Adam Zampa under serious pressure to retain ODI spot

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

The two halves of Adam Zampa’s ODI career contrast starkly. In his first 14 matches, the young Australian leg-spinner took 26 wickets at an average of 23, but in the second half he’s taken only 14 wickets at 52.

Just as alarming is the way his economy rate has ballooned from a very impressive 5.01 runs per over to an awful 6.43.

This illustrates that, in this latter period, Zampa has not been able to put pressure on the opposition either by choking the run rate or making breakthroughs.

A spinner can be excused for leaking runs if they are a strike bowler, or forgiven for lacking penetration if they are consistently frugal. Zampa was both economical and penetrative early in his career but has become a weak link.

The selectors have shown confidence in Zampa by selecting him as the sole specialist tweaker in the initial 14-man squad for the current five-match ODI series against England. Zampa showed enough in the first half of his ODI career, and throughout his so-far-brilliant T20I career, to justify this faith.

But that loyalty won’t last much longer if Zampa remains ineffective.

AAP Image/SNPA, John Cowpland

Who, then, are the top three contenders to take Zampa’s ODI spot? I will rank them, based on where they likely sit in the pecking order.

First choice: Ashton Agar
24 years old, 36 wickets at 30 from 18 List A matches

Clearly rated highly by the selectors, Agar played both Tests and ODIs for Australia last year. He acquitted himself well in two Tests in Bangladesh, but found life tougher in two ODIs in India, where he was targeted by a hyper-talented batting line-up.

Agar’s strength is his precision and the sharp lift he gains thanks to his 189cm height. While he is not a match winner with the ball, Australia may well figure they already have enough strike power thanks to their dynamic pace unit, and that an economical spinner would be a good fit.

Agar also adds significant value with his free-flowing batting and superb fielding.

Second choice: Nathan Lyon
30 years old, 71 wickets at 33 from 55 List A matches

Lyon has long been ignored in ODIs, but there are two reasons the selectors might reconsider this position in 2018.

The first is Lyon’s rampant form. He is coming off comfortably the best year of his international career, played well in the recent domestic One Day Cup, and has made a fine re-entry to the Big Bash League, taking 4-42 across his two matches.

The second thing working in his favour is the fact the World Cup is on next year. Lyon’s vast international experience, albeit limited mostly to Tests, could sway the selectors when they consider which spinner is most likely to thrive under the extreme pressure of a world cup.

Aside from experience, Lyon’s main selling point is his control. The off spinner has been miserly in his 13-match ODI career, giving up just 4.93rpo, and has been even more frugal at domestic level, where his economy rate is 4.80rpo.

[latest_videos_strip category=”cricket” name=”Cricket”]

Third choice: Cameron Boyce
28 years old, 55 wickets at 35 from 48 List A matches

If Australia sought to replace Zampa with another leggie, Boyce is the most likely option.

Victorian leg-spinner Fawad Ahmed has a solid List A bowling average of 33, but turns 36 years old in two weeks’ time. Queenslander Mitchell Swepson, meanwhile, is more of a red-ball specialist, owning a good first-class bowling record but an awful one in 50-over cricket, where he averages 58. The fact Swepson is averaging 55 with the ball in this BBL certainly won’t help his cause.

That leaves Boyce, who is a bit of a forgotten man in Australian cricket, having rarely been spoken about since making a sensational start to his T20I career with eight wickets at 19, and a brilliant economy rate of 6.6rpo, in seven matches.

Boyce gets lovely loop on his deliveries and could be a decent wicket-taking option through the middle overs. If they were looking for an attacking spinner to replace Zampa then Boyce would be the standout, with Agar and Lyon the more reliable, economical options.

AFP PHOTO/ MAL FAIRCLOUGH

Left-field option: D’Arcy Short
27 years old, 12 wickets at 33 from 12 List A matches

The leading runscorer in this summer’s BBL has actually played as a bowling all-rounder for Western Australia this summer in both the Sheffield and the domestic One Day competition.

In his most recent Shield match, last month, he batted all the way down at nine, behind Agar. In the one-dayers he batted mostly at seven for WA, with the notable exception being their match against the Cricket Australia XI when Short opened the batting and made 119 not out from 92 balls.

In spin terms, Short is not on the same level as the likes of Zampa, Agar, Lyon and Boyce. But his ballistic batting will tempt the selectors.

His presence in the ODI XI could potentially allow them to play four specialist fast bowlers, with Short batting at six.

The Crowd Says:

2018-01-20T07:49:25+00:00

DaveJ

Guest


Hold the phone - we’ve forgotten an obvious one - Fawad Ahmed. By far the most consistently dangerous Australian spinner in BBL, way ahead of Boyce. A wrist spinner a better option than Agar or Lyon.

2018-01-19T14:06:31+00:00

Nev

Guest


You, and the selectors.

2018-01-19T14:04:27+00:00

Nev

Guest


Not the same - that's not an actual team is it.

2018-01-19T08:27:38+00:00

DaveJ

Guest


Sounds like they listened to you on Zampa, Ronan. I cant watch the England innings after the first few overs, it’s going to be a boring and inevitable progression, especially without a spinner. 50 overs now means shots we’d be enthusing about in Tests going straight to fieldsmen on the boundary, and it all looks ho hum compared to T20. Interestingly, Agar has a pretty fair econ rate in List A too, just on 5.0, especially with a lot of games at the WACA. Batting is fair too, but perhaps too far down the order to make a difference compared to bowling. In some ways fielding can make even more of a difference in the short form than lower order batting, though these two are both good. Maybe Agar shades it with the ball (occasionally) spinning away, though Lyon’s experience must count. A good wrist spinner would be even better.

2018-01-19T07:45:41+00:00

Simoc

Guest


Nathan Lyon is the best spinner in Australia and as good as any in the world. He should be first picked. He has bowled some great spells this summer better than have ever been dished up by an off spinner in Australia before. I don't mind Agar (batting option) or Boyce but we should pick the best.

2018-01-19T04:45:33+00:00

Curious George

Guest


Zampa axed from the one day side Cummins also axed (is he sickly) ? Cameron White on his final chance with the ODI side too Jhye Richardson to take a bag today on debut

2018-01-19T04:24:41+00:00

Waz

Guest


I have no idea why Lyon isn't picked, is it his batting even though he would bat last? Even Agar is better than Zampa.

2018-01-19T03:27:33+00:00

Liam

Guest


Yes, and I'm inclined to agree with pretty much everything that you said. I was just looking forward to reading a lengthy analysis, not three paragraphs based on a single stat.

2018-01-19T03:18:59+00:00

Ouch

Guest


Except the ODI team of the year.

AUTHOR

2018-01-19T03:11:55+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


James I think Nair is a phenomenal all-round talent, and he could become a seriously good limited overs international cricketer. But he's a ways off yet - he's only played 10 List A matches for a return of 13 wickets at 34. He's only 19 years old, I'd give him at least another 1-2 years to develop before starting to consider him for ODIs.

AUTHOR

2018-01-19T03:09:04+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Haha that was a noble act then

AUTHOR

2018-01-19T03:08:15+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Hazlewood averages 23 with the ball at an incredible economy rate of 4.69rpo - he'd walk into any ODI team in the world.

2018-01-19T03:07:03+00:00

Josh

Guest


In 28 matches Zampa has played he has only scored 12 runs in the onky 3 inmings he has played in matches we have won. If you dont think Lyon could score 12 runs in 3 matches im not sure you have seen him play

2018-01-19T03:01:28+00:00

Josh

Guest


Honestly though whats tje ppint of batting deep. Usually that just means you loose by a little less. I dont know the facts but id say vert few teams win when tjier number 10 bats

2018-01-19T02:30:11+00:00

Chris Kettlewell

Roar Guru


It's always the balancing act. Do you have a longer tail in order to have a top bowling lineup and in doing so reduce the amount of runs your batsmen need to score, or do you weaken the bowling lineup by playing more allrounders but in doing so lengthen the batting lineup and have more freedom for the batsmen to keep going hard throughout the innings. Either approach can fail. Starc and Cummins both started terribly in the first ODI. They just weren't "on" for that match, and paid for it. So picking a strong bowling lineup can still fail if your specialist bowlers have off nights, and picking a longer batting lineup can fail if it means you are forced to chase bigger totals because of weaker bowling and can't pull it off. Does someone like Hazlewood suffer because of his lack of batting. If there's another bowler who can perform the role but is a better late-order hitter, does he struggle to keep his spot regardless of how good he is?

2018-01-19T02:26:33+00:00

matth

Guest


For once I'm not going to treat your comment as a wind up ... Zampa has been failing to perform against all teams, long before he came up against this English team. India may have a case as best limited overs batting line up, depending on conditions, but England are definitely in the conversation.

2018-01-19T02:24:47+00:00

matth

Guest


Yeah but 'Mitch' was just trying to be modest, not putting himself in.

2018-01-19T02:06:33+00:00

David a Pom

Guest


I feel sorry for Zampa - he is bowling against the best limited over batting unit in the world, by far. Not easy against a team with the world's best opener (Roy) and arguably number 3/4 (Root).

2018-01-19T02:04:23+00:00

Jameswm

Guest


Agar is too easy to hit. Nair is the best outside Lyon at keeping the runs down, and can bat.

AUTHOR

2018-01-19T01:53:53+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Over the past two years Mitch Marsh has averaged 40 with the bat, at a strike rate of 93, he is a lock in the ODI side even without considering the value he adds with his bowling.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar