Why the Canes are still the turnover kings

By Nicholas Bishop / Expert

Turnover ball has been the attacking lifeblood of New Zealand teams for as long as anyone can remember – no one quite does it quite like the sides from the ‘Shaky Isles’.

They know how to create turnover ball, and they know how use it when they get it better than anyone.

The crème de la crème on the turnover counter within the New Zealand conference are the Hurricanes, and they reinforced their dominance in the first New Zealand-Australia clash of the season, on Saturday evening at AAMI Park.

The Canes have so many threats in a broken field that it is guaranteed to give defensive coaches sleepless nights – start with the Barrett brothers scanning the field from the back, then check out TJ Perenara’s tapped penalties, move on to prod your beard about the mega-tonnage of power and speed on the edge in the shape of Ben Lam and Julian Savea. Julian’s brother, Ardie, wasn’t even playing, so I guess Dave Wessels could count his blessings on that score.

The first item on a coach’s menu with a New Zealand side in opposition is, therefore, ball control. Control the ball you get, keep it for as long as you productively can. Ireland are the best in the world at doing that, and it is what currently makes them the All Blacks’ most dangerous foes.

The Melbourne Rebels failed miserably in all aspects. They only built 58 rucks in the course of the match – approximately half of Ireland’s average in the past year – and they lost ten per cent of those they did set up. It took them until the 74th minute of the game to move past fourth phase on attack. They gave the ball up far too easily, and the Canes turned all the crumbs that fell off the table into a banquet. Seven tries cost the men from Wellington only 11 phases’ worth of build-up play.

In the course of the unfolding disaster, the Wallaby claims of promising fringe players such as Jack Maddocks, Billy Meakes, Richard Hardwick and Jack Debreczeni were left choking in the dust of Kiwi chariot wheels.

The Rebels made a succession of poor decisions about what to do in and around contact situations, and the pattern was set early in the game (0:07 on the reel):

The highlights show the end of the play, after the turnover has been won only a few metres from the Rebels goal-line. From our point of view, what led up to the turnover is of more interest:

After receiving a pass from Tom English in-goal, fullback Jack Maddocks decides to run the ball out instead of looking for touch. The Canes had already flagged up their intent to hold up the ball-carrier early in the match, aiming for the choke turnover, but Maddocks enters contact far too high against number eight Gareth Evans and number five Sam Lousi, and is promptly stripped of the ball by Evans:

One phase later, Ben Lam is over in the corner. One phase, one try.

The assistant referee got Maddocks off the hook a couple of minutes later, with an interception by Beauden Barrett being called back, wrongly, for offside:

A screenshot shows all of the Canes’ defensive line onside as Will Genia goes to lift the ball from the base:

The ball is in Genia’s hands, off the ground, and Ngani Laumape has not jumped ahead of his mates.

Maddocks had problems with his presentation of the ball throughout the game. Towards the end of the first half, he was unable to assist the cleanouts of Reece Hodge and Meakes on Canes captain Perenara, by moving his body after the tackle:

Gareth Evans kicked the turnover ball all the way down to the Rebels five-metre line, and the Canes scored their third try of the game from that position (1:43 on the reel). With Debreczeni having previously failed to field a high kick, allowing Ben Lam to scoot away and score his second try of the game (1:15), that made it three tries in five phases.

Things did not change for the better in the second half, in fact they got a whole lot worse for Melbourne. In the 46th minute, Marika Koroibete had the ball ripped away after a move from lineout, and the Kiwis scored again when Perenara took a tapped penalty from the resulting scrum win:

The finish to this move (by Evans) can be seen on the reel at 2:09. Four tries, seven phases.

Most of the Rebels’ issues arose from either poor execution of the offload, or misjudgements about when to offload and when to keep the ball:

This is Debereczeni, doing the first part well (making the break), then falling down on the second – offloading to Maddocks in contact.

Matt Phillip takes the ball forward on a good run, but he is never going to be in a position to give the offload. However, this does not stop Meakes running straight past the ball expecting it!

If you understand that your priority is to control the football, that in turn means you have to commit to a higher proportion of rucks and fewer speculative offloads. The mission statement is clear: only offload (or expect the offload) when the odds are definitely in your favour.

Meakes’ absence-without-leave gives Evans a clear shot at the ball on the deck, earning the Canes another turnover penalty.

Replacement flanker Richard Hardwick is standing at first receiver and makes a ‘hospital pass’ Angus Cottrell is never likely to be able to catch, and the turnover ball encourages the Canes the counter down the left-hand side of the field. The move was finished outstandingly well by Laumape on the right next phase (reel at 2:47). Five tries, nine phases.

The Rebels went on making mistakes in contact, and the Canes went on capitalizing on them – immediately. When Maddocks lost the ball during placement once again in the 70th minute, Debreczeni was in a support position well ahead of the ball-carrier, leading to another error and turnover of possession.

The Canes duly converted the opportunity in one single phase (3:40 on the reel). Six tries, ten phases.

The denouement to the game was entirely appropriate (and symbolic), with the Rebels giving up the ball deep in their own end more on a hope and a prayer than in a favourable situation they had manufactured for themselves:

Debreczeni chips, Meakes and Maddocks are shouldered out of the road (legally), the ball is tipped back to Barrett and Lam scores (3:55 on the reel). Seven tries, 11 phases. End of story.

Summary
The Rebels’ gameplan contained some fairly serious errors of judgement, and that is fundamentally the responsibility of their young head coach, Wessels.

Especially with the jumbo back five Wessels selected, featuring Lopeti Timani at six and Angus Cottrell at seven and two natural ‘grunt’ second rows, the ball had to be kept much closer to the Melbourne forwards than it was, with more plays off nine more recycles and fewer offloads.

Instead, they played the game without due care and attention in the contact area and they suffered the consequences in graphic and repeated detail. They offloaded when the offload wasn’t on and their work through and around the tackle was consistently ordinary.

As a result, they gave up a stream of turnover possession against the team in the tournament best-equipped to exploit it. In the process, the Wallaby aspirations of promising players like Maddocks, Meakes, Hardwick and Debreczeni took a painful, if educational hit. Their skill-sets and decision-making all need improvement if international rugby is to become a reality for them.

A young, switched-on coach like Dave Wessels will also take lessons on board about how to approach games against the top New Zealand Super Rugby sides in future.

Despite their profligacy, the Rebels were still well in the game at half-time, and their defence was generally effective in structured play. When Crusaders swing into town in Round 12, there will probably be more method, and considerably less madness in Melbourne.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2018-04-06T06:26:02+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Strange how ALB has been forgotten in the mix isn't it RT? After such an outstanding first international season too...

AUTHOR

2018-04-06T06:24:03+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Thanks Paul, yes the Kiwi forwards are still ahead of the game in terms of skill-set, although the gap is closing. Guys like Tadhg Furlong and Joe Launchbury would slip seamlessly into any of the NZ SR sides, but the depth is not there. The Rebels tight five who played the Canes was not a great ball-handling unit, moreover their scrum was never going to be strong enough to compensate for that weakness. The Tahs have the best ball-handling tight five among Aussie sides, with Kepu, Simmons and Staniforth all having played B/R at certain points in their careers. You can see the impact Mick Byrne has had on the WB forwards handling skills too. If anything, the South Africans have gone too far in the other direction trying to find ball-handling forwards, and too far away from their traditional power and size!

AUTHOR

2018-04-06T06:13:15+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I think part of the coach education at the elite level is trying and adapting your methods to very different cultural environments in the two Hemispheres. That is after all what you have to do with a WC played in the opposite hemisphere. Some coaches can be successful in one hemisphere and not the other, the best (like Henry, Schmidt and Gatland) find a way to be successful in both. So it's a test of growth and adaptability. It's still a mystery why so few NH coaches either refuse to move south - or don't get the opportunity. The English Premiership has always been something of a closed shop from that point of view, with very few coaches even appearing to consider such a move to improve themselves ('fact finding missions' are usually the limit). I know Stuart was interested before he joined Leinster though, and I'm sure it would benefit both parties if guys like Townsend, Farrell, Borthwick and Stephen Jones were to move there at some point in their careers.

2018-04-06T04:08:49+00:00

Rugby Tragic

Roar Rookie


Strange how you guys leave out Anton Lienert-Brown. He is a very intelligent footballer and can anyone really pin point where he has let the All Blacks down? As KK points out, perhaps a little smaller than other but I think he will be in the mix, he has skills compatible for either 12 or 13 and while Goodhue had grabbed the limelight at the moment, I am not so sure ALB is not a more intelligent player

2018-04-06T03:12:28+00:00

Paul Jackson

Roar Rookie


Quality article Nick. Obviously a tad biased being a Wellingtonian, but it seems that the AU sides do not have the same skillset or speed in the forwards. Last week I heard from commentators that the Rebels scrum should dominate, as their forwards were heavier. It is more about technique to win a scrum as was shown by the Canes, which continues to highlight the weaknesses of the AU/Rebels forwards. It seems to me that the Boks are following the ABs. Theirs forwards are raising their passing game, they are getting quicker/agile and their scrum and lineout has always been strong. From what I'm seeing, the Wallabies may struggle with Argentina this year.

2018-04-05T19:59:25+00:00

Taylorman

Guest


Yes kiwis will take some convincing to be coached externally, though for the very same reason we have external coaches for just about every other sport. Our football coach almost slways has a scottish or english accent over the fifty years Ive seen them. Our basketball coaches always seem to be yanks, ozzies have coached our warriors, kiwis, cricket teams. So we typically go where theyre more likely to be the best. No difference with the ABs. We’d have to question hard why we would go outside NZ when local coaching has kept us at no.1 for the period it has. Schmidt is a kiwi and like Hansen and Henry we do treat overseas positions as non official pseudo training positions and with Rennie and Cotter we now seem to encourage it, almost as a pre-requisite, Hansen and Henry heavily influence that thinking, even if its not proven as a success formula for the ABs... it certainly appears that way. We are lucky in that respect but weve also earned it. We simply provide a higher quality product regardless of whether thats a smug attitude or not. If they dont become AB coaches thats fine too. Farrell might see it as a huge opportunity and the family comment is one NHers could perhaps get more used to. Our players and coaches have been sacrificing family commitments for years, in their hundreds.

AUTHOR

2018-04-05T18:22:32+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


On his tour of the SH back in 2016, Stuart Lancaster felt there was far more openness to the idea of a NH coach plying his trade down South in NZ than elsewhere - but New Zealanders have not yet learned how to accept foreigners on the coaching front just yet (despite being eager to do it, if that makes sense).... He's made many more connections with great Kiwi coaching minds and people than he has in Australia or SA, so it would not surprise me if he spent some time coaching in NZ sometime in future. I doubt Andy Farrell would move even if Joe Schmidt asked him - prob too much of a family wrench to leave the UK... However he would definitely add value wherever he went, for sure.

AUTHOR

2018-04-05T18:14:17+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


6 is not a need position for England... They have Lawes, Robshaw, Armand and others able to play there. Give them a Dillon Hunt or a Lachlan Boshier or a Kara Pryor at 7 and they'd be close to international recognition very quickly.

2018-04-05T17:29:45+00:00

Taylorman

Guest


Yep, weve lost something like nearly 30 tests in Sydney alone, by far our biggest losing test city.

2018-04-05T17:27:07+00:00

Taylorman

Guest


Yes Cuw I hadnt linked Henwood with the Counties Henwood and do recall some big raps about him. Again, youd wonder why the Blues didnt bring him in from their own flippin doorstep.!

2018-04-05T17:22:49+00:00

Taylorman

Guest


Yes Im not convinced Sheilds is full on Test quality. Hed be fringe here and probably only selected due to injury. They keep putting guys like Fifita, Luatua there and I think thats because they want a big ball carrying 6 to compensate for Canes lack of focus in that area. Shields is a worker like Cane and probably more in the Robshaw mould. Dont think Jones will be hanging out at the airport just yet.

2018-04-05T17:15:32+00:00

Taylorman

Guest


True, its a nice to have, though forty or fifty years ago it was very common, the ties with english dye to migration falling away more these days.

2018-04-05T17:11:27+00:00

Taylorman

Guest


Now now Nick, lets not get too carried away, very interesting thought though as for one it removes Farrell from the NH scene so theres probably a plus in having him here even if he were hardly involved here! (A NH trick we are learning). Id be surprised if they had a cleanour here. Only way I can see that happening is if we had a disasterous world cup and Schmidt won with Ireland, and they could squarely put the blame on our coaching and management. Continuity in the coaching setup is the biggest learning and reason for success since 2007 and at least Foster would have to remain there. Razor, Rennie, Cotter, Gatland and even Chris Boyd could have credentials by then and to pick Schmidt as head coach after not even been involved in Super rugby for 14 years, let alone NZ rugby isnt something I think theyd go for. Schmidt hasnt won a Super rugby title as head coach so is unproven in terms of coaching winning NZ rugby teams, regardless of what hes done overseas so given all that it would be a huge leap of faith. The others, bar Gatland, whos in the same boat, have morecredentials in that respect. I think coaching overseas is an overated requirement though it is useful and itsour coaches that do it most. So Schmidt and Farrell straight into the ABs? Not likely, first hard question would be ‘whats wrong with our own coaches?’ We’re currently far too conservative for that thinking.

AUTHOR

2018-04-05T16:57:45+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Graham Henry once told me that CauCau was the most naturally gifted athlete he had every coached :)

2018-04-05T16:43:28+00:00

Taylorman

Guest


Yes and both Blues products from their heyday? both, particularly Rupeni, amongst the most stunning ball carriers ever.

AUTHOR

2018-04-05T14:56:11+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I also feel the reaction towards the Crusaders vs Rebels prediction by Nick is entirely reasonable. Would you really put your money on the Rebels to win that game if your life depended on it? What I said was that I'd back the Rebels to get closer than the result last Saturday against the Canes when most NZ posters were suggesting they'd lose at least as heavily again - and that yes, they'd have a better chance of winning of it with the Canes' lesson behind them. Why is it heresy to suggest that Australian teams will learn their lessons and become more competitive against the Kiwi sides? That is what I mean by hypnosis, the subtle implication that "you'll never be good enough so you might as well not bother". It's a nonsense, and the more opponents start believing it, the better things will be in SR as a whole.

2018-04-05T12:06:52+00:00

Blessing

Roar Rookie


I actually agree with everything that Fox wrote. It's so good, he should have written it twice. If anything, I think Nic was projecting with his collective hypnosis comment. Fox is a well balanced poster who didn't deserve that. It's not as if Fox is not stating facts. I also feel the reaction towards the Crusaders vs Rebels prediction by Nick is entirely reasonable. Would you really put your money on the Rebels to win that game if your life depended on it?

AUTHOR

2018-04-05T11:15:23+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Yep Laumape is an extreme block of compact power that's for sure. I was going to mention Jack Maddocks' miss but I thought I'd given him enough stick already!

2018-04-05T10:54:11+00:00

Blessing

Roar Rookie


We may agree to disagree Nick, but I still think that not one but two players missing Laumape so close to the line – was tough sure – but it was poor technique – they both went too high against a player with his upper body strength IMO. ? It happens I guess. Laumape is freakishly strong and has pace and power. I remember listening to the podcast on the ABs website back in the day when they had Dane Coles as a guest. He mentioned that Laumape benches more than the props at the Canes. Like you said, it was daft to try and tackle him high but these things happen so fast.

2018-04-05T10:25:45+00:00

cuw

Guest


DMAC !!!! there is also CHESLIN KOLBE and AKIHITO YAMADA

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar