images:

Australia’s initial defensive set-up gives England the chance to exploit the blind-side. Fullback Beale is right out on the open-side edge of the defence, so Bernard Foley will have to function as an emergency sweeper if a play develops to the narrow side.

There is no problem with Johnny May (with his extreme pace) using late movement to run around the scrum and become an attacking force there.

To open up the opportunity further, England needs a strong promotion on their tight-head. Both replacement front rows are on the field, and England’s big tighthead Harry Williams (all 133 kilos of him) has a decisive impact on the fate of the set-piece.

He bullies Tom Robertson backwards and turns the scrum in to take Ben McCalman and Lopeti Timani further out of the play.

Although McCalman eventually makes the tackle on May a couple of metres from the Wallaby goal-line after he collects the kick through, who is to say that the drive-and-turn by Williams and those extra ten or fifteen minutes out on the field have not taken some vital starch out of his legs and fractionally, but crucially, reduced his ‘impact’ in cover defence?

The final footnote to the narrative occurred in time added on, with Phipps throwing a hanging pass off his left hand in front of a packed rush defence.

May is first to pick it up with Care inevitably on hand to receive the offload and put the icing on the English cake.

When Phipps throws the ‘dying duck’ there are no less than nine English defenders well set and advancing in the area of the pass, and it floats all the way to probably the fastest man on the field with its premier impact player alongside him.

Summary
As long as the starting teams were on the field, Australia was able to play England at least on even terms. Although the rub of the green clearly did not go with the Wallabies, either in terms of refereeing decisions or even the bounce of the ball during that period, the problems off the bench thereafter were largely of their own making.

After the replacements entered en masse around the 60-70th minute, there was only one winner, and it was not Australia.

I believe that Ben McCalman should have started the game at number eight with Sean McMahon shifted to six. Instead, it took forty minutes to find out that Ned Hanigan is not equipped to take on the might of four big, physical men in an opposition back five.

McCalman’s impact off the bench was diluted as a result, even though he still made a hefty contribution to Australia’s ball carrying and second half lineout work.

The impact of players like Tom Robertson and Nick Phipps tended to have a negative rather than a positive measurement. The Wallaby front row showed obvious signs of deterioration after the starters left the field, and Nick Phipps paled in comparison to his opposite number.

(AP Photo/Peter Morrison)

It remains a mystery why young players like Joe Powell or Jake Gordon have not been granted more game time at the higher level this season, or why Robertson is currently rated above other looseheads like Pek Cowan, Allan Alaalatoa or even the Waratahs’ own Paddy Ryan.

Scotland at Murrayfield will certainly now become ‘Mission Less Probable’ for the Wallabies than it was, given the home side’s performance against the All Blacks last Saturday and their two previous games against the Wallabies.

I would like to see Powell given a bench slot at halfback, with Alalaatoa reverting to loosehead back-up and Taniela Tupou as an impact tighthead.

If Adam Coleman is not fit, I further believe that Matt Philip at four, Ben McCalman at eight (with Lopeti Timani on the bench) and Karmichael Hunt at 15 deserve a chance to start the game.

The view of Australia’s season as a whole is likely to be permanently coloured by what happens at Murrayfield next weekend, and the Wallabies cannot afford to slide as far and as fast downhill in the final quarter as they did against England, that is for sure.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2017-11-27T17:02:15+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Hi Thugby and g'day to you too! I think it's pretty simple situation for Phipps. He stays in the backfield unless otherwise indicated. If England make some metres down that side with ball in hand. other defenders can join up and prevent any serious damage. If he comes into line (as he did) there is no way to prevent the try because the last line of D is absent....

2017-11-25T12:44:07+00:00

ThugbyFan

Roar Guru


I remember in the Roar blog during the match (4am and 4 beers), I chuckled at the insanity of bringing on L.Timani in the 78th minute and commented like "what is the point of a 2 minute sub?" Between that comment was my verbal vomit as N.Phipps' panic passing and D.Care's kicks gifted 2 tries to the Poms. LoL I wondered aloud if Timani was brought on so he could be a "part of a team that failed", ie: tag him as a loser. L.Timani left the NSW Tahs for the Rebels, I think at the end of SR2013, when MC was coach and I suspect some bad vibes between the pair. Wouldn't be the first bloke to languish because of the coach's mind set on that player. A real shame as at 6ft4" and 123kg, he ticks a lot of boxes for a #8. For sure a back row of M.Hooper #7, S.McMahon #6 and L.Timani at #8 would be far more lethal backrow without the softie masquerading as a blindside for most of the year.

2017-11-25T12:07:39+00:00

ThugbyFan

Roar Guru


Grouse video there NVFS. A couple of questions though, why is Maradona kicking and warming up with his boots not tied, and secondly he didn't once practice a "hand of god" move? Hmmmmmmmmmmmm he must have that one perfected. :)

2017-11-25T12:03:57+00:00

ThugbyFan

Roar Guru


Damn, if I had bothered to read other comments first I would have seen others already mentioned N.Phipp's "Sophie's Choice" that led to Care's kick resulting in the 2nd England try. My bad! :)

2017-11-25T11:47:38+00:00

ThugbyFan

Roar Guru


G'day Nicolas, and as usual you have given a great explanation of one, if not the major, cause of the WB loss to the dreaded soap-dodgers; that being the by far superior bench. England looked very good for the whole match and applied the dagger with their bench, whereas the WB seemed a little naive with only 1 attack tactic up their sleeve. Just a couple of points, if I may. In the photos shown for the England 2nd try, you showed clearly that Nick Phipps moved up in the WB line and left the backfield short of cover. Rather than shoot down Phipps, look at the situation that had evolved between the 1st and 3rd photo. In the 1st photo, on the WB right hand side of the ruck it's 2 defenders (looks like T.Kuridrani and R.Hodge) lined up against 2 England players, with a possible 3rd Englander joining that side of the ruck (the WB #11 looks caught up in a tackle just near the ref). In the 3rd photo, time 71:34, we now see 4 England players lined up against these two WB defenders . This has placed Phipps in a poo situation, damned if he moves forward to try to even up defence numbers and damned if he moves back to protect the backfield and leaves a 4 on 2 overlap. Rather than blame Phipps, look on the WB left side in the 4th photo, the WB have defenders to burn. I can count 8 WB against 3 and at best 4 England players. So if anyone deserves a boot up the rectum, it's the backrower not tangled in the ruck and standing out on the LHS and K.Hunt. For the 3rd try, sadly Harry Williams doing over Tom Robertson was always going to happen, Robertson has his good points but he is just too small for international rugby. Well spotted that the twisted scrum tied up L.Timani and B.McCalman enough to slow down cover on the blindside. That was a well played try to England, planned and executed to perfection. The only time I have seen Williams was as a sub, can he last 40-60 minutes in a high paced game or is he a special lump of beef to cause scrum havoc in the last 10-15 minutes of a game? I sort of remember Greg Holmes of the Reds and WB was a bit like that, a huge man and perfect as a sub. The 4th try is fair enough, Phipps trying zip zip man passes with a wet ball is asking for trouble and that should cost him his place. I agree with you here that Joe Powell should be sub halfback for a game. Ridiculous having him over the UK for 3-4 weeks as training fodder. Agree that K.Hunt should start as fb. The only time the WB have looked dangerous this year were in matches with K.Beale at #12, so start him at IC and drop either Kerevi or Kuridrani to the bench. Hunt is not I.Folau but neither is Beale, and with the KK centre pairing, Beale's talents are wasted.

AUTHOR

2017-11-24T16:30:52+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


It's called surround sound H :)

2017-11-24T12:08:49+00:00

Fin

Guest


Hi Nick, I thought you would find this article about Taniela Tupou of interest. I know Tonga is different to Fiji but the thinking appears to be similar. Taniela is openly admitting that as a kid growing up in Tonga he wanted to play for the Wallabies. In Fiji it's considered a greater honour to play for either the AB's or Wallabies than it is to play for Fiji. When there is a Bledisloe game on they cheer for the Naholo's, Speight's, Kerevi's etc. these players are regarded more highly than those that play for Fiji. https://www.rugby.com.au/news/2017/11/23/scotland-wallabies-tupou-debut

2017-11-24T11:22:20+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


He was abducted by a girl named Mandy.

2017-11-24T11:21:20+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


Two halfbacks might drive any referee batty

AUTHOR

2017-11-24T07:39:12+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


!

AUTHOR

2017-11-24T07:38:15+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


WB will win handily then if alliterating names have anything to do with it!

2017-11-24T03:10:41+00:00

Fin

Guest


I am not comparing players. I am comparing the approach taken by two successful coaches.

2017-11-24T02:11:54+00:00

Fin

Guest


Hi Nick, Looking forward to some impact in this next game from the six K's (KB, Koroibete, Kuridrani, Kerevi, Kepu, and Special 'K'), along with the three T's off the bench (Tui, Timani, and Tupou), and the two Mc's in the back row (McMahon & McCalman).

2017-11-23T23:03:51+00:00

Fionn

Guest


Nick, right okay, we're on the same page then. I misunderstood. Cheers.

2017-11-23T21:01:34+00:00

Mr Hollywood

Guest


The average height of a Martian is two metres. Thats the average so I’m suspecting there could some three metre ones out there. Retallick and Itoje would be taken to task. Anyway they’re underground (sadly after many a galactic war) and they would need machines to breathe the earths air. It would make a great game mind you...!

2017-11-23T20:48:40+00:00

bazza

Guest


When most elite players kick the ball they generally make the the defender look a step late they hold there kick til the last moment i don't actually see a difference in the philps place you mention. Otherwise they'd all get tackled and not many kicks would happen ? Rest of your analysis is pretty good though.

AUTHOR

2017-11-23T20:05:39+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Cheers Digger - where have you been? :)

2017-11-23T19:59:52+00:00

Digby

Roar Guru


Thank you Nick, quality as always!

AUTHOR

2017-11-23T17:22:53+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Good to know, and thanks for casting more light on the matter Ken :)

AUTHOR

2017-11-23T15:31:31+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Yes it was a very nice play - the WB set-piece attack is beginning to regain its former status!

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar