Michael Hooper, Rob Simmons and the fault-line in rugby thinking

By Nicholas Bishop / Expert

In 2004, Michael Lewis wrote Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game. The book sent a huge shockwave through Major League Baseball circles by questioning received wisdom about the game (which occurred via a closed-shop scouting system) with the use of data-performance analysis.

The central characters in the drama (later to be portrayed by Brad Pitt and Jonah Hill in the eponymous 2011 movie) were the Oakland Athletics’ general manager, Billy Beane, and ‘Paul Brand’ – a fictional representation of his assistant, sabermetrician Paul DePodesta.

DePodesta was an economics graduate from Harvard, who later became the youngest GM in baseball, with the Los Angeles Dodgers, at the tender age of 31.

‘Sabermetrics’ was a term coined by one of the forefathers of baseball analytics, Bill James, for the advanced study of statistics in the game.

James believed baseball was frequently misunderstood by those who both coached and watched it, because the existing tools for its evaluation were flawed.

Michael Lewis summarised those misunderstandings as:

A) The tendency to generalise wildly from [their] own experience. People always thought their own [baseball] experience was typical when it wasn’t…
B) To be overly influenced by a guy’s most recent performance.
C) A bias toward what people saw with their own eyes, or thought they had seen.

As a result, aspects like foot speed, fielding ability and raw power were dramatically overvalued, and players (particularly hitters) were described mainly by their size and obvious physical tools. Scouts spoke of the ‘good body’ or ‘good face’ to portray a player’s aptitude for professional baseball. A ‘bad’ or ‘soft body’ meant just the opposite.

Performance scouting had the effect of elevating a more meaningful range of statistics above the level of subjective impressions. Nowhere was this more obvious than in a new description of a batter’s expertise. A hitter had always previously been valued by his batting average (BA) – a straightforward division of his number of base-hits by the number of appearances at the plate.

In Sabermetrics, this was replaced by on-base percentage (OBP), which gave a more accurate representation of a hitter’s control of the strike zone. OBP also took ‘walks’ into account – where a hitter was able to attract a free walk to first base by forcing the pitcher to deliver more ‘balls’ (illegal pitches outside the strike zone) than ‘strikes’.

The most interesting aspect of this development was that it opened up the game to a much bigger variety of physical types than the ‘good body’ model. As Lewis summarises:

The inability to envision a certain kind of person doing a certain kind of thing because you’ve never seen someone who looks like him do it before is not just a vice. It’s a luxury. What begins as a failure of imagination ends as a market inefficiency: when you rule out an entire class of people from doing a job simple by their appearance, you are less likely to find the best person for the job.

A classic example is Kevin Youkilis (memorably described as “the Greek god of walks” by the Jonah Hill character in the movie). As a college kid, Youkilis was, in Lewis’ words, “a fat third baseman who couldn’t run, throw or field”.

A writer for the Boston Globe described him as “not an MVP candidate; more a refrigerator repairman, a butcher, the man selling hammers behind the counter at the True Value hardware store.” Even his coach at the University of Cincinnati, Brian Cleary, admitted he “looked chubby in uniform… I think the body did scare some people away”.

On top of that, he would set up at plate in a very low crouch with an unorthodox swinging style:

Despite his physical disadvantages and unorthodoxies, Youkilis went on to become a three-time MLB All Star, a two-time World Series winner with the Boston Red Sox, and winner of the 2008 Hank Aaron Award as the top hitter in his league. His OBP was second behind the legendary Barry Bonds.

Youkilis was never a great home-run hitter, but he connected consistently with the ball, could drive it accurately into gaps, seldom struck out, and drew more walks than anyone else. He out-thought the pitcher, and as Cleary recalled: “He coached himself… Anytime we said anything to him, he was already a step ahead… I just think he’s a really smart guy who had a great feel for what he had to do.”

Theo Epstein, the sabermetrician GM who turned the Boston Red Sox around in the early 2000s, called Youkilis “the heart and soul of our team” – no finer compliment could be paid to someone apparently without the right physical tools to do his job.

On Saturday night, at the Sydney Cricket Ground, the Waratahs’ back five forwards were made to look like a group of under-developed college kids by the massive ‘good bodies’ of the Queensland Reds. According to the raw stats, they were giving away more than three inches and 25 lbs per man to their opponents.

In professional rugby, that is a massive difference.

They also contained two Wallabies who attract a great deal of criticism for the impression they make on-watchers of the game. The contract of second row Rob Simmons was not renewed by the Reds at the end of 2017, because of the presence of huge youngsters like Izack Rodda and Lukhan Tui, as well as experienced international Kane Douglas.

Simmons is often perceived as a ‘soft body’ who lacks the necessary physicality for his position.

Rob Simmons (Photo by Mark Metcalfe/Getty Images)

Current Wallabies captain Michael Hooper is likewise bagged for being undersized, playing too ‘fast and loose’, and excessive preoccupation with the appearance of his hair.

On Saturday evening, both Simmons and Hooper shoved those criticisms firmly back to the dark place where they belong, and demonstrated that they are (like Youkilis) “really smart guys with a great feel for what they have to do”.

The Tahs’ back five as a whole comfortably out-thought and out-played their counterparts in control of the ‘strike zone’ and the physical aspects of the game that really mattered.

The introduction of Simmons has turned the dysfunctional Waratah lineout around and made it more productive than for many seasons. Going into the game against the Reds, the Tahs’ led the competition in both steals on opposition throw, and with a 90 per cent ball-retention on their own feed. During the game itself, they won their first six throws with some comfort. In lineout defence, they squeezed five errors out of 13 Queensland lineouts, four of which led directly to turnovers.

Simmons set the tone with a strong aerial challenge on Rodda in the 16th minute:

The ball sailed over the top of Rodda and was picked up by the men in blue.

In attack, Simmons also drew two early penalties from the Reds when they interfered with presentation of the ball, but it was defence where his influence was felt most strongly.

Simmons has always been an outstanding tight-forward defender – one of the few mobile enough to get around the corner of the first midfield ruck from setpiece, and this is his role (along with Sekope Kepu) in NSW:

Second phase from lineout, and Simmons is already in place as the tight forward closest to the ball as Jono Lance takes the ball up.

It was not the only time during the game where Simmons was to be found defending productively in conjunction with Hooper:

Filipo Daugunu has broken into an open field, but the first two Cambridge blue shirts to confront him with forward numbers on their back are those belonging to Simmons and Hooper.

Simmons also did his job in the tight exchanges against the Reds’ version of ‘heavy metal’:

A little earlier in the half, Simmons had hit the Reds’ ball-carrier even further behind the advantage line:

This powerful tackle was preceded by an effective high ‘propping’ tackle by Hooper on the previous phase, delaying the release of the ball and buying time for the defence to regroup:

On a weekend where David Pocock won three conventional turnovers on the ground in a losing cause for the Brumbies against the Highlanders, Hooper was even more effective, reinventing himself as a high choke-type specialist instead of a low-cut tackler:

Despite the presence of a good jackal alongside him (Will Miller, who himself won two turnovers despite being ‘undersized’), Hooper opted for the hold-up tackle on James Slipper, and seems to be a rapidly-developing feature of his play.

The Australian captain generated two hold-up turnovers in addition to his three steals on the ground:

In the first example, Hooper robs Ruan Smith with the ball still above ground, in the second, he is able to jam in underneath Rodda’s left shoulder and prevent him reaching the sanctuary of the turf.

A more conventional turnover occurred in the wide channel, off the Reds’ number eight, Caleb Timu:

The sense that coach Daryl Gibson is taking increasing positive control – which first came to my attention with his use of the kicking game against the Rebels – was also confirmed against the Reds.

He has largely abandoned the Nathan Grey experimental formation from lineout:

Everybody is in their natural place, with Bernard Foley at 10, Kurtley Beale at 12 and Hooper inside them at 7! Maybe that ‘innovation’ too, will help with the perception of Michael Hooper as a true No.7 in due course.

Summary
The perception of Simmons as a ‘soft body’ in the physical exchanges was hardly borne out at the Sydney Cricket Ground – even though he was accompanied by four loose forwards in the Waratahs’ back five, and confronted by the three players preferred to him on the Reds’ roster in Douglas, Tui and Rodda.

In terms of productivity, Rob Simmons was the outstanding second row on view – ruling the lineout, drawing penalties when he carried, hitting close-in attackers behind the gain-line on defence and covering the open spaces with equal facility.

Likewise, Hooper confounded all the generalisations about being undersized and peripheral to the scene of the real action. He looks to have moved his game on under the new breakdown laws. He has learnt how to employ the hold-up tackle and he used his new toy effectively against the Reds’ big ball-carriers. Three turnovers on the ground and two more above it was an outstanding return against some powerful men.

With Jack Dempsey returning from injury, the likelihood of a Pocock-Hooper-Dempsey back-row is in the ascendant for the Wallabies in June.

There is also every sign that Daryl Gibson has released the ‘hold’ of the Wallaby coaching team and is organising his defence along more orthodox lines too. This seems to be having a liberating effect on his charges.

But perhaps the most important lesson of all was that there is no one ‘ideal size’ or temperament for a position. The Reds were physically imposing on paper, compared to opponents from a different weight class, but they did not impose themselves in practice.

Looking good is not the same as playing good, and being big is not the same as being smart and productive – as ‘the Greek god of walks’ once proved in Major League Baseball, and Michael Hooper is now proving in rugby union.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2018-04-22T05:52:22+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Yes it does Fin, because I doubt too many top coaches would be overly concerned at the Reds' scoring capacity. So they might say to themselves, "okay we've only got to find 20-25 points to win this game". The Chiefs scored their 24 points early, took off D Mac, and coasted the rest of the way, waking up only to retrieve the BP at the end. Problem for the Reds also is that they don't as yet have a 'go-to' method of scoring tries either, a form of attack guaranteed to generate points (like the lineout drive for the Brumbies for example)

AUTHOR

2018-04-22T05:49:34+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I haven't seen that game yet Suzy, but Kwagga Smith is an interesting player from a Bokke viewpoint - it will be interesting at least to see if he gets a look under Rassie....

2018-04-22T01:57:39+00:00

Fin

Guest


Hi Nick, Given that at no point this season the Reds have 'hurt' a team on the scoreboard does that make it a lot easier for opposing coaches/teams to plan and prepare to play against them? Ie. knowing that whatever happens on game day the Reds are not going to run away with the game and will always give opponents a decent chance of winning.

2018-04-21T11:06:17+00:00

Rolando

Guest


Hey Peter, I wouldn’t even think of Higginbotham. He looks flashy BUT he can singlehandedly destroy a team’s momentum by atttacting penalties and yellow cards and red cards. His attributes cannot overcome the disadvantages. Scott Fardy used to look flashy and physical but on analysis never really influenced the game much except when he attracted the inevitable penalties and cards. Glad to hear a good write up of Simmons. Unfortunately a few on this site have high opinions of Arnold who is extremely ineffective in comparison.

2018-04-21T06:40:04+00:00

Suzy Poison

Guest


Great article Nick. I love the different sport comparisons. Sadly you jinxed Hooper on Friday. We Saffas have a player similar to Hooper also playing well. In fact he is only 80kilos, 20 kilos lighter than Hooper. I may be wrong but I thought Kwagga outplayed Hooper on Friday night. Kwagga plays a similar running open side game to Hooper, but is very small for Saffa flank. He is deceptively strong for such a small guy. It's hard to believe he is only 80kilos.

AUTHOR

2018-04-21T06:09:59+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I also see the opposition winning the contest in the rucks. In the second half I see fatigued forwards losing their technique, fumbling the ball, losing own line outs either through short lifts or bad throws, scrum penalties lost to expert Mechanics, serious injuries sidelining players for weeks. That's a whole lot of 'glass half empty' you're seeing out of your impressionistic eye Timbo!

AUTHOR

2018-04-21T06:07:24+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Solid SR player, but I doubt he's Test standard. Remnids a bit of Tom Johnson who used to play for Exeter a few years ago - great effort and always whole-hearted, but lacked an outstanding USP...

AUTHOR

2018-04-21T06:05:27+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Yes Rob, and the result against (which I haven't seen as yet) clearly shows it - never want to be 'nilled' on your own patch!

2018-04-21T03:35:52+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


Thanks Nick. Tags improved. But they need to lift it a notch or two to become competitive.

2018-04-20T07:04:12+00:00

Timbo (L)

Roar Guru


I agree, the Wells comment has no judgment in it, but it does validate my observations of how Hoops' skills are utilized. I am questioning whether or not, holistically, this is what is best for the team, be it Tahs or Wallabies. I have an armchair, a keyboard and strong opinions but I stand by what my eyes are seeing. A #7 fresh as a daisy, applauded for his "big engine", playing 80 minutes of every game with high tackle stats, run meters and a handful of pilfers. What more could you ask for in a player for your fantasy football team? I also see the opposition winning the contest in the rucks. In the second half I see fatigued forwards losing their technique, fumbling the ball, losing own line outs either through short lifts or bad throws, scrum penalties lost to expert Mechanics, serious injuries sidelining players for weeks. When you write your article, "Why the Wallabies aren't winning" what are you going to focus on: - 7 out of condition forwards not pulling their weight? or - Why the 10&12 need a forward to defend their channel and the impact it has on the forward pack. Hint: when Carmichael Hunt was collecting stats, the Dynamic changed. You can build a band around a guitarist and a singer but if you want to form a super group, all the band members play their part and share the glory.

2018-04-20T03:49:09+00:00

Rhys Bosley

Guest


Fair nuff Nick, I am quite positive to have read that both are working on weaknesses in their game, i.e. ruck work for Hooper and linking play for Pocock. Maybe there is life in the Pooper yet, so long as the line out can be sorted.

2018-04-19T19:50:16+00:00

Tim

Roar Rookie


Hey Nicolas. Really enjoy the in depth analysi each week. Thank you. What’s your opinion of Michael Wells? He doesnt have a high profile but is an effective defender, efficient third option in the lineout, very mobile, good ball skills as evidenced by his bullet pass at speed in the try last weekend and he has played the full 80 minutes in every game except the last where he went off injured?

2018-04-19T18:44:44+00:00

Carlos The Argie

Guest


:-) That was so funny!

2018-04-19T10:41:07+00:00

soapit

Guest


possibly with your first sentence but i think its far more about preventing the offload, they dont target the ball with their shoulder per se, they just target it that its locked up, with that and the increase of the offload in rugby i think its a worthwhile tactic to try as your standard for front on defence.. having said if you have people with specific skills obviously theres a logic to deviating from the standard, i just think it locks you in and not without cost (when the quite specific plan doesnt pan as tends to happen out in a game)

AUTHOR

2018-04-19T09:22:41+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I would credit not only DG but Chris Malone and Simon Cron (two outa three are from Canterbury Crusaders so rugby smarts and success come together) for the turnaround in the Tahs fortunes. Do you think Cron's presence is the key in pushing Gibson over the top, and into making his own more independent decisions?

AUTHOR

2018-04-19T09:19:18+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I'd see the Michael Wells comment in a positive context, rather than as a compensation for Hooper's perceived weaknesses. Hooper is far and away the best attacking #7 in world rugby - so good that coaches try to find ways to convert his potential to make breaks and create scoring chances. This means some adjustments can be necessary - for example if Hooper is the key attacker on second phase, then Wells might have to clean out on first phase to enable that to happen. I see other teams staffing the 10 and/or 12 Jerseys and channels with players that do what he does, and seeing inadequately protected Wallaby rucks being demolished., I can’t help but think that the strategy of sacrificing ruck security to sure up the 10/12 channel just isn’t working. Are you not confusing attack with defence here? Hooper defended in the 10 channel for the WB's last year (at least from first phase lineout), but that is not related to ruck security on attack, where Hooper obv plays a different role. But thanks for the farmyard analogy - it did (genuinely) give me a good laugh :)

2018-04-19T07:50:22+00:00

Timbo (L)

Roar Guru


Both.

2018-04-19T07:49:38+00:00

Timbo (L)

Roar Guru


I misused the word Traditional, I meant "modern". I used the word Rooster, not hen, and it was intended as a compliment. They are lean, fast, fight well above their weight, protective of their turf and are very good at defending it. Being noisy, flightless and perpetually bringing attention to their crest is cruel but fair imagery. I have been reading your articles, which have opened my previously closed mind and as a result have been able to see and appreciate more of what he adds to the game but my observations still yield the same tactics, recently reinforced by Michael Wells being quoted in an Article. Selfless workhorse Wells is happy to do the grunt work if it means Hooper can have more impact on the game. “(Me) getting through plenty of work allows Hoops to inject himself where he can,” Wells said. I have grown to respect him more as a player and what he does, but when I see other teams staffing the 10 and/or 12 Jerseys and channels with players that do what he does, and seeing inadequately protected Wallaby rucks being demolished., I can't help but think that the strategy of sacrificing ruck security to sure up the 10/12 channel just isn't working. Last year's dismal wallaby record reinforces that there is something wrong. Do any successful teams play strategies like this?

2018-04-19T07:14:02+00:00

ThugbyFan

Roar Guru


RW, leaving Brisbane for Sydney would surely lead to a revival for Mr Simmons. Like leaving Hicksville Arkansas to live in NYC. :)

2018-04-19T06:52:56+00:00

ThugbyFan

Roar Guru


Agree there KC (& the Sunshine Band?), D.Gibson FINALLY ditched the hangovers from the M.Cheika era and moved on to his own tactics. I would credit not only DG but Chris Malone and Simon Cron (two outa three are from Canterbury Crusaders so rugby smarts and success come together) for the turnaround in the Tahs fortunes. They are playing smart rugby now. Look at the rabble last year and compare them to this year, its like comparing the Hornsby 4th grade subbies to the AB. Just for starters how the smaller Tahs backrow have usually out-thought/played their opposition and the home coming of K.Beale has allowed the Tahs to play a wider more expansive game, and finally the ditching of N.Gray's defensive musical chairs charade. But the move that really got me back on the Tah bandwaggon was the brilliant try by T.Naiyaravoro in the Brumbies match just after half time. From a scrum 40m out, a double play with B.Foley slipping the ball to Newsome totally confuzzled the Brumbies defence. You would have to watch a lot of rugby to see a better move from a set piece. One of the match-ups I savoured for in the Tahs vs Reds game was seeing how K.Beale (and B.Foley) would handle the powerful running Reds centres coming right at them. Almost immediately one noticed everyone pretty much kept their position in defence, sometimes B.Foley shifted as 2nd fb if the play was on the other side of the breakdown to him. About the 18th minute, S.Kereevi charged at K.Beale, lips were salivating expecting to see Kereevi brush off a feeble high tackle. Nope, it was a beautiful tackle around the ankles and great to see. About 10 minutes later and whammo! B.Foley takes out C.Feauai-Sautia with another grass cutter. After years of defence protection, Foley and Beale showed everyone what Bovine Manure and harmful the musical chairs rubbish has been. M.Cheika take note! On your comment re: WB #10, K.Beale has often been a quasi 10 for the Tahs anyway. When they want to go wide, Beale is the 10 to throw that long spiral pass out to B.Foley or some other. When they want to truck it up at the edges, Foley usually plays at 10. If B.Foley gets injured or needs a rest, then I would say atm that Beale will be the WB 5/8 and likely R.Hodge comes into the IC position. You then still have 2 playmakers at 10-12.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar