You've got some runs in you England, haven't you?

By Alec Swann / Expert

If you were given a choice in how, ideally, a series should progress it is fairly safe to say you would not choose the road down which England have travelled thus far.

There was a stress-free few weeks that constituted the warm-up – I know they’d have liked tougher opposition but that’s just how it is for all touring teams – but ever since Mitchell Starc sent down the first delivery at the Gabba it’s been something of downhill slide.

Now they did win the toss in Brisbane but this triumph has been lost among the comically hyperbolic nonsense that has engulfed them ever since.

The crappiest of head-butts that, rather curiously, left neither man with any after effects, 10-wicket defeat, backs against the wall press conferences, we sledged, they sledged, we’ll keep sledging, the sledging is nothing, we’ll keep sledging, they’ll keep sledging, we’re mean, they’re mean, 120-run defeat, curfew, they’re not in it, we’re still in it, beer on the head, booze cruise, player (not on the tour) suspension, backs against the wall press conferences, heads should roll, heads will roll, we’re still in it, they’re barely still in it, Ben Stokes’ fault, the WACA.

And given all that has gone on, and depressingly the above paragraph is only a summary, I doubt whether the venue of choice for Round 3 would’ve been the one where England’s record is as convincing as a Lance Armstrong doping denial.

England have shown a few glimpses to suggest that they could, and that needs to be emphasised as a very big ‘could’, upset the apple cart in Perth but history, both distant and very recent, is pointing emphatically towards one outcome and it isn’t a Boxing Day Test with a series still in the balance.

Putting off-field shenanigans, which have been nowhere near as carefree as some would have you believe, to one side for a moment, there is an ever so simple reason why England have headed west two down.

(AAP Image/Dave Hunt)

In four completed innings they have managed totals of 302, 195, 227 and 233 which probably wouldn’t win you games against Zimbabwe let alone the opposition they are currently up against.

To exacerbate this statistic, only four players have managed to raise their bat for a half-century and only once has three figures been remotely threatened – and even in that particular case James Vince still had plenty of work to do.

You could point the finger at the under-par performance of the seamers in Adelaide after Joe Root had invited the hosts to bat on the first morning and even the ineffectiveness of Moeen Ali as contributing factors, which they have been to some extent, but that would be to miss the point.

The West Indies of a late 80s/early 90s vintage could’ve worked with those totals but for Anderson, Broad, Woakes and Overton you cannot read Marshall, Bishop, Ambrose and Walsh and this is the problem.

Compare the firepower of the two sides at this moment in time and there isn’t a comparison to make. This isn’t to demean the England attack who on the whole haven’t performed too badly, but an upturn in their performance needs to be complemented by those making up the top seven.

(Photo by Philip Brown/Getty Images)

If, and this is a really big ‘if’, they can somehow reach the 400 mark in their first innings then there is an opportunity to ruffle a few feathers but any repeat of the previous couple of outings will lead to nothing of the sort.

Root has at least sought to alter the gameplan a touch by moving Jonny Bairstow to six and Ali down to seven and this, given Bairstow is more accomplished than a few of his colleagues, has to be a good thing if only to potentially disrupt Nathan Lyon.

But the issue hasn’t really been the order but the output and until that is rectified nothing will change.

To use a very ropy pun, the third Test looms as a last-chance saloon for England where they simply have to punch above their weight and then some.

Two-one is obviously the favoured scenario to take to the MCG and even 2-0, taking into account the current climate, would be accepted but 3-0 with two to play? That would drive many an Englishman to drink.

The Crowd Says:

2017-12-14T02:57:59+00:00

matth

Guest


I think Stoneman is the best chance of the 2nd tier players to make a significant contribution. He has looked pretty solid so far, without being able to convert.

2017-12-14T02:57:09+00:00

matth

Guest


It's a minor point, but after the Adelaide second innings, Anderson's average is just fine.

2017-12-14T01:07:49+00:00

Go the Wannbe's

Guest


Yes Alec, how about unpacking that comment a little..........

2017-12-14T00:43:34+00:00

Damo

Guest


Maybe The Sun can give them some contacts of people that might pay good money to see them make runs?

2017-12-14T00:28:06+00:00

Tatah

Guest


Alec I like the look of Vince. Played well first test and like most not such a good second. Wouldn’t surprise me if he gets runs going forward.

2017-12-13T22:44:08+00:00

Ouch

Guest


Joe Root looks like the only one who will contribute runs. England should be praying hard to win the toss or the series will be as good as over. Warner, Usman and the rest will feast on the English bowling here.

2017-12-13T22:43:22+00:00

paul

Guest


Me thinks your grasping at straws Alex. The guys who have given you best value are the newbies who have tried their hardest and effectively batted or bowled to about what they average in first class cricket. The guys who have let you down are Cook, Root, Ali, Bairstow, Woakes, Broad and Anderson who who have all significantly underperformed. Sure 400 is possible if all of the batsman fire but Australia would fancy their chances of matching or bettering that score pretty easily. You also mention the England attack that "hasn't performed too badly". They've taken only 28 wickets so far and Broad, Anderson and Ali's averages have copped a hammering. I truly do hope England performs better but I just can't see it happening.

2017-12-13T22:42:32+00:00

JohnB

Guest


I'm intrigued by "... off-field shenanigans, which have been nowhere near as carefree as some would have you believe ...". Anyone care to elaborate?

AUTHOR

2017-12-13T22:34:49+00:00

Alec Swann

Expert


Brett When I wake up halfway through day one I fully expect England to be 150-0. Unless, of course, they put the Aussies in again. Here's hoping anyway!

AUTHOR

2017-12-13T22:27:44+00:00

Alec Swann

Expert


Lancey 1) They could play Ben Foakes and Bairstow as a batter but that's about it. Gary Ballance? I don't think so. 2) I'm still to work out where the Vince selection came from. He can play but has never hinted at any kind of permenance. Root to three might be an idea. 3) Broad doesn't look quite the force of old but I'd still pick him. I like Mark Wood but that would be a real gamble.

2017-12-13T22:06:42+00:00

El Loco

Roar Rookie


I'm never a counter of chickens pre-hatched, but it seems reasonable to feel that Australia is better placed to score a mountain of runs. At least two locals, Warner's best ground, Khawaja due, and Smith (who just is). Of course if being "due" is all there is to it then there's plenty of Englishmen in that category too, but the gut says it won't be so. More than happy to see England mount a challenge to that feeling. But still lose.

2017-12-13T21:41:57+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


I'd love to see England make 400, but it's Ard to see where those runs would come from. Root is obviously world class, and Cook certainly can still be, be neither are any certainty. It'll be interesting to see how the WACA plays this week. And how the English bats play on it...

2017-12-13T21:31:48+00:00

Lancey5times

Roar Rookie


England are certainly up against it. Not that they are the only team with players uniquely suited to playing at home. You could apply this thinking to just about every team in world cricket. A few questions I have though Alec which I'm sure you would know all about. 1) The 4 totals you mentioned so far in this series, all below what has been required. Are we seeing the same top 7 because they are the best available or is a lack of changes at 2-nil down a mistake? 2) Am I right in thinking that if James Vince is the best option on tour at number 3 that England may be years away from finding a solid genuine 3? 3) What would it take for England to drop Stuart Broad? Woakes and Anderson bave improved with each innings and Overton had a reasonable debut despite maybe being underbowled. I personally would have played Wood for Broad in Perth. Thanks. Heres hoping for a few 5 day test matches before your lads head home

2017-12-13T20:38:18+00:00

Neil Back

Roar Rookie


England arrived in Australia with a batting line up full of form question marks and a bowling attack that looked alarmingly thin, particularly for local conditions. Coming in to Perth there really isn’t a single omen working in England’s favour, or a notable piece of momentum. For England, adversity could be a great motivator and complacency a killer for Australia. Probably more chance of Lazarus showing up at the WACA than those two. If nothing else, the travelling fans deserve a performance across the entire Test. As an aside, not that tinkering will matter much at this stage, but about time Bairstow was elevated in the batting on this tour - even if it’s still at least one place too low.

Read more at The Roar