The keys that are locks

By PapanuiPirate / Roar Pro

A while back I wrote a piece on the back row in the context of Australia’s recent difficulty in balancing those positions. This time I want to take a look at lock forward and how the position is fast becoming the bellwether position in the modern game.

On nomenclature
I will be using the term lock throughout this article as opposed to second rower. This is the slightly more old-fashioned term to which I am partial – I also prefer other old-fashioned terms like halfback, first five eighth and second five eighth. It also makes for a witty article title.

The remarkable history of the unremarkables
Lots of words are used to describe locks: hardworking, big engine, toiling, workmanlike, tall. None of these terms are what you would call glamorous, and that seems to fit with the general perception of locks around the world. They are just there. You can’t imagine a rugby game without them, but at the same time you can’t often describe seeing much of them in a given game.

Their work happens in dark places in the middle of scrums, mauls and rucks. Their open play game is normally limited to solid defence in the tight exchanges and grafting carries. For a long time the best compliment you could give a lock went something like this: “Worked really hard, took lineout ball well”. Hardly waxing lyrical.

Yet despite the seeming anonymity of the position a remarkable number of great players have played the position. Locks feature highly in the lists of greatest players in many countries. John Eales is a household name not only in Australia but all over the rugby world. Martin Johnson is revered across England.

The combination of Bakkies Botha and Victor Matfield is still mentioned in hushed tones of awe. Willie John McBride is considered one of the greatest Lions to ever don the famous red jersey. And finally there is Colin Meads, a man whose place in the pantheon of rugby legends is without question and who is considered by many to be perhaps the greatest competitor of the amateur era.

(Credit: Simon Bruty/Allsport)

A job to be done
I’m going to go out on a bit of a limb and say that the role of the lock is probably the least changed since the development of the 3-4-1 scrum in the middle of last century. This has led to a fairy prescribed archetype for body type and style of player with limited variation. Unlike many other positions on the field, locks are pretty much the same world over.

So what is the lock’s role? First and foremost locks are set-piece players. While not quite as dedicated to set piece as front row forwards, the first attributes on any selectors list are lineout production and scrummaging.

Being a team’s primary lineout target, locks are pretty much always the tallest players on the paddock, and they always have been. Before lineout lifting was introduced, height was even more crucial, though players did tend to be somewhat shorter in the amateur era. It is not uncommon for modern test players to be north of two metres tall, and anything shorter than around 195 centimetres is seen as a detriment.

Their role as the primary drivers in a scrum requires powerful driving legs married to a stabilising core. While not normally competing with props for bulk, locks are frequently the largest men on the paddock.

To complement their set-piece role, locks are also required to do huge amounts of work in the tight. It is not uncommon to expect locks to have the highest ruck involvements of any player on the field, including back row players. This is due locks providing the muscle at the breakdown, clearing out opposition bodies, protecting the ball and providing the impetus for turnovers by driving through vulnerable rucks.

They are also the driving force in mauls, often being the ‘driver’ egging on their players from lineout drives, while also providing the strength to stop opponent drives.

(Odd Andersen/AFP/Getty Images)

Locks tend to have the second highest tackle counts, often making the majority of forward-on-forward tackles near the breakdown. They are also called upon to make metres in traffic, working their team over the advantage line with powerful, leg-driving carries.

Basically a lock’s job is to do the hard slog work.

As I have mentioned, locks the world over tend to be cut from the same cloth with very little difference in terms of philosophy by region or country. There is, however, a balance that tends to be struck within locking partnerships. That is the tighthead and loosehead lock roles.

Basically tighthead and loosehead locks have the same job with slightly different priorities. As the tighthead side of the scrum is normally the side that comes under more pressure, it has become common for the stronger, heavier lock to pack down behind the tighthead prop.

The loosehead lock meanwhile tends to be a little lighter and often a bit taller and takes the role as the primary lineout target. These divisions often play out in open play as well, with tighthead locks clearing more rucks and loosehead locks making more tackles.

Sometimes the tighthead lock will carry a little tighter while the loosehead lock will carry more like a blindside flanker. Some great examples of the tight/loose locking combinations are Botha and Matfield along with Brad Thorn and Ali Williams.

(Mark Kolbe/Getty Images)

Why are locks suddenly such a big deal?
Something a bit weird has happened over the last couple of years. Where normally people would be talking incessantly about the ‘glamour’ positions like openside flanker, number eight, first five-eighth or fullback suddenly everyone is talking about locks!

New Zealanders will bend your ear about how Sam Whitelock and Brodie Rettalick are the bee’s knees. Maro Itoje is quickly becoming the most recognisable name in rugby, and he is just one of three English locks people won’t stop talking about. Eben Etzebeth has had people staring at his biceps for years and Adam Coleman is being touted as a Wallabies captain.

How did this happen?
How did the quiet, hardworking giants of the rugby paddock suddenly become some of the most influential players going around?

I once read an unusual statistic that locks have the most head-to-head involvements of any position on the field. Essentially that means that as a lock you are more likely to come up directly against your opposite number than any other player on the field. This means that if one team has an obvious advantage in this position, it quickly gives them an edge in the tight exchanges.

With quick ruck ball becoming such a key part of attack across the world, having locks who can shift bodies powerfully and quickly while also getting over the advantage line and recycling quickly is crucial to owning the momentum of the game.

Locks have also begun to add extra little touches of skill to their core roles, and this is having an oversized impact on games. Itoje is one of the best fetchers in rugby at the moment, which is not something that usually said of a lock. This opens up his back row to focus more on their defensive duties, making England (and Saracens) a particularly difficult team to break down defensively.

(Jason O’Brien/Getty Images)

Brodie Rettalick’s ball playing skills in traffic have completely changed the All Blacks approach to forward play, with Scott Barrett not far behind. The addition of soft hands by big men in the face of the defence opens up little holes for forwards to punch through, adding metres to tight carries and ensuring front-foot ball.

The modern conditioning of players has probably had the biggest impact on locks in terms of their production across a game than any other position. Their core roles are exhausting ones, with a requirement to make a large number of involvements in a game. As locks have become fitter they have also become far more influential on a game. Fitter locks with bigger engines are frequently playing the full 80 minutes and making meaningful contributions throughout the whole game.

Finally, with defences becoming so effective during phase play, most scoring opportunities these days come off set pieces. Locks are critical to success at both the scrum and the lineout. Their ability to secure the ball at the lineout and deliver it quickly is perhaps the most important aspect of lock play in the current era.

[latest_videos_strip category=”rugby” name=”Rugby”]

With the whole width of the field and large numbers of players to work with, attack from a clean lineout is gold to modern teams, and it often rests on the locks to set the whole machine in motion.

Conclusion
Locks have come a long way from being the lumbering giants of the rugby paddock. They are now expected to be involved in so many facets of play, and teams with multi-skilled, athletic locks are reaping the rewards at set piece and around the park.

The era of the lock has just begun, and long may it reign.

What do you think, Roarers? Am I mistaking the importance of the tall timber in today’s game? Are there some other examples of great locking partners that show that these guys were always the core of any successful team?

The Crowd Says:

2018-01-17T07:48:13+00:00

DavSA

Guest


Bit of a late comment from me but what a super article PP . There was a fellow who played for the Boks in the 70,s called Moaner Van Heerden . He made Etsebeth look like Mother Theresa when it came to being aggressive. He paired with the late great Louis Moolman both for SA and provincially. Van Heerdens son Wikus Van Heerden incidentally also played for SA both at lock and flank.

2018-01-16T03:14:04+00:00

MitchO

Guest


Hi PP I thought for scrums if you play the taller lock on the tighthead side he is forward of his/her locking partner and that puts more drive through tighthead. Same principal as putting the stronger lock there but I basically thought the taller lock is usually on the right.

2018-01-16T00:44:37+00:00

Neil

Guest


Very interesting comment, UKKiwi. Hadn't considered from that perspective but you may indeed be correct.

2018-01-15T15:32:57+00:00

UKKiwi

Guest


Wondering about this comment Sam 'NZ more than any other country in the past 5-7 years has demanded more from their locks outside their core duties so we’ve seen improvements in general passing, passing in and before contact, acting as first receivers as well as linkmen out wider.' Has NZ demanded more of it's locks? Or, has the retirement of B Thorne and Ali Williams which opened the door for Retallick and Whitelock both of whom bring those skills to the table? I suspect it's the later and this pair along with Etzebeth and, more recently, Itoje who have set the new benchmark in a lock's required skills.

2018-01-15T14:21:23+00:00

Stefan

Guest


This is a sensational piece and insight into a difficult position to describe. Also your piece on back rowers was also very good. I would like if you could give your insight into other positions (props, hookers, etc) makes for great reading. To me No 10 is also a difficult position to describe as you know they are pivotal and yet at the end of the game, you can ask - 'what did they do exactly'. Looking forward to more - keep it up. Cheers

2018-01-15T13:48:25+00:00

Campbell Watts

Guest


I'll assume you're referring to the great JC? Jerusalem Hall-of-Famer no doubt, but he did have a bit of an advantage ;)

2018-01-14T03:16:39+00:00

Neil

Guest


Sorry, Gepetto. I had taken your comments seriously and did not realise you were winding me up. Simmons is a hopeless carrier, loses the ball often, gets pushed back in carries and cannot hand off. In defence, he is only slightly less ineffectual.

2018-01-13T05:23:22+00:00

Gepetto

Guest


And yet McKenzie dropped Horwill and kept Simmons who has actually played 82 tests for the Wallabies. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHtUy0azDGE. I believe the statistics tell a different story about Simmons - he never lets the team down. Sadly, I think the Tahs will do better this year while the Reds coached by Mr Concussion will fare poorly with small crowds, inexperienced forwards and an amateur playmaker. Simmo rarely loses the ball in contact and always ties up several tacklers for the next attacking phase.

2018-01-12T22:04:36+00:00

Muzzo

Guest


I think you have missed the point Clelo, as what I was referring too, was it was hard to go past Brodie & Sam as a locking combination, but for all round toughness, & being a real hard nut, it would be very hard to go past, both Brodie & Eben. Well after all Brodie was a IRB player of the year. I'm not saying Sam is not a hard nut, but he is really not as tough as those mentioned. That's IMO. Cheers.

2018-01-12T20:49:48+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


Thanks PP, excellent piece. I too am in awe at the capabilities of some of these big guys and how, while the core duties haven't really changed, they have increased athleticism and added ball playing to their repertoire. In that respect, glad you mentioned Nakarawa above - what a phenomenal talent he is!

2018-01-12T20:13:15+00:00

Ben

Guest


Mark Cooksley....(facepalm) Body of an elephant heart of a mouse.

2018-01-12T20:07:49+00:00

Ben

Guest


That wasnt a test match that he captained the ABs in. It was against a French xv. Luke Whitelocks test debut was against Japan as a sub....2013.

2018-01-12T19:59:13+00:00

Ben

Guest


Nope...Titos been back in NZ a couple years now. Lineout coach for Taranaki. So when you say hes still playing well, what are you referring to...cant be rugby.

2018-01-12T19:24:58+00:00

Ben

Guest


Hennie Becker...wow..bring back memories. I was at secondary school and was an usher Athletic Pk 2nd test ABs v Boks 1981. Because of all the trouble the Boks stayed the night under the grandstand. We had to be there at 0900 and conducted regular "emu parades" of the field to ensure no objects were on there. Suddenly the biggest man i had ever seen had to stoop as he exited the stadium onto the field. Becker saw this gangly schoolkid staring at him and with his big mostachioed face gave me a wink. How the heck could we beat them with a guy this big!! Of course we did lose that match. He towered over Frank Oliver who played his last test that day. Both gone now to play each other in heaven.

2018-01-12T09:49:31+00:00

Neil

Guest


Cannot agree with you, Gepetto. What I see is Simmons being slow to get to the breakdown, hopeless in the carry, always getting pushed back. for years he was carried by Horwill and more recently Coleman. Without such players, he is shown up every time.

2018-01-12T09:14:52+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


I was always partial to the way Tim Kava played the game - if only he'd been a little bit taller! Was going to nominate Simon Maling but just checked and he got 11 caps.

2018-01-12T08:21:33+00:00

scottd

Guest


Great article mate. Very engaging.

2018-01-12T07:11:16+00:00

Gepetto

Guest


Simmons is a great lock- 70+tests for Australia - he was a key forward in the Reds defeat of a full strength Canterbury team in the Super rugby final. His work-rate is high. He has great hands and delivers good line-out ball to the halfback. He tackles low like all the Reds used to do. Roar contributors are always hailing some new prospect as a Wallaby starter for the foreseeable future but they don't survive and Simmo comes to the rescue. Simmons can play 80 minutes of test football and is seldom injured. Selecting Simmons is one of the few correct decisions Coach Clown has made.

2018-01-12T07:00:02+00:00

Clelo

Guest


You aren't far off the mark, Muzzo. However, SW is a stand out and, but for BR, would and should be touted as the best lock in the world. It's not just his playing ability, it's also got a lot to do with his leadership skills, his ability to captain a side and think tactically. That is where he surpasses EE but EE will learn with experience. I have yet to see BR in a captain's role. Btw I have yet to see any of the Whitelocks play poorly that's why Luke got to captain the side in France Even tho he was not a test player Hansen knew what he was getting and made the easy decision. Not bad when making your test debut as a captain!

2018-01-12T06:50:23+00:00

Clelo

Guest


I agree regarding Tito, currently playing in the NH and still playing well as is Jeremy Thrush.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar