It's time for standalone WBBL finals

By Mary Konstantopoulos / Expert

When I left North Sydney Oval at the conclusion of WBBL03 opening weekend, I did so feeling buzzed for a massive summer of cricket ahead.

Following the conclusion of a successful Ashes series for the Australian Women’s Cricket team, the 8725 people that joined me through the gates during opening weekend had a real hunger for the women’s game and to cheer on players like Ellyse Perry, Elyse Villani, Ashleigh Gardner, Rachel Haynes, Kristen Beams and Alex Blackwell – all names which are popular and recognised in Australian sport.

It wasn’t just people watching at North Sydney Oval that demonstrated how much of an appetite there is to watch women’s cricket.

Over the weekend, more than one million people tuned in to watch on television, with the game between the Sydney Sixers and the Melbourne Stars peaking at 629,000 viewers on Channel Ten.

And the cricket certainly did not disappoint.

In the game between the Sydney Thunder and the Melbourne Renegades, the Thunder became the first WBBL team to score 200 runs. This total was later eclipsed by the Sixers in their game against the Stars, where the team made 242 thanks largely to Ashleigh Gardner who scored the fastest half-century and then century in WBBL history. Her hundred came off just 47 balls and included nine 4s and ten 6s.

All of this contributed to an opening weekend and a summer that started with a bang.

(Photo by Matt King/Getty Images)

Unfortunately, the summer could not have ended in any more of a stark contrast – rather than going out with a bang, the WBBL ended with a fizzle and it had nothing to do with the quality of the cricket played between the Sixers and the Perth Scorchers in the final.

The Sixers were exceptional in the field and demonstrated again why they have been the dominant team this summer.

Let’s talk about Sarah Coyte, who in just her fourth game for the Sixers this summer (after being brought back to replace Marizanne Kapp, who returned to South Africa for international duty), took 3/17.

Even more remarkable about this story is that Coyte returns to the WBBL after taking some time away from the game to deal with anxiety and anorexia. She had difficulty sleeping in the lead-up to her opening game against the Strikers and has certainly not disappointed, being rightly recognised for her efforts by being named Player of the Match for the Final.

Or Erin Burns, who took 2/26 and throughout her summer demonstrated why she is one of the most effective and consistent fielders in the game.

What about the bravery of Piepa Cleary, who even with the Scorchers staring down a total that wouldn’t even eclipse 100, came in at the tail end of the innings to top score for the team, making 18 not out off 14 balls.

Then with bat in hand, the Sixers chased down the Scorchers total of 99 with ease particularly with Alyssa Healy and Ellyse Perry opening the batting.

(AAP Image/David Moir)

Alyssa made 41 from 32 deliveries including five fours and one six, and Ellyse made 36 not out from 42 and hit the winning runs.

Cricket Australia has done an outstanding job in demonstrating that cricket is a sport for all. From the significant pay increases for our female cricketers (at a domestic and international level), to the availability of merchandise for the Australian Women’s Cricket team and our WBBL teams, to having games live on free-to-air television, it’s no surprise that the women’s game has continued to go from strength to strength.

It’s now time for Cricket Australia to take a big step and recognise that for WBBL04, double-headers for the finals series simply do not work.

Let’s begin with the inherent unfairness of the system as it stands.

In the men’s game, home-ground advantage in the finals is seen as a good incentive for teams to strive to finish at the top of the BBL ladder. No such incentive exists in the WBBL.

While the Adelaide Strikers BBL team had the opportunity to play in front of their home crowd, the Sydney Sixers (who finished top of the WBBL ladder) were denied this opportunity throughout the finals due to Big Bash scheduling.

The Sixers travelled to Adelaide for their first semi-final against the Strikers and then remained there for their final against the Scorchers.

Interestingly, Sydney have a very good record at the Adelaide Oval, having won all four games that they have played there, but that certainly does not negate the lack of home-ground advantage they had throughout the finals series.

Forget there being absolutely no incentive for teams to finish at the top of the WBBL ladder, but the fact that the game is played as a double-header in a place foreign to both teams means that a final, which should have been played in front of thousands of people (just like it was on opening weekend), was not.

(Photo by Paul Kane/Getty Images)

It was great to see the game televised on Channel Ten. But unfortunately, it looked like it was being played in front of an empty stadium.

This is so unfair to the teams competing in the final. They deserve to play in front of a crowd – particularly when you consider how many international players featured in the two line-ups. Players like Natalie Sciver, Nicole Bolton, Katherine Brunt, Elyse Villani, Ashleigh Gardner, Alyssa Healy and Ellyse Perry.

And as good as it is to have the game on television, it looks appalling for people to turn on and see no one in the stadium. An empty stadium lacks atmosphere and increases the incentive for people channel surfing to change the channel.

Additionally, it also deprives fans, so many of whom have followed the women’s game with dedication and passion throughout the summer, the opportunity to watch their team in a final.

I watched the final from the couch – had the game been played in Sydney, I would have joined several thousand of my friends out there to cheer on both teams competing.

Congratulations to the Sixers on becoming the first WBBL team to win back-to-back titles. An exceptional achievement and one which will see the WBBL trophy remain in Sydney for a third consecutive year.

But I challenge Cricket Australia to recognise how effective their support and promotion of women’s cricket has been to date and continue to give the women’s game the spotlight it deserves.

Play the WBBL04 final as a standalone game. I promise, the fans will follow if you lead the way.

The Crowd Says:

2018-02-06T22:48:12+00:00

Nathan

Guest


I agree with Scott, There are some important questions which need to be raised before it is moved to a stand alone game. - Financially would it break even? They would need to staff two grounds plus if the women's game is free there is no gate receipts. - If it wasnt free would anyone come? - Say it was played at prime time is there enough of an audience to out rank their usual shows in that timeslot? - Would channel 10 choose the womens final over their Sat or Sunday night prime time tv shows? - What sort of crowd figure would justify the move? 2k, 5k, 8k,10k? The above is multiplied if you want to have stand alone semi's as well. Particularly as they would generate less interest than the final its self. Also i heard some comments during the competition that the women want to play on the large stadiums not just suburban grounds. So do you play the final at North Sydney Oval or the SCG (in the case of the Sixers)? (would either be available? and what would the rental cost be?) I'm sure that Cricket Australia know the answers to most of these questions and that is why they have chosen the Back to Back option. Also what is not mentioned is that the AFL and NRL play Grand Finals away from the top finishing clubs home ground, The Big Bash had it in Canberra a couple of years ago, so there is precedent for not playing at home in finals.

2018-02-06T07:15:24+00:00

Oingo Boingo

Guest


Watching women's cricket, is like watching people race stock standard cars.

2018-02-05T21:32:56+00:00

tyrone

Guest


"the standard is still not good enough; chasing a total of less than 100 in a final isn’t an exciting game of cricket." So the international game was a great standard the other night? NZ only got 117, not much better than the score set in the women's final.

2018-02-05T11:50:08+00:00

Alex

Guest


This is the easy fix for me. I went to the same game and had time to walk my 3yr old home and make it back for the mens. The BBL should start 15min after the WBBL. If a super over delays it, that’s great

2018-02-05T07:57:21+00:00

Scott Pryde

Expert


Can't see Cricket Australia taking the risk at the moment. On it's own, I've got a huge feeling it'll flop. Besides, let's look at TV dollars - why would Ten (or whoever is on the next deal) want to set up at two grounds, pay two lots of staff, etc. Are they going to get the return they need to make it worth it? Again, highly doubtful. I'd like to see standalone semi-finals and finals, but CA will have done their research into this.... It might be still a few years off I reckon.

2018-02-05T07:52:28+00:00

Scott Pryde

Expert


In the bin... Or back where we are now, with double-headers etc. But I'd be happy to give the semi-finals and finals a chance to breathe. Let's see what the reaction is and go from there.

2018-02-05T06:14:11+00:00

Lynton

Guest


I understand that people may disagree with this but I would like to see the WBBL moved forward to be played between October-November with the Grand Final being played before Christmas. That would also mean that ALL games are on during Prime Time and on Channel Ten. The AFLW is on TV each game so why cant the WBBL do this? Even If the structure for the seasons says December-January, I would still like ALL games on TV. I would still attend the games but it is a bit of a problem as Im a stars member and we play our home games in Casey. That is a long way from the Northern Suburbs where I live plus Public Transport isnt to good to get there. I understand people dont want it but I think the Double Headers work partically for finals.

AUTHOR

2018-02-05T05:02:25+00:00

Mary Konstantopoulos

Expert


I'm not sure how suggesting a home final is suggesting that everything in the WBBL/BBL needs to be equal?

2018-02-05T04:45:23+00:00

Brian

Guest


It's time for an across the board reality check for women's sport. Men's sport,in probably every field is at a higher level, in all areas, whether it be intensity, speed, strength -you name it MEN are more advanced.It's not being sexist to point this out, just factual. Therefore calls for equal prizemoney, sponsorship, media coverage and the like are ridiculous. I'm not suggesting there is NO place for women in sport, however there needs to be a general recognition that the standard will be lower.

2018-02-05T04:04:04+00:00

anon

Roar Pro


I see your point. I think it's probably a good idea to let the WBBL stand on its own two feet rather piggy back off of the wild success of the BBL. Let's see whether we have a viable league that can pay for itself. Put the games on in prime time, stand-alone fixtures, charge a minimum $20 to get in (as they do for the BBL). Let's see where WBBL sits after a couple of seasons.

AUTHOR

2018-02-05T03:51:26+00:00

Mary Konstantopoulos

Expert


James, this is a really interesting question and one that I need to look into more deeply. There is actually a limit on the number of international players that a team can have. From memory it is 3 imports (so for the Thunder there was Rachel Priest, Stefanie Taylor and Harmanpreet Kaur) for example and there is also a cap on the number of Australian players. What makes it interesting though is that an Australian international is classed as a player that has played 10 or more games for Aus. So for the Sixers, because when contracts were signed Ash Gardner and Lauren Cheatle had not played more than 10 games, they were not considered Aussie internationals. This will change by the time the comp rolls around next year.

2018-02-05T03:34:19+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


Some compelling reasons to have a standalone game. I did wonder how many Strikers fans would have been fussed about watching the women's match first. The thing that still concerns me about the WBBL is the disparity between some of the sides in terms of the number of Australian players they have. How is a side like the Hurricanes supposed to compete with the star-studded Sixers? Does there need to be a limit on the number of Australian contracted players a side can have, on top of the cap on imports?

AUTHOR

2018-02-05T03:33:12+00:00

Mary Konstantopoulos

Expert


Thanks for the correction JamesH! :) So used to the Scorchers being dominant that I lost myself for a bit.

2018-02-05T03:27:27+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


*Adelaide Take IAP seriously at your own peril, Mary. You'll find his comments under any article about women's sport, telling us all how dull and lacking in skill it is. Can't see the forest for the trees (or just doesn't want to). It's a little sad TBH.

AUTHOR

2018-02-05T03:04:18+00:00

Mary Konstantopoulos

Expert


You're both absolutely spot on!

AUTHOR

2018-02-05T03:03:17+00:00

Mary Konstantopoulos

Expert


Very well said!

2018-02-05T02:14:30+00:00

Michael

Guest


Couldn't agree more Mary. If CA are going to get serious (and they should) then stand alone home finals are a must. This was a phenomenal season but let down by the administrators in this instance. The quality of the cricket has been outstanding and deserved better

AUTHOR

2018-02-05T01:21:41+00:00

Mary Konstantopoulos

Expert


I ate pies, I actually don't think the double header is the problem - the problem is that two teams were playing in the final beyond far removed from their local fan base. I would have loved to have seen the Sixers play, but the game was in Perth. Additionally, because its a double header and you need to buy a ticket to the men's game to attend the women's, it means many tickets were snapped up by fans of the Hurricanes and Strikers rather than the Scorchers and Sixers. I don't think I'm making assumptions. My estimate of 5k - 8k is in line with what we saw for Opening Weekend and the Women's Ashes. As for the standard - you're wrong. We had a couple of blow outs in the semi's, but instead of suggesting its poor quality, perhaps take a look at Sarah Aley's incredible bowling in the semi (where at one stage she was 4-1) or Sarah Coyte who took 3-17. Ellyse Villani and Nicole Bolton have had one of the strongest opening partnerships this summer and it was strangled by pressure from the Sixers in the field. It's funny, when Australia bowled NZ out for 117 on the weekend, all I heard about was the bowling of Andrew Tye and Billy Stanlake. No one was questioning the quality of T20 cricket at an international level.

AUTHOR

2018-02-05T01:09:31+00:00

Mary Konstantopoulos

Expert


Fine. That's a deal.

2018-02-05T01:04:59+00:00

Harbijan Can't Singh

Guest


Sure, lets make it stand alone. Go for it. Let the market determine the success of the product. Give it prime time. Give it a top class venue. Give it promotion. Just don't give it any excuses or conspiracy theories if the turn out is disappointing.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar