Paine could keep for Australia in all three formats

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

After being on the verge of retirement just nine months ago, Tim Paine now is a chance of nailing down Australia’s wicketkeeping spot in all three formats.

It’s been an extraordinary turnaround for the 32-year-old.

Paine is the incumbent in the Test and Twenty20 teams, yet the 50-over format has long been his strongest.

With Matthew Wade having averaged just eight with the bat from his past ten ODIs, the selectors surely will move in a new direction for this month’s five-match ODI series against England.

Victorian Peter Handscomb should contend strongly for that ODI keeping position, having kept for Australia three times last year in 50-over cricket – twice in New Zealand and once in India.

Handscomb, who has averaged 50 with the bat in the 27 List A matches he’s played as a wicketkeeper, told media last week he wants to be Australia’s first-choice ODI gloveman.

The Australian selectors may also consider SA ‘keeper Alex Carey and Test opener Cameron Bancroft. Carey is a slick gloveman, has a reasonable List A batting average of 30, and started the Big Bash League in hot batting form with scores of 44 and 83no.

Bancroft, meanwhile, was outstanding for WA in the recent domestic One Day Cup, keeping neatly and hitting 265 runs at an average of 53 with a blazing strike rate of 104.

Then there’s Paine, who only played one game for Tasmania in that tournament as the keeping duties were instead handled by Wade and Ben Dunk.

At that stage, Paine’s cricketing career was in a dire state. He could not get a game for Tasmania in either 50-over cricket or first-class cricket, with the Tigers overlooking him for their first four Shield games.

Paine must have been wondering if he would have been better off retiring, something he admitted he strongly considered at the end of the last Australian season.

Then, from nowhere, Paine was vaulted into Australia’s Ashes line-up. It was a left-field selection which prompted widespread shock and criticism.

(AAP Image/Dave Hunt)

While I still find it hard to believe the Australian selectors chose a wicketkeeper who had struggled for two seasons to get a game for the weak Tasmanian side, their decision looks like a masterstroke right now.

Paine has been brilliant in this Ashes. His glovework has ranged from solid to sensational, maintaining a standard which Australia have not seen from their Test wicketkeeper since Adam Gilchrist retired ten years ago.

Paine has been clinical when standing up to the stumps for spin, and nimble and clean to the quicks.

His glovework, so far, has been even better than that of Peter Nevill, who did a good job behind the stumps during his 17 Tests. It was lack of runs which led to the axing of Nevill and of his successor Wade.

Despite having averaged just 19 with the bat from his previous four first-class seasons when he was called up to the Test team, Paine has been in wonderful touch with the blade. His opportunities have been limited, having only batted five times, but he’s compiled 154 runs at 38.

In each of those five knocks Paine has looked terrific from the start of his innings – sturdy in defence and quick to seize upon scoring opportunities. Whether he has been behind or in front of the stumps, Paine has seemed completely at home in this high-profile series.

The selectors deserve generous praise for the chances they took in picking Paine and Shaun Marsh, who also has had a wonderful Ashes. Suddenly Paine looks capable of holding down the Test keeping spot for the next two to three years.

This would be the perfect scenario for Australia, giving time for 26-year-old Carey to develop further and for the best young keeper-batsman in the country, WA’s Sam Whiteman, to hopefully shake off his persistent injury problems.

In the meantime, Paine could well find himself in the ODI team, with an opportunity to cement his position and make a run at the World Cup in England in 18 months from now. The Tasmanian must be pinching himself – his career is unrecognisable from just six weeks ago.

The Crowd Says:

2018-01-02T07:13:44+00:00

Graeme

Guest


The bowling may seem weak on paper but Head is a good ODI bowler. If Maxi or Smith can bowl a few decent overs no problem. 1. Warner 2. Klinger 3. S Marsh 4. Smith 5. Head 6. M. Marsh 7. Bancroft (K) 8. Maxwell 9. Faulkner 10. Starc 11. Tye

2018-01-02T06:03:48+00:00

Adam

Guest


If Starc rest Sydney test should be sweet for at least 3 of the odis.if not Cummins will rest and he will play three games.

2018-01-02T04:04:35+00:00

dan ced

Guest


Fair call on Finch, just not sure who to pick as far as bowlers go, who's getting rested etc.

AUTHOR

2018-01-02T03:33:10+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Dan I gotta say that attack is awfully weak, England's powerful batting lineup would tuck right into that on the Aussie roads. As for Finch he's coming off an outstanding ODI series in India in October when he was one of the few Aussies to really shine. Finch made 401 runs at 51 from his eight ODIs in 2017.

2018-01-02T03:22:44+00:00

Big Daddy

Guest


If the sectors are true to form brad Hogg will line up in 20/20. Nothing surprises me today.

2018-01-02T03:18:59+00:00

dan ced

Guest


Warner, Klinger, Smith, Head, Stoinis, M.Marsh, Carey, Neser, Ahmed, Tremain, Stanlake Finch not in form, Neser lookin' good in all formats, Tremain bats better than Richo, Klinger dominates all formats. Ahmed lookin' crafty again, Zampa's darts better suited to T20 even though I love his competitiveness and variety.

2018-01-02T03:12:20+00:00

AREH

Roar Guru


I hope Buttler said to him, 'Thanks Matt, see you in the One Day ser...oh wait'

2018-01-02T03:03:31+00:00

jameswm

Guest


esp after that unnecessary send off

AUTHOR

2018-01-02T02:40:25+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Brett that's the one doubt I have about Paine as a limited overs player for Australia - whether he can bat down the order and come in and score quickly from ball one with the field set back. Paine's best batting spot in white ball cricket is as an opener but I'm not sure there's room for him in the top 3 in either the ODI or T20I side. In ODIs Warner, Finch and Smith have the top 3 spots sewn up and in T20Is it's Warner, Finch and Lynn (when fit). Paine may need to bat down at 7 in both sides, and it's unclear yet how well suited he is to such a different batting role.

AUTHOR

2018-01-02T02:31:41+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Burgy it's very harsh to drop Head when he averaged 47 with the bat in ODIs in 2017. Head was Australia's 2nd-highest runmaker in ODIs for the year, after Warner, and had a better average than Smith. Although Shaun Marsh is an exceptional 50-over batsman who is in cracking form. If Bancroft or Handscomb got the gloves I'd put them at 6 in between Mitch Marsh and Stoinis to add some cement to that middle order, which has been Australia's weak point for a while now. I'd also like to see Australia be a bit more flexible with their middle order - if they're cruising at 3-200 then send in MMarsh to have a dash, but if they're 3-60 then promote Handscomb to right the ship.

2018-01-02T01:53:49+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


I'd certainly have no issues with Paine keeping in all 3 formats for the next few years, Ronan, in this current form. His limited overs batting is well suited to the top three, where he'd be a great foil for Warner and Finch, and for the likes of Smith and Maxwell below him. That said, it wouldn't necessarily bad to have him head to South Africa with the advance party, skip the tri-series T20s with England and NZ, and have a look at Alex Carey instead...

2018-01-02T01:46:13+00:00

Stewart

Guest


Lots of options Ronan. Hard to see what will play out I guess but as a fan of Paine's technique (both with gloves and bat), I'm always glad to see him running around. I'm also interested as to whether Nathan Lyon still wants to play ODIs, having previously expressed his desire to. He would be great to watch, is fielding terrifically these days and I'm not convinced that Zampa is a far superior batter in ODI context.

2018-01-02T01:16:16+00:00

Reece

Guest


If Paine stays fit the keeper job could be his for the next couple of years. And i would certainly like that to be the case.

2018-01-02T00:59:54+00:00

BurgyGreen

Guest


I'd be picking Bancroft in the ODIs. Paine is a solid top three batsman in List A cricket but probably doesn't have the gears to accelerate in the late overs, and we need our keeper to bat at 7 at the moment. Picking Bancroft also keeps him in the setup and hopefully helps him build confidence at international level after a tough first Test series. 1. Warner 2. Finch 3. Smith 4. S. Marsh 5. Stoinis (deserves a promotion) 6. M. Marsh 7. Bancroft 8. Faulkner 9. Zampa 10. K. Richardson 11. Stanlake The bowling attack is absolute trash, but that's how it is if we want to rest the big quicks.

2018-01-01T23:29:49+00:00

Art

Guest


Anyone but the flog Matty wade.

2018-01-01T22:23:40+00:00

paul

Guest


I assume Paine would have to be considered a "risk" in the same way the quicks are. That is, should he play in every game he can, risk injury and not be available for the tour of Sth Africa? You've pointed out how many very good keeping options are available for the upcoming ODI series. In reality, these are relatively meaningless, ie they're not the Champions Trophy or the World Cup, so I'd rest Paine, bearing in mind he had a severe hand injury not so long ago.

2018-01-01T19:55:30+00:00

AREH

Roar Guru


He was Australia's recent T20I keeper also; so he has already been the best performing keeper of the last 12 months in two out of three formats. I feel they might give the gloves to Bancroft for the ODIs or Carey given his form, but I see no reason why Paine can't do this either, he is arguably a far better batsman in the short form - irrespective of his solid Ashes batting.

2018-01-01T18:21:07+00:00

Linphoma

Guest


The only perspective to think about is the workload I guess.

Read more at The Roar